切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 314 -318. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2019.04.005

所属专题: 文献

论著

Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析
秦耕1, 周君琳1,()   
  1. 1. 100020 北京,首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2019-11-05
  • 通信作者: 周君琳
  • 基金资助:
    北京市科委首都市民健康项目培育(Z161100000116080)

Clinical efficacy analysis of Multiloc intramedullary nail in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures

Geng Qin1, Junlin Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2018-03-16 Published:2019-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Junlin Zhou
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zhou Junlin, Email:
引用本文:

秦耕, 周君琳. Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(04): 314-318.

Geng Qin, Junlin Zhou. Clinical efficacy analysis of Multiloc intramedullary nail in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(04): 314-318.

目的

探讨Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2017年7月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科采用Multiloc髓内钉治疗并获得完整随访资料的33例肱骨近端骨折患者,年龄44~83岁,平均(68.7±15.7)岁;其中Neer分型二部分骨折22例,三部分骨折11例。分别记录手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合情况及手术并发症,采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)及Constant-Murley评分评价患者术后肩关节功能情况。

结果

手术均顺利完成,平均手术时间为93.2 min(70~150 min),术中平均出血量为108.2 ml(30~200 ml)。随访时间最短13个月,最长40个月,平均随访时间为(22.4±7.3)个月。末次随访平均肩关节疼痛评分0.47分(0~2分)。骨折平均愈合时间为(15.7±2.9)周,肩关节活动平均活动范围:前屈140.2°,外展135.9°,内旋36.0°,外旋54.4°。术后平均Constant评分为(85.9±10.8)分,其中优11例、良17例、一般3例,优良率为90.9%。末次随访时无一例发生切口感染、骨折不愈合及肩袖损伤等并发症。

结论

Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折具有手术创伤小、并发症少、内固定物牢固、关节功能恢复优良,对肱骨近端Neer分型二部分和三部分骨折有满意的治疗效果。

Background

Proximal humeral fracture refers to the fracture of humerus above the humeral neck. It is a common type of fracture in clinic, accounting for 4%-6% of the total fractures. Such fractures are more common in the elderly population who were often combined with osteoporosis. With the aging population and raising life expectancy, the incidence increases year by year. For non-displaced fractures, conservative treatment can achieve a better prognosis. However, for 2-part, 3-part and 4-part proximal humeral fractures with obvious displacement, the non-surgical treatment often results in fracture malunion with the difficulty of achieving satisfactory results in functional recovery, and thus surgical treatment is recommended. The current treatment methods include internal fixation and arthroplasty, but there are no surgical procedure for all types of proximal humeral fractures. Each method has its own advantages and limitations. In the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with intramedullary nail, the main nail is inserted into the medullary cavity along the axial direction of the humeral shaft. For fractures of humeral head involving humeral shaft or proximal humeral fractures combined with segmental humeral shaft, the treatment with intramedullary nail has remarkable biological advantages. The fracture is reduced through a small incision with less soft tissue exfoliation. Thus the blood supply of fracture ends is less affected and the postoperative complications are significantly decreased. Multiloc intramedullary nail is a new generation of straight type for treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Compared with the traditional intramedullary nail, the insertion point is on the inner side, which can reduce the risk of rotator cuff injury and can complete multidimensional locking according to the condition to make the internal fixation more rigid. Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of Multiloc intramedullary nail in the treatment of proximal fractures.

Methods

From January 2015 to July 2017, a retrospective analysis of 33 patients with proximal humeral fractures were treated with Multiloc intramedullary nailing in the department of orthopaedics, Beijing Chao-yang hospital, capital medical university. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, fracture healing status and operative complications were recorded, and visual analogue scale (VAS) and Constant-Murley scoring system were used for evaluation of postoperative shoulder joint function.

Results

A total of 33 patients were included. The ages ranged from 44 to 83 years with an average of (68.7±15.7) years. Among them, 22 patients were Neer 2-part fractures and 11 patients were Neer 3-part fractures. The operation was successfully completed. The mean operation time was 93.2 min (70-150 min) , and the mean intraoperative blood loss was 108.2 ml (30-200 ml) . The follow-up time was 13-40 months with an average time of (22.4±7.3) months. At the last follow-up, the mean VAS score was 0.47 points (0-2 points) . The mean fracture healing time was (15.7±2.9) weeks. The mean range of motion was 140.2°of flexion, 135.9°of abduction, 36.0°of internal rotation and 54.4°of external rotation. The mean postoperative Constant score was (85.9±10.8) points, of which 11 cases were excellent, 17 cases were good, and 3 cases were moderate. The excellent and good rate was 90.9%. At the last follow-up, there were no complications such as wound infection, fracture nonunion, rotator cuff injury, etc.

Conclusion

Multiloc intramedullary nail has less surgical trauma, fewer complications, rigid internal fixation, excellent recovery of joint function, and satisfactory therapeutic effect for proximal humeral Neer 2 and 3-part proximal humeral fractures.

图1 患者,女性,66岁,因不慎摔伤致右侧肱骨近端骨折(Neer分型为三部分骨折),采用Multiloc髓内钉治疗 图A:术前X线正位平片;图B:术前X线穿胸位平片;图C:术前X线Y位平片;图D:术后X线正位平片;图E:术后X线穿胸位平片;图F:术后X线Y位平片;图G:术后6个月时复查X线正位平片;图H:术后6个月时复查X线侧位平片;图I-L:术后6个月门诊复查时功能照片
图2 患者,男性,39岁,因不慎摔伤致右侧肱骨近端骨折(Neer分型为三部分骨折),采用Multiloc髓内钉治疗 图A:术前X线片;图B:术后即刻X线片;图C:术后3个月X线片;图D:术后6个月X线片;图E-H:术后6个月门诊随访时功能照片
[1]
Roux A, Decroocq L, El BS, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center[J]. Orthop Trauma Surg Res, 2012, 98(6):715-719.
[2]
Launonen AP, Lepola V, Saranko A, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Arch Osteop, 2015, 10(1):1-5.
[3]
Sobel AD, Shah KN, Paxton ES. Fixation of a Proximal Humerus Fracture With an Intramedullary Nail[J]. J Orthop Trauma,2017,31 (Suppl 3):S47-S49.
[4]
Rothstock S, Plecko M, Kloub M, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of two intramedullary nailing techniques with different locking options in a three-part fracture proximal humerus model[J]. Clin Biomech,2012,27(7):686-691.
[5]
Konrad G, Audige L, Lambert S, et al. Similar outcomes for nail versus plate fixation of three-part proximal humeral fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2012,470(2):602-609.
[6]
Hessmann MH, Nijs S, Mittlmeier T, et al. Internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus with the MultiLoc nail[J]. Oper Orthop Und Traumatologie,2012,24(4-5):418-431.
[7]
俞银贤,吴晓明,王秋根.交锁髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2012,14(12):1092-1094.
[8]
Kloub M, Holub K, Polakova S. Nailing of three- and four-part fractures of the humeral head - Long-term results[J].Injury,2014,45(Suppl 1):S29-S37.
[9]
Liu QH, Sun W, Zhou JL, et al. A new approach for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures using the TRIGEN proximal humeral nail[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(4):467-474.
[10]
周君琳.肱骨近端骨折的交锁髓内钉治疗[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2015,3(2):51-56.
[11]
向明,胡晓川.Multiloc髓内钉内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折进展与展望[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2016,4(1):1-4.
[12]
Stedtfeld HW, Mittlmeier T. Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fractures with an Intramedullary Nail: Tipps and Tricks[J].Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg,2007,33(4):367-374.
[13]
杨国勇,向明,陈杭,等.Multiloc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折的近期疗效[J].中华骨科杂志,2016,36(2):103-112.
[14]
Naik LG, Sharma GM, Badgire KS, et al. Cross Pinning Versus Lateral Pinning in the Management of Type III Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Children[J]. J Clin Diagn Res,2017,11(8):RC01-RC03.
[15]
Mittlmeier TW, Stedtfeld HW, Ewert A, et al. Stabilization of proximal humeral fractures with an angular and sliding stable antegrade locking nail (Targon PH) [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85(Suppl 4):136-146.
[16]
王艳华,张晓萌,付中国,等.肱骨髓内钉治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效与体会[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2017,5(2):113-118.
[17]
Lopiz Y, Garcia-Coiradas J, Garcia-Fernandez C, et al. Proximal humerus nailing: a randomized clinical trial between curvilinear and straight nails[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2014,23(3):314-318.
[1] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[2] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[3] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[4] 车娟, 刘俊阳. 肱骨近端骨折围手术期深静脉血栓发生因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 146-149.
[5] 张晓萌, 杨杰, 刘海, 王艳华, 张一翀, 张立佳, 熊晨, 唐缪田, 张殿英. 科研创新就在我们身边[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-6.
[6] 刘兵, 马翔宇, 杨超, 周大鹏. 应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 293-299.
[7] 丁小方, 杨黎黎, 周海涛, 纪坤羽, 杨鹏杰, 杨坤, 吕昊润, 王元利, 付中国. 基于"悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论的老年肱骨近端粉碎骨折术后康复策略探讨[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 232-238.
[8] 张伟, 成冬冬, 崔胜宇, 徐又佳, 刘巍, 丁一, 朱新辉. 两种内固定对中老年肱骨近端合并肱骨干骨折的疗效及功能预后:前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 207-213.
[9] 程邦君, 黄燕峰, 罗轶, 何耀华. 两种手术方法治疗Neer Ⅲ型肱骨近端骨折的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 335-340.
[10] 祝相如, 张聿达, 李绪文, 刘国明, 梁承志, 扈延龄. 自体髂骨块植骨结合Calcar螺钉重建内侧柱治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 244-248.
[11] 徐小东, 王颜华, 刘洋, 杨雨润, 朱前拯, 杨欢, 陈星佐, 王立强, 陈瀛, 林朋. 老年肱骨近端骨折患者围手术期隐性失血情况分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 164-168.
[12] 金万通, 薛海鹏, 周大鹏, 刘兵, 纪振钢, 马翔宇, 杨超, 张昊, 韩宁, 宗宇宁, 张咏晧, 马泽方. 3D打印结合PMMA骨水泥髓内支撑技术在老年肱骨近端骨质疏松性骨折中的应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-284.
[13] 杨良栋, 张华泽, 何举仁, 高艳刚, 李栋. 锁定钢板与交锁髓内钉固定治疗老年Neer分型2、3部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 96-103.
[14] 赵阔, 王忠正, 王宇钏, 张浚哲, 郭家良, 郑占乐, 陈伟, 张英泽. 双反牵引复位器联合MIPO技术治疗肱骨近端骨折的初步应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 321-325.
[15] 诸壬卿, 张钦, 沈瑾, 张毅, 王敏, 薛萍, 周渊峰, 施伟, 李昊, 顾硕, 赵瑞. 儿童局灶性皮层发育不良的手术疗效及影响因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(08): 591-596.
阅读次数
全文


摘要