切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 308 -313. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2019.04.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

青壮年患者肱骨近端严重骨折脱位的内固定治疗
石华峰1, 王庆伟1, 王华松2,(), 王军海1, 谢辉1, 刘曦明2, 黄继锋2, 丰瑞兵2   
  1. 1. 448000 荆门市第一人民医院骨科
    2. 430070 武汉解放军中部战区总医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2019-11-05
  • 通信作者: 王华松
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省卫计委医药科研项目(WJ2018H0069)

Internal fixation for treatment of severe proximal humeral fracture-dislocation in young adults

Huafeng Shi1, Qingwei Wang1, Huasong Wang2,(), Junhai Wang1, Hui Xie1, Ximing Liu2, Jifeng Huang2, Ruibing Feng2   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, the First People, s Hospital of Jingmen, Jingmen 448000, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Wuhan General Hospital of Chinese People, s Liberation Army, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2018-03-16 Published:2019-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Huasong Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Huasong, Email:
引用本文:

石华峰, 王庆伟, 王华松, 王军海, 谢辉, 刘曦明, 黄继锋, 丰瑞兵. 青壮年患者肱骨近端严重骨折脱位的内固定治疗[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(04): 308-313.

Huafeng Shi, Qingwei Wang, Huasong Wang, Junhai Wang, Hui Xie, Ximing Liu, Jifeng Huang, Ruibing Feng. Internal fixation for treatment of severe proximal humeral fracture-dislocation in young adults[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(04): 308-313.

目的

探讨青壮年患者肱骨近端严重骨折脱位行锁定钢板内固定保头治疗的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析荆门市第一人民医院自2012年6月至2017年6月收治的24例肱骨近端严重骨折脱位患者的临床资料,其中男15例,女9例;年龄31~59岁,平均39.2岁;右侧8例,左侧16例;本组均为新鲜骨折,骨折按Neer分型:三部分6例,四部分18例;肱骨头前脱位21例,肱骨头后脱位3例。记录手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间,观察切口愈合、骨折愈合情况及术后并发症情况,末次随访采用Neer肩关节功能评分标准评定肩关节功能。

结果

本组患者获随访12~37个月,平均19.7个月;手术时间69~113 min,平均82.3 min;术中出血量100~500 ml,平均197.5 ml;住院时间6~14 d,平均8 d;患者切口均Ⅰ期愈合,末次随访时21例患者骨折获得临床愈合,1例患者术后半年发现感染,后分期行人工肱骨头置换治疗,2例患者出现肱骨头坏死,但患者自觉可耐受未行特殊处理。术后肩关节前屈活动范围82°~165°,平均136°;后伸活动范围20°~45°,平均40°;外展活动范围87°~170°,平均147°;内旋活动范围L5~T9水平,平均L1水平;与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05 )。根据Neer肩关节功能评分标准:优8例,良11例,可4例,差1例,总体优良率79.17%。

结论

对于青壮年患者肱骨近端严重骨折脱位行锁定钢板内固定保头治疗,临床疗效较好,也是一种治疗选择。

Background

Proximal humeral fracture accounts for about 5% of all fractures, and epidemiological studies in China have shown that proximal humeral fracture accounts for 13.5% of hospitalized patients with periarticular fracture. However, the cases of severe proximal humeral fracture combined with humeral head dislocation are rare in clinical practice. For elderly osteoporosis patients with severe proximal humeral fracture and humeral head dislocation, it is currently accepted that shoulder arthroplasty is preferred. But for young adults, the choice of surgical methods is often controversial. Due to the complex type of proximal humeral fractures and special anatomical structure, the operative manipulation of open reduction and internal fixation as well as humeral head preservation is difficult. There are a series of postoperative complications such as plate breakage, nail withdraw, screw penetration, infection, etc., and high incidence of humeral head necrosis is reported in the literatures, which has always been a major challenge for surgeons of shoulder and elbow trauma. Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of locking plate internal fixation for treatment of severe proximal humeral fracture-dislocation in young adults.

Methods

From June 2012 to June 2017, 24 patients (15 males and 9 females) with severe proximal humeral fracture-dislocations were treated in our hospital, and the clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. The ages ranged from 31-59 years with an average age of 39.2 years. There were 8 right-sided cases and 16 left-sided cases. All the fractures were fresh, and according to Neer classification, there were 6 three-part cases and 18 four-part cases. Twenty one cases were anterior dislocations, and 3 cases were posterior dislocations. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization duration were recorded, and the incision healing, fracture healing and postoperative complications were observed. The shoulder function was evaluated by Neer scoring system in the last follow-up.

Results

The patients were followed up for 12 to 37 months, with an average of 19.7 months. The operation time was 69-113 minutes with an average of 82.3 minutes. The intraoperative blood loss was 100-500 ml with an average of 197.5 ml. The hospital stay was 6 to 14 days with an average of 8 days. All the incisions healed at the first stage. At the last follow-up, 21 patients had clinical healing, 1 patient was found to have infection half a year after operation and treated with humeral head replacement at the secondary stage, and 2 patients developed humeral head necrosis but refused further treatment. The postoperative range of anterior flexion was 82°-165° with an average of 136°, the postoperative range of backward flexion was 20°-45° with an average of 40°, the range of abduction was 87°-170° with an average of 147°, and the range of internal rotation was L5 to T9. There was statistical significance between the postoperative ranges of motion and the preoperative ones (P<0.05) . According to Neer scoring system, there were 8 excellent case, 11 good cases, 4 moderate cases, and 1 poor case. The overall excellent and good rate was 79.17%.

Conclusions

For the treatment of severe proximal humeral fracture-dislocation in the young patients with locking plate internal fixation, the clinical efficacy is better, which is also a treatment option.

图1 患者,男,49岁,高处坠落伤致左肱骨近端骨折合并肩关节前脱位,伤后6 d行切开复位锁定钢板内固定保头治疗 图A、B:术前肩关节正侧位X线片及CT三维重建示左肱骨近端解剖颈骨折合并肱骨头前脱位,大小结节骨折,移位明显,属Neer分型的四部分骨折合并前脱位;图C、D:术后肩关节正侧位X线片及CT三维重建示肱骨近端骨折脱位复位良好,固定可靠;图E:术后4个月复查肩关节正侧位X线片示内侧骨质吸收,骨折线清晰可见;图F:术后15个月再次复查肩关节正侧位X线片示内侧骨质吸收处骨折愈合,骨折线模糊,无肱骨头坏死、内翻断板退钉等并发症;图G、H:术后15个月患者肩关节前屈活动范围为138°,后伸活动范围为41°,外展活动范围为150°,内旋范围为T12水平,应用Neer评分为97分(优),患者肩关节无痛且功能恢复良好
[1]
Nowak LL, Dehghan N, Mckee MD, et al. Plate fixation for management of humerusfractures[J]. Injury, 2018, 49(1):33-35.
[2]
姜保国,陈建海. 肱骨近端骨折的治疗[J]. 北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(6):821-823.
[3]
姜春岩. 关于人工肩关节置换的相关热点问题[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(8):684-686.
[4]
Jabran A, Peach C, Ren L. Biomechanical analysis of plate systems for proximal humerus fractures: a systematic literature review[J]. Biomed Eng Online, 2018, 17(47):1-30.
[5]
Namdari S, Lipman AJ, Ricchetti ET, et al. Fixation Strategies to Prevent Screw Cut-Out and Malreduction in Proximal Humeral Fracture Fixation[J]. ClinOrthopSurg, 2012, 4(4):321-324.
[6]
Neer CS. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. Part I. Classification and evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970, 52(6):1077-1089.
[7]
白晓东,邢更彦,姜川,等. 解剖钢板内固定治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折伴肱骨干骨折[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2017, 33(5):408-413.
[8]
刘明,马林,崔忠宁,等. 青壮年复杂肱骨近端骨折的内固定治疗[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2015, 31(5):345-347.
[9]
Robinson CM, Seah M, Akhtar MA. The epidemiology, risk of recurrence, and functional outcome afteranacute traumatic posterior dislocation of the shoulder[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011,93(17):1605-1613.
[10]
Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, et al. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2004, 13(4):427-433.
[11]
Goldberg SS, Bigliani LU. Hemiarthroplasty for the rotator cuff-deficient shoulder. Surgical technique[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91(2):22-29.
[12]
Shukla DR, Mcanany S, Kim J, et al. Hemiarthroplasty versus reverse shoulder arthroplastyfor treatment of proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2016, 25(2):330-340.
[13]
陈建海. 肱骨近端骨折内固定技术[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2017, 5(2):81-83.
[14]
向明,胡晓川,姜春岩. 重视整体观念,提高肱骨近端骨折诊治水平[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2017, 37(21):1313-1317.
[15]
Gracitelli ME, Malavolta EA, Assunção JH, et al. Locking intramedullary nails compared with locking plates for two- and three-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a randomized controlled trial[J].J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(5):695-703.
[16]
Dai J, Chai Y, Wang C, et al. Meta-analysis comparing locking plate fixation with hemiarthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(3):305-313.
[17]
Kavuri V, Bowden B, Kumar N, et al. Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2018, 52(2):108-116.
[18]
Hanzlik SR, Pearson SE. Excision and Reimplantation of the Proximal Humerus After Fracture-Dislocation[J].Orthopedics, 2016,39(4):1-4.
[19]
唐佩福. 解放军总医院创伤骨科手术学:创(战) 伤救治理论与手术技术[M]. 北京:人民军医出版社, 2014.
[20]
Wijgman AJ, Roolker W, Patt TW, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of three and four-part fractures of the proximal part of the humerus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002, 84-A(11):1919-1925.
[1] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[2] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[3] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[4] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[5] 周海燕, 王秋根, 王庚启, 王健, 黄志海, 吴立生, 吴力军. 经鹰嘴骨折肘关节前脱位的诊疗策略[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 224-234.
[6] 马小刚, 秦桂兰, 缪嘉吉. 西藏地区复杂肩胛骨骨折手术治疗疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 117-121.
[7] 车娟, 刘俊阳. 肱骨近端骨折围手术期深静脉血栓发生因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 146-149.
[8] 刘泽民, 张经, 王栋, 李岩, 常诗语, 张永红. 解剖锁定板是否联合带线锚钉重建喙锁韧带治疗不稳定性锁骨远端骨折疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 53-62.
[9] 张晓萌, 杨杰, 刘海, 王艳华, 张一翀, 张立佳, 熊晨, 唐缪田, 张殿英. 科研创新就在我们身边[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-6.
[10] 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 刘伦, 张鹏, 韩鹏飞, 李晓东. TTIE中桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定与桡骨头置换疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 240-246.
[11] 高岩, 张泽, 张进, 张登峰, 刘杰, 刘沛东, 包勤济, 张永红. 主辅钢板内固定治疗胫骨中下1/3骨折的初步临床研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(01): 39-44.
[12] 杨杨, 刘永志, 刘军峰, 周雪涛, 张东升. 回顾性分析完全胸腔镜下肋骨骨折内固定术治疗肋骨骨折患者的临床效果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 137-142.
[13] 江凯乐, 杨异. 肋骨骨折的手术治疗进展及存在问题[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 149-152.
[14] 张强, 李博闻, 刘振振. 胸骨骨折的外科治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 80-85.
[15] 周志明, 姜威, 王泽学, 曲博, 梁磊, 张敏. 肋弓骨折手术内固定治疗[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(02): 63-69.
阅读次数
全文


摘要