切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 252 -257. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2023.03.009

论著

胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析
左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光()   
  1. 130021 长春,吉林大学第一医院骨科中心·创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-13 出版日期:2023-08-05
  • 通信作者: 杨光
  • 基金资助:
    吉林省发改委基金(2023C043-1)

Therapeutic effect analysis of pectoralis major deltoid approach and trans-deltoid lateral approach on proximal humeral fracture

Nan Zuo, Yan Liu, Dahui Sun, Zhewen Liu, Guang Yang()   

  1. Orthopaedic Center, The First Bethune Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun 130021, China
  • Received:2023-06-13 Published:2023-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Guang Yang
引用本文:

左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.

Nan Zuo, Yan Liu, Dahui Sun, Zhewen Liu, Guang Yang. Therapeutic effect analysis of pectoralis major deltoid approach and trans-deltoid lateral approach on proximal humeral fracture[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(03): 252-257.

目的

对比通过胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路锁定钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析自2018年1月至2022年10月,吉林大学第一医院创伤骨科采用锁定钢板治疗的NeerⅡ型和Ⅲ型肱骨近端骨折患者143例。根据手术入路的不同,分为胸大肌三角肌组和经三角肌外侧组。记录患者的手术时间、切口长度、末次随访时的肩关节功能Constant评分。

结果

对于NeerⅡ型骨折和NeerⅢ型骨折,经三角肌外侧组在手术时间和切口长度上,相比于胸大肌三角肌组都更有优势,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。但在末次随访时,胸大肌三角肌组患者的Constant评分与经三角肌外侧组患者的Constant评分差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

在治疗NeerⅡ型、Ⅲ型肱骨近端骨折时,经三角肌外侧入路相对于胸大肌三角肌入路具有切口小、手术时间短、术后恢复快的优势,但在远期的临床疗效上两者并无差异。

Background

In 1970, Neer first proposed the Neer classification of proximal humeral fractures. The traditional pectoralis major deltoid approach was often adopted with satisfactory results for the proximal humeral fracture requiring surgery. In recent years, with the concept of minimal invasion and rapid rehabilitation, the trans-deltoid lateral approach has been gradually accepted by more and more surgeons, but there are still some controversies on the selection of the two surgical approaches.

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of locking plate internal fixation by pectoralis major deltoid approach and trans-deltoid lateral approach in treating proximal humerus fracture.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 143 patients with Neer type II and type III proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plate fixation in the department of orthopedic and traumatology of the first bethune hospital of Jilin University from January 2018 to October 2022. According to the different surgical approaches, they were divided into pectoralis major deltoid group and trans-deltoid lateral group. The operative time, incision length, and Constant-Murley score of shoulder joint function at the last follow-up were recorded.

Results

For Neer type II and type III fractures, the trans-deltoid lateral group had more operation time and incision length advantages than those of the pectoralis major deltoid group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) . However, at the last follow-up, there was no significant difference in the Constant-Murley score between the pectoralis major deltoid group and the trans-deltoid lateral group (P>0.05) .

Conclusion

In treating Neer type II and type III proximal humeral fractures, the trans-deltoid lateral approach has the advantages of smaller incision, shorter operation time, and faster postoperative recovery compared with the pectoralis major deltoid approach. Still, there is no difference in long-term clinical efficacy.

表1 两组NeerⅡ型患者一般资料及术中、术后结果的比较(±s
表2 两组NeerⅢ型患者一般资料及术中、术后结果的比较(±s
图1 男性患者,30岁,左肱骨近端骨折,NeerⅢ型 图A:术前右肩关节正位X线片;图B:术前右肩关节CT示NeerⅢ型骨折;图C-D:术后右肱骨正、侧位X线片;图E:术后6个月复查肩关节正位X线片;图F-G:术后12个月取出内固定
图2 女性患者,42岁,右肱骨近端骨折,NeerⅡ型 图A:术前右肩关节正位X线片;图B-C:术后右肱骨正、侧位X线片;图D-E:术后6个月右肱骨正、侧位X线片
[1]
王亦璁,刘沂,姜保国,等.骨与关节损伤[M].4版.北京:人民卫生出版社, 2011:758.
[2]
Li F, Liu X, Wang F, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis and open reduction-internal fixation for proximal humeral fractures: a meta-analysis based on 1050 individuals[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord201920(1):550.
[3]
Hirschmann MT, Fallegger B, Amsler F,et al. Clinical longer-term results after internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures with a locking compression plate (PHILOS)[J]. J Orthop Trauma201125(5):286-293.
[4]
Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z,et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Injury201142(4):408-413.
[5]
Brunner F, Sommer C, Bahrs C, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using a proximal humeral locked plate: a prospective multicenter analysis[J]. J Orthop Trauma200923(3):163-172.
[6]
Constant CR, Murley AH. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res1987,(214):160-164.
[7]
谢麟臻,陈春慧,陈华. 肱骨近端骨折的治疗进展[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2020,8(2):186-190.
[8]
Kruithof RN, Formijne Jonkers HA, van der ven DJC, et al. Functional and quality of life outcome after non-operatively managed proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2017,18(4):423-430.
[9]
Konrad G, Bayer J, Hepp P,et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Surgical technique[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92 (Suppl 1 Pt 1):85-95.
[10]
Dilisio MF, Nowinski RJ, Hatzidakis AM,et al. Intramedullary nailing of the proximal humerus: evolution, technique, and results[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016 ,25(5):e130-138.
[11]
Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM,et al. Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2003,85(7):1215-1223.
[12]
Colasanti CA, Anil U, Adams J,et al. Primary versus conversion reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients: a retrospective comparative study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2023 ,32(8):e396-e407.
[13]
Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU,et al. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma,2007,21(3):185-191.
[14]
Cetik O, Uslu M, Acar HI,et al. Is there a safe area for the axillary nerve in the deltoid muscle? A cadaveric study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006 ,88(11):2395-2399.
[15]
Khan LA, Robinson CM, Will E,et al. Assessment of axillary nerve function and functional outcome after fixation of complex proximal humeral fractures using the extended deltoid-splitting approach[J]. Injury,2009,40(2):181-185.
[16]
黄沛彦,董有海,顾军,等. 经皮微创钢板内固定治疗肱骨近端骨折的解剖学研究及初步临床报告[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志201113(8):710-714.
[17]
唐强.经三角肌入路结合锁定接骨板治疗肱骨近端骨折的近期临床疗效观察[J].中华骨与关节外科杂志,2017,10(3):224-227.
[18]
徐丁,季烈峰,潘志军,等. 内侧柱有效支撑与肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板固定术后疗效的相关性研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志201333(11):1091-1096.
[19]
沈庆峰,温新,杨胜武,等.MIPPO与ORIF治疗Neer Ⅱ型老年肱骨近端骨折病例对照研究[J].中国骨伤,2018,31(2):160-164.
[20]
Liu YW, Wei XE, Kuang Y,et al. Open vs. closed reduction combined with minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis in humeral fractures[J]. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol201625(4):215-221.
[21]
Kavuri V, Bowden B, Kumar N, et al. Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures[J]. Indian J Orthop201852(2):108-116.
[22]
Mao F, Zhang DH, Peng XC,et al. Comparison of Surgical versus Non-Surgical Treatment of Displaced 3- and 4-Part Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: A Meta-Analysis[J]. J Invest Surg201528(4):215-224.
[1] 向锋, 张锡平, 陈侠甫, 戴涛, 李艳军, 文捷. 矩形钢丝环扎联合8字钢丝张力带与传统克氏针钢丝张力带对治疗髌骨横形骨折的早中期疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 251-254.
[2] 朱前拯, 付中国, 陈瀛. 反向肩关节置换治疗老年肱骨近端四部分骨折[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 190-190.
[3] 丁镇涛, 邢博涵, 曲洋, 王泊江, 张培训. 老年肱骨近端骨折的围手术期治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 292-294.
[4] 王晓梅, 刘宇, 董金磊, 刘凡孝, 王成龙, 李连欣. 单一前方入路内固定对肱骨近端骨折合并肱骨头后脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 319-325.
[5] 赵静磊, 陈晓婷, 夏莹, 黄维佳, 周菊, 刘芳. 锁骨骨折切开复位内固定术后患者肩关节功能恢复的风险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 216-222.
[6] 单磊, 周君琳. 同期修复肩袖撕裂结合锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的特点及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 211-215.
[7] 王曦, 关鹏飞. 双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折的有限元分析及基于肘关节功能和肘关节活动度评估疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 230-237.
[8] 冷昆鹏, 孟钰童, 单磊, 刘洋, 周君琳. 不同手术入路治疗肱骨远端冠状面骨折的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 127-134.
[9] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[10] 谭明明, 战世强, 侯宏涛, 曾翔硕. 经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定术对骨质疏松脊柱压缩性骨折患者临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 349-354.
[11] 李欣, 雷孝勇, 康大为. 手术与功能支具对闭合性移位肱骨干骨折患者功能结局的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 215-221.
[12] 郑益钒, 曾令祺, 高志鹏, 吴忻, 吴靖, 陈俊泽. 骨质疏松性骶髂关节复合体损伤诊疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 184-188.
[13] 张一凡, 姚孟轩, 王海程, 张宇钦, 史泰龙, 吕红芝, 秦士吉. 点接触固定器的发展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 178-183.
[14] 郭昆, 杨晓峰, 李传明. 双切口双钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅣ型以上复杂胫骨平台骨折的安全性及中远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 159-164.
[15] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
阅读次数
全文


摘要