切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (03) : 230 -237. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2024.03.006

论著

双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折的有限元分析及基于肘关节功能和肘关节活动度评估疗效
王曦1,(), 关鹏飞2   
  1. 1. 063000 唐山,华北理工大学临床医学院骨科
    2. 063000 唐山市第二医院创五科
  • 收稿日期:2024-02-28 出版日期:2024-08-05
  • 通信作者: 王曦

Finite element analysis of double-plate internal fixation for distal 1/3 humeral fractures and evaluation of efficacy based on elbow function and elbow range of motion

Xi Wang1,(), Pengfei Guan2   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, North China University of Science and Technology Clinical School, Tangshan 063000, China
    2. Department of Traumatology, Second Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Received:2024-02-28 Published:2024-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Xi Wang
引用本文:

王曦, 关鹏飞. 双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折的有限元分析及基于肘关节功能和肘关节活动度评估疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 230-237.

Xi Wang, Pengfei Guan. Finite element analysis of double-plate internal fixation for distal 1/3 humeral fractures and evaluation of efficacy based on elbow function and elbow range of motion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(03): 230-237.

目的

探讨双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折的生物力学特性及其对肘关节功能和肘关节活动度的影响。

方法

选取本院2020年1月至2022年12月收治的160例肱骨远1/3骨折患者,随机分为传统内固定组(n=80)和双钢板内固定组(n=80),比较两组患者的手术指标、术后肘关节功能Mayo评分、肘关节评分、并发症发生率以及肩关节功能改善情况。采用人工骨建立肱骨远端C1型骨折模型,分别采用传统内固定和双钢板内固定,通过特定的软件进行建模,模拟生物力学的各种测试,进行有限元分析。依据术后Mayo评分将患者分为优良组(≥75分)和非优良组(<75分),分析两组患者的基本资料,Logistic回归分析影响患者手术疗效的因素。

结果

双钢板内固定组的切口长度、手术时间、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间均显著低于传统内固定组(P<0.05)。双钢板内固定组的术后肘关节功能Mayo评分、肘关节活动度、肘关节评分、肩关节功能改善情况均显著高于传统内固定组(P<0.05)。双钢板内固定组的并发症发生率(6.25%)显著低于传统内固定组(21.25%,P<0.05)。有限元分析结果显示,双钢板内固定组的应力分布更均匀,应变能量密度更低,骨折稳定性更高,骨折愈合速度更快。Logistic分析结果显示,影响患者手术疗效的因素有年龄、性别、骨折类型、内固定方式、术中出血量、骨折愈合时间、并发症发生率等,其中内固定方式是最重要的影响因素(OR=8.32,95% CI:2.54~27.28,P<0.01)。

结论

双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折具有良好的生物力学特性,能有效提高骨折稳定性,促进骨折愈合,改善肘关节功能和肘关节活动度,降低并发症发生率,是一种安全、有效、可靠的治疗方法。

Background

The distal 1/3 fracture of the humeral shaft refers to the fracture from below the middle part to 2 cm above the condyle of the humerus. The structural and anatomical characteristics of the distal 1/3 of the humeral shaft make it a prone site for fracture. As the aging of society progresses, about 85% of the patients occur in people over 50 years of age, with the incidence peaking in the 60-90-year age group. For distal humerus fractures, non-surgical methods such as upper limb suspension fixation usually result in good treatment if there is no significant displacement. However, for severely displaced or comminuted fractures, surgical treatment with locking plate internal fixation is usually more effective. However, there are inconsistent conclusions about the clinical effectiveness of different internal fixation procedures, which increases the difficulty of selecting an appropriate clinical treatment strategy. The efficacy varies, especially in treating distal humerus 1/3 fracture with double plate internal fixation. Therefore, it is essential to analyze the factors affecting the therapeutic effect based on clinical data, evaluate the prognosis of patients accordingly, and provide timely and reasonable treatment to improve the quality of life of patients with distal humerus 1/3 fracture.

Objective

To investigate the biomechanical characteristics of double plate internal fixation in treating distal humerus 1/3 fracture and its effect on elbow joint function and elbow joint motion.

Methods

A total of 160 patients with distal 1/3 fracture of the humerus admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were randomly divided into a traditional internal fixation group (80 cases) and a double plate internal fixation group (80 cases) . The two groups’ surgical indicators, postoperative Mayo score of elbow function, elbow joint score, complication rate, and improvement of shoulder joint function were compared. The C1 fracture model of the distal humerus was established using artificial bone. Traditional internal fixation and double plate internal fixation were used, respectively. The model was modeled using special software, various biomechanical tests were simulated, and finite element analysis was performed. The patients were divided into the excellent group (≥75 points) and the non-excellent group (<75 points) according to the postoperative Mayo score. The primary data of the two groups were analyzed, and the factors affecting the surgical efficacy of the patients were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

The incision length, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and fracture healing time in the double-plate internal fixation group were significantly lower than those in the traditional internal fixation group (P<0.05) . The improvement of elbow joint function Mayo score, elbow joint motion, elbow joint score, and shoulder joint function in the double-plate internal fixation group were significantly higher than in the traditional internal fixation group (P<0.05) . The complication rate of the double plate internal fixation group (6.25%) was significantly lower than that of the traditional internal fixation group (21.25%) (P<0.05) . The finite element analysis results showed that the stress distribution was more uniform, the strain energy density was lower, the fracture stability was higher, and the fracture healing speed was faster in the double-plate internal fixation group. Logistic analysis showed that age, gender, fracture type, internal fixation mode, intraoperative blood loss, fracture-healing time, and complication rate were the most important factors influencing the surgical outcome of patients (OR=8.32, 95% CI=2.54-27.28, P<0.01) .

Conclusion

The treatment of distal 1/3 humerus fracture with double plate internal fixation has good biomechanical properties, can effectively improve fracture stability, promote fracture healing, improve elbow joint function and elbow joint motion, and reduce the incidence of complications. It is a safe, effective, and reliable treatment method.

图1 患者肱骨远端骨折,AO分型:C1.3型,术式:双钢板固定 图A:术前X线片;图B:术后X线片
表1 两组患者的手术指标比较(±s
表2 两组患者的术后肘关节功能Mayo评分比较(分,±s
表3 双钢板内固定组患者不同骨折类型的术后肘关节功能Mayo评分比较(分,±s
表4 两组患者的术后肘关节活动度比较(°,±s
表5 两组患者的术后肘关节评分比较[例(%)]
表6 两组患者的术后并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表7 两组患者的术后肩关节功能改善情况比较(°,±s
表8 两组患者的有限元分析结果比较
表9 影响患者手术疗效的因素Logistic回归分析结果
[1]
胡汉,陈刚,张中伟,等.高龄肱骨近端骨折治疗研究进展[J].创伤与急危重病医学, 2019,7(2):121-123.
[2]
韩文兴,何红英,王浩.MIPPO技术入路内固定治疗肱骨干中下1/3骨折的临床疗效[J].中国骨与关节杂志, 2021, 10(9):644-648.
[3]
王智加,刘彦群.双钢板内固定治疗11例肱骨中下1/3骨折临床观察[J].延边大学医学学报, 2019, 42(2):139-141.
[4]
余建,马华,赵奎.经尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远端C型骨折[J].临床骨科杂志, 2020, 23(1):94-97.
[5]
于广洋, 刘刚, 唐晓明.不同双钢板内固定方式治疗肱骨远端AO-C型骨折的临床疗效研究[J].现代医药卫生, 2019, 35(22):3436-3439.
[6]
Xu Y, Guo X, Peng H, et a1. Different internal fixation methods for unstable distal clavicle fractures in adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res2022,17(1):43.
[7]
Haglin JM, Lott A, Kugelman DN, et a1. Olecranon Osteotomy Fixation Following Distal Humerus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation: Clinical Results of Plate and Screws Versus Tension Band Wiring[J]. Orthopedics2021,44(1):e107-e113.
[8]
张勇,郭维忠,张媛,等. 垂直双锁定加压钢板治疗对肱骨干下段骨折患者手术指标、肘关节Mayo功能评分及并发症的影响[J]. 解放军医药杂志,2021,33(5):66-69,74.
[9]
张笑,巨积辉,胡海洋,等. 前外侧入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨干远端1/3骨折[J]. 临床骨科杂志,2022,25(1):39.
[10]
Durgut F, Ozdemir A, Ergin M, et a1. The effect of single plate and double plate application on union and functional results in humeral diaphyseal nonunions[J]. Acta Orthop Belg2022,88(4):727-732.
[11]
Liu CH, Tsai PJ, Chen IJ, et a1. The double-plate fixation technique prevents varus collapse in AO type C3 supra-intercondylar fracture of the distal femur[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2023,143(10):6209-6217.
[12]
张笑,巨积辉,胡海洋,等.前外侧入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨干远端1/3骨折[J].临床骨科杂志, 2022,25(1): 39.
[13]
Woo SH, Bae JY, Jung SW, et a1. Usefulness of double plate fixation after failed ORIF for clavicle shaft fracture[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol2024,10(1):21-24.
[14]
Park KH, Oh CW, Park KC, et a1. Excellent outcomes after double-locked plating in very low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2021,141(2):207-214.
[15]
Takahashi D, Noyama Y, Asano T, et a1. Finite element analysis of double-plate fixation using reversed locking compression-distal femoral plates for Vancouver B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord2021,22(1):276.
[16]
于桂泳,任虹,刘娟,等. 镇痛泵持续臂丛阻滞联合早期运动康复治疗对肱骨远端C型骨折患者关节功能及血清sVCAM、JGF-1的影响[J]. 临床和实验医学杂志,2022,21(22):2455-2458.
[17]
金虎,张军强,徐诚. 经肱三头肌两侧入路与尺骨鹰嘴截骨入路内固定术治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折患者的效果比较[J]. 中国临床医生杂志,2022,50(3):341-344.
[18]
杨金星,刘黎军,徐旭,等. 螺旋形桥接组合式内固定系统经皮内固定治疗肱骨中上段长劈裂骨折[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2021,35(11):1422-1426.
[1] 冷昆鹏, 孟钰童, 单磊, 刘洋, 周君琳. 不同手术入路治疗肱骨远端冠状面骨折的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 127-134.
[2] 李明震, 韩勇, 路庆森, 王甫. 肱骨近端骨折中内侧锁定钢板重建内侧柱的有限元分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 321-329.
[3] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[4] 新苏雅拉图, 刘峰, 高雨, 高晓宇, 谢迎光. 关节镜松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 239-243.
[5] 王晨, 潘海乐. 肩袖三维有限元模型建立及力学分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 221-225.
[6] 焦鑫, 张堃, 朱养均, 宋哲, 年跃文, 张军, 衡立松, 蔡枭. 改良张力支具对肱骨髁间骨折患者术后功能康复的临床效果评价[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 148-153.
[7] 曾本强, 卢冰, 刘攀, 罗凌云, 秦谊, 李想, 胡骅. 经肱三头肌两侧入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 169-174.
[8] 丁一, 杨嘉瑞, 李学民. 眼部建模的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 356-360.
[9] 崔梦凡, 贺瑞, 李晓娜, 陈维毅, 宋耀文. 角膜生物力学评估参数的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 236-240.
[10] 郭昆, 杨晓峰, 李传明. 双切口双钢板内固定治疗SchatzkerⅣ型以上复杂胫骨平台骨折的安全性及中远期预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 159-164.
[11] 张乾龙, 王继荣, 宋晨辉, 刘修信, 任政, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 覃祺, 冉建. 两种髓内钉固定A3.1粗隆间骨折的有限元分析:增强型PFNA与InterTan[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 209-217.
[12] 朱燕宾, 程晓东, 王宇钏, 王忠正, 李泳龙, 李会杰, 王娟, 吕红芝, 陈伟, 张英泽. 股骨头部分置换术精准微创治疗中老年ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头缺血坏死的有限元分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 257-259.
[13] 杜兵, 马腾, 路遥, 张聪明, 许毅博, 黄强, 姬帅, 李明, 任程, 王谦, 张堃, 李忠. 新型股骨颈内固定系统与3枚空心钉加内侧钢板固定青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 333-338.
[14] 王晖, 杨朝旭, 孟凡涛. 胫骨托盘的不同结构设计对胫骨应力分布的影响[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 321-326.
[15] 李颖, 童梁成, 杨智伟, 蒋继亮, 汪剑龄, 杨俊生, 邢建新. 四维有限元骨承载力分析技术在判断长管骨愈合程度中的应用[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2020, 06(06): 312-320.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?