切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (03) : 232 -238. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2022.03.008

论著

基于"悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论的老年肱骨近端粉碎骨折术后康复策略探讨
丁小方1, 杨黎黎1, 周海涛1, 纪坤羽1, 杨鹏杰1, 杨坤1, 吕昊润1, 王元利1,(), 付中国2   
  1. 1. 100010 北京市隆福医院骨科
    2. 100044 北京大学人民医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-06-25 出版日期:2022-08-05
  • 通信作者: 王元利
  • 基金资助:
    首都卫生发展科研专项(2020-2-4086); 北京市东城区卫健委科研项目基金(2018-13)

Rehabilitation strategy of proximal humerus comminuted fracture in elderly patients based on the theory of "cantilever-lever reconstruction-instability"

Xiaofang Ding1, Lili Yang1, Haitao Zhou1, Kunyu Ji1, Pengjie Yang1, Kun Yang1, Haorun Lyu1, Yuanli Wang1,(), Zhongguo Fu2   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Longfu Hospital, Beijing 100010, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedic Trauma, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2022-06-25 Published:2022-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Yuanli Wang
引用本文:

丁小方, 杨黎黎, 周海涛, 纪坤羽, 杨鹏杰, 杨坤, 吕昊润, 王元利, 付中国. 基于"悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论的老年肱骨近端粉碎骨折术后康复策略探讨[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 232-238.

Xiaofang Ding, Lili Yang, Haitao Zhou, Kunyu Ji, Pengjie Yang, Kun Yang, Haorun Lyu, Yuanli Wang, Zhongguo Fu. Rehabilitation strategy of proximal humerus comminuted fracture in elderly patients based on the theory of "cantilever-lever reconstruction-instability"[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(03): 232-238.

目的

探究不同的康复方案对于高龄人群肱骨近端骨折术后的疗效,选择最适宜高龄患者的术后康复理念及方法。

方法

回顾性对照研究北京市隆福医院骨科从2019年1月至2021年6月因Neer分型三、四部分的肱骨近端骨折行PHILOS钢板内固定的患者共31例,将符合入组标准的60岁以上的肱骨近端骨折患者分为两组:活动组和制动组。分别于术前、术后3个月和术后12个月采用Constant-Murley评分量表、上肢功能评定量表(disabilities of the arm,shoulder and hand,DASH)、疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、生命质量SF-12量表评估患者术后肩关节功能及生活质量,测量术后12个月时X线肱骨颈干角,与术后结果对比,比较这两种康复方法的优劣性。

结果

入组患者31例,其中24例为合并骨质疏松的高龄患者,其中活动组为15例、制动组为16例。术后3个月时、12个月时活动组与制动组Constant评分改善量差异有统计学意义(P<0.001),制动组改善更明显。住院时长差异有统计学意义(P=0.016),制动组(12.0±5.6)d比活动组(7.3±1.3)d的住院时间更长。而DASH评分、VAS评分、SF-12评分在两组间未能体现出明显差异。制动组12个月时颈干角变化值(2.8°±0.9°)较活动组(3.9°±1.1°)更少。

结论

对于60岁以上的肱骨近端骨折患者应选择一种更保守的术后康复方案,术后早期不宜进行肩关节活动度锻炼,不但可以保证关节活动度不受影响,还能有效改善患者术后的Constant评分。

Background

Proximal humeral fractures are a common limb fracture in the elderly, accounting for 4%-9% of total body fractures. Surgical treatment is the preferred treatment for proximal humeral fractures with apparent displacement. The proximal humeral internal fixation locking system for Neer III and IV fractures is relatively mature and practical, but screw cutting and internal fixation failure are still complications. For elderly patients with osteoporosis, although internal fixation materials and surgical techniques have become increasingly complete, there is still a lack of systematic and targeted postoperative rehabilitation programs. The theory of "cantilever-lever reconstruction-instability" indicates that premature postoperative exercise may lead to internal fixation failure, fracture nonunion, and other postoperative complications, so selecting an appropriate rehabilitation program is particularly important.

Objective

Based on the cantilever-lever reconstruction-instability theory, this study retrospectively analyzed the efficacy of different rehabilitation programs for elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures after surgery. It explored the most appropriate postoperative rehabilitation concepts and methods for elderly patients.

Methods

A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 31 patients who underwent PHILOS plate internal fixation for Neer type III and IV proximal humeral fractures in the Department of Orthopedics of Beijing Longfu Hospital from January 2019 to June 2021. PHFs patients over 60 who met the inclusion criteria were divided into the active group and the immobilization group. Postoperative shoulder function and quality of life were evaluated by Constant-murley scale, disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) , visual analogue scale (VAS) , and quality of life (SF-12) before, 3, and 12 months after surgery, respectively. The neck-shaft angle of the humerus was measured by X-ray 12 months after the operation and compared with the postoperative results to compare the advantages and disadvantages of the two rehabilitation methods.

Results

Among the enrolled patients, 24 were aged (> 60 years) with osteoporosis. There were 15 cases in the active group and 16 in the immobilization group. There was a statistical difference in Constant score improvement between the active and braking groups at 3 and 12 months after surgery (P < 0.001) , and the progress was more evident in the braking group. The length of hospital stay was statistically significant (P =0.016) , and the length of hospital stay was longer in the immobilization group than in the activity group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in DASH, VAS, and SF-12 scores. At 12 months, the neck-shaft angle of the immobilization group (2.8°±0.9°) was less than that of the active group (3.9°±1.1°) .

Conclusions

For PHFs patients over 60 years old, a more conservative postoperative rehabilitation program should be selected, and shoulder range of motion exercise should not be carried out in the early postoperative period, which can not only ensure that the range of motion is not affected but also effectively improve the postoperative Constant score of patients.

图1 颈干角测量示意图注:红线表示肱骨干纵轴线和肱骨头轴线内下方所形成的夹角
表1 两组患者临床特征资料(±s)
表2 两组患者术前、术后评分比较(分,±s)
表3 两组患者手术及围术期指标比较(±s)
图2 肩关节外展位时肱骨头内螺钉受力情况分析注:绿色箭头表示近端和远端螺钉的受力方向,近端2枚螺钉产生支撑应力,远端2枚螺钉产生牵张应力
图3 肩关节内收位时肱骨头内螺钉受力情况分析注:绿色箭头表示近端和远端螺钉的受力方向,近端2枚螺钉产生牵张应力,远端2枚螺钉产生支撑应力
[1]
Shin WC, Kang SW, Son SM,et al . High bone union rate using a locking plate for proximal humeral fractures in patients older than 70 years: importance of the medial column[J] . Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg202248(4):2937-2942.
[2]
Compito CA, Self EB, Bigliani LU. Arthroplasty and acute shoulder trauma. Reasons for success and failure[J] . Clin Orthop Relat Res1994,(307):27-36.
[3]
张殿英. "悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论——肱骨近端骨折治疗的新理念[J/CD] .中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2021,9(4):289-292.
[4]
Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected] . The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG) [J] . Am J Ind Med, 1996, 29(6):602-608.
[5]
De Smedt D, Clays E, Annemans L, et al. EQ-5D versus SF-12 in coronary patients: are they interchangeable? [J] . Value Health, 2014, 17(1):84-89.
[6]
Launonen AP, Lepola V, Saranko A,et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures[J] . Arch Osteoporos,2015,10:209.
[7]
Biermann N, Prall WC, Böcker W, et al. Augmentation of plate osteosynthesis for proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of current biomechanical and clinical studies[J] . Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2019,139(8):1075-1099.
[8]
Plath JE, Kerschbaum C, Seebauer T,et al. Locking nail versus locking plate for proximal humeral fracture fixation in an elderly population: a prospective randomised controlled trial[J] . BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2019,20(1):20.
[9]
de Kruijf M, Vroemen JP, de Leur K, et al. Proximal fractures of the humerus in patients older than 75 years of age: should we consider operative treatment? [J] . J Orthop Traumatol, 2014 ,15(2):111-115.
[10]
Bergdahl C, Ekholm C, Wennergren D,et al. Epidemiology and patho-anatomical pattern of 2,011 humeral fractures: data from the Swedish Fracture Register[J] . BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2016,17:159.
[11]
姜保国,陈建海.肱骨近端骨折的治疗进展[J] .北京大学学报(医学版),2016,4(1):1-23.
[12]
Schliemann B, Wähnert D, Theisen C,et al. How to enhance the stability of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures? An overview of current biomechanical and clinical data[J] . Injury,2015,46(7):1207-1214.
[13]
Laux CJ, Grubhofer F, Werner CML, et al. Current concepts in locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J] . J Orthop Surg Res,2017,12(1):137.
[14]
Chen H, Yin P, Wang S,et al. The Augment of the Stability in Locking Compression Plate with Intramedullary Fibular Allograft for Proximal Humerus Fractures in Elderly People[J] . Biomed Res Int,2018,16:3130625.
[15]
Zhu Y, Lu Y, Shen J,et al. Locking intramedullary nails and locking plates in the treatment of two-part proximal humeral surgical neck fractures: a prospective randomized trial with a minimum of three years of follow-up[J] . J Bone Joint Surg Am,2011,93(2):159-168.
[16]
Südkamp N, Bayer J, Hepp P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Results of a prospective, multicenter, observational study[J] . J Bone Joint Surg Am,2009,91(6):1320-1328.
[17]
Koukakis A, Apostolou CD, Taneja T, et al. Fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the PHILOS plate: early experience[J] . Clin Orthop Relat Res,2006,442:115-120.
[18]
Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cutout after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures [J] . J Bone Joint Surg Am,2008 ,90(2):233-240.
[19]
王胜浪,吴春飞,何益凤.Multiloc髓内钉与锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的早期疗效[J] .中国医药科学,2022,12(4):169-172.
[20]
高丽洁,刘晓华,李蔷.肱骨近端四部分骨折内固定术后患者的康复疗效观察[J] .中国康复医学杂志,2021,36(7):849-851.
[21]
樊守刚,李开南,母建松.肱骨近端Neer 3部分或4部分骨折治疗的加速康复研究[J/CD] .中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2020,8(3):237-242.
[22]
Mighell MA, Kolm GP, Collinge CA, et al. Outcomes of hemiarthroplasty for fractures of the proximal humerus[J] . J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2003,12(6):569-577.
[1] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[2] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[3] 李婷婷, 吴荷玉, 张悦, 程康, 张晓芳, 程娅婵. 复合保温策略在老年腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 522-525.
[4] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[5] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[6] 赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[7] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[8] 张汪, 徐淑英, 张爱华, 夏芬荣, 汪露. 手术室体温护理结合细节护理干预在老年腹股沟疝围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 635-638.
[9] 杨鹏, 刘冲. PFNA治疗老年股骨转子间骨折后隐匿性失血及其危险因素的横断面研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 301-306.
[10] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[11] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[12] 毛树文, 袁方, 唐昊, 王建民. 针刀调节交感神经对老年胃溃疡患者胃功能和溃疡愈合的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 326-330.
[13] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
[14] 晏美娟, 邵礼晖. 高水平脂蛋白(a)与无“三高”老年人群小动脉硬化型脑小血管病的相关性研究[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 458-463.
[15] 邓颖, 黄山, 胡慧秀, 孙超. 老年缺血性脑卒中患者危险因素聚集情况分析[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 344-349.
阅读次数
全文


摘要