切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (04) : 293 -299. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2022.04.002

论著

应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效
刘兵1, 马翔宇1, 杨超1, 周大鹏1,()   
  1. 1. 110016 沈阳,北部战区总医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-12 出版日期:2022-11-05
  • 通信作者: 周大鹏
  • 基金资助:
    辽宁省科学技术计划项目(2021JH2/10300057)

Clinical efficacy of PHILOS plate combined with individualized intramedullary anatomic bone cement occupying device in the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in the elderly

Bing Liu1, Xiangyu Ma1, Chao Yang1, Dapeng Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang 110016, China
  • Received:2022-09-12 Published:2022-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Dapeng Zhou
引用本文:

刘兵, 马翔宇, 杨超, 周大鹏. 应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 293-299.

Bing Liu, Xiangyu Ma, Chao Yang, Dapeng Zhou. Clinical efficacy of PHILOS plate combined with individualized intramedullary anatomic bone cement occupying device in the treatment of osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures in the elderly[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2022, 10(04): 293-299.

目的

探讨应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的可行性及疗效。

方法

回顾性分析从2020年1月至2021年6月在本院治疗的38例老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折患者,按固定方式的不同,分为Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器组(A组,n=18)和单独Philos钢板组(B组,n=20),比较两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后48 h切口引流量、骨折愈合时间、术后随访影像学资料(颈干角丢失量、肱骨头内翻角度、肱骨头高度丢失量)、肩关节Constant-Murley评分(Constant-Murley scores,CMS)及总并发症发生情况。

结果

所有38例患者术后均获随访,两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、术后48 h切口引流量、骨折愈合时间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),但术后颈干角丢失量、肱骨头内翻角度、肱骨高度丢失量、CMS评分及术后总并发症发生率比较,A组则均优于B组(P<0.05)。

结论

应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折临床效果优于单独Philos钢板内固定,其具有固定强度高、复位维持好、功能评分高、并发症少等优点,是一种治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的可靠方法。

Background

Fractures of the proximal humerus account for 5% of all fractures, and the incidence of comminuted fractures of the proximal humerus gradually increases with age, among which 71% of proximal humerus fractures occur in the elderly population over 60 years old. Except for conservative treatment for a small number of patients who cannot tolerate anesthesia, open reduction and internal fixation is still the first choice for treating displaced proximal humeral fractures. Affected by the fragile bone mass, elderly osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures of Neer type III-IV fractures are often accompanied by small fragments of metaphyseal comminuted. Most have metaphyseal compression or defect, which is extremely unstable and needs to be strengthened and rigid internal fixation. Still, due to the thin layer of cortical bone and sparse trabecular bone structure, the anchoring strength between internal fixation and bone is significantly reduced. Currently, the clinical treatment of this type of fracture often uses a single lateral plate fixation. Some scholars have reported that complications with a single locking plate are as high as 50%, and the related revision rate is about 15%. Complications include varus collapse, loss of reduction, screw penetration into the joint, internal fixation failure, subacromial impingement, and necrosis of the humeral head. Most scholars agree that repairing the medial structure, restoring metaphyseal support, and anatomically reducing nodules are the key to ensuring the therapeutic effect. Some studies have suggested that using a lateral plate combined with an allogeneic fibula or autologous ilium for intramedullary support can help resolve metaphyseal osteopenia and provide medical support for patients with osteoporosis, and achieve good clinical results. However, this method of bone implant fixation is limited by the source of the allogeneic bone, increased infection rate, disease transmission, immune rejection, complications in the donor site of autologous bone, etc., and has not been widely used clinically.

Objective

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of PHILOS plate combined with individualized intramedullary anatomical bone cement placeholder in treating elderly osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

Retrospective analysis was made on 38 cases of elderly osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures treated in our hospital from January 2020 to June 2021. According to the different fixation methods, they were divided into two groups: the PHILOS plate combined with individualized intramedullary anatomical bone cement placeholder group (group A, 18 cases) and the PHILOS plate alone group (group B, 20 cases) . The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, incision drainage volume 48 hours after the operation, fracture healing time Follow up imaging data (loss amount of neck shaft angle, humeral head varus angle, loss amount of humeral head height) , Constant Murley scores of the shoulder (CMS) and total complications.

Results

All 38 patients were followed up after the operation. There was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the operation time, intraoperative bleeding volume, incision drainage volume 48 hours after the operation, and fracture healing time (P>0.05) . Still, the loss of neck shaft angle, humeral head varus angle, humeral height loss, CMS score, and the incidence of total complications after the operation were better in group A than in group B (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

The clinical effect of PHILOS plate combined with individualized intramedullary anatomical bone cement placeholder in treating elderly osteoporotic proximal humeral fracture is better than that of internal fixation with Philips plate alone. It has the advantages of high fixation strength, sound reduction and maintenance, high functional score, and fewer complications. It is a reliable method for treating an elderly osteoporotic proximal humeral fracture.

表1 两组纳入患者基线资料比较(±s)
图1 解剖型骨水泥占位制作过程 图A:应用3D打印技术制作的个体化树脂材料模具,模具由2个可对合的半杯状体和1个顶盖三部分组成;图B:将PMMA骨水泥混匀后呈糊状时打入模具,并将模具压实;图C:待骨水泥完全凝固后打开模具,得到个体化的解剖型骨水泥占位注:PMMA为聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯
图2 典型病例:女性,69岁,跌伤致骨质疏松性左肱骨近端Neer Ⅳ型骨折,骨密度T值:-3.0 图A:伤后左肩关节正侧位X线片提示左肱骨近端骨折移位明显,肱骨头内翻畸形;图B:左肱骨近端三维重建CT示骨折干骺端粉碎,内侧柱无支撑;图C:将占位器插入髓腔内重建肱骨近端内侧柱支撑,并借助占位器复位肱骨近端骨折;图D:术中透视见左肱骨近端骨折复位良好,钢板及骨水泥占位器位置良好;图E:术后12周左肱骨近端正侧位X线片提示骨折端初步愈合;图F:术后1年左肱骨近端正侧位X线片提示完全愈合;图G:术后1年肩关节三维CT示钢板螺钉与占位器形成"钢混结构",未见松动、骨吸收;图H:术后1年左肩关节功能恢复良好
表2 两组纳入患者手术情况比较(±s)
表3 两组纳入患者术后临床疗效情况比较(±s)
表4 两组纳入患者术后并发症发生率情况比较[例(%)]
[1]
Barrett JA, Baron JA, Karagas MR,et al. Fracture risk in the U.S.Medicare population[J]. J Clin Epidemiol, 1999, 52(3):243-249.
[2]
Roux A,Decroocq L,El BS,et al.Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, 98(6): 715-719.
[3]
谢麟臻,陈春慧,陈华.肱骨近端骨折的治疗进展[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2020,8(2):186-190.
[4]
Singh A,Adams AL,Burchette R,et al. The effect of osteoporosis management on proximal humeral fracture[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(2): 191-198.
[5]
Sproul RC,Iyengar JJ,Devcic Z,et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Injury, 2011, 42(4): 408-413.
[6]
Vachtsevanos L,Hayden L,Desai AS,et al. Management of proximal humerus fractures in adults[J]. World J Orthop, 2014, 5(5): 685-693.
[7]
Jung SW,Shim SB,Kim HM,et al. Factors that Influence Reduction Loss in Proximal Humerus Fracture Surgery[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(6): 276-282.
[8]
Neviaser AS,Hettrich CM,Beamer BS,et al. Endosteal strut augment reduces complications associated with proximal humeral locking plates[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(12): 3300-3306.
[9]
周磊,王海涛,王华.锁定钢板内固定联合植骨在老年肱骨近端骨折患者治疗中的应用研究[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2020,8(4):352-357.
[10]
Chen H,Ji X,Gao Y,et al.Comparison of intramedullary fibular allograft with locking compression plate versus shoulder hemi-arthroplasty for repair of osteoporotic four-part proximal humerus fracture:Consecutive,prospective,controlled,and comparative study[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(3):287-292.
[11]
Constant CR, Gerber C, Emery RJ, et al. A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(2): 355-361.
[12]
Adam J, Basil AM, Isah I, et al. Mortality after inpatient stay for proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020, 29(1): e22-e28.
[13]
Singh A,Adams AL,Burchette R,et al. The effect of osteoporosis management on proximal humeral fracture[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(2): 191-198.
[14]
Jonsson , Ekholm C, Salomonsson B, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty provides better shoulder function than hemiarthroplasty for displaced 3- and 4-part proximal humeral fractures in patients aged 70 years or older: a multicenter randomized controlled trial[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2021, 30(5): 994-1006.
[15]
Stone MA, Namdari S. Surgical Considerations in the Treatment of Osteoporotic Proximal Humerus Fractures[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2019, 50(2): 223-231.
[16]
Varga P,Grünwald L,Inzana JA,et al. Fatigue failure of plated osteoporotic proximal humerus fractures is predicted by the strain around the proximal screws[J]. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater, 2017, 75: 68-74.
[17]
Schliemann B,Risse N,Frank A,et al. Screws with larger core diameter and lower thread pitch increase the stability of locked plating in osteoporotic proximal humeral fractures[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2019, 63: 21-26.
[18]
Kim DS,Lee DH,Chun YM,et al. Which additional augmented fixation procedure decreases surgical failure after proximal humeral fracture with medial comminution: fibular allograft or inferomedial screws?[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(10): 1852-1858.
[19]
Jang Y, Kim D. Biomechanical study of Proximal humeral fracture fixation: Locking plate with medial support screw vs. locking plate with intramedullary fibular graft[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2021, 90: 105510.
[20]
Chen H,Zhu ZG,Li JT,et al. Finite element analysis of an intramedulary anatomical strut for proximal humeral fractures with disrupted medial column instability: A cohort study[J]. Int J Surg, 2020, 73: 50-56.
[21]
Tuerxun M,Tuxun A,Zeng LQ,et al. Locking Plate Combined With Endosteal Fibular Allograft Augmentation for Medial Column Comminuted Proximal Humeral Fracture[J]. Orthopedics, 2020, 43(6): 367-372.
[22]
Warnhoff M,Jensen G,Dey HO,et al. Double plating - surgical technique and good clinical results in complex and highly unstable proximal humeral fractures[J]. Injury, 2021, 52(8): 2285-2291.
[23]
Moursy M,Wegmann K,Wichlas F,et al. Distal humerus fracture in patients over 70 years of age: results of open reduction and internal fixation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2022, 142(1): 157-164.
[24]
Theopold J,Schleifenbaum S,Müller M,et al. Biomechanical evaluation of hybrid double plate osteosynthesis using a locking plate and an inverted third tubular plate for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J]. PLoS One, 2018, 13(10): e0206349.
[25]
Zhang QH,Cossey A,Tong J.Stress shielding in bone of a bone-cement interface[J]. Med Eng Phys, 2016, 38(4): 423-426.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 浦路桥, 徐永清, 齐保闯, 施洪鑫, 林玮, 卜鹏飞, 白艳, 唐志方, 李川. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)计划书[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 747-750.
[3] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[4] 陆宜仙, 张震涛, 夏德萌, 王家林. 巨噬细胞极化在骨质疏松中调控作用及机制的研究进展[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 538-541.
[5] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[6] 晏晴艳, 雍晓梅, 罗洪, 杜敏. 成都地区老年转移性乳腺癌的预后及生存因素研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 636-638.
[7] 刘跃刚, 薛振峰. 腹腔镜腹股沟疝日间手术在老年患者中的安全性分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 711-714.
[8] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[9] 赵宏霞, 刘静, 李晓薇, 陈金婵, 汪志霞. 腹腔镜下经阴道子宫全切术联合阴道前后壁修补术治疗老年子宫脱垂效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 561-565.
[10] 孙伟, 林丽, 师高洋. 超声引导下连续髂腹股沟-髂腹下神经阻滞与腹横肌平面阻滞在老年腹股沟疝手术中应用效果比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 593-597.
[11] 金浪, 石洁, 黄正, 贾永伟, 张建坡, 魏礼成, 金昊雷. 3D打印数字技术辅助改良交叉PVP对重度骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折脊柱-骨盆矢状面平衡状态的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 263-268.
[12] 王娟, 高俊, 周伊兰, 李小红, 史兵伟, 潘美珍. 血清IL-2、IL-17和骨密度关系及其对骨质疏松症的预测价值[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 295-300.
[13] 单秋洁, 孙立柱, 徐宜全, 王之霞, 徐妍, 马浩, 刘田田. 中老年食管癌患者调强放射治疗期间放射性肺损伤风险模型构建及应用[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 388-393.
[14] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[15] 郭震天, 张宗明, 赵月, 刘立民, 张翀, 刘卓, 齐晖, 田坤. 机器学习算法预测老年急性胆囊炎术后住院时间探索[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 955-961.
阅读次数
全文


摘要