切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 16 -20. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.01.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

不同类型肩峰下骨赘对肩袖肌腱病关节镜治疗的影响
汤毅勇1, 侯景义1, 黎清悦1, 于萌蕾1, 李方奇1, 张琮达1, 杨睿1,()   
  1. 1. 510120 广州,中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-04-18 出版日期:2020-02-05
  • 通信作者: 杨睿
  • 基金资助:
    广州市科技计划项目产学研协同创新重大专项(201704020132); 广东省自然科学基金博士启动项目(2015A030310321)

Effects of different types of acromial spur on arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy

Yiyong Tang1, Jingyi Hou1, Qingyue Li1, Menglei Yu1, Fangqi Li1, Congda Zhang1, Rui Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China
  • Received:2019-04-18 Published:2020-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Rui Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Rui, Email:
引用本文:

汤毅勇, 侯景义, 黎清悦, 于萌蕾, 李方奇, 张琮达, 杨睿. 不同类型肩峰下骨赘对肩袖肌腱病关节镜治疗的影响[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 16-20.

Yiyong Tang, Jingyi Hou, Qingyue Li, Menglei Yu, Fangqi Li, Congda Zhang, Rui Yang. Effects of different types of acromial spur on arthroscopic treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 16-20.

目的

观察肩峰外侧骨赘对关节镜下肩峰成形术治疗肩袖肌腱病临床疗效的影响。

方法

对2016年1月至2016年12月在中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院行肩峰成形术的68例肩袖肌腱病患者进行回顾性研究。依据患者肩关节X线检查将其肩峰下骨赘分为外侧型骨赘和前侧型骨赘两大类。采用视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale/score,VAS)、Constant肩关节评分、12条生存质量量表(12-items the short form health survey questionnaire, SF-12)评分进行术前及术后3个月评分。

结果

68例患者中26例为外侧型,42例为前侧型。术前外侧型患者的VAS、Constant、SF-12评分明显劣于前侧型患者(P<0.05)。术后3个月,外侧型患者VAS评分降低(3.64 ± 0.54)分,前侧型患者VAS评分降低(2.61±0.09)分,外侧型患者VAS评分改善显著(P<0.05)。其Constant、SF-12评分改善也更为明显(P<0.05)。

结论

肩峰下骨赘的形态短期内影响肩袖肌腱病的临床效果。外侧型骨赘的患者临床症状更严重,但手术效果改善也较为明显。

Background

Shoulder joint pain is a very common clinical symptom. Approximately 1%-2% of patients visit a doctor for shoulder pain each year, and symptoms usually last for many years. Acromial osteophyte is an important external cause of rotator cuff tendinopathy. Tucker, et al. proposed a special type of acromial osteophyte - Keeled Acromion which had the characteristics of being located in the center of the inferior margin of acromion, longitudinally, and downward sloping. They believed that this type of osteophyte was an important risk factor for partial rotator cuff injury on the bursal side and full-thickness rotator cuff tear. Joo Han Oh, et al. divided the acromial osteophytes into heel type, lateral traction type, anterior traction type, lateral bird beak type, anterior bird beak type and medial type. The heel type of acromial osteophytes is the most common (56%) , and the author speculates that it may be a risk factor for rotator cuff tendinopathy. However, the influences of different types of acromial osteophytes on the symptoms of patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy and the therapeutic effect of arthroscopic treatment have not been reported. As the classification of acromial osteophytes in previous studies is complicated, and some types of osteophytes are rare, it is not conducive to clinical application. Considering that the acromion extension will affect the muscle force vector direction of the middle portion of deltoid muscle (the further outside the acromion extends, the greater the upward component of the deltoid muscle, and the more prone to subacromial impingement and supraspinatus tendon degeneration) . Therefore, the lateral acromial osteophyte may promote rotator cuff tendinopathy by affecting the acromion extension. Objective To observe the effect of lateral acromial osteophytes on the clinical effect of arthroscopic acromioplasty in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2016, 68 patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy underwent acromioplasty in our hospital, and the data was retrospectively analyzed. According to the patient’s shoulder X-ray examination, the acromial osteophytes were divided into two types: lateral osteophytes and anterior osteophytes. The VAS score, SF 12 score and Constant-Murley score were used before and 3 months after surgery.

Results

Of the 68 patients, 26 were lateral type and 42 were anterior type. The VAS score, Constant-Murley score and SF 12 score of the patients with acromial osteophytes of the lateral type before surgery were significantly inferior to those of the anterior type (P<0.05) . Three months after surgery, the VAS score of the lateral type group decreased by (-3.64±0.54) , and the VAS score of the anterior type group decreased by (-2.61 ± 0.09) . In the lateral type group, the VAS score improved more significantly (P<0.05) , and the improvements of Constant-Murley score and SF 12 score were also more obvious (P<0.05) .

Conclusions

The morphology of acromial osteophytes affects the clinical effect of rotator cuff tendinopathy in the short term. The clinical symptoms of patients with lateral osteophytes are more severe, but the results of the surgery also improved significantly.

图1 前侧型肩峰骨赘(图A)和外侧型肩峰骨赘(图B)
表1 两组患者一般临床资料
表2 前侧型组术前与术后3个月临床疗效比较(分,±s)
表3 外侧型组术前与术后3个月临床疗效比较(分,±s)
表4 前侧型组与外侧型组术后3个月与术前临床疗效 差值比较(分,±s)
[1]
van der Windt DA, Koes BW, de Jong BA, et al. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1995, 54(12): 959-964.
[2]
Linsell L, Dawson J, Zondervan K, et al. Prevalence and incidence of adults consulting for shoulder conditions in UK primary care; patterns of diagnosis and referral[J]. Rheumatology (Oxford), 2006, 45(2): 215-221.
[3]
Tekavec E, Joud A, Rittner R, et al. Population-based consultation patterns in patients with shoulder pain diagnoses[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2012, 13:238.
[4]
Greenberg DL. Evaluation and treatment of shoulder pain[J]. Med Clin North Am, 2014, 98(3): 487-504.
[5]
Lewis JS. Rotator cuff tendinopathy/subacromial impingement syndrome: is it time for a new method of assessment? [J].Br J Sports Med, 2009, 43(4): 259-264.
[6]
Seitz AL, McClure PW, Finucane S,et al. Mechanisms of rotator cuff tendinopathy: Intrinsic, extrinsic, or both? [J].Clin Biomech, 2011, 26(1): 1-12.
[7]
Tucker TJ, Snyder SJ. The keeled acromion: an aggressive acromial variant--a series of 20 patients with associated rotator cuff tears[J]. Arthroscopy, 2004, 20(7): 744-753.
[8]
Oh JH, Kim JY, Lee HK, et al. Classification and Clinical Significance of Acromial Spur in Rotator Cuff Tear: Heel-type Spur and Rotator Cuff Tear[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 468(6): 1542-1550.
[9]
Bhatia DN,Debeer JF,Toit DF. Association of a large lateral extension of the acromion with rotator cuff tears[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(4): 800-805.
[10]
Chambler AF, Pitsillides AA, Emery RJ. Acromial spur formation in patients with rotator cuff tears[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2003, 12(4): 314-321.
[11]
Fujisawa Y, Mihata T, Murase T. Three-dimensional analysis of acromial morphologic characteristics in patients with and without rotator cuff tears using a reconstructed computed tomography model[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(11): 2621-2626.
[12]
Pandey V, Vijayan D, Tapashetti S, et al. Does scapular morphology affect the integrity of the rotator cuff? [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(3): 413-421.
[13]
张一翀,陈建海. 肩袖疾病的治疗: ISAKOS上肢专业委员会专家共识[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2014, 2(2): 128-135.
[14]
Neer CS 2nd. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1972, 54(1): 41-50.
[15]
Banas MP, Miller RJ, Totterman S. Relationship between the lateral acromion angle and rotator cuff disease[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1995, 4(6): 454-461.
[16]
Ozaki J, Fujimoto S, Nakagawa Y,et al. Tears of the rotator cuff of the shoulder associated with pathological changes in the acromion. A study in cadavera[J]. Bone Joint Surg Am, 1988, 70(8): 1224-1230.
[17]
Tetreault P, Krueger A, Zurakowski D,et al. Glenoid version and rotator cuff tears[J]. J Orthop Res, 2004, 22(1): 202-207.
[18]
Toivonen DA, Tuite MJ, Orwin JF. Acromial structure and tears of the rotator cuff[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1995, 4(5): 376-383.
[19]
Jim YF, Chang CY, Wu JJ,et al. Shoulder impingement syndrome: impingement view and arthrography study based on 100 cases[J]. Skeletal Radiol, 1992, 21(7): 449-451.
[20]
Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Inokuchi W, et al. Acromial spur: relationship to aging and morphologic changes in the rotator cuff[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14(6): 591-598.
[21]
Kongmalai P, Apivatgaroon A, Chernchujit B. Morphological classification of acromial spur: correlation between Rockwood tilt view and arthroscopic finding[J]. Sicot J ,2017, 3:4.
[1] 王文, 王敏, 梁绍华, 秦胜男, 陈亮, 梁伟国. 肩胛上神经松解对关节镜修补巨大肩袖撕裂的早期影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 492-495.
[2] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[3] 纪晓希, 陈雨舟, 黄秋, 曹烈虎, 朱文辉. 肩峰成形术对关节镜下修补外伤性与非外伤性肩袖损伤临床结果影响的比较研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 103-110.
[4] 赵琛, 胡锐, 周红, 王芳, 胡真, 文凡. 力偶练习和肩肱节律调整对肩袖损伤保守治疗影响的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 226-231.
[5] 陈奇, 沈子龙, 温向伟, 王晨, 高奥飞, 丁明强, 余嘉文, 潘海乐. 自体髌骨股四头肌肌腱治疗家兔巨大肩袖损伤的实验研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 214-220.
[6] 张清, 向明, 李一平, 陈杭, 胡晓川, 杨金松. 肩袖损伤保守治疗失败的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 129-134.
[7] 陈国栋, 郑美妍, 张峻, 曾一鸣. 肩袖损伤合并肩关节粘连:一期松解修补还是先松解后修补?[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 122-128.
[8] 张元桢, 张艺, 薛超, 蔡秋晨, 程飚. 肩袖损伤患者关节镜修补术后的预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 3-6.
[9] 王洋, 刘俐惠, 刘伟, 田红梅, 毛永鹏, 李旭阳, 曹冉, 王振威, 艾笛, 张腾, 毛子木, 姜双鹏. ERAS理念早期康复的医护患新模式在肩袖损伤关节镜术后的临床效果研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 360-364.
[10] 董志辉, 徐建杰, 季伟, 毕伟东, 李洁冰, 张立兴, 武建忠. 肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 325-330.
[11] 梁洁浩, 高大伟, 陈亮, 吴微. 早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤术后中-长期影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 220-228.
[12] 何勇, 唐晓野, 毛剑莹, 张杰超. 肩袖修补术后导引训练对冈上肌形态影响的肌骨超声研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 212-219.
[13] 居家宝, 刘洋, 陈建海, 马明太, 张一翀, 张子宵, 张殿英. 复杂性肩关节脱位术后功能分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 154-158.
[14] 王红莉, 张妍, 居家宝, 张艳, 李立, 陈建海. 肩袖损伤患者术前焦虑状况与肩关节镜术后疼痛的相关性分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 38-41.
[15] 王帅, 王素平, 宋涛. 富血小板血浆在肩袖损伤治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 374-379.
阅读次数
全文


摘要