切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (02) : 103 -110. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2023.02.002

论著

肩峰成形术对关节镜下修补外伤性与非外伤性肩袖损伤临床结果影响的比较研究
纪晓希, 陈雨舟, 黄秋, 曹烈虎, 朱文辉()   
  1. 200040 上海,复旦大学附属华山医院运动医学科
    614000 乐山市人民医院骨一科
    201900 上海市宝山区罗店医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-08 出版日期:2023-05-05
  • 通信作者: 朱文辉
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年基金(81702145)

Comparative study of the effect of acromioplasty on the clinical outcome of arthroscopic repair of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries

Xiaoxi Ji, Yuzhou Chen, Qiu Huang, Liehu Cao, Wenhui Zhu()   

  1. Department of Sports Medicine, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040,China
    Department of Orthopedics, Leshan People's Hospital, Leshan 614000,China
    Department of Orthopedics, Luodian Hospital of Baoshan District, Shanghai 201900,China
  • Received:2022-10-08 Published:2023-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Wenhui Zhu
引用本文:

纪晓希, 陈雨舟, 黄秋, 曹烈虎, 朱文辉. 肩峰成形术对关节镜下修补外伤性与非外伤性肩袖损伤临床结果影响的比较研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 103-110.

Xiaoxi Ji, Yuzhou Chen, Qiu Huang, Liehu Cao, Wenhui Zhu. Comparative study of the effect of acromioplasty on the clinical outcome of arthroscopic repair of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(02): 103-110.

目的

对关节镜下修补外伤性与非外伤性肩袖损伤的患者,回顾性地评价行肩峰成形术或肩峰下滑囊切除对术后临床效果的影响。

方法

将复旦大学附属华山医院2016年1月至2020年7月收治并进行关节镜下肩袖修补术的肩袖损伤患者,按有无外伤病史,分为创伤组或非创伤组。所有患者术中行肩峰成形术或肩峰下滑囊切除术。术后患者定期随访至少12个月。术前、术后记录患者的Constant-Murley、美国肩肘外科协会评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons'form, ASES)、美国加州大学洛杉矶分校(University of California,Los Angels,UCLA)评分、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)及肩关节活动度。比较创伤性与非创伤性肩袖损伤,接受肩峰成形术与接受肩峰下滑囊切除术患者的术前、术后临床功能。

结果

共114例患者入组本研究(创伤组50例患者、非创伤组64例患者)。创伤组中41例患者(41/50,82.0%)、非创伤组中43例患者(43/64,67.2%)在肩袖修补术中接受了肩峰成形术,其余患者行肩峰下滑囊切除术。在术后12个月,创伤组及非创伤组患者的Constant-Murley评分、ASES评分、VAS评分及肩关节活动度均较术前明显改善。对于创伤组,接受肩峰成形术患者的术后功能、活动度与接受肩峰下滑囊切除患者无明显差异。然而对于非创伤组,接受肩峰成形术患者较肩峰下滑囊切除患者在Constant-Murley评分(83.6分vs. 81.6分, P = 0.03)、ASES评分(89.0分vs. 80.1分, P <0.01)、UCLA评分(31.1分vs. 29.2分, P = 0.03)、VAS疼痛评分(1.2分vs. 2.1分, P <0.01) ,外展角度(160.0° vs. 151. 7°, P = 0.03)及外旋角度(60.1° vs. 53.3°, P = 0.03)均显著改善。

结论

关节镜下修补非外伤性肩袖损伤术中,进行肩峰成形术较肩峰下滑囊切除术可达到更好的关节功能及活动度。

Background

Rotator cuff degeneration and tear are common causes of shoulder pain, often induced by multiple factors. Two theories are widely accepted to explain the mechanism of this injury: the mechanical (extrinsic) theory, which suggests symptoms arise from changes in the anatomical shape of the acromion, and the degenerative (intrinsic) theory, which suggests symptoms arise from degeneration of the rotator cuff tissue. The anatomical changes in the acromion lead to impingement between the acromion and rotator cuff, which is the theoretical basis of acromioplasty. Since Neer first reported this, many open or arthroscopic acromioplasty has been performed, aiming to reduce the pressure between the acromion and rotator cuff by partially reshaping the acromion. However, in recent years, more and more studies have questioned the necessity of acromioplasty in treating rotator cuff injuries. McCallister et al. repaired full-thickness rotator cuff tears without performing acromioplasty and significantly improved shoulder joint range of motion (ROM) and other clinical functions after surgery. Subsequent prospective randomized controlled studies have also not found any benefits of acromioplasty in treating full-thickness rotator cuff injuries.Furthermore, some studies have found that partial release of the coracohumeral ligament during acromioplasty can increase the risk of anterior superior instability of the glenohumeral joint. Based on these observations, many surgeons have begun to reassess the role of acromioplasty and the concept of extrinsic impingement in treating rotator cuff injuries. In addition to common causes of rotator cuff injuries, such as age-related degeneration, overuse of the shoulder joint, smoking, diabetes, etc., some patients can recall a history of shoulder joint trauma before the onset of shoulder joint symptoms. Studies have discussed the relationship between trauma and rotator cuff injuries. Braune et al. compared the postoperative outcomes of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries and found that patients with traumatic rotator cuff injuries had higher Constant-Murley scores, better ROM, and lower visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for pain. Tan et al. sequentially compared 1,300 patients with rotator cuff injuries and found that patients with traumatic tears had more restricted ROMs. In a retrospective study, Kang Jianguo et al. found that acromioplasty did not further improve joint function after rotator cuff repair and may not be a common choice for rotator cuff repair. Therefore, it is still unclear whether a history of trauma affects the functional results of rotator cuff injuries and their surgical repair.

Objective

To retrospectively evaluate the effect of acromioplasty or subacromial bursectomy on postoperative clinical outcomes in patients with arthroscopic repair of traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries.

Methods

The patients with rotator cuff injury who received arthroscopic rotator cuff repair from January 2016 to July 2020 were retrospectively divided into trauma group or non-trauma group according to the history of trauma. Each patient underwent acromioplasty or subacromial bursectomy. The patients were followed up regularly for at least 12 months. Constant-Murley score, ASES score, UCLA score, VAS pain score, and shoulder range of motion were recorded before and after surgery. The preoperative and postoperative clinical functions of patients with traumatic and nontraumatic rotator cuff injuries, or acromioplasty and subacromial bursectomy, were compared with those who underwent acromioplasty.

Results

One hundred fourteen patients were enrolled in this study, including 50 in the trauma group and 64 in the non-trauma group. Among the trauma group, 41 patients (82.0%) received acromioplasty during rotator cuff repair surgery, while 43 (67.2%) in the non-trauma group received acromioplasty. The remaining patients underwent subacromial bursectomy. At 12 months postoperatively, the Constant-Murley score, ASES score, VAS pain score, and shoulder joint range of motion significantly improved compared to preoperative values in both the trauma and non-trauma groups. There was no significant difference in postoperative function and range of motion in the trauma group between patients who received acromioplasty and those who underwent subacromial bursectomy. However, in the non-trauma group, patients who received acromioplasty had significantly better Constant-Murley scores (83.6 points vs. 81.6 points, P = 0.03), ASES score (89.0 points vs. 80.1 points, P <0.01), UCLA score (31.1 points vs. 29.2 points, P= 0.03), VAS pain score (1.2 points vs. 2.1 points, P <0.01), external rotation angle (160.0°vs. 151.7°, P= 0.03), and abduction angle (60.1° vs. 53.3°, P= 0.03) compared to patients who underwent subacromial bursectomy.

Conclusion

In the arthroscopic repair of non-traumatic rotator cuff injuries, acromioplasty results in better joint function and range of motion than subacromial bursectomy.

表1 创伤组与非创伤组肩袖损伤患者的人口学信息、关节镜术中发现及修补方式
表2 创伤组分别接受肩峰成形术或者肩峰下滑囊切除术患者的人口学信息、关节镜术中发现及修补方式
表3 非创伤组分别接受肩峰成形术或者肩峰下滑囊切除术患者的人口学信息、关节镜术中发现及修补方式
表4 创伤组、非创伤组患者的年龄分布范围[例(%)]
表5 创伤组、非创伤组分别接受肩峰成形术、肩峰下滑囊切除术患者的肩峰形态分型
表6 创伤组与非创伤组肩袖损伤患者的关节功能及ROM在术前、术后比较(±s
表7 创伤组、非创伤组接受肩峰下滑囊切除术与肩峰形成术的关节功能评分和ROM比较(±s
表8 对于I、II、III型肩峰形态,创伤组、非创伤组患者术后临床评分及ROM比较(±s
[1]
Abrams GD, Gupta AK, Hussey KE, et al. Arthroscopic Repair of Full-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears With and Without Acromioplasty: Randomized Prospective Trial With 2-Year Follow-up[J]. Am J Sports Med201442(6):1296-1303.
[2]
Chahal J, Mall N, MacDonald PB, et al. The role of subacromial decompression in patients undergoing arthroscopic repair of full-thickness tears of the rotator cuff: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Arthroscopy201228(5):720-727.
[3]
Neer CS. Anterior acromioplasty for the chronic impingement syndrome in the shoulder: a preliminary report[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am197254(1):41-50.
[4]
Shin SJ, Oh JH, Chung SW, et al. The efficacy of acromioplasty in the arthroscopic repair of small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears without acromial spur: prospective comparative study[J]. Arthroscopy201228(5):628-635.
[5]
McCallister WV, Parsons IM, Titelman RM, et al. Open rotator cuff repair without acromioplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am200587(6):1278-1283.
[6]
Braune C, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Welsch F, et al. Mid-term results and quantitative comparison of postoperative shoulder function in traumatic and non-traumatic rotator cuff tears[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg2003123(8):419-424.
[7]
Tan M, Lam PH, Le BTN, et al. Trauma versus no trauma: an analysis of the effect of tear mechanism on tendon healing in 1300 consecutive patients after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg201625(1):12-21.
[8]
康建国, 孙永青, 韩云毅, 等. 关节镜下肩袖修复术中应用肩峰成形对术后疗效的影响研究[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志201912(4):271-276.
[9]
Michener LA, McClure PW, Karduna AR. Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)200318(5):369-379.
[10]
Sano H, Ishii H, Trudel G, et al. Histologic evidence of degeneration at the insertion of 3 rotator cuff tendons: a comparative study with human cadaveric shoulders[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg19998(6):574-579.
[11]
Jacobson SR, Speer KP, Moor JT, et al. Reliability of radiographic assessment of acromial morphology[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg19954(6):449-453.
[12]
Nordt WE, Garretson RB, Plotkin E. The measurement of subacromial contact pressure in patients with impingement syndrome[J]. Arthroscopy199915(2):121-125.
[13]
Natsis K, Tsikaras P, Totlis T, et al. Correlation between the four types of acromion and the existence of enthesophytes: a study on 423 dried scapulas and review of the literature[J]. Clin Anat200720(3):267-272.
[14]
菅永志, 方钦正, 李珂, 等. 肩袖修复中是否行肩峰成形术的荟萃分析[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志201826(20):1871-1876.
[15]
曾一鸣, 王燎, 严孟宁, 等. 关节镜下肩袖修补术同时行肩峰成形术手术前后肩峰形态学参数的差异[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志20198(8):604-609.
[16]
徐丛, 任江涛, 李嘉, 等. 肩峰成形对肩袖损伤缝线桥修复术后功能的影响[J]. 中国运动医学杂志201736(6):526-530.
[17]
Henkus HE, de Witte PB, Nelissen RGHH, et al. Bursectomy compared with acromioplasty in the management of subacromial impingement syndrome: a prospective randomised study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br200991(4):504-510.
[18]
Kukkonen J, Joukainen A, Itälä A, et al. Operatively treated traumatic versus non-traumatic rotator cuff ruptures: a registry study[J]. Ups J Med Sci2013118(1):29-34.
[19]
Kolk A, Thomassen BJW, Hund H, et al. Does acromioplasty result in favorable clinical and radiologic outcomes in the management of chronic subacromial pain syndrome? A double-blinded randomized clinical trial with 9 to 14 years’ follow-up[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg201726(8):1407-1415.
[20]
Donigan JA, Wolf BR. Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: acromioplasty versus bursectomy alone--does it really matter? A systematic review[J]. Iowa Orthop J201131:121-126.
[21]
Tamai M, Okajima S, Fushiki S, et al. Quantitative analysis of neural distribution in human coracoacromial ligaments[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res2000,(373):125-134.
[22]
Bigliani LU, Ticker JB, Flatow EL, et al. The relationship of acromial architecture to rotator cuff disease[J]. Clin Sports Med199110(4):823-838.
[23]
MacDonald P, McRae S, Leiter J, et al. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with and without acromioplasty in the treatment of full-thickness rotator cuff tears: a multicenter, randomized controlled trial[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am201193(21):1953-1960.
[1] 王文, 王敏, 梁绍华, 秦胜男, 陈亮, 梁伟国. 肩胛上神经松解对关节镜修补巨大肩袖撕裂的早期影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 492-495.
[2] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[3] 赵琛, 胡锐, 周红, 王芳, 胡真, 文凡. 力偶练习和肩肱节律调整对肩袖损伤保守治疗影响的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 226-231.
[4] 陈奇, 沈子龙, 温向伟, 王晨, 高奥飞, 丁明强, 余嘉文, 潘海乐. 自体髌骨股四头肌肌腱治疗家兔巨大肩袖损伤的实验研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 214-220.
[5] 张清, 向明, 李一平, 陈杭, 胡晓川, 杨金松. 肩袖损伤保守治疗失败的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 129-134.
[6] 陈国栋, 郑美妍, 张峻, 曾一鸣. 肩袖损伤合并肩关节粘连:一期松解修补还是先松解后修补?[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 122-128.
[7] 张元桢, 张艺, 薛超, 蔡秋晨, 程飚. 肩袖损伤患者关节镜修补术后的预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 3-6.
[8] 王洋, 刘俐惠, 刘伟, 田红梅, 毛永鹏, 李旭阳, 曹冉, 王振威, 艾笛, 张腾, 毛子木, 姜双鹏. ERAS理念早期康复的医护患新模式在肩袖损伤关节镜术后的临床效果研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 360-364.
[9] 董志辉, 徐建杰, 季伟, 毕伟东, 李洁冰, 张立兴, 武建忠. 肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 325-330.
[10] 何勇, 唐晓野, 毛剑莹, 张杰超. 肩袖修补术后导引训练对冈上肌形态影响的肌骨超声研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 212-219.
[11] 梁洁浩, 高大伟, 陈亮, 吴微. 早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤术后中-长期影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 220-228.
[12] 居家宝, 刘洋, 陈建海, 马明太, 张一翀, 张子宵, 张殿英. 复杂性肩关节脱位术后功能分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 154-158.
[13] 王红莉, 张妍, 居家宝, 张艳, 李立, 陈建海. 肩袖损伤患者术前焦虑状况与肩关节镜术后疼痛的相关性分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 38-41.
[14] 杨泽政, 许苑晶, 柳毅浩, 李涛, 刘至原, 江川, 王金武, 戴尅戎. 肩袖间隙滑移修补结合渐进式康复治疗巨大肩袖损伤[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 30-37.
[15] 王帅, 王素平, 宋涛. 富血小板血浆在肩袖损伤治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 374-379.
阅读次数
全文


摘要