切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (02) : 115 -120. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2024.02.004

论著

肩周肌群的抗阻力量训练对肩袖损伤患者术后功能恢复及预后质量的影响
郭丹1,()   
  1. 1. 015000 巴彦淖尔市医院康复科
  • 收稿日期:2024-01-03 出版日期:2024-05-05
  • 通信作者: 郭丹

Effect of resistance strength training of perishoulder muscles on functional recovery and prognostic quality of patients with rotator cuff injury after surgery

Dan Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation, Bayannur City Hospital, Bayannur 015000, China
  • Received:2024-01-03 Published:2024-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Dan Guo
引用本文:

郭丹. 肩周肌群的抗阻力量训练对肩袖损伤患者术后功能恢复及预后质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 115-120.

Dan Guo. Effect of resistance strength training of perishoulder muscles on functional recovery and prognostic quality of patients with rotator cuff injury after surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(02): 115-120.

目的

分析肩周肌群的抗阻力量训练对肩袖损伤患者术后功能恢复及预后质量的影响。

方法

选择在本院行手术治疗的肩袖损伤患者90例,纳入时间为2020年1月至2023年6月,随机数字表法分为对照组(n=45)、观察组(n=45),对照组给予常规围术期护理,观察组在对照组基础上给予肩周肌群的抗阻力量训练,比较两组患者肩关节功能优良率,比较两组患者治疗前、治疗后1个月、治疗后3个月肩关节功能恢复情况[肩关节功能评分(constant-murley score,CMS)],比较两组患者治疗前、治疗后3个月肩关节活动度和生活质量评分。

结果

对照组、观察组患者肩关节功能优良率分别为77.78%、93.33%,观察组肩关节功能优良率明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后1个月、3个月时间点中,观察组患者CMS评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后3个月,观察组患者前屈、外展、外旋、内旋活动度明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后3个月,观察组患者生理、心理、社会关系、环境各维度评分明显高于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

肩周肌群的抗阻力量训练可有效提高肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复效果,改善肩关节活动能力,增强患者生活质量,可推广应用。

Background

Rotator cuff injury, one of the common shoulder joint diseases in the clinic, refers to the injury of tendons, muscles, ligaments, and other tissue structures around the shoulder joint. There are various treatment methods for rotator cuff injury, among which surgical treatment is the most common and effective. However, postoperative functional recovery has become the focus of patients and doctors, and how to improve patients' postoperative quality of life and promote functional recovery has become an essential topic of current research. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR) is a commonly used surgical method for treating and repairing rotator cuff injuries. However, patients' postoperative shoulder mobility and function are still limited to a certain extent, so postoperative rehabilitation exercises are of great significance for improving shoulder function. The importance of rehabilitation after rotator cuff injury is self-evident. Conversely, postoperative rehabilitation can help joint fluid circulation, reduce swelling, and prevent joint adhesion. On the other hand, rehabilitation training can stimulate muscle growth, increase muscle strength, and improve joint stability, thereby improving patients' quality of life. However, in the process of postoperative rehabilitation, patients often face many problems, such as pain, limited joint activity, and decreased muscle strength, which seriously affect the rehabilitation process of patients. Therefore, exploring an effective method to improve patients functional recovery and quality of life after surgery is of great significance. Resistance strength training is a kind of resistance training and activity mode of muscle tissue, which can effectively improve the resistance ability of the trainer's muscles and is also a standard mode of sports training and rehabilitation. It has been applied significantly after hip surgery, but there are few studies on the influence of resistance training of the perishoulder muscle group on the postoperative function of patients with postoperative rotator cuff injury.

Objective

To analyze the effect of resistance strength training of shoulder muscles on functional recovery and prognostic quality of patients with rotator cuff injury after surgery.

Methods

A total of 90 patients with rotator cuff injury who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital were selected from January 2020 to June 2023 and were divided into conventional group (n=45) and resistance group (n=45) by random number table method. The conventional group was given routine perioperative nursing, and the resistance group was given resistance strength training for the shoulder muscle group based on the conventional group. The excellent and good rates of shoulder joint function between the two groups were compared, and the recovery of shoulder joint function between the two groups before treatment, one month after treatment, and three months after treatment [shoulder joint function score (CMS) ] was compared, and the scores of shoulder joint motion and quality of life between the two groups were compared before treatment and three months after treatment.

Results

The excellent and good rates of shoulder joint function in the conventional and anti-resistance groups were 77.78% and 93.33%, respectively. The excellent and good rates of shoulder joint function in the anti-resistance group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group (P<0.05). At the time points of 1 month and three months after treatment, the CMS score of the anti-resistance group was significantly higher than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). Three months after treatment, the activity of flexion, abduction, external rotation, and internal rotation in the resistance group was significantly higher than in the conventional group (P<0.05). After three months of treatment, WHOQOL-BREF scores of patients in the anti-resistance group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group regarding physiological, psychological, social, and environmental dimensions (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

The resistance strength training of the perishoulder muscle group can effectively improve the functional recovery effect of the shoulder joint in patients with rotator cuff injury after surgery, improve the mobility of the shoulder joint, and enhance the quality of life of patients, and can be widely applied.

表1 两组患者肩关节功能优良率[例(%)]
表2 两组患者肩关节功能恢复情况(分,±s
表3 两组患者肩关节活动度比较(°,±s
表4 两组患者生活质量比较(分,±s
[1]
Fitzpatrick LA, Atinga A, White L, et al. Rotator Cuff Injury and Repair[J]. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol,2022,26(5):585-596.
[2]
Doiron-Cadrin P, Lafrance S, Saulnier M, et al. Shoulder Rotator Cuff Disorders: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines and Semantic Analyses of Recommendations[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2020,101(7):1233-1242.
[3]
Patel M, Amini MH. Management of Acute Rotator Cuff Tears[J]. Orthop Clin North Am,2022,53(1):69-76.
[4]
Matlak S, Andrews A, Looney A, et al. Postoperative Rehabilitation of Rotator Cuff Repair: A Systematic Review[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2021,29(2):119-129.
[5]
冯倩茜,隆海红.抗阻训练改善颈椎后路术后病人轴性症状的效果[J].护理研究, 2022, 36(23):4296-4299.
[6]
Santos LV, Pereira ET, Reguera-García MM, et al. Resistance Training and Muscle Strength in people with Spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Bodyw Mov Ther,2022, 29(1):154-160.
[7]
王欢,蔡华安,张淑云,等.早期下床活动联合髋部周围肌肉抗阻训练对老年全髋关节置换术后患者髋关节功能和生活质量的影响[J].现代生物医学进展,2022,22(15):2986-2989.
[8]
胡玲,吴梦娇,唐梅,等.下肢可调负重支具训练联合渐进性抗阻运动训练对股骨粗隆间骨折术后患者康复效果,髋关节功能和生活质量的影响[J].现代生物医学进展, 2023, 23(6):1155-1159.
[9]
Thamyongkit S, Wanitchanont T, Chulsomlee K, et al. The University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder scale: translation, reliability and validation of a Thai version of UCLA shoulder scale in rotator cuff tear patients[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2022,23(1):65.
[10]
Zhou A, Xu S, Yew KSA, et al. Minimal Clinically Important Differences for Oxford, Constant, and University of California Los Angeles Shoulder Scores After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty to Allow Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Future Statistical Power Analyses[J]. Arthroscopy, 2023,39(6):1405-1414.
[11]
Ilić I, Šipetić S, Grujičić J, et al. Psychometric Properties of the World Health Organization’s Quality of Life (WHOQOL-BREF) Questionnaire in Medical Students[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2019,55(12):772.
[12]
Plancher KD, Shanmugam J, Briggs K, et al. Diagnosis and Management of Partial Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Comprehensive Review[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2021,29(24):1031-1043.
[13]
Zhao J, Luo M, Pan J, et al. Risk factors affecting rotator cuff retear after arthroscopic repair: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2021,30(11):2660-2670.
[14]
Turner MN, Hernandez DO, Cade W, et al. The Role of Resistance Training Dosing on Pain and Physical Function in Individuals With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review[J]. Sports Health, 2020,12(2):200-206.
[15]
Carvalho L, Junior RM, Barreira J, et al. Muscle hypertrophy and strength gains after resistance training with different volume-matched loads: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab, 2022,47(4):357-368.
[16]
de Oliveira NT, Lopez P, Severo-Silveira L, et al. Dose-response effect of lower limb resistance training volume on pain and function of women with patellofemoral pain: A systematic review and meta-regression[J]. Phys Ther Sport,2023,63(1):95-103.
[17]
Grgic J, Schoenfeld BJ, Mikulic P. Effects of plyometric vs. resistance training on skeletal muscle hypertrophy: A review[J]. J Sport Health Sci, 2021,10(5):530-536.
[18]
Vincent KR, Vincent HK. Concentric and Eccentric Resistance Training Comparison on Physical Function and Functional Pain Outcomes in Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Controlled Trial[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 2020,99(10):932-940.
[19]
黄海娟.62例快速康复理念在肩关节镜治疗肩袖损伤术后护理中的应用价值分析[J].结直肠肛门外科, 2020, 26(S01):85-86.
[20]
吴志峰,路莹,唐子滨,等.肩周肌群训练联合发散式冲击波治疗肩峰下撞击综合征临床疗效[J].临床军医杂志,2021,49(3):350-351.
[21]
许新旋,杨龙飞,蒋苏,等.渐进性抗阻运动训练在老年股骨粗隆间骨折内固定术后患者中的应用效果[J].中国医药导报, 2021, 18(9):99-103.
[1] 钟锴, 蒋铁民, 张瑞青, 吐尔干艾力·阿吉, 邵英梅, 郭强. 加速康复外科在肝囊型棘球蚴病肝切除术中的应用分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 425-429.
[2] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[3] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[4] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[5] 赵丽霞, 王春霞, 陈一锋, 胡东平, 张维胜, 王涛, 张洪来. 内脏型肥胖对腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后早期并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 35-39.
[6] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[7] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[8] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[9] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[10] 李代勤, 刘佩杰. 动态增强磁共振评估中晚期低位直肠癌同步放化疗后疗效及预后的价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 100-103.
[11] 韩加刚, 王振军. 梗阻性左半结肠癌的治疗策略[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 450-458.
[12] 董佳, 王坤, 张莉. 预后营养指数结合免疫球蛋白、血糖及甲胎蛋白对HBV 相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者治疗后预后不良的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 555-559.
[13] 王景明, 王磊, 许小多, 邢文强, 张兆岩, 黄伟敏. 腰椎椎旁肌的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 846-852.
[14] 吴荣奎, 吴静, 冯俊浩, 钟嘉懿. 临床护理路径在经股动脉入路介入患者的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 729-733.
[15] 郭曌蓉, 王歆光, 刘毅强, 何英剑, 王立泽, 杨飏, 汪星, 曹威, 谷重山, 范铁, 李金锋, 范照青. 不同亚型乳腺叶状肿瘤的临床病理特征及预后危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 524-532.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?