切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -25. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.01.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩
束昊1, 袁滨1, 黄瑶1, 何兵1, 王磊1, 王芳1, 孙鲁宁1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京中医药大学附属医院运动医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 出版日期:2020-02-05
  • 通信作者: 孙鲁宁
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(BK20191505)

Treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder with arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release via double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach

Hao Shu1, Bin Yuan1, Yao Huang1, Bing He1, Lei Wang1, Fang Wang1, Luning Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Institute of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2019-07-01 Published:2020-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Luning Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Luning,Email:
引用本文:

束昊, 袁滨, 黄瑶, 何兵, 王磊, 王芳, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 21-25.

Hao Shu, Bin Yuan, Yao Huang, Bing He, Lei Wang, Fang Wang, Luning Sun. Treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder with arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release via double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 21-25.

目的

研究肩关节镜双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩的临床效果。

方法

2013年1月至2016年12月南京中医药大学附属医院对16例重度原发性冻结肩患者行关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解术,男2例、女14例,平均年龄46.6岁,左肩4例、右肩12例。所有患者术前均拍摄肩关节正位片、冈上肌出口位X线片和肩关节MRI检查,全部患者均行双后入路关节镜下盂肱关节囊松解术,所有病例均同时行肩峰下滑囊清理术,分别在术前和末次随访时采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Constant-Murley评分和美国加利福尼亚大学(University of California, Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节评分标准进行评价。

结果

随访时间10~37个月,平均26个月。术前、术后即刻和末次随访平均UCLA评分分别为(10.3±3.2)分、(28.2±3.3)分和(31.2±5.3)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);平均Constant-Murley评分为(38.3±4.2)分、(89.2±4.5)分和(95.2±3.3)分;VAS评分平均为(6.3±1.9)分、(1.3±0.3)分和(1.0±0.2)分(P<0.01)。所有患者均对手术效果表示满意。

结论

关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩,便于术中操作,可以显著地缓解疼痛、恢复肩关节功能。关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解为治疗重度原发性冻结肩提供有效方法。

Background

Frozen shoulder is a common clinical disease of shoulder joint, which occurs frequently in women around 50 years old. The incidence of normal people is about 2% - 5%. Frozen shoulder is a multiple bursal disease, involving glenohumeral joint capsule, subacromial or deltoid muscle, bursa of long head tendon of biceps brachii, etc. The early lesions were hyperemia, edema and exudation of the bursa. Therefore, the early treatment of this disease is mainly conservative. With the functional exercise and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, most of the patients can obtain satisfactory results after conservative treatment within 6 months; for patients who fail to respond to conservative treatment, arthroscopic release is an effective treatment method. However, in clinical arthroscopic release, for a few severe patients, the glenohumeral joint adhesion is severe and the joint space is extremely narrow. It is not only difficult to complete manual release under preoperative anesthesia, but also impossible for arthroscopy to enter the glenohumeral joint space through posterior approach. At this point, it is necessary to use double posterior approaches to release the glenohumeral joint capsule under arthroscopy. Objective To study the effectiveness of shoulder arthroscopic double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach in the treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder.

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2016, 16 patients with severe primary frozen shoulder underwent arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release through double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach. There were 2 males and 14 females (4 left shoulders and 12 right shoulders) with an average age of 46.6 years. Six patients had a history of diabetes mellitus. Two patients had a history of hypothyroidism. X-ray films of shoulder joint and supraspinatus outlet as well as shoulder MRI were taken before operation. All patients underwent arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release through double posterior approaches and subacromial decompression as well. VAS pain score, Constant-Murley score and UCLA score were used for assessment before operation and at the final follow-up after operation.

Results

The follow-up time w as 10-37 months with an average of 26 months. The mean UCLA scores before and after operation and at the last follow-up were (10.3±3.2) , (28.2±3.3) and (31.2±5.3) . The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01) . The mean Constant-Murley scores were (38.3±4.2) , (89.2±4.5) and (95.2±3.3) (P<0.01) . The mean VAS scores were (6.3±1.9) , (1.3±0.3) and (1.0±0.2) (P<0.01) . There were 12 excellent cases and 4 good cases. All patients were satisfied with the results of operation.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic glenohumeral joint release through double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach is an effective method for treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder.

图1 术前MRI检查
图2 术中见盂肱关节极度狭窄
图3 双后入路体表标记,白色箭头为常规后入路,蓝色箭头为后下入路
表1 患者术前及末次随访肩关节功能评分比较(分,±s)
图4 松解下方关节囊
[1]
Balci TO,Turk AC,Sahin F,et al.Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound in treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial[J].J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2018,31(5): 955-961.
[2]
Georgiannos D, Markopoulos G, Devetzi E,et al. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. is there consensus regarding the treatment? a comprehensive review[J].Open Orthop J,2017, 28(11): 65-76.
[3]
D’Orsi GM, Via AG, Frizziero A, et al. Treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a review[J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J,2012, 2(2): 70-78.
[4]
Tarang KJ, Sharma KN. The effectiveness of physiotherapeutic interventions in treatment of frozen shoulder adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review[J]. J Back Musculosklet Rehabil, 2014,27(3): 247-273.
[5]
Rostami HR, Arefi A, Tabatabaei S, et al. Effect of mirror therapy on hand function in patients with hand orthopaedic injuries: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2013,35(19): 1647-1651.
[6]
Neviaser AS, Hannafin JA. Adhesive capsulitis: a review of current treatment[J]. Am J Sports Med,2010,38(11): 2346-2356.
[7]
Ewald A. Adhesive capsulitis: a review[J]. Am Fam Physician,2011,83(4), 417-422.
[8]
Struyf F, Meeus M.Current evidence on physical therapy in 351 patients with adhesive capsulitis: what are we missing?[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2014,33(5): 593-600.
[9]
Tsai MJ, Ho WP, Chen CH, et al.Arthroscopic extended rotator interval release for treating refractory adhesive capsulitis[J].J Orthop Surg ,2017,25(1): 1-7.
[10]
Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, et al. Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2008,17(5): 231-236.
[11]
Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Pritsch M, et al. Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2004,13(1): 5-12.
[12]
Gallacher S,Beazley JC,Evans J, et al.A randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic capsular release versus hydrodilatation in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2018,27(8): 1401-1406.
[13]
Le Lievre HM, Murrell GA.Long-term outcomes after arthroscopic capsular release for idiopathic adhesive capsulitis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2012,94(13): 1208-1216.
[14]
Barbosa F,Swamy G,Salem H, et al. Chronic adhesive capsulitis(Frozen shoulder): comparative outcomes of treatment in patients with diabetes and obesity[J].J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019,10(2): 265-268.
[15]
Walch G,Edwards TB,Boulahia A,et al. Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears:clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2005,14(3): 238-246.
[16]
Smith CD, Hamer P, Bunker TD,et al. Arthroscopic capsular release for idiopathic frozen shoulder with intra-articular injection and a controlled manipulation[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Eng,2014,96(1): 55-60.
[17]
Smitherman JA, Struk AM, Cricchio M, et al. Arthroscopy and manipulation versus home therapy program in treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study[J]. J Surg Orthop Adv, 2015,24(1): 69-74.
[18]
Pearsall AW, Osbahr DC, Speer KP, et al.An arthroscopic technique for treating patients with frozen shoulder[J].Arthroscopy,1999, 15(1): 2-11.
[19]
Chen J, Chen S, Li Y, et al. Is the extended release of the inferior glenohumeral ligamentnecessary for frozen shoulder[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(4): 529-535.
[20]
Roh YH, Yi SR, Noh JH, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ,2012,20(10): 1947-1952.
[1] 蔡雨琦, 史尉利, 陶立元, 曹建夫, 崔国庆, 杨渝平. 支持带松解联合外侧成形治疗髌骨外侧过度挤压综合征[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 186-192.
[2] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-246.
[3] 黄彩英, 陈萍, 潘杰, 莫彩云, 尚敏红, 周俊. 紫杉醇治疗胸腺鳞癌致大疱性表皮松解坏死性药疹救治成功一例[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 442-444.
[4] 刘颂, 张喜成, 孙元, 黄献琛, 卢杏生. 腹腔镜治疗中弓韧带压迫综合征[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(06): 370-375.
[5] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[6] 林健, 韩晓玲, 黄建华, 吴剑宏, 翁诗阳, 吴晓明. 肩关节镜手术技能训练中同伴协作学习与个体学习教学效果的对照研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 350-354.
[7] 白志钢, 新苏雅拉图, 谢迎光, 奥其. 肘关节僵硬手术松解治疗的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 175-180.
[8] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[9] 刘佳琳, 王晓宁, 黄晓虹, 刘佳, 李亘, 严彬. 新型患肢固定牵引带在肩关节镜手术侧卧牵引位中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 122-127.
[10] 蒋梦洁, 钱治军, 徐思, 梁伟. 低强度脉冲超声波治疗冻结肩模型兔的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 30-34.
[11] 李朋, 吴剑波, 王东, 赵峰, 田伟, 常峰, 张宇明. 关节镜治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴纤维性Bankart损伤的疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 12-17.
[12] 戴伟川, 郭协力, 方仲宁, 蔡文华, 洪天生, 田夏阳. 显微镜下周围神经松解术治疗腰椎间盘突出症术后残余神经症状的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 84-90.
[13] 肖丹, 陈辰, 查晔军, 公茂琪, 花克涵, 孙伟桐, 蒋协远. 改良松解术治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的疗效及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-263.
[14] 常文利, 刘亚芳, 宿晓雷, 陈广先, 张学磊, 赵建勇. 尺神经原位松解术与松解皮下前移术治疗中度肘管综合征的前瞻性对比研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 111-116.
[15] 崔子豪, 阳跃, 冯光, 郝岱峰, 庹晓晔. Stevens-Johnson综合征/中毒性表皮坏死松解症六例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 30-34.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?