切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -25. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.01.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩
束昊1, 袁滨1, 黄瑶1, 何兵1, 王磊1, 王芳1, 孙鲁宁1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京中医药大学附属医院运动医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-01 出版日期:2020-02-05
  • 通信作者: 孙鲁宁
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省自然科学基金面上项目(BK20191505)

Treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder with arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release via double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach

Hao Shu1, Bin Yuan1, Yao Huang1, Bing He1, Lei Wang1, Fang Wang1, Luning Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Institute of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2019-07-01 Published:2020-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Luning Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Luning,Email:
引用本文:

束昊, 袁滨, 黄瑶, 何兵, 王磊, 王芳, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 21-25.

Hao Shu, Bin Yuan, Yao Huang, Bing He, Lei Wang, Fang Wang, Luning Sun. Treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder with arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release via double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(01): 21-25.

目的

研究肩关节镜双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩的临床效果。

方法

2013年1月至2016年12月南京中医药大学附属医院对16例重度原发性冻结肩患者行关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解术,男2例、女14例,平均年龄46.6岁,左肩4例、右肩12例。所有患者术前均拍摄肩关节正位片、冈上肌出口位X线片和肩关节MRI检查,全部患者均行双后入路关节镜下盂肱关节囊松解术,所有病例均同时行肩峰下滑囊清理术,分别在术前和末次随访时采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Constant-Murley评分和美国加利福尼亚大学(University of California, Los Angeles,UCLA)肩关节评分标准进行评价。

结果

随访时间10~37个月,平均26个月。术前、术后即刻和末次随访平均UCLA评分分别为(10.3±3.2)分、(28.2±3.3)分和(31.2±5.3)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);平均Constant-Murley评分为(38.3±4.2)分、(89.2±4.5)分和(95.2±3.3)分;VAS评分平均为(6.3±1.9)分、(1.3±0.3)分和(1.0±0.2)分(P<0.01)。所有患者均对手术效果表示满意。

结论

关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解治疗重度原发性冻结肩,便于术中操作,可以显著地缓解疼痛、恢复肩关节功能。关节镜下双后入路结合前方入路盂肱关节囊松解为治疗重度原发性冻结肩提供有效方法。

Background

Frozen shoulder is a common clinical disease of shoulder joint, which occurs frequently in women around 50 years old. The incidence of normal people is about 2% - 5%. Frozen shoulder is a multiple bursal disease, involving glenohumeral joint capsule, subacromial or deltoid muscle, bursa of long head tendon of biceps brachii, etc. The early lesions were hyperemia, edema and exudation of the bursa. Therefore, the early treatment of this disease is mainly conservative. With the functional exercise and the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, most of the patients can obtain satisfactory results after conservative treatment within 6 months; for patients who fail to respond to conservative treatment, arthroscopic release is an effective treatment method. However, in clinical arthroscopic release, for a few severe patients, the glenohumeral joint adhesion is severe and the joint space is extremely narrow. It is not only difficult to complete manual release under preoperative anesthesia, but also impossible for arthroscopy to enter the glenohumeral joint space through posterior approach. At this point, it is necessary to use double posterior approaches to release the glenohumeral joint capsule under arthroscopy. Objective To study the effectiveness of shoulder arthroscopic double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach in the treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder.

Methods

From January 2013 to December 2016, 16 patients with severe primary frozen shoulder underwent arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release through double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach. There were 2 males and 14 females (4 left shoulders and 12 right shoulders) with an average age of 46.6 years. Six patients had a history of diabetes mellitus. Two patients had a history of hypothyroidism. X-ray films of shoulder joint and supraspinatus outlet as well as shoulder MRI were taken before operation. All patients underwent arthroscopic glenohumeral capsule release through double posterior approaches and subacromial decompression as well. VAS pain score, Constant-Murley score and UCLA score were used for assessment before operation and at the final follow-up after operation.

Results

The follow-up time w as 10-37 months with an average of 26 months. The mean UCLA scores before and after operation and at the last follow-up were (10.3±3.2) , (28.2±3.3) and (31.2±5.3) . The difference was statistically significant (P<0.01) . The mean Constant-Murley scores were (38.3±4.2) , (89.2±4.5) and (95.2±3.3) (P<0.01) . The mean VAS scores were (6.3±1.9) , (1.3±0.3) and (1.0±0.2) (P<0.01) . There were 12 excellent cases and 4 good cases. All patients were satisfied with the results of operation.

Conclusions

Arthroscopic glenohumeral joint release through double posterior approaches combined with anterior approach is an effective method for treatment of severe primary frozen shoulder.

图1 术前MRI检查
图2 术中见盂肱关节极度狭窄
图3 双后入路体表标记,白色箭头为常规后入路,蓝色箭头为后下入路
表1 患者术前及末次随访肩关节功能评分比较(分,±s)
图4 松解下方关节囊
[1]
Balci TO,Turk AC,Sahin F,et al.Efficacy of therapeutic ultrasound in treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a prospective double blind placebo-controlled randomized trial[J].J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil, 2018,31(5): 955-961.
[2]
Georgiannos D, Markopoulos G, Devetzi E,et al. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. is there consensus regarding the treatment? a comprehensive review[J].Open Orthop J,2017, 28(11): 65-76.
[3]
D’Orsi GM, Via AG, Frizziero A, et al. Treatment of adhesive capsulitis: a review[J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J,2012, 2(2): 70-78.
[4]
Tarang KJ, Sharma KN. The effectiveness of physiotherapeutic interventions in treatment of frozen shoulder adhesive capsulitis: a systematic review[J]. J Back Musculosklet Rehabil, 2014,27(3): 247-273.
[5]
Rostami HR, Arefi A, Tabatabaei S, et al. Effect of mirror therapy on hand function in patients with hand orthopaedic injuries: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Disabil Rehabil, 2013,35(19): 1647-1651.
[6]
Neviaser AS, Hannafin JA. Adhesive capsulitis: a review of current treatment[J]. Am J Sports Med,2010,38(11): 2346-2356.
[7]
Ewald A. Adhesive capsulitis: a review[J]. Am Fam Physician,2011,83(4), 417-422.
[8]
Struyf F, Meeus M.Current evidence on physical therapy in 351 patients with adhesive capsulitis: what are we missing?[J]. Clin Rheumatol, 2014,33(5): 593-600.
[9]
Tsai MJ, Ho WP, Chen CH, et al.Arthroscopic extended rotator interval release for treating refractory adhesive capsulitis[J].J Orthop Surg ,2017,25(1): 1-7.
[10]
Hand C, Clipsham K, Rees JL, et al. Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2008,17(5): 231-236.
[11]
Habermeyer P, Magosch P, Pritsch M, et al. Anterosuperior impingement of the shoulder as a result of pulley lesions: a prospective arthroscopic study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2004,13(1): 5-12.
[12]
Gallacher S,Beazley JC,Evans J, et al.A randomized controlled trial of arthroscopic capsular release versus hydrodilatation in the treatment of primary frozen shoulder[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2018,27(8): 1401-1406.
[13]
Le Lievre HM, Murrell GA.Long-term outcomes after arthroscopic capsular release for idiopathic adhesive capsulitis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2012,94(13): 1208-1216.
[14]
Barbosa F,Swamy G,Salem H, et al. Chronic adhesive capsulitis(Frozen shoulder): comparative outcomes of treatment in patients with diabetes and obesity[J].J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019,10(2): 265-268.
[15]
Walch G,Edwards TB,Boulahia A,et al. Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears:clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2005,14(3): 238-246.
[16]
Smith CD, Hamer P, Bunker TD,et al. Arthroscopic capsular release for idiopathic frozen shoulder with intra-articular injection and a controlled manipulation[J]. Ann R Coll Surg Eng,2014,96(1): 55-60.
[17]
Smitherman JA, Struk AM, Cricchio M, et al. Arthroscopy and manipulation versus home therapy program in treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study[J]. J Surg Orthop Adv, 2015,24(1): 69-74.
[18]
Pearsall AW, Osbahr DC, Speer KP, et al.An arthroscopic technique for treating patients with frozen shoulder[J].Arthroscopy,1999, 15(1): 2-11.
[19]
Chen J, Chen S, Li Y, et al. Is the extended release of the inferior glenohumeral ligamentnecessary for frozen shoulder[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(4): 529-535.
[20]
Roh YH, Yi SR, Noh JH, et al. Intra-articular corticosteroid injection in diabetic patients with adhesive capsulitis: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ,2012,20(10): 1947-1952.
[1] 陈祥慧, 杨静, 朱亚琼, 陈思明, 王月香, 唐杰. 超声引导经肩袖间隙注射治疗冻结肩的临床研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 311-316.
[2] 李杨, 宁雅婵, 郭连瑞, 佟铸, 李立强, 孟良, 谷涌泉. 腘动脉松解术治疗腘动脉陷迫综合征一例并文献复习[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(03): 273-275.
[3] 《造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术》编审委员会, 《中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版)》编辑委员会, 全国卫生产业企业管理协会疝和腹壁外科产业及临床研究分会造口旁疝专家组. 造口旁疝专家微共识:腹膜外Sugarbaker修补技术[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 243-246.
[4] 黄彩英, 陈萍, 潘杰, 莫彩云, 尚敏红, 周俊. 紫杉醇治疗胸腺鳞癌致大疱性表皮松解坏死性药疹救治成功一例[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(03): 442-444.
[5] 白志钢, 新苏雅拉图, 谢迎光, 奥其. 肘关节僵硬手术松解治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 175-180.
[6] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[7] 刘佳琳, 王晓宁, 黄晓虹, 刘佳, 李亘, 严彬. 新型患肢固定牵引带在肩关节镜手术侧卧牵引位中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 122-127.
[8] 吴宇顺, 刘诗滦, 卓鸿武, 肖靖, 潘玲, 李坚. 氨甲环酸对肩关节镜手术疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 63-70.
[9] 蒋梦洁, 钱治军, 徐思, 梁伟. 低强度脉冲超声波治疗冻结肩模型兔的实验研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 30-34.
[10] 李朋, 吴剑波, 王东, 赵峰, 田伟, 常峰, 张宇明. 关节镜治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴纤维性Bankart损伤的疗效研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 12-17.
[11] 新苏雅拉图, 刘峰, 高雨, 高晓宇, 谢迎光. 关节镜松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的疗效观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 239-243.
[12] 魏澜, 王泓巍, 杨仁豪, 宋艳艳, 刘敬锋, 王蕾, 王晓宁, 庄澄宇. 肩关节镜术中低体温情况的观察性研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 154-161.
[13] 王伟, 李世英, 郭晓平, 张桐桐, 高星, 孟玉凤, 贾芳莹. 坚骨胶囊联合关节镜和尺神经松解术治疗肘关节骨关节炎伴尺神经卡压综合征的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 141-147.
[14] 陈国栋, 郑美妍, 张峻, 曾一鸣. 肩袖损伤合并肩关节粘连:一期松解修补还是先松解后修补?[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 122-128.
[15] 薛庆云, 赵立连, 徐旭阳, 郑其开, 傅志俭, 张元民, 王延秀, 熊晓扬, 许亚男, 石磊, 王飞. 奇正消痛贴膏治疗渐冻期冻结肩的多中心随机对照临床试验[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 352-359.
阅读次数
全文


摘要