切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 47 -53. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2018.01.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

经典孔隙结构钛合金内置物在兔肱骨近端大结节处骨长入的初步组织学研究
薛喆1, 宋关阳1, 李奉龙1, 姜春岩1,()   
  1. 1. 100035 北京积水潭医院运动损伤科
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-29 出版日期:2018-02-05
  • 通信作者: 姜春岩
  • 基金资助:
    北京市医院管理局临床医学发展专项经费资助(XMLX201511); 北京市优秀人才培养资助工作,青年骨干项目(2016000021469G178); 北京市科学技术委员会课题(Z141107002514001); 北京市自然科学基金项目(7142074)

Preliminary histological study on bone- ingrowth Characteristics of titanium metal of classical pore structure in the greater tuberosity of proximal humerus in rabbits

Zhe Xue1, Guanyang Song1, Fenglong Li1, Chunyan Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing 100035, China
  • Received:2017-06-29 Published:2018-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Chunyan Jiang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Jiang Chunyan, Email:
引用本文:

薛喆, 宋关阳, 李奉龙, 姜春岩. 经典孔隙结构钛合金内置物在兔肱骨近端大结节处骨长入的初步组织学研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 47-53.

Zhe Xue, Guanyang Song, Fenglong Li, Chunyan Jiang. Preliminary histological study on bone- ingrowth Characteristics of titanium metal of classical pore structure in the greater tuberosity of proximal humerus in rabbits[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(01): 47-53.

目的

建立兔肱骨近端生物型内置物植入模型,进行随时间演变内置物骨长入情况的组织学研究。

方法

建立肱骨近端经典孔隙结构即正六面体孔隙结构的钛合金内置物植入模型,将15只骨骼成熟雄兔随机分为3组,分别于建模后3、6、12周对肱骨近端内置物植入部分进行取材、切片及甲苯胺蓝染色,观察随着时间的演变内置物中骨长入的情况。

结果

在对15个样本进行定性观察后发现随着时间的进展,内置物空隙内的骨质在不断的增长,骨长入面积在不断的扩大。组织学定量分析发现3周与6周雄兔的骨长入面积百分比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),而3周与12周以及6周与12周相比差异均有统计学意义(P <0.05),且总体在12周内,骨长入面积百分比与时间成对数关系。

结论

随着时间的推移,兔肱骨近端长入生物型钛合金内置物的骨质不断增加,且在12周内,骨长入面积百分比与时间成对数关系,骨长入速度逐渐变慢。

Background

The postoperative nonunion of greater tuberosity is the most common complication after the treatment of complex proximal humeral fracture with traditional shoulder prosthesis replacement, which severely affects shoulder joint function and reduces operative effect. Currently, the porous-coated prosthesis applied in clinic has several defects, such as low porosity, interfacial shear force between coating and prosthetic frame space, galvanic effect, etc., which can affect bone ingrowth and reduce biological fixation strength. However, the titanium alloy biological implant with classical regular hexahedral pore structure made by electron beam melting can overcome the shortcomings of traditional coated prosthesis and further improve the effect of bone ingrowth theoretically.In this study, the New Zealand rabbit was used for experiment. The classic pore structure, namely the titanium alloy biological implant with regular hexahedral pore structure, was implanted into greater tuberosity. With the help of histological research, the purpose of this study includes the confirmations of whether the titanium alloy of classical pore structure has the potential of bone ingrowth over time; what are the histological characteristics over time. This study can provide theoretical basis and evidential support for the application of titanium alloy biological implant in the field of shoulder surgery and the design of artificial shoulder prosthesis for enhancing the healing of greater tuberosity.

Methods

(1) Design: animal modeling observation. Time and location: it was completed in the animal laboratory of our hospital from May 2015 to November 2016. Materials: 15 adult male New Zealand rabbits of 4 months old (random allocation with three rabbits in each group) . The body weight was 2.41-2.70 kg, and the rabbits were raised in single cage and fed with standard diet. All rabbits were observed preoperatively for 1 week to confirm healthy. The disposal of animal during the experimental process is in conformity with the standard of medical ethics. (2) Methods. Establishment of rabbit proximal humeral biological implant model: The rabbit was given the intramuscular injection of mianmixin II (0.2 ml/kg) for general anesthesia. Afterward, the rabbit was placed in left lateral decubitus. Skin preparation, cleaning, regular disinfection and draping were carried out preoperatively. A 2-cm longitudinal incision was made in the shoulder, and the deltoid muscle was bluntly split to expose greater tuberosity. A 2.0 Kirschner wire was drilled through the center of humeral shaft at the insertion of greater tuberosity, which had an angle of 120° with the long axis of distal humerus. The titanium alloy screw with classic pore structure was inserted through bone tunnel to establish the model of proximal humeral titanium alloy biological implant. Without active hemorrhage, the wound was closed layer by layer. (3) Management after modeling: the rabbits were awakened naturally and fed regularly. They were kept in cage (65 cm × 40 cm × 40 cm) for activity restriction throughout the experiment, and the affected limb was immobilized. Penicillin (4 × 105 U) was injected intramuscularly to prevent infection for the first 3 days after modeling, and the samples were collected randomly and respectively at the 3rd, 6th and 12th week. The bone sample from humeral head to its distal end of 3 cm was kept for use, and all the muscle and soft tissue were removed. The bone sample was fixed with neutral buffered formalin for 48 hours and then dehydrated with gradient alcohol of 70%, 80% and 90% for 7 days and 100% for twice and 2 days per time. Afterward, the samples were infiltrated with Technovit7200VLC UV-curable resin for 1 month to complete photocurable embedding. The slices were made by EXAKT 400 CS/AW micro grinding system, which were cut parallel to humeral shaft with anatomical axis as the center. With about 1 mm set aside in both lateral and medial sides, the bone tissue was cut into slices of approximately 2 mm in thickness for toluidine blue staining. Under optical microscope (Nikon Eclipse 90i; Nikon Instruments, Inc., Melville, NY, USA) , the image acquisition was performed by 4 times magnification. The measurement of bone in growth area was processed and analyzed by Image-Pro Plus software (Media Cybernetics, Silver Spring, MD, USA) . A rectangle that contained the length a of the screw and its width b was made in the sagittal section of the slice, and the total area S0 = a × b. The rectangular area S1 with screws removed was calculated as well as the toluidine blue stained area Six, and the definition of bone in growth area S% = Sx / S1 ×100%. All the histological measurements were performed by the same operator. (4) Major observation indexes. ① Qualitative observation: general situation of bone ingrowth of biological implant with time. ② Quantitative measurement: changes of bone in growth area percentage with time. (5) Statistical analysis.SPSS 20.0 software (SPSS/PC Inc., Chicago, IL) was used for statistical analysis. The data was expressed as mean value ± standard division, and a P value < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. The ANOVA variance analysis was performed to evaluate the difference of bone in growth area percentages in the 3 experimental groups at 3-time points.

Results

(1) Quantitative analysis of experimental animals.All rabbits were in good health after operation, and they all began to take food independently on the same day of modeling. No wound infection or unpredicted death occurred during observation. In the process of modeling, the local anatomical structure of rabbit shoulder joint was similar to that of human being’s, and the anatomical position of surgical approach was relatively constant. The establishment of biological implant model of greater tuberosity was highly repeatable. (2) General change of biological implant bone ingrowth with time. Under the microscopic view of histological staining, the number of chondrocyte in screw gap showed enhancing trend with expanding range of distribution based on the 3-time points of 3rd, 6th and 12th months. (3) Changes of bone ingrowth percentage with time.The histological data showed that the difference of bone ingrowth percentage among 3 groups was statistically significant, and the percentage of bone in growth area of 12th week increased remarkably compared to those of 3rd week (P<0.05) and 6th week (P<0.05) . However, there was no statistical difference between the bone in growth area percentages of 3rd week and 6th week (P>0.05) .Meanwhile, we made the histogram and line chart of bone in growth area percentage of 3-time points. The percentage of bone in growth area and its corresponding time point were used for function fitting, and it was discovered that the bone ingrowth and time were in logarithmic relationship within 3 months. S% = 13.706ln (T) + 5.3095; R2 = 0.9868.

Conclusion

In this study, the histological sections confirmed that the bone in growth area of titanium alloy biological implant with classic pore structure in rabbit proximal humerus increases over time. Within 12 weeks of modeling, the bone in growth area and time were in exponential relationship, and the growth rate slowed down gradually. The results of this study suggest that it is necessary to strictly follow the rehabilitation protocol of active functional exercise after shoulder arthroplasty to reduce the occurrence of postoperative complication in clinic.

图1 骨长入模型建立 图A钝性分离兔三角肌,显露大结节;图B将经典孔隙结构的钛合金螺钉与肱骨远端长轴成约120°打入骨质,建立肱骨近端钛合金生物型内置物植入模型
图2 经典结构钛合金内置物,以正六面体网格为基础单元向周围空间规律排布
图3 螺钉实物图(每刻度为1 mm)
图4 骨长入面积测量,此图为沿螺钉矢状位切割后的组织学切片,其中黑色为螺钉部分(右侧为螺母部分),紫色部分为长入螺钉空隙内的骨质。取可包含螺钉体部的矩形,最长径为a,最宽径为b(黄色示),则总面积S0=a×b,使用Image-Pro Plus软件计算出此矩形中去除螺钉后的总面积S1及可被甲苯胺蓝着色的组织面积Sx,则骨长入面积百分比S%=Sx/S1×100%
图5 不同时间点螺钉骨长入面积情况 图A、B、C分别为3、6、12周时骨长入螺钉孔隙的镜下情况。其中黑色为螺钉部分(右侧为螺母部分),紫色部分为长入螺钉空隙内的骨组织,可见螺钉空隙内软骨细胞数量成正增长趋势,且分布的范围逐渐扩大
表1 15个样本组织学测量结果
表2 三个时间点骨长入面积百分比情况(±s
图6 3、6、12周时骨长入面积百分比比较情况
图7 骨长入面积百分比随时间变化折线图
图8 骨长入面积百分比与时间的函数关系
[1]
Reuther F, Mühlhäusler B, Wahl D, et al. Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: A multicentre analysis[J]. Injury, 2010, 41(6): 606-612.
[2]
Fialka C, Stampfl P, Arbes S, et al. Primary hemiarthroplasty in four-part fractures of the proximal humerus: Randomized trial of two different implant systems[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(2): 210-215.
[3]
Anjum SN, Butt MS. Treatment of comminuted proximal humerus fractures with shoulder hemiarthroplasty in elderly patients[J]. Acta Orthop Belg, 2005, 71(4): 388-395.
[4]
Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Tinsi L, et al. Tuberosity malposition and migration: reasons for poor outcomes after hemiarthroplasty for displaced fractures of the proximal humerus[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2002, 11(5): 401-412.
[5]
Robinson CM, Page RS, Hill RM, et al. Primary hemiarthroplasty for treatment of proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85(7): 1215-1223.
[6]
Kralinger F, Schwaiger R, Wambacher M, et al. Outcome after primary hemiarthroplasty for fracture of the head of the humerus. A retrospective multicentre study of 167 patients[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2004,86(2):217-219.
[7]
Krishnan SG, Bennion PW, Reineck JR. Hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fracture: restoration of the Gothic arch[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2008, 39(4): 441-450.
[8]
Grassi F, Tajana MS. Partial prosthetic replacement of the shoulder in fractures and fracture-dislocations of the proximal humerus[J]. Chir Organi Mov, 2005, 90(2): 179-190.
[9]
朱以明,姜春岩,王满宜.人工肱骨头置换术中大结节与假体背翅间相对位置的解剖学研究[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(20):1427-1429.
[10]
姜春岩,朱以明,鲁谊,等.人工肱骨头置换术中大结节不同固定方式的稳定性研究[J].中华骨科杂志,2006,26(7):459-463.
[11]
姜春岩,朱以明,鲁谊,等.人工肱骨头置换术后大结节影像学改变对肩关节功能的影响[J].中华骨科杂志,2007(27):505-508.
[12]
Reuther F, Muhlhausler B, Wahl D, et al. Functional outcome of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures:A multicentre analysis[J]. Injury, 2010, 41(6): 606-612.
[13]
Brems JJ. Rehabilitation following total shoulder arthroplasty[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1994(307): 70-85.
[14]
Wilcox RB, Arslanian LE, Millett PJ. Rehabilitation following total shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther, 2005, 35(12): 821-836.
[15]
Boardman ND 3rd, Cofield RH, Bengtson KA,et al.Rehabilitation after total shoulder arthroplasty[J].Arthroplasty, 2001, 16(4): 483-486.
[16]
Li F, Zhu Y, Lu Y, et al. Hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures: does a trabecular metal prosthesis make a difference? A prospective, comparative study with a minimum 3-year follow-up[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(10): 1437-1443.
[1] 单磊, 周君琳. 同期修复肩袖撕裂结合锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的特点及疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 211-215.
[2] 乐佳迪, 蔡乐益, 陈思源, 鲁建鹏, 陈龙. 肱骨近端骨折经微创钢板接骨术治疗术后的放射学测量与肩关节功能关系[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 61-68.
[3] 代飞, 向明. 肱骨距螺钉在肱骨近端骨折治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 373-376.
[4] 李明震, 韩勇, 路庆森, 王甫. 肱骨近端骨折中内侧锁定钢板重建内侧柱的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 321-329.
[5] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[6] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[7] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[8] 车娟, 刘俊阳. 肱骨近端骨折围手术期深静脉血栓发生因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 146-149.
[9] 张晓萌, 杨杰, 刘海, 王艳华, 张一翀, 张立佳, 熊晨, 唐缪田, 张殿英. 科研创新就在我们身边[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-6.
[10] 刘兵, 马翔宇, 杨超, 周大鹏. 应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 293-299.
[11] 丁小方, 杨黎黎, 周海涛, 纪坤羽, 杨鹏杰, 杨坤, 吕昊润, 王元利, 付中国. 基于"悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论的老年肱骨近端粉碎骨折术后康复策略探讨[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 232-238.
[12] 张伟, 成冬冬, 崔胜宇, 徐又佳, 刘巍, 丁一, 朱新辉. 两种内固定对中老年肱骨近端合并肱骨干骨折的疗效及功能预后:前瞻性队列研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 207-213.
[13] 何昌军, 马腾, 任程, 李庆达, 路遥, 熊晨, 杨明义, 崔玉, 杨娜, 许毅博, 李明, 李忠, 张堃. 肱骨近端骨折内固定术后影响肩关节功能的因素分析及生活质量的研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 296-303.
[14] 金万通, 薛海鹏, 周大鹏, 刘兵, 纪振钢, 马翔宇, 杨超, 张昊, 韩宁, 宗宇宁, 张咏晧, 马泽方. 3D打印结合PMMA骨水泥髓内支撑技术在老年肱骨近端骨质疏松性骨折中的应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-284.
[15] 杨良栋, 张华泽, 何举仁, 高艳刚, 李栋. 锁定钢板与交锁髓内钉固定治疗老年Neer分型2、3部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 96-103.
阅读次数
全文


摘要