切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (01) : 38 -46. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2018.01.007

所属专题: 总编推荐 文献

论著

改良关节镜双袢法Latarjet术治疗严重骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位
钟名金1, 陆伟2,(), 柳海峰1, 朱伟民2, 欧阳侃1, 彭亮权1, 李皓1, 冯文哲1, 陈康1, 李瑛1, 许鉴1, 王大平2   
  1. 1. 518000 深圳大学第一附属医院运动医学科
    2. 518000 深圳大学第一附属医院运动医学科;518035 深圳市组织工程重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-27 出版日期:2018-02-05
  • 通信作者: 陆伟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省公益研究与能力建设专项基金项目(2015A030401017)

Modified arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with double Endobuttons for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with severe glenoid bone defect

Mingjin Zhong1, Wei Lu2,(), Haifeng Liu1, Weimin Zhu2, Kan Ouyang1, Liangquan Peng1, Hao Li1, Wenzhe Feng1, Kang Chen1, Ying Li1, Jian Xu1, Daping Wang2   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Shenzhen Second People's Hospital) , Shenzhen 518000, China
    2. Department of Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Shenzhen Second People's Hospital) , Shenzhen 518000, China; Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Tissue Engineering, Shenzhen 518035, China
  • Received:2017-04-27 Published:2018-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Wei Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Wei, Email:
引用本文:

钟名金, 陆伟, 柳海峰, 朱伟民, 欧阳侃, 彭亮权, 李皓, 冯文哲, 陈康, 李瑛, 许鉴, 王大平. 改良关节镜双袢法Latarjet术治疗严重骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 06(01): 38-46.

Mingjin Zhong, Wei Lu, Haifeng Liu, Weimin Zhu, Kan Ouyang, Liangquan Peng, Hao Li, Wenzhe Feng, Kang Chen, Ying Li, Jian Xu, Daping Wang. Modified arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with double Endobuttons for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with severe glenoid bone defect[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(01): 38-46.

目的

研究改良关节镜双袢法Latarjet术治疗严重骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位的临床疗效并评估喙突骨块的位置和愈合情况。

方法

2014年10月至2016年10月,深圳大学第一附属医院共收治50例严重伴骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位的患者,年龄15~45岁,平均(27.2±2.1)岁,接受了三入路双袢防旋转固定关节镜下Latarjet手术。通过术后三维CT扫描观察喙突骨块位置及愈合情况。随访时肩关节功能采用美国肩肘外科评分(Amreican shoulder and elbow surgeons,ASES)、ROWE和Walch-Duplay评分系统进行功能评估。

结果

所有患者术后均得到随访,随访时间6~24个月,平均(13.2±3.6)个月,49例患者恢复良好,1例患者因为骨块分离需要进行再次手术固定。骨块位置情况:三维CT上按4:30为骨块中心评估,良好45例、过高2例、过低3例;CT横断位按与关节盂相平评估:良好43例、偏内1例、偏外6例。骨块吸收情况:术后骨块吸收稳定时间2~6个月,平均(3.3±0.6)个月,骨块吸收比率15%~60%,平均(27.5±3.8)%。术后无神经损伤并发症,所有患者在最后随访时骨块均愈合(包括1例翻修)。终末随访时所有患者无主观不稳,客观检查(恐惧试验/再复位试验)阴性。术后ASES评分、ROWE评分和Walch-Duplay评分较术前得到明显改善:ASES评分为(80.2±16.2)分vs.(95.2±5.6)分(P <0.05),ROWE评分为(40.2±9.8)分vs.(94.5±2.7)分(P <0.05),Walch-Duplay评分为(67.5±10.2)分vs.(95.6±3.2)分(P <0.05)。

结论

改良关节镜下双袢法Latarjet术治疗严重伴有骨缺损的复发性肩关节前脱位操作简便,术后喙突骨块位置良好、愈合率高,无神经损伤等并发症,术后临床疗效满意,可作为传统Latarjet术的可靠有效的替代方法。

Background

In 1954, Latarjet firstly reported the open procedure of coracoid transfer with conjoin tendon to anteroinferior glenoid for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. This technology on the one hand, filled in the glenoid bone defect and restored its size; on the other hand, the conjoin tendon and part of the split subscapularis had "sling" effect and enhanced the obstacle of anteroinferior soft tissue, which significantly reduced the recurrence rate of shoulder dislocation.With the continuous improvement of arthroscopic technology, more and more literatures about arthroscopic Latarjet procedure have been reported recently. Compared with traditional open urgery, arthroscopic procedures have such advantages as small invasion, little blood loss, fast recovery, satisfactory curative effect, etc. However, the arthroscopic technique requires a long learning curve and has some certain difficulties. One is that the arthroscopic operation has multiple approaches, especially the medial approach. The biggest potential risk for the complication of nerve injury is that the approaches are too many and too close to the medial side, especially when the course of brachial plexus have mutation. The second is that it is difficult to fix the coracoid fragment parallel to the glenoid surface with screws. This often lead to the poor position of fragment or the impact of screw head on humeral head cartilage, and even cause complications such as screw loosening or withdraw, fragment fracture, fragment nonunion or absorption, etc. In order to simplify the arthroscopic Latarjet procedure, reduce the complications and improve the clinical efficacy, we adopted the modified arthroscopic Latarjet procedure of double Endobuttons anti-rotation fixation with three approaches for the treatment of patients with recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation of severe bone defect. The fragment position and healing was observed by three-dimensional CT scan. We followed up the clinical efficacy and achieved satisfactory results.

Methods

(1) Operation steps.①Coracoid osteotomy and preparation. After general anesthesia, the patient was in beach chair position with routine disinfection and draping. A longitudinal incision of 3 cm was made in the center of coracoid. The coracoid was exposed to cut off the coracoacromial ligament and most of the pectoralis minor muscle. The coracoid was osteotomized for 2 cm to facilitate trimming, and the coracoid pedicle was left 3-4 cm to prevent its impact with axillary nerve. The 3.0 mm and 2.4 mm bone tunnels were drilled respectively at a distance of 6 mm, and the distal pedicle bone tunnel (2.4 mm) was penetrated with PDS suture. The Endobutton (Smiths & Nephew, USA) was placed on the surface of proximal pedicle bone tunnel (3.0 mm) with 3 high tensile-strength sutures penetrated through the central 2 holes to set aside. The other high tensile-strength suture was penetrated through the lateral holes to tie the knot with the suture from anti-rotational anchor. After trimming the coracoid process, the incision was partially closed with 8 mm gap left for A approach which was located right at the anterosuperior side of subscapularis tendon.②Subscapularis split and glenoid bone bed preparation. The lateral approach C was established under arthroscopy through the standard posteior approach (B) . The glenoid bone defect and Hill-Sachs lesion were assessed after joint exploration, and a 2.5 mm hole was drilled on the glenoid for positioning at the direction of 3:00. The C approach was used for observation, and the A approach was used for planer and radiofrequency coblation. After the positioning of switch rod through B approach, the subscapularis was split at the same level of glenoid and the axillary nerve was exposed for protection. The glenoid was observe through the subscapular incision, and then the bone bed of glenoid was refreshed as well.③Transposition and fixation of coracoid fragment. A double cylinder locator of 8 mm was inserted through the switch rod. This locator was 120 mm in length and consisted of 2 hollow titanium alloy tubes at a distance of 5-10 mm which were connected by the titanium alloy of 3 mm thick. One of the hollow tube was 4.5 mm in diameter and used for switch rod insertion, while the other tube was 2.5 mm in diameter and used for the 2.4 mm guide pin insertion. The design and use of this locator were simple and safe. Under the guidance of switch rod, the glenoid was drilled at the position of 5:00 with a guide pin of 2.4 mm after the preoperative CT measurement of its anteroposterior diameter. Then an Endobutton drill of 4.5 mm was used to expand the hole, through which the PDS suture was penetrated to set aside. A Twinfix anchor (Smiths & Nephew, USA) of 2.8 mm was implanted parallel and superior to the bone tunnel of the glenoid to prevent fragment rotation.The small incision of coracoid osteotomy was open to pull out the PDS suture as well as the suture of anchor. After that, the suture of anchor penetrated through the distal bone tunnel. Under the guidance of PDS suture, the 3 high tensile-strength sutures from the preset Endobutton were pulled out through B approach. The coracoid fragment was pulled into the joint and attached to the glenoid. The other Endobutton was penetrated with high tensile-strength sutures, and it was tied and fixed through B approach. The high tensile-strength sutures and the suture of anchor were tied for fixation with Double-Pulley technique to prevent Endobutton rotation.Finally, the B approach was used to observe the relationship between the surfaces of fragment and glenoid. If necessary, the fragment should be shaped to match glenoid. The articular capsule was not sutured. (2) Rehabilitation plan.The shoulder was immobilized with brace in 30° of abduction and 0° of external rotation for 2 weeks, and in the meanwhile, the early active exercises of hand, wrist and elbow were encouraged. The passive pendulum exercise of shoulder joint was allowed 2 weeks later. With the removal of brace, the active rehabilitation training was conducted under the guidance of physicians. The active exercise of biceps brachii muscle with high intensity was forbidden with 6 months after operation. (3) Postoperative evaluation.The position of coracoid fragment was observed by three-dimensional CT scan. From the front view of glenoid, the best position was where the center of fragment was at the direction of 4:30. The range of center was from 2:00 to 5:00, and the center was considered high if it was higher than 3:00 and low if it was lower than 5:00. From the cross-sectional view of CT scan, the best position was where the fragment was even with glenoid or below <5 mm. The fragment was considered to be medial if it was below >5 mm and lateral if it was higher than the glenoid. If the patient complained mainly about the feelings of shoulder instability such as shoulder laxity or dislocation, etc. or both the Apprehension test and the Relocation test were positive, the operation was considered a failure. The shoulder joint function was evaluated by rating scale of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) , ROWE score and Walch-Duplay score. The operative time was recorded as well. (4) Statistical analysis.The data were expressed as mean value±standard deviation, and the software of SPSS 18.0 was used for statistical analysis. The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05) .

Results

From October 2014 to October 2016, a total of 50 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocations of severe bone defects received arthroscopic Latarjet procedure of double Endobuttons anti-rotation fixation with three approaches. There were 39 males and 11 females (45 left shoulders and 5 right shoulders) with an average age of (27.2±2.1) years (15-45 years old) . The average time from primary dislocation to surgery was (24.3±12.7) months (6-120 months) . The average percentage glenoid bone defect was (20.1%±2.9%) (18%-39%) . The average episodes of shoulder dislocations was (16.1±2.4) times (3-40 times) . There were 4 revision cases, including 3 recurrent cases after Bankart repair and 1 recurrent case of multiple directions instability (MDI) after capsule constriction. The operation time ranged from 57 min to 150 min with an average of (105±38) min. (1) Postoperative posititon of coracoid bone fragment. Glenoid surface observation: according to the standard of fragment center at the position of 4:30, there were 45 cases of good position, 2 cases of high position and 3 cases of low position. Cross-sectional observation: there were 43 cases of good position, 1 case of medial position and 6 cases of lateral position. It was worth noting that the coracoid fragments which were superolateral to the glenoid in 6 patients had been moulded and become even with the glenoid during CT examination of 6 months after operation. (2) Postoperative absorption and healing of coracoid fragment.There were different levels of coracoid fragment absorption, and the stabilization time was 2-6 months with an average of (3.3±0.6) months after operation. The absorption ratio was 15%-60% with an average of (27.5±3.8) %. Thereinto, 8 cases had a ratio of <20%, 25 cases had a ratio of 20%-30%, 35 cases had a ratio of 30%-40% and 5 cases had a ratio of >40%. All the patients achieved fragment union 6 months after operation or revision without soft tissue healing or partial healing. (3) Postoperative clinical efficacy evaluation.The patients were followed up for 6-24 months with an average of (13.2±3.6) months. In the preoperative and final follow-ups, the mean ASES score was (80.2±16.2) points vs. (95.2±5.6) (P <0.05) , the mean ROWE score was (40.2±9.8) vs. (94.5±2.7) (P <0.05) , and the mean Walch-Duplay score was (67.5±10.2) vs. (95.6±3.2) (P <0.05) . All the patients returned to normal life, and compared with pre-operation, 45 (90%) patients had more intense exercises. No recurrence of shoulder dislocation or instability occurred, and the Apprehension test and the Relocation test were all negative.

Conclusions

The modified arthroscopic Latarjet procedure of double Endobuttons anti-rotation fixation with three approaches was adopted for the treatment of recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation with severe glenoid bone defect. With this technique, not only were the operation process and surgical instrument simple, but also the coracoid fragment was in accurate position with high healing rate. As this technique reduces the majority of arthroscopic approaches and reduces the risk of potential nerve injury, it can be a reliable and effective alternative to traditional Latarjet procedure.

图1 图A喙突骨块的截取及引入Endobutton;图B缝合取喙突切口作为A入路及建立前上外侧入路C
图2 肩胛下肌劈开与关节盂骨床准备 图A为三入路操作图;图B为入路进入交换棒穿过肩胛下肌(关节内侧);图C为交换棒穿过肩胛下肌(关节外侧),并沿此劈开肩胛下肌;图D为劈开肩胛下肌,暴露关节盂骨床并新鲜化
图3 双筒定位器
图4 喙突骨块转位与固定 图A为通过4.5 mm筒置入交换棒定位骨块位置;图B为通过2.5 mm筒置入2.4 mm克氏针;图C为关节盂骨道上方植入1枚防旋转锚钉;图D为喙突骨块转位固定后
图5 骨块位置评估术后三维CT关节盂观察 图A为骨块中心高于3:00表示过高;图B为骨块中心位于4:30表示良好;图C为骨块中心低于5:00表示过低;图D为术后CT普通平扫横断位,骨块与关节盂平行;图E为骨块高于关节盂水平;图F为骨块低于关节盂水平
图6 CT普通平扫横断位观察位置偏高的骨块塑形情况 图A为术后3 d骨块高于关节盂水平;图B为术后3个月,骨块逐渐塑形;图C为术后6个月,骨块进一步塑形;图D为术后12个月,骨块最终与关节盂平行
表1 术前与术后末次随访肩关节功能评分(分,±s
[1]
Latarjet M. Treatment of recurrent dislocation of the shoulder[J]. Lyon Chir, 1954, 49(8): 994-997.
[2]
Giles JW, Boons HW, Elkinson I, et al. Does the dynamic sling effect of the Latarjet procedure improve shoulder stability? A biomechanical evaluation[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(6): 821-827.
[3]
Boileau P, Mercier N, Roussanne Y, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure: the development and early results of a safe and reproducible technique[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(11): 1434-1450.
[4]
Lafosse L, Lejeune E, Bouchard A, et al. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior shoulder instability[J]. Arthroscopy, 2007, 23(11): 1242.e1-5.
[5]
Agneskirchner JD, Lafosse L. Transfer of the coracoid process in recurrent anterior instability of the shoulder joint. The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure[J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2014, 26(3): 296-306.
[6]
Metais P, Clavert P, Barth J, et al. Preliminary clinical outcomes of Latarjet-Patte coracoid transfer by arthroscopy vs. open surgery: Prospective multicentre study of 390 cases[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(8S): S271-S276.
[7]
Athwal GS, Meislin R, Getz C, et al. Short-term complications of the arthroscopic latarjet procedure: A North american experience[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(10): 1965-1970.
[8]
Gracitelli ME, Ferreira AA, Benegas E, et al. Arthroscopic latarjet procedure: safety evaluation in cadavers[J]. Acta Ortop Bras, 2013, 21(3): 139-143.
[9]
Zuckerman JD, Matsen FA 3rd. Complications about the glenohumeral joint related to the use of screws and staples[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1984, 66(2): 175-180.
[10]
Gendre P, Thélu CE, D'ollonne T, et al. Coracoid bone block fixation with cortical buttons: An alternative to screw fixation?[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(8): 983-987.
[11]
Castricini R, De Benedetto M, Orlando N, et al. Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: analysis of the learning curve[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2013, 97(1): 93-98.
[12]
Sastre S, Peidro L, Méndez A, et al. Suprascapular nerve palsy after arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: a case report and review of literature[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(2): 601-603.
[13]
姜春岩,吴关,鲁谊,等.关节镜下喙突移位术:手术技术与早期随访探讨[J].中国运动医学杂志,2014,33(4):297-302, 311.
[14]
吴关,姜春岩,鲁谊,等.改良关节镜下喙突移位Latarjet手术治疗肩关节前方不稳定[J].北京大学学报:医学版,2015, 47(2):321-325.
[15]
Weppe F, Magnussen RA, Lustig S, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of bicortical metal screw fixation versus absorbable interference screw fixation after coracoid transfer for anterior shoulder instability[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(10): 1358-1363.
[16]
Boileau P, Gendre P, Baba M, et al. A guided surgical approach and novel fixation method for arthroscopic Latarjet[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(1): 78-89.
[17]
Butt U, Charalambous CP. Complications associated with open coracoid transfer procedures for shoulder instability[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(8): 1110-1119.
[18]
Kleiner MT, Payne WB, Mcgarry MH, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the latarjet procedure with and without capsular repair[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2016, 8(1): 84-91.
[19]
Abdulian MH, Kephart CJ, Mcgarry MH, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the modified Bristow procedure with and without capsular repair[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(2): 489-495.
[20]
Patel RA, Wilson RF, Patel PA, et al. The effect of smoking on bone healing: A systematic review[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2013, 2(6): 102-111.
[1] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[2] 蔡雨琦, 史尉利, 陶立元, 曹建夫, 崔国庆, 杨渝平. 支持带松解联合外侧成形治疗髌骨外侧过度挤压综合征[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 186-192.
[3] 肖志满, 庄锡琪, 龚煜. 关节镜下Lasso-loop Gould术式治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 280-284.
[4] 张骏, 李强, 孟柏屹, 李成宇. 关节镜松解联合肩袖修复治疗肩袖损伤合并继发冻结肩[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-7.
[5] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[6] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[7] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[8] 韩伟峰, 王典, 陈艺丹, 曾峥. 关节镜下半月板成形术与康复训练治疗中年退行性内侧半月板撕裂的疗效比较[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 134-140.
[9] 王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[10] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[11] 唐晓俞, 邓凯文, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 王小芃. 关节镜下V-Y结缝合方式与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖损伤的比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 107-114.
[12] 白云鹏, 孙卫兵, 王苗, 丁浩亮, 孙健. 肘关节镜桡侧腕短伸肌腱松解联合关节清理术治疗顽固性网球肘[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 135-139.
[13] 黄丹蕾, 叶志扬, 王俊, 翁蔚宗, 王光泽, 刘好源, 黄建明. 关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位的初步临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 34-39.
[14] 李广峰, 李王, 尹志峰, 王思成, 张文薷, 彭勇, 杜暠, 曹中华, 张友忠, 刘仲祥, 刘望, 刘祥飞. 切开复位与全关节镜下空心钉内固定治疗Mutch II型肱骨大结节骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 56-60.
[15] 李丹妹, 许鉴. 基于CT三维重建技术的正常关节盂宽度和高度关系及形态学研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 69-74.
阅读次数
全文


摘要