切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 159 -163. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.02.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

锁定钢板结合异体腓骨治疗老年肱骨近端Neer III、IV型骨折的疗效分析
赵彦瑞1, 刘洋1, 单磊1, 周君琳1,()   
  1. 1. 100020 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-29 出版日期:2021-05-05
  • 通信作者: 周君琳
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金项目(7202049)

Efficacy analysis of locking compression plate combined with fibula allograft in the treatment of senile proximal humeral fractures of Neer part-III and IV

Yanrui Zhao1, Yang Liu1, Lei Shan1, Junlin Zhou1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2020-10-29 Published:2021-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Junlin Zhou
引用本文:

赵彦瑞, 刘洋, 单磊, 周君琳. 锁定钢板结合异体腓骨治疗老年肱骨近端Neer III、IV型骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 159-163.

Yanrui Zhao, Yang Liu, Lei Shan, Junlin Zhou. Efficacy analysis of locking compression plate combined with fibula allograft in the treatment of senile proximal humeral fractures of Neer part-III and IV[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(02): 159-163.

目的

探讨锁定钢板结合异体腓骨治疗老年肱骨近端Neer III、IV型骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2014年1月至2019年10月本院56例肱骨近端Neer III、IV型骨折患者资料,其中采用单纯锁定钢板治疗31例患者为A组,锁定钢板结合异体腓骨治疗25例患者为B组。采用Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分和肩关节活动范围(range of motion,ROM)对患者的肢体功能进行评定,并评估治疗效果及并发症发生情况。

结果

两组患者基本资料的差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后Constant-Murley评分,A组(62.89±8.25)分,B组(75.42±4.77)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后ROM评分,A组(18.34±4.43)分,B组(25.77±3.84)分,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。A组中1例发生肱骨头内翻畸形,2例发生螺钉切出,1例发生肱骨头坏死,并发症发生率为12.9%;B组中1例发生伤口感染,1例发生肱骨头坏死,并发症发生率为8.0%,低于A组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

锁定钢板结合异体腓骨治疗老年肱骨近端Neer III、IV型骨折,疗效优于单纯锁定钢板治疗,能对肱骨头提供有效支撑及稳定性,使患者术后顺利进行早期功能锻炼,提高患者术后生活质量。

Background

Proximal humeral fractures account for 4%-5% of total fractures, in which elderly patients account for 70%, and the incidence is still increasing year by year. Locking compression plate is a common method for treatment of proximal humeral fractures, and the clinical effect is definite. However, the postoperative complication rate is very high, among which the incidence of varus deformity is as high as 71%. In recent years, fibula allograft combined with locking plate has gradually become popular in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Objective

To investigate the clinical efficacy of locking compression plate combined with fibula allograft in the treatment of senile proximal humeral fractures of Neer part-III and IV.

Methods

From January 2014 to October 2019, the data of 56 patients with Neer part-III and IV proximal humeral fractures in our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 31 cases treated with locking compression plate were divided into group A, and 25 cases treated with locking compression plate and fibula allograft were divided into group B. The Constant-Murley and ROM scores of shoulder joint function were used to evaluate the patient's limb function, the treatment effect and the occurrence of complications.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups of basic data (P>0.05) . The postoperative Constant-Murley scores were (62.89±8.25) points in group A and (75.42±4.77) points in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) . The postoperative ROM scores were (18.34±4.43) points in group A and (25.77±3.84) points in group B, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) . In group A, there were 1 case of humeral head varus deformity, 2 cases of screw excision and 1 case of humeral head necrosis, and the complication rate was 12.9%. In group B, there were 1 case of wound infection and 1 case of humeral head necrosis, and the complication rate was 8.0%, which was lower than that of group A with statistical difference (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

Locking compression plate combined with fibula allograft in the treatment of elderly proximal humeral fracture of Neer type-III and IV is better than those with simple locking compression plate. It can provide sufficient support and stability to the humeral head, so that patients can carry out early functional exercise smoothly after surgery, and improve the quality of life of patients after surgery.

表1 两组患者基本资料比较
表2 两组患者并发症及术后功能评分比较
图1 患者女,73岁,左侧Neer III型肱骨近端骨折 图A:术前肩关节正位X线片;图B-C:术前肩关节CT;图D:异体腓骨;图E-F:术中异体腓骨置入、钢板固定大体像;图G-I:术中透视影像
[1]
Jo MJ, Gardner MJ. Proximal humerus fractures[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2012, 5(3):192-198.
[2]
Konrad G, Bayer J, Hepp P, et al. Open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with use of the locking proximal humerus plate. Surgical technique[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2010,92(Suppl 1 Pt 1):85-95.
[3]
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review[J]. Injury, 2006, 37 (8): 691-697.
[4]
Vachtsevanos L, Hayden L, Desai AS, et al. Management of proximal humerus fractures in adults[J]. World J Orthop, 2014, 5(5):685-693.
[5]
Solberg BD, Moon CN, Franco DP, et al. Locked plating of 3-and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in older patients: the effect of initialfracture pattern on outcome[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2009, 23 (2):113-119.
[6]
Namdari S, Voleti PB, Mehta S. Evaluation of the osteoporotic proximal humeral fracture and strategies for structural augmentation during surgical treatment[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21 (12):1787-1795.
[7]
Gardner MJ, Collinge C. Management principles of osteoporotic fractures[J]. Injury, 2016, 47(Suppl 2):S33-S35.
[8]
Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Injury,2011,42(4):408-413.
[9]
Agudelo J, Schurmann M, Stahel P, et al. Analysis of efficacy and failure in proximal humerus fractures treated with locking plates[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(10):676-681.
[10]
Hardeman F, Bollars P, Donnelly M, et al. Predictive factors for functional outcome and failure in angular stable osteosynthesis of the proximal humerus[J]. Injury, 2012, 43 (2): 153-158.
[11]
Thanasas C, Kontakis G, Angoules A, et al. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures with locking plates: a systematic review[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2009, 18 (6): 837-844.
[12]
Owsley KC, Gorczyca JT. Fracture displacement and screw cut out after open reduction and locked plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures[corrected][J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90 (2):233-240.
[13]
Katthagen JC, Schwarze M, Meyer-Kobbe J, et al. Biomechanical effects of calcar screws and bone block augmentation on medial support in locked plating of proximal humeral fracture[J]. Clin Biomech(Bristol, Avon), 2014, 29(7):735-741.
[14]
Mathison C, Chaudhary R, Beaupre L, et al. Biomechanical analysis of proximal humeral fixation using locking plate fixation with an intramedullary fibular allograft[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2010, 25(7): 642-646.
[15]
Chow RM, Begum F, Beaupre LA, et al. Proximal humeral fracture fixation: locking plate construct +/- intramedullary fibular allograft[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(7): 894-901.
[16]
Gardner MJ, Boraiah S, Helfet DL, et al. Indirect medial reduction and strut support of proximal humerus fractures using an endosteal implant[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2008, 22 (3): 195-200.
[17]
Little MT, Berkes MB, Schottel PC, et al. The impact of preoperative coronal plane deformity on proximal humerus fixation with endosteal augmentation[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2014, 28 (6):338-347.
[18]
Matassi F, Angeloni R, Carulli C, et al. Locking plate and fibular allograft augmentation in unstable fractures of proximal humerus[J]. Injury, 2012, 43 (11): 1939-1942.
[19]
Zhu L, Liu Y, Yang Z, et al. Locking plate fixation combined with iliac crest bone autologous graft for proximal humerus comminuted fracture[J].Chin Med J (Engl) , 2014, 127 (9): 1672-1676.
[1] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[2] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[3] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[4] 车娟, 刘俊阳. 肱骨近端骨折围手术期深静脉血栓发生因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 146-149.
[5] 张晓萌, 杨杰, 刘海, 王艳华, 张一翀, 张立佳, 熊晨, 唐缪田, 张殿英. 科研创新就在我们身边[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-6.
[6] 刘兵, 马翔宇, 杨超, 周大鹏. 应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 293-299.
[7] 丁小方, 杨黎黎, 周海涛, 纪坤羽, 杨鹏杰, 杨坤, 吕昊润, 王元利, 付中国. 基于"悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论的老年肱骨近端粉碎骨折术后康复策略探讨[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 232-238.
[8] 程邦君, 黄燕峰, 罗轶, 何耀华. 两种手术方法治疗Neer Ⅲ型肱骨近端骨折的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 335-340.
[9] 祝相如, 张聿达, 李绪文, 刘国明, 梁承志, 扈延龄. 自体髂骨块植骨结合Calcar螺钉重建内侧柱治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 244-248.
[10] 徐小东, 王颜华, 刘洋, 杨雨润, 朱前拯, 杨欢, 陈星佐, 王立强, 陈瀛, 林朋. 老年肱骨近端骨折患者围手术期隐性失血情况分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 164-168.
[11] 张晓萌, 陈征, 陈杰, 张殿英, 熊建. 如何使用术中超声探测肱骨近端板钉固定后的螺钉穿透:一项初步尸体研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 48-54.
[12] 金万通, 薛海鹏, 周大鹏, 刘兵, 纪振钢, 马翔宇, 杨超, 张昊, 韩宁, 宗宇宁, 张咏晧, 马泽方. 3D打印结合PMMA骨水泥髓内支撑技术在老年肱骨近端骨质疏松性骨折中的应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-284.
[13] 杨良栋, 张华泽, 何举仁, 高艳刚, 李栋. 锁定钢板与交锁髓内钉固定治疗老年Neer分型2、3部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 96-103.
[14] 赵阔, 王忠正, 王宇钏, 张浚哲, 郭家良, 郑占乐, 陈伟, 张英泽. 双反牵引复位器联合MIPO技术治疗肱骨近端骨折的初步应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 321-325.
[15] 吕鹏飞, 裴征, 张清华, 刘家帮. 老年桡骨远端关节内骨折保守与掌侧锁定钢板手术治疗的疗效比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 487-492.
阅读次数
全文


摘要