切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 244 -248. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.03.009

论著

自体髂骨块植骨结合Calcar螺钉重建内侧柱治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折
祝相如1, 张聿达1, 李绪文2, 刘国明2, 梁承志1, 扈延龄2,()   
  1. 1. 266073 青岛大学医学部
    2. 266000 青岛大学附属医院创伤外科
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-02 出版日期:2021-09-13
  • 通信作者: 扈延龄
  • 基金资助:
    青岛市博士后研究人员应用研究项目(20200306)

Medial column reconstruction with autogenous iliac bone graft and Calcar screw for treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures

Xiangru Zhu1, Yuda Zhang1, Xuwen Li2, Guoming Liu2, Chengzhi Liang1, Yanling Hu2,()   

  1. 1. Medical School of Qindao University, 266073 Qingdao, China
    2. Department of Traumatic Surgery, Affiliated Hospital to Qindao Uniersity,266000 Qingdao, China
  • Received:2021-02-02 Published:2021-09-13
  • Corresponding author: Yanling Hu
引用本文:

祝相如, 张聿达, 李绪文, 刘国明, 梁承志, 扈延龄. 自体髂骨块植骨结合Calcar螺钉重建内侧柱治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 244-248.

Xiangru Zhu, Yuda Zhang, Xuwen Li, Guoming Liu, Chengzhi Liang, Yanling Hu. Medial column reconstruction with autogenous iliac bone graft and Calcar screw for treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(03): 244-248.

目的

探讨自体髂骨块移植结合Calcar螺钉重建内侧柱治疗肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析我院自2016年1月至2018年12月收治的36例单侧复杂肱骨近端骨折患者,采用自体髂骨块移植结合Calcar螺钉治疗。随访时间12~24个月,平均17.04个月。记录术后3、6、12个月随访时Neer肩关节功能评分(Neer评分)和肩关节功能评分(Constant评分);采用视觉模拟评分( visual analogue scale,VAS )评估患者术后疼痛程度。分析患者骨折愈合时间、并发症发生情况及肩关节活动范围。

结果

36例患者均达到解剖复位,骨折平均愈合时间为3.71个月,没有患者出现肱骨头缺血性坏死及内翻塌陷。术后12个月随访时,患者Neer评分(84.64±3.40)分;Constant评分(74.26±4.70)分;VAS(1.24±0.72)分。患肩关节活动度:屈(132.58±8.01)°、伸(43.75±3.41)°、内旋(58.25±4.89)°、体侧外旋(58.89±4.83)°、外展(136.46±11.04)°。

结论

对于内侧粉碎性复杂肱骨近端骨折,自体髂骨块植骨结合Calcar螺钉能够重建可靠的内侧支撑,降低内翻塌陷及肱骨头缺血性坏死等并发症的风险,术后功能恢复满意。

Background

In recent years, the incidence of proximal humeral fractures has been increasing year by year, reaching 4% to 5% of systemic fractures. With the progress of the aging population, the incidence of significantly displaced proximal humeral fractures has increased by 50%. Early open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) has become a consensus in treating complex proximal humeral fractures. However, in the complex Neer part-3 or 4 proximal humerus fractures, the destroyed medial humeral support structure will significantly negatively impact postoperative functional recovery. The current research believes that providing reliable medial support while reducing the fracture is significant for decreasing postoperative complications and achieving good functional recovery. However, there are different opinions on the selection of support methods.

Objective

To explore the clinical effect of medial column reconstruction with autogenous iliac bone graft and Calcar screw in the treatment of proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

From January 2016 to December 2018, 36 patients with unilateral complex proximal humeral fractures were treated in our hospital with autogenous iliac bone graft combined with Calcar screw. The follow-up period ranged from 12 to 24 months, with an average of 17.04 months. Neer shoulder function score and Constant-Murley score were recorded at 3rd, 6th, and 12th months after the operation, and the degree of postoperative pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) . The time of fracture healing, complications, and the range of motions of the shoulder joint were analyzed.

Results

All 36 patients achieved anatomical reduction, and the average healing time of the fractures was 3.71 months. No avascular necrosis (AVN) of the humeral head or varus collapse occurred. In the 12-month follow-up, the Neer function score, Constant-Murley score, and VAS score were (84.64 ±3.40) , (74.26 ±4.70) , and (1.24±0.72) , respectively. The range of motions of the affected shoulder joint were (132.58 ±8.01) ° of flexion, (43.75 ±3.41) ° of extension, (58.25 ±4.89) ° of internal rotation, (58.89 ±4.8) ° of external rotation, and (136.46 ±11.04) ° of abduction.

Conclusion

For complex proximal humeral fractures with medial comminution, autogenous iliac bone graft combined with Calcar screw can provide reliable medial support, reduce the risk of varus collapse, AVN, and other complications, and the postoperative functional recovery is satisfactory.

图1 患者术前三维CT图像,可见肱骨内侧皮质粉碎,肱骨头干完全分离(A);术中直视下可见内侧柱区域大块骨质缺损(B);术中取出的自体髂骨块,带有3面皮质,长约4 cm(C);术中临时复位图像,可见移植的髂骨块起到内侧支撑作用(D)
表1 术后Neer、Costant、VAS评分(分,±s)
图2 术中最终固定图像,可见自体髂骨加强内侧支撑,Calcar螺钉穿入移植骨块,骨折复位良好(A);术后1个月及术后6个月随访时X线图像,可见骨折愈合,内固定物位置牢固(B、C);术后8个月时复查CT,髂骨块支撑良好,内固定强度满意(D)
[1]
谢晓涛, 周军杰, 吕顺,等. 老年肱骨近端骨折患者的锁定加压钢板内固定与人工肱骨头置换疗效对比分析[J]. 中国骨与关节杂志, 2016, 5(9): 647-652.
[2]
加速康复外科理念下肱骨近端骨折诊疗规范的专家共识[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2020, (3): 187-196.
[3]
Kancherla VK, Singh A, Anakwenze OA. Management of acute proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2017, 25(1): 42-52.
[4]
游小军, 路考生, 韩月起, 等. 锁定钢板结合自体大块髂骨治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折的疗效[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2020,36(3): 222-227.
[5]
张军, 庄云强, 李东贞, 等. 锁定钢板结合异体腓骨支撑治疗老年肱骨近端Neer三、四部分骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(11): 946-952.
[6]
朱炼, 王博, 赵昌平, 等. 锁定钢板结合同种异体髂骨移植与腓骨移植治疗肱骨近端粉碎性骨折的对比研究[J]. 河北医科大学学报,2017,38(4): 395-398.
[7]
Schnetzke M, Bockmeyer J, Porschke F, et al. Quality of reduction influences outcome after locked-plate fixation of proximal humeral type-C fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2016, 98(21): 1777-1785.
[8]
Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Injury,2011,42(4): 408-413.
[9]
Krappinger D, Bizzotto N, Riedmann S, et al. Predicting failure after surgical fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Injury,2011,42(11): 1283-1288.
[10]
Lescheid J, Zdero R, Shah S, et al. The biomechanics of locked plating for repairing proximal humerus fractures with or without medial cortical support[J]. J Trauma, 2010, 69(5): 1235-1242.
[11]
Laux CJ, Grubhofer F, Werner C, et al. Current concepts in locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fracture[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2017,12(1): 137.
[12]
Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barker JU, et al. The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma,2007, 21(3): 185-191.
[13]
Katthagen JC, Schwarze M, Meyer-Kobbe J, et al. Biomechanical effects of calcar screws and bone block augmentation on medial support in locked plating of proximal humeral fractures[J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2014,29(7): 735-741.
[14]
石金柱, 黄强, 张玉富. 解剖锁定钢板结合异体腓骨髓腔内结构植骨治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2017, 5(4): 272-277.
[15]
Matassi F, Angeloni R, Carulli C, et al. Locking plate and fibular allograft augmentation in unstable fractures of proximal humerus[J]. Injury, 2012, 43(11): 1939-1942.
[16]
买买提艾力·吐尔逊, 曾浪清, 陆叶,等. 锁定钢板固定联合同种异体腓骨髓内植入治疗内侧柱粉碎性肱骨近端骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2017, 19(11): 928-934.
[17]
Hinds RM, Garner MR, Tran WH,et al. Geriatric proximal humeral fracture patients show similar clinical outcomes to non-geriatric patients after osteosynthesis with endosteal fibular strut allograft augmentation[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2015, 24(6): 889-896.
[18]
张殿英. 肱骨近端骨折选择关节置换的理由[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2017, 5(1): 77.
[19]
王尧, 曹烈虎, 崔进,等. 锁定钢板联合同种异体腓骨植骨与半肩关节置换治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折疗效的对比研究[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2019, 7(2): 128-135.
[20]
陈剑, 孙海飚, 韩晓强,等. 锁定钢板与半肩关节置换治疗中老年复杂肱骨近端骨折的Meta分析[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019,13(3): 320-328.
[21]
Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, et al. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2004,13(4): 427-433.
[1] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[2] 马瑞, 杨佩, 田润, 王春生, 王坤正. 机器人辅助髓芯减压术治疗股骨头坏死的效果[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 123-128.
[3] 刘凯, 李萌, 姬文晨, 杨卫周, 刘俭涛. 全髋关节置换联合自体松质骨移植治疗老年股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 786-789.
[4] 徐永清, 浦路桥, 李川, 单长蒙, 浦绍全, 王腾, 林玮, 蔡兴博, 李霞. 保留后上支持动脉的股方肌骨瓣治疗股骨头坏死的临床研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 664-669.
[5] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[6] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[7] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[8] 车娟, 刘俊阳. 肱骨近端骨折围手术期深静脉血栓发生因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 146-149.
[9] 张晓萌, 杨杰, 刘海, 王艳华, 张一翀, 张立佳, 熊晨, 唐缪田, 张殿英. 科研创新就在我们身边[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-6.
[10] 王常青, 赵承武, 汪坤, 宋之明. 关节镜下改良髂骨移植技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位短期疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 312-318.
[11] 刘兵, 马翔宇, 杨超, 周大鹏. 应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 293-299.
[12] 丁小方, 杨黎黎, 周海涛, 纪坤羽, 杨鹏杰, 杨坤, 吕昊润, 王元利, 付中国. 基于"悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论的老年肱骨近端粉碎骨折术后康复策略探讨[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 232-238.
[13] 郭晓磊, 李晓云, 孙嘉怿, 金乐, 郭亚娟, 史新立. 含生长因子骨移植材料的研究进展和监管现状[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 373-378.
[14] 金万通, 薛海鹏, 周大鹏, 刘兵, 纪振钢, 马翔宇, 杨超, 张昊, 韩宁, 宗宇宁, 张咏晧, 马泽方. 3D打印结合PMMA骨水泥髓内支撑技术在老年肱骨近端骨质疏松性骨折中的应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-284.
[15] 中华医学会骨科学分会, 邢军超, 毕龙, 陈林, 董世武, 高梁斌, 侯天勇, 侯志勇, 黄伟, 靳慧勇, 李岩, 李忠海, 刘鹏, 刘曦明, 罗飞, 马锋, 沈杰, 宋锦璘, 唐佩福, 吴新宝, 徐宝山, 许建中, 徐永清, 颜滨, 杨鹏, 叶青, 殷国勇, 于腾波, 曾建成, 张长青, 张英泽, 张泽华, 赵枫, 周跃, 朱芸, 邹俊. 自体骨髓富集骨修复技术临床应用专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 129-141.
阅读次数
全文


摘要