切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肩肘外科电子杂志

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 154 -158. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.02.009

所属专题： 文献；

论著

复杂性肩关节脱位术后功能分析
居家宝1, 刘洋1, 陈建海1, 马明太1, 张一翀1, 张子宵1, 张殿英2,†()   
  1. 1. 100044　北京大学人民医院创伤骨科
    2. 100044　北京大学人民医院创伤骨科；300450　天津，北京大学滨海医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-06 出版日期:2021-05-05
  • 通信作者: 张殿英
  • 基金资助:
    北京大学医学部学院建设项目（2020）-国家创伤医学中心(BMU2020XY005-01); 北京大学医学部学院建设项目（2020）-创伤救治与神经再生教育部重点实验室(BMU2020XY005-03)

Functional analysis of complicated shoulder dislocation after surgical repair

Jiabao Ju1, yang Liu1, Jianhai Chen1, Mingtai Ma1, Yichong Zhang1, Zixiao Zhang1, Dianying Zhang2,†()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China; Department of Orthopaedics, Peking University Binhai Hospital, Tianjin 300450, China
  • Received:2020-07-06 Published:2021-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Dianying Zhang
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

居家宝, 刘洋, 陈建海, 马明太, 张一翀, 张子宵, 张殿英. 复杂性肩关节脱位术后功能分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 154-158.

Jiabao Ju, yang Liu, Jianhai Chen, Mingtai Ma, Yichong Zhang, Zixiao Zhang, Dianying Zhang. Functional analysis of complicated shoulder dislocation after surgical repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(02): 154-158.

目的

探讨复杂性肩关节脱位术后不同类型的合并损伤对肩关节功能的影响。

方法

回顾性收集2015年1月至2017年12月北京大学人民医院收治的32例复杂性肩关节脱位患者的病例资料。分析因素包括年龄、性别、受伤方式、合并损伤类型及手术方式。

结果

肩关节脱位合并单纯肱骨大结节骨折行手术治疗组（n=8）末次随访时视觉模拟评分（visual analogue scale，VAS）为（0.75±0.71）分，保守治疗组（n=6）VAS评分为（3.33±1.03）分，两组间差异具有统计学意义（P<0.01）。美国肩肘外科协会评分（American shoulder and elbow surgeons, ASES）手术治疗组（78.75±11.11）分，保守治疗组（64.17±11.63）分，两组间差异具有统计学意义（P=0.04）。26例肩关节脱位伴合并损伤的患者术前VAS评分、ASES评分及Constant-Murley评分分别为（5.19±0.98）分、（46.38±5.70）分、（43.65±5.83）分，手术治疗合并损伤后，末次随访时评分分别为（0.54±0.58）分、（80.00±8.87）分、（74.54±12.76）分，手术前后差异均具有统计学意义（P<0.01）。多元线性回归分析提示合并损伤在手术修复后对功能评分的影响差异无统计学意义。

结论

手术治疗复杂性肩关节脱位合并损伤可改善肩关节功能，恢复关节稳定性。

关键词: 复杂性肩关节脱位, 大结节骨折, 肩袖损伤, Bankart损伤
Background

Shoulder dislocation is often caused by excessive abduction and external rotation of the upper arm. Anterior shoulder dislocation may be accompanied with axillary nerve injury, labrum avulsion (Bankart injury) , glenoid fracture (bony Bankart injury) , rotator cuff tear and humeral head compression fracture (Hill-Sachs injury) or greater tuberosity fractures, and dislocation accompanied with other injuries can be defined as complex shoulder dislocations. With the further understanding of shoulder joint dislocation, the rate of accompanied injuries has also increased. Studies have shown that early repair of the accompanied injuries was beneficial to restore shoulder joint stability.

Objective

To investigate the association between complicated injury types and shoulder function of patients with shoulder dislocation.

Methods

We retrospectively retrieved the data of 32 patients with complicated shoulder dislocation from January 2015 to December 2017. Preoperative factors included age, gender, mechanisms of injury, associated injury types and surgical approaches.

Results

Among patients with isolated greater tuberosity fracture, the VAS scores in the surgery (n=8) and conservative group (n=6) were 0.75±0.71 and 3.33±1.03, respectively, with statistically significant difference (P<0.01) . The ASES scores in the surgery (n=8) and conservative group (n=6) were 78.75±11.11 and 64.17±11.63, respectively, with statistical difference (P=0.04) . Preoperative VAS, ASES and CM scores were 5.19±0.98, 46.38±5.70, and 43.65±5.83, respectively, and postoperative score were 0.54±0.58, 80.00±8.87, and 74.54±12.76, respectively. The differences were statistically significant (P<0.01) . Multivariable linear regression analysis demonstrated that none of the injuries had association with shoulder function after operation.

Conclusion

Surgical repair of dislocation associated injuries can improve shoulder function and restore joint stability.

Key words: Complicated shoulder dislocation, Greater tuberosity fracture, Rotator cuff tear, Bankart lesion
表1 急性脱位合并单纯大结节骨折行手术与保守治疗的肩关节功能比较（分，±s）
组别 例数 VAS评分 ASES评分 Constant-Murley评分
手术治疗组 8 0.75±0.71 78.75±11.11 71.88±17.42
保守治疗组 6 3.33±1.03 64.17±11.63 72.17±10.36
t值   5.29 4.03 0.72
P值   <0.01 0.04 0.97
表2 手术前后肩关节疼痛及功能评分比较（分，±s）
时间 VAS评分 ASES评分 Constant-Murley评分
术前 5.19±0.98 46.38±5.70 43.65±5.83
术后 0.54±0.58 80.00±8.87 74.54±12.76
t值 10.12 8.56 6.27
P值 <0.01 <0.01 <0.01
表3 多因素分析不同类型合并损伤对肩关节ASES评分的影响
  B值 t值 P值 95%CI
性别 0.99 0.21 0.84 -8.70，10.69
年龄 -0.20 -1.14 0.27 -0.55，0.16
肩袖损伤 2.17 0.51 0.62 -6.62，10.97
Bankart损伤 0.50 0.09 0.93 -11.02，12.03
肱骨大结节骨折 -8.78 -1.58 0.13 -20.16，2.61
表4 多因素分析不同类型合并损伤对肩关节Constant-Murley评分的影响
  B值 t值 P值 95%CI
性别 0.79 0.15 0.89 -10.37，11.95
年龄 0.10 0.50 0.62 -0.31，0.51
肩袖损伤 0.40 0.02 0.08 -9.72，10.52
Bankart损伤 1.47 0.23 0.82 -11.79，14.73
肱骨大结节骨折 -8.10 -1.27 0.22 -21.21，5.00
[1]
Robinson CM, Shur N, Sharpe T, et al. Injuries associated with traumatic anterior glenohumeral dislocations[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2012, 94(1): 18-26.
[2]
Atef A, El-Tantawy A, Gad H, et al. Prevalence of associated injuries after anterior shoulder dislocation: a prospective study[J]. Int Orthop, 2016, 40(3): 519-524.
[3]
Merlini L, Yalizis M, Carrillon Y, et al. Hidden degloving rotator cuff tears secondary to glenohumeral dislocation[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(8): 1456-1461.
[4]
曹烈虎，章浩，张春才, 等. 肩关节前脱位的诊治体会[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2014, 2(1): 37-40.
[5]
Rouleau DM, Mutch J, Laflamme GY. Surgical Treatment of Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fractures of the Humerus[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2016, 24(1): 46-56.
[6]
Ogawa K, Yoshida A, Ikegami H. Isolated fractures of the greater tuberosity of the humerus: solutions to recognizing a frequently overlooked fracture[J]. J Trauma, 2003, 54(4): 713-717.
[7]
Hebert-Davies J, Mutch J, Rouleau D, et al. Delayed Migration of Greater Tuberosity Fractures Associated With Anterior Shoulder Dislocation[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(10): e396-400.
[8]
Liao W, Zhang H, Li Z, et al. Is Arthroscopic Technique Superior to Open Reduction Internal Fixation in the Treatment of Isolated Displaced Greater Tuberosity Fractures?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2016, 474(5): 1269-1279.
[9]
姜棚菲，马张稳，高飞, 等. 关节镜治疗肩关节脱位并肱骨大结节骨折的临床研究[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2017, 23(5): 395-399.
[10]
Shields E, Mirabelli M, Amsdell S, et al. Functional and imaging outcomes of arthroscopic simultaneous rotator cuff repair and bankart repair after shoulder dislocations[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014, 42(11): 2614-2620.
[11]
Teunis T, Lubberts B, Reilly BT, et al. A systematic review and pooled analysis of the prevalence of rotator cuff disease with increasing age[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(12): 1913-1921.
[12]
Aboalata M, Plath JE, Seppel G, et al. Results of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair for Anterior-Inferior Shoulder Instability at 13-Year Follow-up[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2017, 45(4): 782-787.
[13]
Park I, Oh MJ, Shin SJ. Minimal Clinically Important Differences and Correlating Factors for the Rowe Score and the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Score After Arthroscopic Stabilization Surgery for Anterior Shoulder Instability[J]. Arthroscopy, 2019, 35(1): 54-59.
[14]
Hawkins RJ, Thigpen CA. Selection, implementation, and interpretation of patient-centered shoulder and elbow outcomes[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(2): 357-362.
[15]
陈建海. 肩关节不稳:前方软组织损伤[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1): 77.
[16]
Wasserstein DN, Sheth U, Colbenson K, et al. The True Recurrence Rate and Factors Predicting Recurrent Instability After Nonsurgical Management of Traumatic Primary Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review[J]. Arthroscopy, 2016, 32(12): 2616-2625.
[17]
Olds M, Ellis R, Donaldson K, et al. Risk factors which predispose first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations to recurrent instability in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Br J Sports Med, 2015, 49(14): 913-922.
[18]
Donohue MA, Mauntel TC, Dickens JF. Recurrent Shoulder Instability After Primary Bankart Repair[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2017, 25(3): 123-130.
[19]
Rugg CM, Hettrich CM, Ortiz S, et al. Surgical stabilization for first-time shoulder dislocators: a multicenter analysis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(4): 674-685.
[1] 杨仁瑞, 徐永清, 何鹏举, 金涛, 耿睿智, 杨够仙. 关节镜下改良双滑轮技术交叉缝合固定骨性Bankart损伤[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 609-613.
[2] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[3] 纪晓希, 陈雨舟, 黄秋, 曹烈虎, 朱文辉. 肩峰成形术对关节镜下修补外伤性与非外伤性肩袖损伤临床结果影响的比较研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 103-110.
[4] 李朋, 吴剑波, 王东, 赵峰, 田伟, 常峰, 张宇明. 关节镜治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴纤维性Bankart损伤的疗效研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 12-17.
[5] 王常青, 赵承武, 汪坤, 宋之明. 关节镜下改良髂骨移植技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位短期疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 312-318.
[6] 周启荣, 陈晓, 盛世豪, 潘思华, 张利杰, 苏佳灿. CT在预防肩关节脱位伴肱骨大结节骨折手法复位致医源性骨折中的作用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 307-311.
[7] 赵琛, 胡锐, 周红, 王芳, 胡真, 文凡. 力偶练习和肩肱节律调整对肩袖损伤保守治疗影响的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 226-231.
[8] 陈奇, 沈子龙, 温向伟, 王晨, 高奥飞, 丁明强, 余嘉文, 潘海乐. 自体髌骨股四头肌肌腱治疗家兔巨大肩袖损伤的实验研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 214-220.
[9] 余洋, 谢冰, 王国梁, 施政良, 熊波涵, 李彦林. 关节镜下肩胛下肌腱部分转位加强修复复发性肩关节前脱位[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 203-206.
[10] 张清, 向明, 李一平, 陈杭, 胡晓川, 杨金松. 肩袖损伤保守治疗失败的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 129-134.
[11] 陈国栋, 郑美妍, 张峻, 曾一鸣. 肩袖损伤合并肩关节粘连：一期松解修补还是先松解后修补？[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 122-128.
[12] 张元桢, 张艺, 薛超, 蔡秋晨, 程飚. 肩袖损伤患者关节镜修补术后的预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 3-6.
[13] 王洋, 刘俐惠, 刘伟, 田红梅, 毛永鹏, 李旭阳, 曹冉, 王振威, 艾笛, 张腾, 毛子木, 姜双鹏. ERAS理念早期康复的医护患新模式在肩袖损伤关节镜术后的临床效果研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 360-364.
[14] 董志辉, 徐建杰, 季伟, 毕伟东, 李洁冰, 张立兴, 武建忠. 肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 325-330.
[15] 王帅, 王素平, 宋涛. 富血小板血浆在肩袖损伤治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 374-379.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号