切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 325 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.04.007

论著

肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究
董志辉1,(), 徐建杰1, 季伟2, 毕伟东1, 李洁冰1, 张立兴1, 武建忠1   
  1. 1. 050000 石家庄市人民医院骨科二病区
    2. 050000 石家庄长城中西医结合医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-25 出版日期:2021-11-05
  • 通信作者: 董志辉
  • 基金资助:
    2017石家庄市科学技术研究与发展指导计划第一批(171461343)

Study on the effect of functional recovery,pain and prognosis after shoulder arthroscopic double-row suture bridge technique for massive rotator cuff injury

Zhihui Dong1,(), Jianjie Xu1, Wei Ji2, Weidong Bi1, Jiebing Li1, Lixing Zhang1, Jianzhong Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Ward II, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang Great Wall Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2021-03-25 Published:2021-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Zhihui Dong
引用本文:

董志辉, 徐建杰, 季伟, 毕伟东, 李洁冰, 张立兴, 武建忠. 肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 325-330.

Zhihui Dong, Jianjie Xu, Wei Ji, Weidong Bi, Jiebing Li, Lixing Zhang, Jianzhong Wu. Study on the effect of functional recovery,pain and prognosis after shoulder arthroscopic double-row suture bridge technique for massive rotator cuff injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(04): 325-330.

目的

探讨肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响。

方法

选取2018年6月至2020年6月本院收治的巨大肩袖损伤患者100例,据手术方式的不同采用随机数字表的方法分为单缝组和双缝组各50例,单缝组予肩关节镜下单排缝合技术治疗,双缝组予肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术治疗。比较两组患者术前及术后3个月美国肩肘外科评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons'form,ASES)、美国加州大学肩关节评分(the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale,UCLA)、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)及患肩关节前屈、外旋活动度,并于术后随访12个月,比较两组术后并发症及肩袖再损伤发生情况。

结果

单缝组和双缝组术后ASES、UCLA评分明显高于术前,且双缝组术后ASES、UCLA评分明显高于单缝组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。单缝组和双缝组术后VAS评分均降低,且双缝组降低程度更大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。单缝组和双缝组术后前屈、外旋活动度明显高于术前,且双缝组术后前屈、外旋活动度明显高于单缝组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后随访12个月,两组均无血管、神经损伤及切口感染等术后并发症发生,双缝组肩袖再损伤发生率为6.00%,明显低于单缝组的20.00%(x2 = 4.332,P = 0.037)。

结论

与单排缝合技术比较,肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术可有效改善巨大肩袖损伤患者肩关节功能和疼痛症状,并减少了术后肩袖再损伤的发生,具有良好的安全性。

Background

Massive rotator cuff injury is often accompanied with decrease of rotator cuff muscle strength, acromion impingement syndrome, tendon retraction and even muscle atrophy with fatty infiltration, which can cause suprascapular nerve paralysis, shoulder instability, humeral head dislocation and other dysfunctions. The manifestations were posterolateral shoulder pain, radiating pain behind the neck and in the arm, and weakness of shoulder abduction and external rotation. It is a potentially devastating disease. Massive rotator cuff injury is often combined with the injury of biceps tendon of long head. Massive rotator cuff injury usually refers to the injury which is > 5 cm or which involves more than 2 tendons. In Europe, the injury of more than 2 tendons is defined as massive rotator cuff injury, while in North America, the diameter of rotator cuff injury > 5 cm is defined as massive rotator cuff injury.

Objective

To investigate the effect of arthroscopic double row suture bridge technique on shoulder function recovery, pain and prognosis in patients with huge rotator cuff injury.

Methods

From June 2018 to June 2020, 100 patients with massive rotator cuff injury in our hospital were equally divided into single suture group and double suture group with andomized digital table according to different treatment methods. The patients in the single suture group was treated with single-row suture technique under shoulder arthroscopy, and the patients in the double suture group was treated with double-row suture bridge technique under shoulder arthroscopy. American shoulder and elbow surgery score (ASES) , the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score (UCLA) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and the range of motion of flexion and external rotation of the affected shoulder were compared before and 3 months after operation. The postoperative complications and rotator cuff retear were compared between the two groups after 12 months of follow-up.

Results

The postoperative ASES scores and UCLA scores in both single suture group and double suture group were significantly higher than those before operation, and the postoperative ASES scores and UCLA scores in the double suture group were significantly higher than those in the single suture group (P<0.01) . The VAS scores of both single suture group and double suture group were lower after operations, and the decrease degree of VAS scores in the double suture group was larger than those in the single row group (P<0.01) . The ranges of motion of flexion and external rotation in both single suture group and double suture group were significantly higher than those before operation, and the ranges of motion of flexion and external rotation in the double suture group were significantly higher than those in single suture group (P<0.01) . After 12 months of follow-up, there were no postoperative complications such as vascular, nerve injury or incision infection in both groups. The incidence of rotator cuff retear in the double suture group was 6.00%, which was significantly lower than that in the single suture group (20.00%) (x2=4.332, P=0.037) .

Conclusion

Compared with single-row suture technique, arthroscopic double-row suture bridge technique can effectively improve shoulder function and pain of patients with massive rotator cuff injury, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative rotator cuff retear, which has sound security.

表1 巨大肩袖损伤两组基线资料比较
表2 巨大肩袖损伤两组手术前后ASES、UCLA评分比较(分,±s
表3 巨大肩袖损伤两组手术前后VAS评分比较(分,±s
表4 巨大肩袖损伤两组手术前后患者肩关节前屈、外旋活动度比较(o,±s
[1]
孙峥,王胜杰,吕明超.肩袖损伤诊疗的研究进展[J].中国医刊,2018,15(12):19-21.
[2]
李磊,黄兆钢,王伟.肩关节镜下治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效观察[J].河北医学,2016,22(11):1844-1846.
[3]
Boyer P, Bouthors C, Delcourt T,et al. Arthroscopic double-row cuff repair with suture-bridging:a structural and functional comparison of two techniques[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumat Arthrosc,2019,23(2):478-486.
[4]
张凯搏,唐新,李箭,等.2019年美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)肩袖损伤临床实践指南解读[J].中国运动医学杂志,2020,39(5):403-412.
[5]
邓威,谌业帅,郑欣,等.关节镜下双排缝合桥固定技术修复大型肩袖撕裂的临床观察[J].中国骨与关节外科,2017,10(1):48-51.
[6]
侯建勇,孔亮,刘兵兵.关节镜手术对老年肩袖损伤患者VAS、UCLA评分的影响[J].临床医学工程,2020,27(6):713-714.
[7]
Heuberer PR, Klblinger R, Buchleitner S, et al. Arthroscopic management of massive rotator cuff tears: an evaluation of debridement, complete, and partial repair with and without force couple restoration[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(12): 3828-3837.
[8]
李良军,丑克,何志勇,等.肩关节镜下治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效观察[J].中国内镜杂志,2015,21(10):1078-1081.
[9]
Thorsness R, Romeo A. Massive rotator cuff tears:trends in surgical management[J]. Orthopedics,2016,39(3):145-151.
[10]
高庆峰,成雪,马震胜,等.关节镜下部分修补老年性巨大肩袖损伤[J].首都医科大学学报,2016,37(6):821-825.
[11]
Henry P, Wasserstein D, Park S, et al. Arthroscopic repair for chronic massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review[J]. Arthroscopy,2015,31(12):2472-2480.
[12]
许健,干阜生,郭标,等.关节镜下双锚钉单排缝合治疗中型肩袖撕裂的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(3):287-289.
[13]
Greenspoon JA, Petri M, Warth RJ, et al. Massive rotator cuff tears: pathomechanics, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes[J]. J Should Elbow Surg, 2018,24(9): 1493-1505.
[14]
张辉,庄万强,骆勇刚,等.关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究[J/CD].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,5(6):337-341.
[15]
Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, et al. Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and knot-tying transosseous-equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair[J]. J Arthroscop Relat Surg,2018,32(1):7-12.
[16]
毛俊超,陈德生,张辉,等.关节镜下缝合桥修复术治疗全层肩袖撕裂的临床疗效观察[J].中国医师杂志,2017,17(9):1397-1399.
[17]
潘海乐,张一翀,吕松岑,等.使用单排缝合技术和缝线桥技术修补中度肩袖撕裂的结果比较[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2019,10(2):85-90.
[18]
宁凡友,李无阴,张作君,等.关节镜下修复巨大肩袖撕裂12例疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,29(9):942-943.
[19]
Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, et al. Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and knot-tying transosseous-equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair[J]. J Arthroscop Relat Surg,2019,32(1):7-12.
[20]
张黎明,汪志芳.肩关节内镜下缝线桥技术治疗肩袖损伤的临床研究[J].中国医药科学,2020,6(22):175-179.
[1] 马桥桥, 张传开, 郭开今, 蒋涛, 王子豪, 刘勇, 郝亮. 可降解止血粉减少初次全膝关节置换术失血量的研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 585-589.
[2] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[3] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[6] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[7] 许杰, 李亚俊, 冯义文. SOX新辅助化疗后腹腔镜胃癌D2根治术与常规根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 647-650.
[8] 康婵娟, 张海涛, 翟静洁. 胰管支架置入术治疗急性胆源性胰腺炎的效果及对患者肝功能、炎症因子水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 667-670.
[9] 付成旺, 杨大刚, 王榕, 李福堂. 营养与炎症指标在可切除胰腺癌中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 704-708.
[10] 曾繁利, 齐秩凯, 杨贺庆. 两种经Glisson蒂鞘解剖路径肝切除术治疗原发性肝癌的肿瘤学疗效及风险比对[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 525-527.
[11] 王维花, 王楠, 乔庆, 罗红. 完全腹腔镜右半结肠癌切除术两种腔内消化道重建方案对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 574-577.
[12] 翟刚, 邓修民, 岑川, 黄锋, 黄显壮, 王运成. 改良双通道吻合法在完全腹腔镜近端胃切除术中的临床效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 397-400.
[13] 罗柳平, 吴萌萌, 陈欣磊, 林科灿. 胰腺全系膜切除在胰头癌根治术中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 651-656.
[14] 韩青雷, 丛赟, 李佳隆, 邵英梅. 术前减黄方式对壶腹周围癌胰十二指肠切除术后并发症的影响[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 665-669.
[15] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?