切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (04) : 325 -330. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.04.007

论著

肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究
董志辉1,(), 徐建杰1, 季伟2, 毕伟东1, 李洁冰1, 张立兴1, 武建忠1   
  1. 1. 050000 石家庄市人民医院骨科二病区
    2. 050000 石家庄长城中西医结合医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-25 出版日期:2021-11-05
  • 通信作者: 董志辉
  • 基金资助:
    2017石家庄市科学技术研究与发展指导计划第一批(171461343)

Study on the effect of functional recovery,pain and prognosis after shoulder arthroscopic double-row suture bridge technique for massive rotator cuff injury

Zhihui Dong1,(), Jianjie Xu1, Wei Ji2, Weidong Bi1, Jiebing Li1, Lixing Zhang1, Jianzhong Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Ward II, Shijiazhuang People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang Great Wall Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2021-03-25 Published:2021-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Zhihui Dong
引用本文:

董志辉, 徐建杰, 季伟, 毕伟东, 李洁冰, 张立兴, 武建忠. 肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 325-330.

Zhihui Dong, Jianjie Xu, Wei Ji, Weidong Bi, Jiebing Li, Lixing Zhang, Jianzhong Wu. Study on the effect of functional recovery,pain and prognosis after shoulder arthroscopic double-row suture bridge technique for massive rotator cuff injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(04): 325-330.

目的

探讨肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响。

方法

选取2018年6月至2020年6月本院收治的巨大肩袖损伤患者100例,据手术方式的不同采用随机数字表的方法分为单缝组和双缝组各50例,单缝组予肩关节镜下单排缝合技术治疗,双缝组予肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术治疗。比较两组患者术前及术后3个月美国肩肘外科评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons'form,ASES)、美国加州大学肩关节评分(the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale,UCLA)、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)及患肩关节前屈、外旋活动度,并于术后随访12个月,比较两组术后并发症及肩袖再损伤发生情况。

结果

单缝组和双缝组术后ASES、UCLA评分明显高于术前,且双缝组术后ASES、UCLA评分明显高于单缝组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。单缝组和双缝组术后VAS评分均降低,且双缝组降低程度更大,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。单缝组和双缝组术后前屈、外旋活动度明显高于术前,且双缝组术后前屈、外旋活动度明显高于单缝组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。术后随访12个月,两组均无血管、神经损伤及切口感染等术后并发症发生,双缝组肩袖再损伤发生率为6.00%,明显低于单缝组的20.00%(x2 = 4.332,P = 0.037)。

结论

与单排缝合技术比较,肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术可有效改善巨大肩袖损伤患者肩关节功能和疼痛症状,并减少了术后肩袖再损伤的发生,具有良好的安全性。

Background

Massive rotator cuff injury is often accompanied with decrease of rotator cuff muscle strength, acromion impingement syndrome, tendon retraction and even muscle atrophy with fatty infiltration, which can cause suprascapular nerve paralysis, shoulder instability, humeral head dislocation and other dysfunctions. The manifestations were posterolateral shoulder pain, radiating pain behind the neck and in the arm, and weakness of shoulder abduction and external rotation. It is a potentially devastating disease. Massive rotator cuff injury is often combined with the injury of biceps tendon of long head. Massive rotator cuff injury usually refers to the injury which is > 5 cm or which involves more than 2 tendons. In Europe, the injury of more than 2 tendons is defined as massive rotator cuff injury, while in North America, the diameter of rotator cuff injury > 5 cm is defined as massive rotator cuff injury.

Objective

To investigate the effect of arthroscopic double row suture bridge technique on shoulder function recovery, pain and prognosis in patients with huge rotator cuff injury.

Methods

From June 2018 to June 2020, 100 patients with massive rotator cuff injury in our hospital were equally divided into single suture group and double suture group with andomized digital table according to different treatment methods. The patients in the single suture group was treated with single-row suture technique under shoulder arthroscopy, and the patients in the double suture group was treated with double-row suture bridge technique under shoulder arthroscopy. American shoulder and elbow surgery score (ASES) , the University of California at Los Angeles shoulder score (UCLA) and visual analogue scale (VAS) scores and the range of motion of flexion and external rotation of the affected shoulder were compared before and 3 months after operation. The postoperative complications and rotator cuff retear were compared between the two groups after 12 months of follow-up.

Results

The postoperative ASES scores and UCLA scores in both single suture group and double suture group were significantly higher than those before operation, and the postoperative ASES scores and UCLA scores in the double suture group were significantly higher than those in the single suture group (P<0.01) . The VAS scores of both single suture group and double suture group were lower after operations, and the decrease degree of VAS scores in the double suture group was larger than those in the single row group (P<0.01) . The ranges of motion of flexion and external rotation in both single suture group and double suture group were significantly higher than those before operation, and the ranges of motion of flexion and external rotation in the double suture group were significantly higher than those in single suture group (P<0.01) . After 12 months of follow-up, there were no postoperative complications such as vascular, nerve injury or incision infection in both groups. The incidence of rotator cuff retear in the double suture group was 6.00%, which was significantly lower than that in the single suture group (20.00%) (x2=4.332, P=0.037) .

Conclusion

Compared with single-row suture technique, arthroscopic double-row suture bridge technique can effectively improve shoulder function and pain of patients with massive rotator cuff injury, and reduce the occurrence of postoperative rotator cuff retear, which has sound security.

表1 巨大肩袖损伤两组基线资料比较
表2 巨大肩袖损伤两组手术前后ASES、UCLA评分比较(分,±s
表3 巨大肩袖损伤两组手术前后VAS评分比较(分,±s
表4 巨大肩袖损伤两组手术前后患者肩关节前屈、外旋活动度比较(o,±s
[1]
孙峥,王胜杰,吕明超.肩袖损伤诊疗的研究进展[J].中国医刊,2018,15(12):19-21.
[2]
李磊,黄兆钢,王伟.肩关节镜下治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的临床疗效观察[J].河北医学,2016,22(11):1844-1846.
[3]
Boyer P, Bouthors C, Delcourt T,et al. Arthroscopic double-row cuff repair with suture-bridging:a structural and functional comparison of two techniques[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumat Arthrosc,2019,23(2):478-486.
[4]
张凯搏,唐新,李箭,等.2019年美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)肩袖损伤临床实践指南解读[J].中国运动医学杂志,2020,39(5):403-412.
[5]
邓威,谌业帅,郑欣,等.关节镜下双排缝合桥固定技术修复大型肩袖撕裂的临床观察[J].中国骨与关节外科,2017,10(1):48-51.
[6]
侯建勇,孔亮,刘兵兵.关节镜手术对老年肩袖损伤患者VAS、UCLA评分的影响[J].临床医学工程,2020,27(6):713-714.
[7]
Heuberer PR, Klblinger R, Buchleitner S, et al. Arthroscopic management of massive rotator cuff tears: an evaluation of debridement, complete, and partial repair with and without force couple restoration[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2016, 24(12): 3828-3837.
[8]
李良军,丑克,何志勇,等.肩关节镜下治疗巨大肩袖撕裂的疗效观察[J].中国内镜杂志,2015,21(10):1078-1081.
[9]
Thorsness R, Romeo A. Massive rotator cuff tears:trends in surgical management[J]. Orthopedics,2016,39(3):145-151.
[10]
高庆峰,成雪,马震胜,等.关节镜下部分修补老年性巨大肩袖损伤[J].首都医科大学学报,2016,37(6):821-825.
[11]
Henry P, Wasserstein D, Park S, et al. Arthroscopic repair for chronic massive rotator cuff tears: a systematic review[J]. Arthroscopy,2015,31(12):2472-2480.
[12]
许健,干阜生,郭标,等.关节镜下双锚钉单排缝合治疗中型肩袖撕裂的疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2017,32(3):287-289.
[13]
Greenspoon JA, Petri M, Warth RJ, et al. Massive rotator cuff tears: pathomechanics, current treatment options, and clinical outcomes[J]. J Should Elbow Surg, 2018,24(9): 1493-1505.
[14]
张辉,庄万强,骆勇刚,等.关节镜下单排与双排缝合桥修复技术治疗老年肩袖损伤的对照研究[J/CD].中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志,2019,5(6):337-341.
[15]
Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, et al. Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and knot-tying transosseous-equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair[J]. J Arthroscop Relat Surg,2018,32(1):7-12.
[16]
毛俊超,陈德生,张辉,等.关节镜下缝合桥修复术治疗全层肩袖撕裂的临床疗效观察[J].中国医师杂志,2017,17(9):1397-1399.
[17]
潘海乐,张一翀,吕松岑,等.使用单排缝合技术和缝线桥技术修补中度肩袖撕裂的结果比较[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2019,10(2):85-90.
[18]
宁凡友,李无阴,张作君,等.关节镜下修复巨大肩袖撕裂12例疗效分析[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2019,29(9):942-943.
[19]
Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, et al. Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and knot-tying transosseous-equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair[J]. J Arthroscop Relat Surg,2019,32(1):7-12.
[20]
张黎明,汪志芳.肩关节内镜下缝线桥技术治疗肩袖损伤的临床研究[J].中国医药科学,2020,6(22):175-179.
[1] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[2] 刘鹏, 周莹佳, 常彦峰, 甄平, 李生贵, 刘军, 周胜虎. 类风湿关节炎行关节置换围术期风险管理的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 540-548.
[3] 王博永, 张飞洋, 沈灏. 全髋关节置换术后假体周围骨折研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 391-397.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[8] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[9] 宋钰, 赵阳, 王惠君, 廖新华. 术前BMI与可切除胃癌患者术后远期生存的关系[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 530-533.
[10] 汪毅, 许思哲, 任章霞. 胸乳入路腔镜单侧甲状腺叶切除术与开放手术对分化型甲状腺癌患者术后恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 542-545.
[11] 陈俊宇, 崔宇. TAPP治疗腹股沟嵌顿疝的临床分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 546-549.
[12] 赵新亮, 荆克杰, 樊红艳, 王妮, 葸根. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外补片与腹腔内补片治疗两侧下腹壁切口疝的临床对比观察[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 554-557.
[13] 惠立良, 王成果, 段东峰, 王健. 腹腔镜保留脾脏胰体尾切除术治疗胰体尾部良性肿瘤及部分交界性肿瘤的临床效果[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 558-561.
[14] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[15] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
阅读次数
全文


摘要