切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 55 -62. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.01.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨修复合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤临床疗效分析
程念南1, 潘剑英1, 曾春1,()   
  1. 1. 510630 广州,南方医科大学第三附属医院运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-23 出版日期:2021-02-05
  • 通信作者: 曾春
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金(2018A030313278)

Clinical efficacy analysis of Arthroscopic double Endobuttons fixation of autologous iliac bone for the repair of Bankart lesion with severe bone defect

Niannan Cheng1, Jianying Pan1, Chun Zeng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou 510630, China
  • Received:2020-09-23 Published:2021-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Chun Zeng
引用本文:

程念南, 潘剑英, 曾春. 关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨修复合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤临床疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 55-62.

Niannan Cheng, Jianying Pan, Chun Zeng. Clinical efficacy analysis of Arthroscopic double Endobuttons fixation of autologous iliac bone for the repair of Bankart lesion with severe bone defect[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(01): 55-62.

目的

探讨关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨修复合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤患者肩关节临床功能改善及肩胛盂骨缺损修复情况。

方法

回顾性分析2015年7月至2018年7月在南方医科大学第三附属医院运动医学科采用关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨植骨术治疗的17例合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤患者。在术前和术后使用美国肩肘外科协会(American shoulder and elbow surgeons,ASES)评分、Constant评分、Rowe评分量表并测量肩关节主动活动度以评估肩关节功能改善情况,在三维CT上评估术后骨缺损修复程度。

结果

所有17例患者均完成随访,期间未出现感染、创伤性关节炎及再脱位等并发症。术后6个月、12个月、24个月平均ASES评分、Constant评分、Rowe评分均较术前显著增高,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),各评分在术后24个月较术后6个月均显著增高,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后6个月、12个月、24个月平均前屈、体侧内旋活动度均较术前显著增大,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05);平均体侧外旋、外展90°时内旋、外展90°时外旋活动度在手术前后差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后6个月、12个月、24个月时平均肩胛盂骨缺损程度均较术前显著降低,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后24个月较术后12个月差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。术后24个月CT可见各移植骨块均已与肩胛盂融合。

结论

关节镜下双袢固定自体髂骨修复合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤术后患者肩关节功能改善好,移植骨块骨吸收程度较少、愈合良好,随访期间未观察到肩部术后并发症,该术式治疗合并严重骨缺损的Bankart损伤临床效果良好。

Background

The osseous Bankart lesion is a common glenoid bone lesion of shoulder in clinical practice, which often causes anterior instability or even recurrent dislocation of the shoulder joint. With arthroscopic Bankart repair becoming the first choice for soft tissue injury in patients with anterior shoulder instability, the choice of arthroscopic treatment for patients with chronic glenoid bone defect has attracted more and more attention of surgeons. At present, arthroscopic reconstruction of glenoid cavity with Endobutton fixation of autologous iliac bone grafting has been applied in clinical practice, but there are still few studies on its postoperative efficacy. Objective To investigate the improvement of shoulder clinical function and glenoid bone defect repair in patients of Bankart lesion with severe bone defect repaired by arthroscopic double Endobutton fixation with autologous ilium bone grafting.

Methods

From July 2015 to July 2018, 17 patients with Bankart injury of shoulder joint complicated with severe bone defect were treated with arthroscopic double Endobutton fixation and autologous iliac bone grafting in the department of sports medicine, the third affiliated hospital of southern medical university. The American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score, Constant-Murley score, Rowe score, and active range of motion of shoulder joint were measured preoperatively and postoperatively to assess the improvement of shoulder joint function, and the degree of postoperative bone defect repair was evaluated by three-dimensional CT.

Results

All 17 patients were followed up and the average age was 32.11 (17-71) years. No complications such as infection, traumatic arthritis or redislocation occurred during the period. The mean ASES score, Constant-Murley score and Rowe score in the 6th month, 12th month and 24th month after operation were significantly higher than those before operation, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05) . The scores in the 24th month were significantly higher than those in the 6th month after operation, and there was statistical difference (P<0.05) . The mean ranges of motion of anteflexion and internal rotation was significantly increased in the 6th month, 12th month and 24th month after operation, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05) . The mean range of motion of external rotation, internal rotation at 90° of abduction and external rotation at 90° of abduction had no significant difference before and after operation (P>0.05) . The average degrees of glenoid bone defect in the 6th month, 12th month and 24th month after operation were significantly reduced, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05) , and there was no significant difference in the 24th month compared with that in the 12th month after operation (P>0.05) . In the 24th month after surgery, the CT scan demonstrated that each grafted bone fragment had fused with the glenoid cavity.

Conclusion

Arthroscopic double Endobutton fixation with autologous iliac bone grafting for the repair of Bankart injury with severe bone defect can improve the shoulder joint function with less bone resorption and good healing of the grafted bone fragment. No postoperative shoulder complications were observed during the follow-up period. The clinical effect of this treatment for Bankart injury with severe bone defect is good.

图1 关节镜下调整移植骨块平行于关节盂面且位于肩胛盂前下方3~6点位置
图2 关节镜下修复肩胛盂前下方盂唇损伤
图3 最佳拟合圆法测算肩胛盂骨缺损程度 图A:术前;图B:术后6个月;图C:术后12个月;图D:术后24个月
表1 患者术前、术后随访时功能评分比较(分,±s)
表2 患者术前、术后Constant评分各单项评分(分,±s)
表3 患者术前、术后随访时主动活动度比较(°,±s)
图4 术前、术后平均ASES评分比较
图5 术前、术后平均Constant评分比较
图6 术前、术后平均Rowe评分比较
图7 术前、术后平均肩胛盂骨缺损程度比较
图8 术前、术后肩关节主动前屈上举平均活动度比较
图9 术前、术后肩关节主动外旋平均活动度比较
图10 术前、术后肩关节主动内旋平均活动度比较
图11 术前、术后肩关节外展90°时主动内、外旋平均活动度比较
图12 术前、术后肩关节CT三维重建前位像 图A:术前;图B:术后第1天;图C:术后6个月;图D:术后12个月;图E:术后24个月
[1]
Griffith JF, Antonio GE, Yung PS, et al. Prevalence, pattern, and spectmm of Glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder dislocation: CT analysis of 218 patients [J].AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 190 (5): 1247-1254.
[2]
Kim SH,Ha KI,Cho Y,et al. Arthroscopic anterior stabilization of the shoulder: two to six-year follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2003,85(8):1511-1518.
[3]
Sugaya H,Moriishi J,Dohi M, et al.Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2003,85-A(5):878-884.
[4]
Yamamoto N, Muraki T, Sperling JW, et al. Stabilizing mechanism in bone grafting of a large glenoid defect [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92 (11): 2059-2066.
[5]
Boehm E, Minkus M, Moroder P, et al. Massive graft resorption after iliac crest allograft reconstruction for glenoid bone loss in recurrent anterior shoulder instability [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2020,140 (7):895-903.
[6]
Taverna E,D'Ambrosi R,Perfetti C, et al. Arthroscopic bone graft procedure for anterior inferior glenohumeral instability[J]. Arthrosc Tech,2014,3(6): 653-660.
[7]
Kazum E, Chechik O, Pritsch T, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of suture buttons versus cortical screws in the Latarjet-bristow procedure: A fresh-frozen cadavers study [J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2019,139:1779-1783.
[8]
Bonnevialle N, Thélu CE, Bouju Y, et al. Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure with double-button fixation: short-term complications and learning curve analysis [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2018,27(6):e189-e195.
[9]
Sigrist B,Ferguson S,Boehm E, et al.The biomechanical effect of bone grafting and bone graft remodeling in patients with anterior shoulder instability [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020,48(8):1857-1864.
[10]
Carbone S, Moroder P, Runer A, et al. Scapular dyskinesis after Latarjet procedure [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg ,2016,25:422-427.
[11]
Gendre P, Thélu CE, d'Ollonne T,et al. Coracoid bone block fixation with cortical buttons: an alternative to screw fixation? [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2016,102(8):983-987.
[12]
Provencher MT, Aman ZS, LaPrade CM, et al. Biomechanical comparison of screw fxation vs a cortical button and self-tensioning suture for the Latarjet procedure [J]. Orthop J Sports Med,2018,6(6):2325967118777842.
[13]
Boileau P, Gendre P, Baba M, et al. A guided surgical approach and novel fixation method for arthroscopic Latarjet [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2016,25(1):78-89.
[14]
Butt U,Charalambous CP.Complications associated with open coracoid transfer procedures for shoulder instability[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2012,21 (8):1110-1119.
[15]
Willemot LB, Akbari-Shandiz M, Sanchez-Sotelo J, et al. Restoration of articular geometry using curre graft options for large glenoid bone defects in anterior shoulder instability [J]. Arthroscopy,2017,33(9):1661-1669.
[16]
Moroder P, Schulz E, Wierer G, et al. Neer Award 2019: Latarjet procedure vs. iliac crest bone graft transfer for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: a prospective randomized trial[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2019,28(7):1298-1307.
[17]
Chen AL, Hunt SA, Hawkins RJ, et al. Management of bone loss associated with recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability[J]. Am J Sports Med,2005,33:912-925.
[18]
Young DC, Rockwood CA Jr. Complications of a failed Bristow procedure and their management[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1991,73:969-981.
[19]
Carbone S,Moroder P,Runer A,et al.Scapular dyskinesis after Latarjet procedure[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2016,25(3): 422-427.
[20]
Moroder P, Schulz E, Wierer G, et al. Neer Award 2019: Latarjet procedure vs. iliac crest bone graft transfer for treatment of anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: a prospective randomized trial[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2019,28(7):1298-1307.
[1] 杨仁瑞, 徐永清, 何鹏举, 金涛, 耿睿智, 杨够仙. 关节镜下改良双滑轮技术交叉缝合固定骨性Bankart损伤[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(05): 609-613.
[2] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[3] 刘佳琳, 王晓宁, 黄晓虹, 刘佳, 李亘, 严彬. 新型患肢固定牵引带在肩关节镜手术侧卧牵引位中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 122-127.
[4] 吴宇顺, 刘诗滦, 卓鸿武, 肖靖, 潘玲, 李坚. 氨甲环酸对肩关节镜手术疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 63-70.
[5] 李朋, 吴剑波, 王东, 赵峰, 田伟, 常峰, 张宇明. 关节镜治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴纤维性Bankart损伤的疗效研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 12-17.
[6] 王常青, 赵承武, 汪坤, 宋之明. 关节镜下改良髂骨移植技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位短期疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 312-318.
[7] 余洋, 谢冰, 王国梁, 施政良, 熊波涵, 李彦林. 关节镜下肩胛下肌腱部分转位加强修复复发性肩关节前脱位[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 203-206.
[8] 魏澜, 王泓巍, 杨仁豪, 宋艳艳, 刘敬锋, 王蕾, 王晓宁, 庄澄宇. 肩关节镜术中低体温情况的观察性研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 154-161.
[9] 董志辉, 徐建杰, 季伟, 毕伟东, 李洁冰, 张立兴, 武建忠. 肩关节镜下双排缝合桥技术对巨大肩袖损伤患者术后肩关节功能恢复、疼痛及预后的影响研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 325-330.
[10] 祝相如, 张聿达, 李绪文, 刘国明, 梁承志, 扈延龄. 自体髂骨块植骨结合Calcar螺钉重建内侧柱治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 244-248.
[11] 黄晓虹, 刘佳, 庄澄宇, 王晓宁. 灌注流速对肩关节镜术后患者的康复效果研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 236-243.
[12] 居家宝, 刘洋, 陈建海, 马明太, 张一翀, 张子宵, 张殿英. 复杂性肩关节脱位术后功能分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 154-158.
[13] 王红莉, 张妍, 居家宝, 张艳, 李立, 陈建海. 肩袖损伤患者术前焦虑状况与肩关节镜术后疼痛的相关性分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 38-41.
[14] 曾一鸣, 王燎, 王采凤, 杨志英, 张峻. 肩关节镜临床登记系统的构建与应用研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 340-346.
[15] 楚晓丰, 范小艺, 姜丽, 梁宁, 刘春玲. 温针疗法对肩关节镜术后镇痛消肿的疗效观察[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2021, 10(01): 5-9.
阅读次数
全文


摘要