切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (02) : 101 -106. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2019.02.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

肱骨近端"头帽型"骨折的解剖学特点及诊疗方案研究
李策1, 付中国1,()   
  1. 1. 100044 北京大学人民医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2019-05-05
  • 通信作者: 付中国
  • 基金资助:
    教育部创新团队项目(IRT-16R01)

Special type of proximal humerus fracture: anatomical characteristics and speciality of diagnosis and treatment

Ce Li1, Zhongguo Fu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2018-03-16 Published:2019-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Zhongguo Fu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Fu Zhongguo, Email:
引用本文:

李策, 付中国. 肱骨近端"头帽型"骨折的解剖学特点及诊疗方案研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(02): 101-106.

Ce Li, Zhongguo Fu. Special type of proximal humerus fracture: anatomical characteristics and speciality of diagnosis and treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(02): 101-106.

目的

探索适合肱骨近端特殊类型的"头帽型"骨折的诊疗方案,降低术后并发症的发生率。

方法

根据骨折的影像学分型、解剖学特点及术后并发症的发生率,结合北京大学人民医院创伤骨科2016年1月至2017年12月诊治的肱骨近端"头帽型"骨折患者18例诊疗结果,研究肱骨近端"头帽型"骨折的诊疗特殊性。

结果

符合肱骨近端"头帽型"骨折分型的18例中9例采取切开复位钢板内固定手术治疗,有2例(22%)出现了不同程度的肱骨头吸收、肱骨头骨块厚度变薄和预后肩关节活动功能差;而采取人工关节置换术的9例未出现预后肩关节活动受限等并发症。

结论

"头帽型"骨折术后发生肱骨头坏死、畸形愈合等风险高,应高度重视该骨折类型固定的特殊性。

Background

Shoulder joint is the joint with the largest range of movement. The shoulder joints structure is complex and plays an extremely important role in people's daily life. The complex type of proximal humerus fractures has always been a complex disease in the treatment of traumatic orthopedics. The type of proximal humerus fractures and the shape of displacement depend on the mechanism of injury and the pulling of muscle around the fractures. The clinical classification of proximal humeral fractures includes Neer classification and AO classification. Neer classification is based on the affected part and displacement for fracture classification. The proximal of humerus is divided into four parts: humeral head, greater tuberosity, lesser tuberosity and humeral shaft. The classification is based on the number of fractured parts (displacement > 1 cm or > 45°) , and the degree of fracture displacement refers to the position of the other three fracture blocks relative to humeral head. AO classification: type A fracture, as one fracture outside the joint; type B fracture as two fractures outside the joint; type C fracture as intra-articular (anatomical neck) fracture. As the two types of classification are compared, AO classification is used relatively lesser in the clinical due to its large number of subtypes. On the other hand, Neer classification is most commonly used in clinical application. Neer classification can evaluate the complexity of proximal humeral fractures, determine the damage of humeral head blood supply, and guide clinical treatment plan to determine the prognosis of fractures. After more and more clinical cases, however, a special type of fracture was found. According to the Neer classification, it may be only a two-part fracture or a three-part fracture, but the complexity of fractures, the degree of damage to fracture block and the poor prognosis are as bad as the four-part fracture. We call it "head-cap" fracture.

Methods

In the Department of Trauma and Orthopedics, Peking University People's Hospital, a total of 76 cases of proximal humeral fractures were diagnosed from January 2016 to December 2017, including 18 cases of "head-cap" type fractures. According to the patient's imaging data, it was found that the humeral head fracture line was located in anatomical neck, and the humeral head had different degrees of compression fracture. The distance between the central region of humeral head anatomical neck plane and the humeral head cartilage surface was less than 17.7 mm, and the average thickness of radial head fracture block was (15.6±1.2) mm. To find a suitable diagnosis and treatment program, we studied the special of the "head-cap" fracture of proximal humerus.

Results

According to the Neer classification, there were 2 cases of two-part fracture, 5 cases of three-part fracture and 11 cases of four-part fracture. Among them, 9 cases were treated with artificial joint replacement, and 9 cases were treated with open reduction and internal fixation. Of the 9 cases treated with open reduction and internal fixation, 2 cases (22%) had different degrees of humeral head absorption. The thickness of radial head fracture block was thinner, and the prognosis of shoulder joint was poor. In the 9 cases of artificial joint replacement, no complication that the shoulder mobility was limited was found.

Conclusions

The risk of humeral head necrosis, malunion and greater tuberosity absorption is very high after the operation of humeral proximal "head-cap" fracture. The orthopedic surgeons should not simply develop a treatment plan based on traditional fracture classification when the corresponding type of fractures is met. According to the specific fracture condition of patients, the surgical treatment should be adjusted. The high risk of humeral head necrosis and malunion after operation for such type of fractures should be taken seriously. The depth of nail should be controlled during internal fixation operation. The screw tip must be strictly 5 mm within joint surface as close as possible, and the crossing of joint surface should be avoided. At the same time, the exact stable fixation of greater and lesser tuberosity is particularly important. The possibility of tuberosity absorption after non-exactly fixation is very high, which may result in serious consequences that cannot be repaired. Arthroplasty is a good treatment option to avoid the complication of humeral head absorption after proximal humeral "head-cap" fracture.

图1 "头帽型"骨折
图2 典型病例:肱骨近端"头帽型"骨折的影像学表现(A、B、C),肱骨头厚度为15.5 mm(D)和14.7 mm(E)
表1 18例肱骨头厚度测量结果、Neer分型及治疗方案
图3 2例肱骨近端"头帽型"骨折患者采取切开复位钢板内固定治疗术后肱骨头骨块吸收变薄,伴大结节吸收,肩关节持续疼痛伴活动受限 图A:术前影像学资料,测量肱骨头骨块厚度为15.4 mm;图B:术后1周内的影像学资料;图C:术后1年的影像学资料,测量肱骨头骨块的厚度为13.2 mm;图D:术前影像学资料,测量肱骨头骨块的厚度为16.9 mm;图E:术前肩关节CT影像学资料;图F:术后3个月的影像学资料,测量肱骨头骨块的厚度为15.5 mm
图4 旋肱前动脉位置
[1]
Helmy N, Hintermann B. New trends in the treatment of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2006, 442 (1) : 100-108.
[2]
Neer CS. Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: purpose and reliable use[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2002, 11 (4): 389-400.
[3]
Miiller ME, Allgower M, Schneider R, et al. Manual of internal fixation[J]. Berlin: Springer, 1990, (1):70-75.
[4]
DeLude JA, Bicknell RT, MacKenzie GA, et al. An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16(4):477-483.
[5]
Humphrey CS, Sears BW, Curtin MJ,et al. An anthropometric analysis to derive formulae for calculating the dimensions of anatomically shaped humeral heads[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2016, 25(9): 1532-1541.
[6]
Chen YF, Zhu NF, Zhang CQ. The relevance of the anatomicalbasis of fracture for the subsequent treatment of the anterior humeralcircumflex artery and the axillary nerve[J]. Int Orthop, 2012, 36(4): 783-787.
[7]
Hertel R, Hempfing A, Stiehler M, et al. Predictors of humeral head ischemia after intracapsular fracture of the proximal humerus[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2004, 13(4): 427-433.
[8]
Jost B, Spross C, Grehn H, et al. Locking plate fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus: analysis of complications, revision strategies and outcome[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(4):542-549.
[9]
张长青,黄轶刚.肱骨近端骨折后遗症的手术治疗[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2013, 1(1):4-7.
[10]
Vallier HA. Treatment of proximal humerus fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(7):469-476.
[11]
吴克俭,王晓宁,张建,等.肱骨近端骨折[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2014, 2(4):209-218.
[12]
Kazakos K, Lyras DN, Galanis V, et al. Internal fixation of proximal humerus fractures using the Polarus intramedullary nail[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2007, 127(7): 503-508.
[13]
唐诗添,刘刚,王军,等.锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端三部分、四部分骨折的疗效分析[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2017, 5(2):96-101.
[14]
Gadea F, Alami G, Pape G, et al. Shoulder hemiarthroplasty: Outcomes and long-term survival analysis according to etiology[J]. Orthop Traumatol, 2012, 98(6):659-665.
[15]
Choi S, Bae JH, Kwon YS, et al. Clinical outcomes and complications of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during the early learning curve period[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1):53.
[16]
Figaredo VM, Pons-Villanueva J. How many cephalic locked screws are needed in valgus proximal humeral fractures?[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(10) : 2370-2372.
[17]
Liew ASL, Johnson JA, Patterson SD,et al. Effect of screw placement on fixation in the humeral head[J]. J Shoulder Elb Surg, 2000, 9 (5):423-426.
[18]
Erhardt JB, Stoffel K, Kampshoff J, et al. The position and number of screws influence screw perforation of the humeral head in modern locking plates: a cadaver study[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26(10):188-192.
[19]
McLaughlin-Symon I, Kenyon P, Morgan B, et al. A new "trapdoor technique" for fixation of displaced greater tuberosity fractures of the shoulder[J]. J Hand Micro Surg, 2015, 7(2): 241-243.
[20]
Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, et al. Neer award 2005: the grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis : results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty [J] . J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15(5):527- 540.
[21]
Rouleau DM, Mutch J, Laflamme GY. Surgical treatment of displaced greater tuberosity fractures of the humerus[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2016, 24(1):46-56.
[22]
付中国,邓磊,白露, 等.肱骨近端骨折锁定接骨板治疗术后并发症分析[J]. 北京大学学报:医学版, 2011, 43(5):666-670.
[23]
姜保国,陈建海.肱骨近端骨折的治疗[J].北京大学学报(医学版), 2012, 44(6):821-823.
[24]
Lanting B, Macdermid J, Drosdowech D, et al. Proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review of treatment modalities[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(1):42-54.
[1] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[2] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[3] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[4] 车娟, 刘俊阳. 肱骨近端骨折围手术期深静脉血栓发生因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 146-149.
[5] 汪磊, 邢丹谋, 王欢. 肱骨头坏死的疾病特点及诊疗情况[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 89-93.
[6] 刘泽民, 张经, 王栋, 李岩, 常诗语, 张永红. 解剖锁定板是否联合带线锚钉重建喙锁韧带治疗不稳定性锁骨远端骨折疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 53-62.
[7] 张晓萌, 杨杰, 刘海, 王艳华, 张一翀, 张立佳, 熊晨, 唐缪田, 张殿英. 科研创新就在我们身边[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 1-6.
[8] 刘兵, 马翔宇, 杨超, 周大鹏. 应用Philos钢板联合个体化髓内解剖型骨水泥占位器治疗老年骨质疏松性肱骨近端骨折的临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 293-299.
[9] 丁小方, 杨黎黎, 周海涛, 纪坤羽, 杨鹏杰, 杨坤, 吕昊润, 王元利, 付中国. 基于"悬臂-杠杆重建-不稳定"理论的老年肱骨近端粉碎骨折术后康复策略探讨[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 232-238.
[10] 程邦君, 黄燕峰, 罗轶, 何耀华. 两种手术方法治疗Neer Ⅲ型肱骨近端骨折的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(04): 335-340.
[11] 金万通, 薛海鹏, 周大鹏, 刘兵, 纪振钢, 马翔宇, 杨超, 张昊, 韩宁, 宗宇宁, 张咏晧, 马泽方. 3D打印结合PMMA骨水泥髓内支撑技术在老年肱骨近端骨质疏松性骨折中的应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 276-284.
[12] 杨良栋, 张华泽, 何举仁, 高艳刚, 李栋. 锁定钢板与交锁髓内钉固定治疗老年Neer分型2、3部分肱骨近端骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(02): 96-103.
[13] 赵阔, 王忠正, 王宇钏, 张浚哲, 郭家良, 郑占乐, 陈伟, 张英泽. 双反牵引复位器联合MIPO技术治疗肱骨近端骨折的初步应用[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 321-325.
[14] 林炳基, 郭培义, 张子宏, 柯森淼, 汪洋. 掌背侧联合入路植骨钢板治疗老年C型桡骨远端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(05): 284-290.
[15] 杨杨, 刘永志, 刘军峰, 周雪涛, 张东升. 回顾性分析完全胸腔镜下肋骨骨折内固定术治疗肋骨骨折患者的临床效果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 137-142.
阅读次数
全文


摘要