切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (01) : 56 -62. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2019.01.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

肩袖损伤修补金属锚钉置入角度——有限元分析
包呼日查1, 齐岩松1, 陶立元2, 王永祥1, 魏宝刚1, 李筱贺3, 徐永胜1,()   
  1. 1. 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古自治区人民医院骨关节科(运动医学中心)
    2. 100191 北京大学第三医院临床流行病学研究中心
    3. 010110 呼和浩特,内蒙古医科大学基础医学院人体解剖教研室
  • 收稿日期:2017-08-15 出版日期:2019-02-05
  • 通信作者: 徐永胜
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金地区科学基金项目(81560374); 内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(201602098); 内蒙古自治区人民医院院内基金项目(201501)

A finite element analysis of the insertion angle of the metal anchor screw for rotator cuff injury repair

Richa Baohu1, Yansong Qi1, Liyuan Tao2, Yongxiang Wang1, Baogang Wei1, Xiaohe Li3, Yongsheng Xv1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Inner Mongolia People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China
    2. Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing 100191, China
    3. Department of Anatomy, Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010110, China
  • Received:2017-08-15 Published:2019-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Yongsheng Xv
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Xu yongsheng, Email:
引用本文:

包呼日查, 齐岩松, 陶立元, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 李筱贺, 徐永胜. 肩袖损伤修补金属锚钉置入角度——有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(01): 56-62.

Richa Baohu, Yansong Qi, Liyuan Tao, Yongxiang Wang, Baogang Wei, Xiaohe Li, Yongsheng Xv. A finite element analysis of the insertion angle of the metal anchor screw for rotator cuff injury repair[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(01): 56-62.

目的

通过有限元分析方法比较肩袖修补术中冈上肌肌腱足印区处以90°、45°置入金属锚钉时钉体及周围骨组织的受力情况。

方法

利用CT数据建立肱骨近端和锚钉的三维模型,在冈上肌肌腱止点足印区、肱骨大结节和关节软骨交接区模拟90°、45°置入锚钉,且加载15°、30°、45°、60°、75°、90°的100 N拉力,采用有限元分析软件ABAQUS模拟分析锚钉和肱骨近端骨组织应力分布情况。

结果

在所有的模型中,锚钉的最大等效应力集中在锚钉下方小孔和近端螺纹之间。45°置入的锚钉周围骨组织的最大等效应力集中在近端锚钉螺纹和牵引侧的骨组织表面之间;而90°置入的锚钉周围骨组织等效应力比较均衡的分布在近端螺纹周围。以100 N的拉力从15°~75°对锚钉进行牵拉时,45°置入的锚钉所受的最大等效应力大于90°置入锚钉所受应力;随着角度的增大,两个角度置入锚钉之间应力差异逐渐减小。90°牵拉载荷时,90°置入的锚钉所受的应力稍大于45°置入锚钉所受应力。金属锚钉受从15°~90°牵拉载荷时,45°置入锚钉周围骨组织所受的最大等效应力均大于以90°置入锚钉周围骨组织的所受的最大等效应力。

结论

有限元分析结果显示,以90°置入锚钉时锚钉及其周围骨组织所受的应力较45°置入锚钉更小,建议肩袖修补手术中采用90°置入锚钉。

Background

Arthroscopic repair of injured rotator cuff with suture anchor has become the main method for surgical treatment of rotator cuff injury. The failure of rotator cuff repair is associated with many factors, among which the failure of anchor fixation is one major cause. The reasons of the failure of anchor fixation include anchor loosening, displacement, extraction. These eventually lead to the articular cartilage damage, pain and even secondary surgery. The fixation strength of anchors is related to the design of anchors, patient's bone density, anchor insertion depth and insertion angle.At present, there is no unified opinion on the reasonable placement angle of anchor. The integrity of the repair using the anchor depends on the strength at the two main interfaces, which are the strength between the anchor and the bone and the strength between the suture and the tendon. With regard to anchor placement techniques, many orthopaedic surgeons place the anchors at the angle of 45° to the bone surface to increase the resistance of the anchor when pulled out by the tension generated by the rotator cuff. Burkhart first proposed the "Deadman theory" for the angle of anchor insertion. It is believed that the anchoring force of the anchor is the strongest when the angle of insertion is less than 45°. Therefore, in the current rotator cuff repair surgery, the surgeon usually inserts the anchor at 45° or less. But the theory was originally based on the analogy of the angular barrier stabilization system, rather than based on any biomechanical test data, some scholars have questioned this. Recent studies have shown that the "Deadman theory" does not necessarily show the strongest pull-out strength of the anchor with a suture. Nagamoto H et al placed metal anchors at 90° and 45° into artificial bones of different densities and greater tuberosity of pigs, and performed biomechanical pull-out tests. The results showed that they were placed at 90° regardless of bone density. The anchoring strength of the anchors on the surface of the bone is greater than 45°. The purpose of this study is to use three-dimensional finite element method to clarify the stress distribution pattern of suture anchor and surrounding bone inserted at different angles, and provides a theoretical basis for the selection of intraoperative insertion angle.

Methord

1. finite element modeling: (1) Objective: A thin-slice CT image of the proximal humerus and a micro-CT of a metal anchor (TwinfixTM, 5.0 mm, Smith & Nephew) were used in a patient with a rotator cuff injury (male, 68 years old, signed informed consent) . A three-dimensional model of the proximal humerus and metal anchor was established by the medical tomographic image processing software MIMICS 14.1 (Materialise, Belgium) . A cylinder with a diameter of 3.0 mm was established in the MMICICS software, and the position of the joint between the articular cartilage and the greater tuberosity opened in the foot print area of the supraspinatus tendon. The anchors were placed at 90° and 45°, and each anchor was placed in the same position and depth (the proximal end of the metal anchor was flush with the bone surface) such that the entire thread was in contact with the proximal humerus bone. The meshing function of the MIMICS software is used to mesh the 3D model. In order to simulate the shape and calculation of the metal anchor more realistically, the mesh size of the anchor is set to 0.06 mm; the proximal mesh of the humerus is given a gradient meshing method according to the shape of the model, and the mesh size interval is 0.2 mm to 0.06mm. The model is then imported into the finite element software ABAQUS 6.11, which applies the tetrahedral element to divide the model into meshes and assemble the parts as a whole. (2) Mechanical parameters of the material: The three-dimensional model of the proximal humerus was introduced into the FEA material module of the MMICICS software, and the material properties were assigned according to the gray value. According to the proximal humeral parameters provided by the software: the relationship between density and gray is ρ= 0.624 × HU + 173; the relationship between elastic modulus and density is E = 0.06 ×ρ1.57. The proximal humerus model was introduced into ABAQUS finite element software to simulate the different densities and material properties of different parts of the proximal humerus. According to the related literature, the elastic modulus of the metal titanium alloy anchor is E=110000 MPa, and the Poisson's ratio V=0.28.Two contact pairs are defined in this finite element model: the anchor thread contact surface and the threaded contact surface created when the anchor is placed. Joint contact is defined as a finite slip, frictionless, and non-penetrating hard contact. (3) Load and boundary conditions: 6 degrees of freedom of the distal radius of the humerus is completely restrained and fixed, and the degree of freedom of the metal anchor is not restricted. A 100 N tensile load is applied to the metal anchored upper surface at different angles (15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, 75°, 90°) . The shoulder joints that simulate the rotator cuff are moved at various angles. The condition of the bone tissue and the metal anchor was measured, and the contact stress under different simulated conditions was calculated.2. statistical analysis: This study calculated the distribution of von Mises equivalent stress in the metal anchor and the bone tissue around the anchor. At the same time, the stress distribution pattern and the maximum value of the equivalent stress under different angles of traction were studied, and then the anchors were compared between 45° and 90°. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 16.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) . A paired t-test was used to compare the highest value of the equivalent stress between 45° and 90° anchor placement.

Results

At different angles of 100 N tension, the maximum von mises equivalent stress of the metal anchors in all models is concentrated between the small holes below the anchor and the proximal threads. When the anchor is pulled from 15°-75°, the maximum von mises equivalent stress of the anchor placed at 45° is greater than 90°, and the difference of stress between two insertion angle decreases as the angle increases. At 90° pull load, the stress placed on the 90° anchor is slightly greater than 45°. At different angles of 100N tension, the maximum von mises equivalent stress of the bone tissue around the 45° placed metal anchor is concentrated between the proximal anchor thread and the traction side bone tissue surface; and for the 90° placed metal anchor, the maximum von mises equivalent stress of the bone tissue around the screw is concentrated around the proximal thread, which is more obvious with the increase of the pulling angle. When a metal anchor is subjected to a 100 N tensile load from 15° to 90°, the stress placed on the bone tissue around the anchor at 45° is greater than the stress placed on the bone tissue around the anchor at 90°. Statistically, the maximum value of the equivalent stress of the screw and its surrounding bone was not statistically different between insertion angles of 45° and 90° (P=0.244, P=0.319) . However, we observed that the equivalent stress of the screw and its surrounding bone tissue was less when the metal anchor was placed at 90°.

Conclusion

According to the results of finite element analysis, when the metal anchor is placed at 90° on the bone surface of the rotator cuff footprint, the stress on the anchor and its surrounding bone tissue is smaller than that at 45°. We recommend repairing the rotator cuff with metal anchors placed at 90° clinically to avoid early postoperative anchor fixation failure.

图1 肱骨近端和金属锚钉的有限元模型
图2 按照灰度肱骨近端赋予材料属性
图3 锚钉的置入角度和拉力方向
图4 在100 N拉力载荷下金属锚钉等效应力分布
图5 在100 N拉力载荷下锚钉周围骨组织等效应力分布
图6 在100 N拉力载荷下金属锚钉和其周围骨组织等效应力分布
图7 锚钉以45°和90°置入时金属锚钉和其周围骨组织最大等效应力对比
[1]
Cheon SJ, Lee HY, Jeon WK. Arthroscopic treatment for intratendinous rotator cuff tear results in satisfactory clinical outcomes and structural integrity[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2018, 26(12):3797-3803.
[2]
叶鹏,李奉龙,姜春岩,等.巨大及不可修复肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2017, 5(3):231-236.
[3]
陈建海.肩袖损伤的诊断与治疗[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2016, 4(3):191.
[4]
Kumar, R, Jadhav U. Functional evaluation of patient after arthroscopic repair of rotator cuff tear[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2014. 5(2): 84-90.
[5]
Park JY, Lee SH, Oh KS, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes of arthroscopic suture bridge repair for massive rotator cuff tear[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(2): 280-289.
[6]
Denard PJ, Burkhart SS. The evolution of suture anchors in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(9): 1589-1595.
[7]
Benson EC, MacDermid JC, Drosdowech DS, et al. The incidence of early metallic suture anchor pullout after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(3): 310-315.
[8]
Park HB, Keyurapan E, Gill HS, et al. Suture anchors and tacks for shoulder surgery, part II: the prevention and treatment of complications[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2006, 34(1): 136-144.
[9]
Liporace FA, Bono CM, Caruso SA, et al. The mechanical effects of suture anchor insertion angle for rotator cuff repair[J]. Orthopedics, 2002, 25(4): 399-402.
[10]
Poukalova M, Yakacki CM, Guldberg RE, et al. Pullout strength of suture anchors: effect of mechanical properties of trabecular bone[J]. J Biomech, 2010, 43(6): 1138-1145.
[11]
Barber FA, Herbert MA. Herbert, All-suture anchors: biomechanical analysis of pullout strength, displacement, and failure mode[J]. Arthroscopy, 2017, 33(6): 1113-1121.
[12]
Wong AS, Kokkalis ZT, Schmidt CC. S, Proper insertion angle is essential to prevent intra-articular protrusion of a knotless suture anchor in shoulder rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(2): 286-290.
[13]
Mahar AT, Tucker BS, Upasani VV. Increasing the insertion depth of suture anchors for rotator cuff repair does not improve biomechanical stability[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14(6): 626-630.
[14]
Clevenger TA, Beebe MJ, Strauss EJ. The effect of insertion angle on the pullout strength of threaded suture anchors: a validation of the deadman theory[J]. Arthroscopy, 2014, 30(8): 900-905.
[15]
Burkhart SS. The deadman theory of suture anchors: observations along a south texas fence line[J]. Arthroscopy, 1995, 11(1): 119-123.
[16]
Sano H, Takahashi A, Chiba D, et al. Stress distribution inside bone after suture anchor insertion: simulation using a three-dimensional finite element method[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2013, 21(8): 1777-1782.
[17]
Rossi MJ, Brand JC, Provencher MT, et al. A cavalcade of shoulder controversies: deadman angle revisited. divergent anchor angles and depths, and rotator cuff vectors confuse comparison... and more[J]. Arthroscopy, 2014, 30(12): 1529-1532.
[18]
Nagamoto H, Yamamoto N, Sano H, et al. A biomechanical study on suture anchor insertion angle: Which is better, 90 degrees or 45 degrees ? [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2017, 22(1): 56-62.
[19]
Rho JY, Hobatho MC, Ashman RB. Ashman, Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone[J]. Med Eng Phys, 1995, 17(5): 347-355.
[20]
Spazzin AO, Abreu RT, Noritomi PY, et al.Evaluation of stress distribution in overdenture-retaining bar with different levels of vertical misfit[J]. J Prosthodont, 2011, 20(4): 280-285.
[21]
Sakaguchi RL, Borgersen SE. Nonlinear contact analysis of preload in dental implant screws[J]. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1995, 10(3): 295-302.
[22]
Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Lehtinen J, et al. Anchor design and bone mineral density affect the pull-out strength of suture anchors in rotator cuff repair: which anchors are best to use in patients with low bone quality? [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2004, 32(6): 1466-1473.
[23]
Zumstein MA, Raniga S, Labrinidis A, et al. Optimal lateral row anchor positioning in posterior-superior transosseous equivalent rotator cuff repair: a micro-computed tomography study[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2016, 4(11): 2325967116671305.
[24]
Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, von Stechow D, et al. The cortical thickness of the proximal humeral diaphysis predicts bone mineral density of the proximal humerus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2003, 85(4): 611-617.
[25]
Strauss E, Frank D, Kubiak E, et al. The effect of the angle of suture anchor insertion on fixation failure at the tendon-suture interface after rotator cuff repair: deadman's angle revisited[J]. Arthroscopy, 2009, 25(6): 597-602.
[1] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[2] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[3] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[4] 纪晓希, 陈雨舟, 黄秋, 曹烈虎, 朱文辉. 肩峰成形术对关节镜下修补外伤性与非外伤性肩袖损伤临床结果影响的比较研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 103-110.
[5] 赵琛, 胡锐, 周红, 王芳, 胡真, 文凡. 力偶练习和肩肱节律调整对肩袖损伤保守治疗影响的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 226-231.
[6] 王晨, 潘海乐. 肩袖三维有限元模型建立及力学分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 221-225.
[7] 陈奇, 沈子龙, 温向伟, 王晨, 高奥飞, 丁明强, 余嘉文, 潘海乐. 自体髌骨股四头肌肌腱治疗家兔巨大肩袖损伤的实验研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 214-220.
[8] 张清, 向明, 李一平, 陈杭, 胡晓川, 杨金松. 肩袖损伤保守治疗失败的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 129-134.
[9] 陈国栋, 郑美妍, 张峻, 曾一鸣. 肩袖损伤合并肩关节粘连:一期松解修补还是先松解后修补?[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 122-128.
[10] 张元桢, 张艺, 薛超, 蔡秋晨, 程飚. 肩袖损伤患者关节镜修补术后的预后影响因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 3-6.
[11] 张乾龙, 王继荣, 宋晨辉, 刘修信, 任政, 刘宇哲, 阿里木江·玉素甫, 覃祺, 冉建. 两种髓内钉固定A3.1粗隆间骨折的有限元分析:增强型PFNA与InterTan[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 209-217.
[12] 王帅, 王素平, 宋涛. 富血小板血浆在肩袖损伤治疗中的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(06): 374-379.
[13] 朱燕宾, 程晓东, 王宇钏, 王忠正, 李泳龙, 李会杰, 王娟, 吕红芝, 陈伟, 张英泽. 股骨头部分置换术精准微创治疗中老年ARCO Ⅲ期股骨头缺血坏死的有限元分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(05): 257-259.
[14] 周彤, 尚运涛, 马莹莹, 张延祠, 李军勇. 锚钉技术治疗糖尿病与非糖尿病患者腱性锤状指畸形的疗效分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2022, 08(01): 29-34.
[15] 杜兵, 马腾, 路遥, 张聪明, 许毅博, 黄强, 姬帅, 李明, 任程, 王谦, 张堃, 李忠. 新型股骨颈内固定系统与3枚空心钉加内侧钢板固定青壮年Pauwels Ⅲ型股骨颈骨折的有限元分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2021, 07(06): 333-338.
阅读次数
全文


摘要