切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 24 -29. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2023.01.005

论著

肌骨高频超声在肘关节软组织损伤诊断中的应用价值
刘丽清1,(), 杨菲1, 路鑫铭1, 赵紫钰2   
  1. 1. 054000 华北医疗健康集团邢台总医院超声医学科
    2. 054000 邢台市人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-07 出版日期:2023-02-05
  • 通信作者: 刘丽清
  • 基金资助:
    邢台市市级科技计划自筹经费项目(2021ZC074)

Application value of musculoskeletal high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of elbow joint soft tissue injury

Liqing Liu1,(), Fei Yang1, Xinming Lu1, Ziyu Zhao2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Xingtai General Hospital, North China Medical and Health Group, Xingtai 054000, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Xingtai People's Hospital, Xingtai 054000, China
  • Received:2022-09-07 Published:2023-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Liqing Liu
引用本文:

刘丽清, 杨菲, 路鑫铭, 赵紫钰. 肌骨高频超声在肘关节软组织损伤诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 24-29.

Liqing Liu, Fei Yang, Xinming Lu, Ziyu Zhao. Application value of musculoskeletal high-frequency ultrasound in the diagnosis of elbow joint soft tissue injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(01): 24-29.

目的

探讨肌骨高频超声在肘关节软组织损伤诊断中的应用价值。

方法

选择2020年1月至2022年1月本院收治的肘关节外伤患者120例作为研究对象,对所有患者行肘关节肌骨超声探查。分析肌骨超声对肘关节软组织损伤的检出情况。以MRI、超声随访、临床症状缓解、手术结果等作为诊断金标准。计算肌骨超声诊断肘关节软组织损伤的敏感性、特异性及准确性,并使用Kappa检验分析肌骨超声诊断结果与金标准检查结果之间的一致性。选用受试者工作特征曲线(receiver operating characteristic curve, ROC)分析肌骨超声对肘关节软组织损伤的诊断效能。

结果

120例受检者中,金标准检查结果为肘关节软组织损伤患者共110例(91.67%),共明确诊断169处肘关节软组织损伤。肘关节软组织损伤类型以肌腱损伤[30.77%(52/169)]、韧带损伤[26.04%(44/169)]和骺软骨损伤[18.34%(31/169)]多见。在不同年龄段(3~14岁、>14岁)肘关节软组织损伤类型分布中,骺软骨损伤主要见于3~14岁儿童,3~14岁儿童骺软骨损伤发生率为37.50%(27/72),>14岁儿童骺软骨损伤发生率为8.33%(4/48),差异有统计学意义(x2=12.787,P<0.05)。其余软组织损伤类型两个年龄段均有分布,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。肌骨超声诊断肘关节软组织损伤的敏感性为91.12%(154/169),特异性为90.00%(9/10),准确性为91.06%(163/179);Kappa检验结果显示,肌骨超声诊断肘关节周围软组织损伤的结果与金标准检查结果的一致性较好(Kappa值=0.489);ROC曲线分析显示,对应的曲线下面积(area under curve, AUC)为0.906,表明肌骨超声对肘关节周围软组织损伤具有较高的诊断价值。

结论

肌骨超声诊断肘关节软组织损伤的敏感性与特异性高,且具有较高的准确性,可有效减少漏诊及误诊的发生,能更好地满足临床诊断需求。

Background

The elbow joint is essential in the human body, composed of the distal end of the humerus and the proximal end of the radius and ulna. The anatomy of this joint is complex, and it is prone to soft tissue injuries due to trauma. Children are a high-risk group for soft tissue injuries of the elbow joint. Due to their young age, immature physical development, and tendency to play and engage in activities such as climbing and running, children are more likely to experience soft tissue injuries of the elbow joint. Additionally, because children cannot clearly express their feelings of illness due to age, diagnosing these injuries can be more complex, and medical imaging techniques are often needed for accurate diagnosis. CT and MRI scans are commonly used for soft tissue injuries of the elbow joint, but CT scans have high radiation doses, and MRI scans have long scan times and high costs, so they are generally not used as routine screening methods. In recent years, with the continuous development of ultrasound imaging technology, musculoskeletal ultrasound has gradually been applied in diagnosing and treating various joint fractures and soft tissue injuries due to its convenience, precise imaging, and lack of radiation. Objective To investigate the application value of musculoskeletal high-frequency ultrasound in diagnosing elbow joint soft tissue injury.

Methods

One hundred twenty patients with elbow joint trauma admitted to our hospital from January 2020 to January 2022 were selected as the research objects. All patients underwent musculoskeletal ultrasound exploration of the elbow joint. The detection of soft tissue injury of the elbow joint by musculoskeletal ultrasound was analyzed. MRI, ultrasound follow-up, remission of clinical symptoms, and surgical results were used as the gold diagnostic criteria. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in diagnosing elbow joint soft tissue injury were calculated, and the Kappa test was used to analyze the consistency between musculoskeletal ultrasonography diagnosis results and gold standard examination results. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of musculoskeletal ultrasound in elbow soft tissue injury.

Results

Among the 120 patients, 110 (91.67%) were found to have soft tissue injuries of the elbow by gold standard examination, and 169 soft tissue injuries of the elbow were diagnosed. Tendon injury [30.77% (52/169) ], ligament injury [26.04% (44/169) ], and epiphyseal cartilage injury [18.34% (31/169) ] were the most common types of soft tissue injury of the elbow joint. Among the types of elbow soft tissue injury in different age groups (3-14 years old, >14 years old), epiphysis cartilage injury was mainly seen in children aged 3-14. The incidence of epiphysis cartilage injury was 37.50% (27/72) in children aged 3-14 years old and 8.33% (4/48) in children aged >14 years old. The difference was statistically significant (x2=12.787, P<0.05). The other types of soft tissue injury were distributed in both age groups, with no statistical significance (P>0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of musculoskeletal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of soft tissue injury of the elbow joint were 91.12% (154/169), 90.00% (9/10), and 91.06% (163/179). Kappa test results showed that the musculoskeletal ultrasound diagnosis of soft tissue injury around the elbow joint was in good agreement with the results of the gold standard examination (Kappa value =0.489). ROC curve analysis showed that the corresponding AUC was 0.906, indicating that musculoskeletal ultrasound has a high diagnostic value for soft tissue injuries around the elbow joint.

Conclusion

Musculoskeletal ultrasound diagnosis of elbow joint soft tissue injury has high sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy can effectively reduce the occurrence of missed diagnosis and misdiagnosis, and can better meet the needs of clinical diagnosis.

图1 患者,女,49岁,肘部外伤后滑囊积液,左侧肘关节处尺骨鹰嘴滑囊内可见液性暗区,局部滑膜增厚。超声诊断提示:左侧肘关节处尺骨鹰嘴滑囊积液并滑膜增厚
图2 患者,男,38岁,肘部外伤后桡神经损伤,左侧桡神经沟内桡神经增厚,回声增强,周围组织增厚回声减低。超声诊断提示:左侧桡神经沟内桡神经及周围组织损伤
图3 患者,男,39岁,桡骨小头骨折后肌层回声不均匀,左侧肘关节骨质旁可见不均质混合回声,边界欠清晰,形态欠规则。超声诊断提示:左侧肘关节骨质旁回声欠均匀
图4 患者,男,53岁,外伤后桡侧肌层回声不均匀并积液,左上肢前臂近肘关节处桡侧局部肌层回声不连续,肌肉纹理走行不自然,可见不均质暗区。超声诊断提示:左上肢前臂近肘关节处桡侧肌层不均质回声区,考虑肌肉撕裂可能
表1 169处肘关节软组织损伤类型分布情况
表2 肌骨超声对于肘关节周围软组织损伤的诊断结果
图5 肌骨超声诊断肘关节周围软组织损伤的ROC曲线注:ROC为受试者工作特征
[1]
Fene ES, Grewal IS, Eakin JL, et al. Internal Joint Stabilizer: A Safe Treatment for Traumatic Elbow Instability [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2022, 36 (9): 458-464.
[2]
史振升,李国庆,姜鹏,等.不同影像学方法在诊断儿童肘关节细微骨折中的应用比较[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202018(2):142-144,148.
[3]
Deirdre DR, Sophia L. Applications of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in the Pediatric Emergency Department [J]. Pediatr Ann, 2021, 50 (10): e411-e418.
[4]
马玉龙,宋得夫,幸世龙,等. X线平片及MSCT后处理技术在儿童肘关节外伤性骨折中的临床应用价值探讨[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202119(8):169-171.
[5]
王鑫,赵晨光,王斌,等.髌下脂肪垫损伤中肌骨超声诊断的意义[J].中国疼痛医学杂志201925(9):706-709.
[6]
Varga M, Papp S, Kassai T, et al. Standardized sonographic examination of pediatric elbow injuries is an effective screening method and improves diagnostic efficiency [J]. Injury, 2021, 52 (S1): S25-S30.
[7]
Midtgaard KS, Ruzbarsky JJ, Hackett TR, et al. Elbow Fractures [J]. Clin Sport Med, 2020, 39 (3): 623-636.
[8]
Zhou S. The X-ray Diagnosis and Signs Analysis of Occult Elbow Fractures in Children [J]. Int J Sci, 2020, 9 (6): 19-20.
[9]
石思李,李胜,邹文远,等.儿童肘关节隐匿性骨折X线诊断及征象分析[J].实用骨科杂志201723(1):86-89.
[10]
张晓燕,陈亚南,吴晓明,等.肌骨超声与MRI对创伤性浅表软组织损伤的诊断效果评价[J].中国CT和MRI杂志202220(4):180-182.
[11]
郝懿,杨海平,韩洋,等. DR平片、肌骨超声及多层螺旋CT诊断肋骨及肋软骨骨折的临床分析[J].医学影像学杂志201929(4):697-699.
[12]
唐盛斐,蓝常贡,涂振阳.肌骨超声在诊断肢体肌腱和韧带损伤中应用进展[J].中华实用诊断与治疗杂志202034(2):214-216.
[13]
Galbraith JG, Mullett H, Gaafar M, et al. Ulnar collateral ligament reconstruction of the elbow at minimum 48-month mean follow-up demonstrates excellent clinical outcomes with low complication and revision rates: systematic review [J]. J ISAKOS, 2021, 6 (5): 290-294.
[14]
夏薇.创伤性浅表软组织损伤中高频彩超检查的临床价值[J].北华大学学报(自然科学版)202122(2):235-238.
[15]
李晓娜,彭志刚,张雪松,等. MRI在儿童肘关节损伤中的应用[J].河北医药202042(9):1344-1347.
[16]
耿维,陈瑛,刘远,等.肌肉骨骼超声对软组织损伤诊断价值的Meta分析[J].海军医学杂志202243(1):78-83.
[17]
尹存军,郑芸.肌骨超声诊断创伤性浅表软组织损伤的临床价值[J].生命科学仪器202018(2):90-94,69.
[18]
Ostrowski JL, Beaumont A, Dochterman E. Diagnostic Accuracy of Musculoskeletal Ultrasound on Long Head Biceps Tendon Pathologies [J]. J Sport Rehabil, 2021, 30 (7): 1098-1101.
[19]
Domenico A, Giacomo A, Carmelo M, et al. High-Frequency and Ultra-High Frequency Ultrasound: Musculoskeletal Imaging up to 70MHz [J]. Semin Musculoskel R, 2020, 24 (2): 125-134.
[20]
Ait Ichou J, Gauvin S, Faingold R, et al. Ultra-high-frequency ultrasound of superficial and musculoskeletal structures in the pediatric population [J]. Pediatr Radiol, 2021, 51 (9): 1-10.
[1] 付泽辉, 王思齐, 卢叶君, 张剑, 贺烨, 陈卉. 超声对易误诊的等回声、高回声甲状腺结节良恶性的鉴别[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 517-523.
[2] 王泽勇, 覃健. 白细胞含量对富血小板血浆治疗运动系统损伤的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 684-688.
[3] 李殷南, 王乾, 孙宾. 膀胱壁、逼尿肌壁厚度与老年女性膀胱过度活动症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 178-182.
[4] 赵文思, 曾艳峰. 血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶联合CT检查对肺尘病诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(01): 67-69.
[5] 丁薇, 王保兰, 李朋玲. 硫氧还蛋白还原酶联合肺癌标志物对肺结节良恶性的诊断意义[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(05): 685-687.
[6] 周海燕, 王秋根, 王庚启, 王健, 黄志海, 吴立生, 吴力军. 经鹰嘴骨折肘关节前脱位的诊疗策略[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 224-234.
[7] 赵佳音, 张晓萌, 张艳, 李立, 王瑞灯. 创伤后肘关节僵硬的病理机制及治疗进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 181-185.
[8] 白志钢, 新苏雅拉图, 谢迎光, 奥其. 肘关节僵硬手术松解治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 175-180.
[9] 王博文, 赵玲珑, 于学军, 杨波, 汪国梁, 曹文亮. 关节镜下治疗Larsen 3-4期类风湿性肘关节炎短期疗效观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 128-131.
[10] 任雨昊, 刘晋元, 吕欣, 尹芸生, 冯毅, 赵斌, 王小虎. 套索缝合技术治疗肘关节"恐怖三联征"中的冠状突骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 18-23.
[11] 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 刘伦, 张鹏, 韩鹏飞, 李晓东. TTIE中桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定与桡骨头置换疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 240-246.
[12] 井鹏, 宋九龙, 高红亮, 王超, 吴珊珊, 俞暖新, 赵添莹. 超声可视化注射对老年偏瘫肩痛炎性吸收的疗效[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 145-151.
[13] 张泽, 王琦, 杨文强, 张黎. 肌骨超声在周围神经病诊疗中的应用[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 257-263.
[14] 袁媛, 赵良平, 刘智慧, 张丽萍, 谭丽梅, 閤梦琴. 子宫内膜癌组织中miR-25-3p、PTEN的表达及与病理参数的关系[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1016-1020.
[15] 林燕霞, 吴才标, 王小霞. 实时超声造影定量分析对体检初次发现肝脏局灶性病变的诊断价值分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 176-181.
阅读次数
全文


摘要