切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (01) : 18 -23. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2023.01.004

论著

套索缝合技术治疗肘关节"恐怖三联征"中的冠状突骨折
任雨昊1, 刘晋元1, 吕欣1, 尹芸生1, 冯毅1, 赵斌1, 王小虎1,()   
  1. 1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学第二医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-08 出版日期:2023-02-05
  • 通信作者: 王小虎
  • 基金资助:
    山西省自然科学基金(201901D111370); 山西省卫生健康委员会"四个一批"创新计划(2020TD18)

Suture lasso technique for the treatment of coronal fracture in the terrible triad of the elbow

Yuhao Ren1, Jinyuan Liu1, Xin Lyu1, Yunsheng Yi1, Yi Feng1, Bin Zhao1, Xiaohu Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, the Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001, China
  • Received:2022-10-08 Published:2023-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Xiaohu Wang
引用本文:

任雨昊, 刘晋元, 吕欣, 尹芸生, 冯毅, 赵斌, 王小虎. 套索缝合技术治疗肘关节"恐怖三联征"中的冠状突骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 18-23.

Yuhao Ren, Jinyuan Liu, Xin Lyu, Yunsheng Yi, Yi Feng, Bin Zhao, Xiaohu Wang. Suture lasso technique for the treatment of coronal fracture in the terrible triad of the elbow[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(01): 18-23.

目的

探讨套索缝合技术治疗肘关节"恐怖三联征"中Regan-Morrey I/II型冠状突骨折的手术方式和临床疗效。

方法

采用回顾性随访分析2018年1月至2022年6月,山西医科大学第二医院创伤骨科病区采用套索缝合技术治疗的18例肘关节"恐怖三联征"中冠状突Regan-Morrey I/II型骨折患者的临床资料及随访结果,其中男12例、女6例;年龄18~55岁,平均年龄32岁;其中摔伤12例、交通伤5例、高处坠落伤1例。所有患者都是Regan-Morrey I/II型骨折,外侧副韧带均有损伤,所有患者均采用单纯肘关节外侧入路,术中依次固定冠状突、桡骨小头,缝线锚钉修复损伤的外侧副韧带,内侧副韧带常规不给予处理。术后肘关节功能位石膏外固定2周后开始功能锻炼,术后3周、6周、12周定期门诊随访,术后肘关节评分采用Mayo肘关节功能评分(Mayo elbow performance score,MEPS)系统。

结果

所有患者均获得了随访,随访时间3~52个月,平均18个月。所有骨折均获得愈合,末次随访时肘关节伸直为0~30°,屈曲为90~125°,平均活动度为103.61°,旋前10~90°,旋后20~90°,平均旋转142.78°。术后按照MEPS功能评分平均为88.89分(65~100分),优12例、良3例、可3例,优良率为83.3%,有3例患者出现骨化性肌炎的症状,有1例患者因为局部感染取出缝线锚钉。

结论

在肘关节恐怖三联征中冠状突Regan-Morrey I/II型的骨折采用套索缝合技术固定冠状突骨折临床疗效是满意的。

Background

Coronal process fracture and radial head fracture are accompanied by posterior dislocation of the elbow joint, which is called the "terror triad" by Hotchkiss. It consists of the elbow fracture and the medial and lateral collateral ligament injuries of the elbow joint, resulting in severe instability, which is very difficult in clinical treatment as one of the main factors affecting the stability of the elbow joint, coronal process fracture plays a pivotal role in preventing posterior dislocation of the elbow joint. There is no adequate internal fixation for the coronal process fracture fragment with conventional methods, so it has always been a difficult point in clinical treatment. The technique of suture lasso was used in the cases of coronal process fracture of Regan-Morrey type I/II, and the preliminary curative effect was obtained. Objective To explore the operative method and clinical effect of the suture lasso technique in treating Regan-Morrey type I/II coronal process fracture.

Methods

From January 2018 to June 2022, the clinical data and follow-up results of 18 patients with coronal process Regan-Morrey type I/II fracture in terror triad of the elbow treated with suture lasso technique were retrospectively analyzed, including 12 males and 6 females. Their ages ranged from 18 to 55 years, with an average age of 32 years. The causes of injuries included 12 cases of traffic injuries, 5 cases of high fall injuries, and 1 case of fall damage. All of them were type I/II according to the Regan-Morrey classification. All the lateral collateral ligaments were injured. All patients were treated through a lateral approach to reduce and fix fractures of the coronal process, radial head, and lateral collateral ligament. After the operation, the elbow joint was set in the functional position for 2 weeks, followed by functional exercise. The outpatients were followed up regularly for 3 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months after the operation. The postoperative elbow joint score was evaluated by the MEPS score system.

Results

All patients were followed up for 3 to 52 months, with an average of 18 months. Bone union was achieved in all fractures. Elbow joint flexion position (0-30°), extension position (90-125°), with an average range of joint motion being 103.61°; pronation (10-90°), supination (20-90o), with an average rotation range of 142.78°. According to the MEPS Elbow Performance Index, the average postoperative score was 88.89 points (range 65-100 points). Among them, 12 cases were excellent, 3 were good, and 3 were moderate. The excellent and good rate was 83.3%. Three patients developed myositis ossificans. One patient took out the suture anchor due to infection.

Conclusion

In the terror triad of the elbow, the clinical effect of the lateral approach of the elbow joint using the suture lasso technique to fix the coronal process fracture of Regan-Morrey I/ II type fracture is satisfactory.

图1 患者,男,35岁,因高处摔伤收住本院,诊断为"恐怖三联征" 图A:术前肘关节恐怖三联征未整复时X线片;图B:急诊科骨科整复室整复石膏外固定后X线片;图C:肘关节三维CT示冠状突II型骨折;图D:3D打印模型;图E-F:术中C型臂下正位X线片;图G:术后肘关节正侧位示冠状突复位良好;图H-K:术后肘关节屈伸和旋转活动度良好
[1]
Garrigues GE, Wray III WH, Lindenhovius ALC, et al. Fixation of the coronoid process in elbow fracture-dislocations[J]. JBJS, 2011, 93(20): 1873-1881.
[2]
Rhyou IH, Lee JH, Kim KC, et al. What injury mechanism and patterns of ligament status are associated with isolated coronoid, isolated radial head, and combined fractures?[J] .Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(9): 2308-2315.
[3]
Kekatpure AL, Aminata IW, Jeon IH, et al. Isolated coronoid fracture: Assessment by magnetic resonance imaging for concomitant injuries[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2016, 50(3): 311-315.
[4]
Thayer MK, Swenson AK, Hackett DJ, et al. Classifications in brief: Regan-Morrey classification of coronoid fractures[J] .Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2018, 476(7): 1540.
[5]
Kani KK, Chew FS. Terrible triad injuries of the elbow[J] .Emerg Radiol, 2019, 26(3): 341-347.
[6]
Giannicola G, Polimanti D, Gumina S, et al. Use of fine-threaded K-wires in the treatment of coronoid fractures in complex elbow instability[J]. Orthopedics, 2013, 36(10): e1233-e1238.
[7]
Zhang J, Tan M, Kwek EBK. Outcomes of coronoid-first repair in terrible triad injuries of the elbow[J] .Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2017, 137(9): 1239-1245.
[8]
Manidakis N, Sperelakis I, Hackney R, et al. Fractures of the ulnar coronoid process[J]. Injury, 2012, 43(7): 989-998.
[9]
Hopkins CM, Calandruccio JH, Mauck BM. Controversies in fractures of the proximal ulna[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2017, 48(1): 71-80.
[10]
Karbach LE, Elfar J. Elbow instability: anatomy, biomechanics, diagnostic maneuvers, and testing[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2017, 42(2): 118-126.
[11]
Thayer MK, Swenson AK, Hackett DJ, et al. Classifications in brief: Regan-Morrey classification of coronoid fractures[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2018, 476(7): 1540.
[12]
Masood QM, Qulaghassi M, Grewal U, et al. Proximal ulna fractures in adults: A review of diagnosis and management[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2021, 20: 101481.
[13]
Wake H, Hashizume H, Nishida K, et al. Biomechanical analysis of the mechanism of elbow fracturedislocations by compression force[J]. J Orthop Sci, 2004, 9(1): 44-50.
[14]
Pai V, Pai V. Use of suture anchors for coronoid fractures in the terrible triad of the elbow[J]. J Orthop Surg, 2009, 17(1): 31-35.
[15]
李连欣,李庆虎,李正宾,等.尺骨冠状突骨折的手术治疗进展[J/CD] .中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2019,7(3):193-195.
[16]
Antoni M, Eichler D, Kempf JF, et al. Anterior capsule re-attachment in terrible triad elbow injury with coronoid tip fracture[J]. Orthop Traum Surg Res, 2019, 105(8): 1575-1583.
[17]
Kim BS, Kim DH, Byun SH, et al. Does the coronoid always need to be fixed in terrible triad injuries of the elbow? Mid-term postoperative outcomes following a standardized protocol[J]. J Clin Med, 2020, 9(11): 3500.
[18]
Lin KC, Lai WY, Yang YP, et al. Single pulley double-strand anchor suture fixation of the coronoid process in terrible triad of the elbow injury[J]. J Chin Med Assoc, 2022, 85(2): 222-227.
[19]
Wang P, Zhuang Y, Li Z, et al. Lasso plate–An original implant for fixation of type I and II Regan-Morrey coronoid fractures[J]. Orthop Traum Surg Res,2017, 103(3): 447-451.
[20]
Reichel LM, Morales OA. Gross anatomy of the elbow capsule: a cadaveric study[J]. J Hand Surg, 2013, 38(1): 110-116.
[21]
Lühmann P, Kremer T, Siemers F, et al. Comparative histomorphological analysis of elbow ligaments and capsule[J].Clin Anat, 2022, 35(8): 1070-1084.
[22]
Wu H, Liao Q, Zhu Y, et al. Surgical reconstruction of comminuted coronoid fracture in terrible triad injury of the elbow[J] .Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2012, 22(8): 667-671.
[23]
Zhou C, Lin J, Xu J, et al. Does timing of surgery affect treatment of the terrible triad of the elbow?[J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24: 4745.
[24]
Zhou C, Xu J, Lin J, et al. Comparison of a single approach versus double approaches for the treatment of terrible traid of elbow — —A retrospective study[J]. Int J Surg, 2018, 51: 49-55.
[25]
Gong M, Huang X, Li G, et al. Comparative study of single lateral incision and combined lateral and medial incisions for treatment of terrible triad of the elbow[J]. Chinese J Trauma, 2017: 389-396.
[26]
Zha YJ, Xiao D, Hua KH, et al. Lateral minimal approach to the terrible triad of the elbow: a treatment protocol in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital[J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(15):1232.
[27]
Ring D, Horst TA. Coronoid fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2015, 29(10): 437-440.
[28]
成欣,周立建,高炳俊,等.个体化方案治疗不同类型尺骨冠状突骨折的肘关节恐怖三联征[J] .临床骨科杂志,2021,24(2):247-250.
[29]
Lee SH, Lim KH, Kim JW. Case series of all-arthroscopic treatment for terrible triad of the elbow: indications and clinical outcomes[J]. Arthroscopy, 2020, 36(2): 431-440.
[1] 周海燕, 王秋根, 王庚启, 王健, 黄志海, 吴立生, 吴力军. 经鹰嘴骨折肘关节前脱位的诊疗策略[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 224-234.
[2] 赵佳音, 张晓萌, 张艳, 李立, 王瑞灯. 创伤后肘关节僵硬的病理机制及治疗进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 181-185.
[3] 白志钢, 新苏雅拉图, 谢迎光, 奥其. 肘关节僵硬手术松解治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 175-180.
[4] 王博文, 赵玲珑, 于学军, 杨波, 汪国梁, 曹文亮. 关节镜下治疗Larsen 3-4期类风湿性肘关节炎短期疗效观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 128-131.
[5] 刘丽清, 杨菲, 路鑫铭, 赵紫钰. 肌骨高频超声在肘关节软组织损伤诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 24-29.
[6] 王龑懋, 何涛, 陆晟迪, 丁坚. 关节镜下与切开复位内固定治疗桡骨头骨折疗效比较的初步报道[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 319-326.
[7] 新苏雅拉图, 刘峰, 高雨, 高晓宇, 谢迎光. 关节镜松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的疗效观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 239-243.
[8] 焦鑫, 张堃, 朱养均, 宋哲, 年跃文, 张军, 衡立松, 蔡枭. 改良张力支具对肱骨髁间骨折患者术后功能康复的临床效果评价[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 148-153.
[9] 王伟, 李世英, 郭晓平, 张桐桐, 高星, 孟玉凤, 贾芳莹. 坚骨胶囊联合关节镜和尺神经松解术治疗肘关节骨关节炎伴尺神经卡压综合征的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 141-147.
[10] 严攀, 张鑫, 向明, 杨金松, 郭洁. 创伤后重度肘关节僵硬患者的综合康复治疗近期疗效及相关影响因素分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 59-64.
[11] 熊晨, 张堃, 何晓, 杨佳瑞, 何昌军, 黄伟, 朱养均, 衡立松. 张力性支具结合开放松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的初步疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 257-262.
[12] 曾本强, 卢冰, 刘攀, 罗凌云, 秦谊, 李想, 胡骅. 经肱三头肌两侧入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远端C3型骨折疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 169-174.
[13] 李先锋, 熊燕, 唐新, 李箭. 局部使用氨甲环酸在关节镜下肘关节松解中的临床效果[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 347-351.
[14] 杨春喜, 杜琳, 刘晓琳, 张炜, 赵耀超, 王友. 肘关节粘连松解术中减少射频消融的使用对术后疗效的影响[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 232-236.
[15] 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 刘伦, 张鹏, 韩鹏飞, 李晓东. TTIE中桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定与桡骨头置换疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 240-246.
阅读次数
全文


摘要