切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华肩肘外科电子杂志

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 257 -262. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.03.011

论著

张力性支具结合开放松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的初步疗效分析
熊晨1, 张堃2, 何晓2, 杨佳瑞2, 何昌军2, 黄伟2, 朱养均2, 衡立松2,†()   
  1. 1. 716000　延安大学医学院（外科学专业）
    2. 710054　西安交通大学医学院附属红会医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-18 出版日期:2021-09-13
  • 通信作者: 衡立松
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省重点研发计划项目(2017SF-197); 西安市科技计划项目(20YXYJ004)

Preliminary efficacy analysis of tension brace combined with open arthrolysis in the treatment of elbow ankylosis

Chen Xiong1, Kun Zhang2, Xiao He2, Jiarui Yang2, Changjun He2, Wei Huang2, Yangjun Zhu2, Lisong Heng2,†()   

  1. 1. Yan'an University, Yan'an 716000, China
    2. Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, China
  • Received:2020-11-18 Published:2021-09-13
  • Corresponding author: Lisong Heng
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

熊晨, 张堃, 何晓, 杨佳瑞, 何昌军, 黄伟, 朱养均, 衡立松. 张力性支具结合开放松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的初步疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 257-262.

Chen Xiong, Kun Zhang, Xiao He, Jiarui Yang, Changjun He, Wei Huang, Yangjun Zhu, Lisong Heng. Preliminary efficacy analysis of tension brace combined with open arthrolysis in the treatment of elbow ankylosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(03): 257-262.

目的

探讨张力性支具结合开放性肘关节松解术治疗肘关节僵硬的初步疗效。

方法

回顾性分析我院采用开放性肘关节松解术治疗的40例肘关节僵硬患者资料。单纯采用开放性肘关节松解术为对照组（21例），采用张力性支具结合开放肘关节松解术为观察组（19例）。比较两组患者末次随访时肘关节屈伸、旋转活动度和Mayo肘关节功能评分，并评定疗效。

结果

所有患者术后均获得随访，随访时间12~28个月，平均18.9个月。对照组与观察组相比，术后末次随访时肘关节旋转活动度[（142.14±34.91）° VS （136.32±42.75）°, t=0.562, P=0.910]差异无统计学意义；肘关节屈伸活动度[（95.71±10.87 ）° VS （107.47±14.13）°, t=2.966, P=0.005]和Mayo肘关节功能评分[（72.62±6.05）分VS （80.79±9.61）分, t=1.456, P=0.029]观察组显著高于对照组，差异均有统计学意义。

结论

张力性支具结合开放性肘关节松解术可以改善肘关节的屈伸活动度和肘关节功能，疗效满意。

关键词: 肘关节, 僵硬, 松解术, 治疗结果
Background

When a fracture occurs around the elbow, it can easily lead to joint stiffness if it is not properly treated and rehabilitated. The incidence of post-traumatic elbow ankylosis is 3% to 20%, which seriously affects people’s daily life. After the single release, if the elbow joint rehabilitation exercise is not appropriate, the joint stiffness may reoccur. In order to avoid the recurrence of stiffness, orthopaedic surgeons take a variety of measures to carry out rehabilitation exercise and improve the elbow function.

Objective

To investigate the preliminary efficacy of tension brace combined with open elbow arthrolysis in the treatment of elbow ankylosis.

Methods

The data of 40 patients with elbow ankylosis treated with open elbow lysis in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively. Open elbow joint arthrolysis was used in control group (n=21) and tension brace combined with open elbow joint release in observation group (n=19) . The ranges of elbow flexion, extension and rotation and Mayo elbow function score were compared between the two groups during the last follow-up, and the curative effect was evaluated.

Results

All patients were followed up for 12 to 28 months with an average of 18.9 months. There was no statistical difference in the range of elbow joint rotation between the control group and the observation group in the last follow-up[ (142.14 ±34.91) °vs (136.32±42.75) °, t=0.562, P=0.910], but there was significant difference in the ranges of flexion and extension [ (95.71±10.87) ° vs (107.47±14.13) °, t=2.966, P=0.005] and Mayo elbow function score [ (72.62±6.05) score vs (80.79±9.61) score, t=1.456, P=0.029]. The ranges of elbow flexion and extension and Mayo elbow function score of the observation group were significantly higher than those of the control group in the last follow-up.

Conclusion

Tension brace combined with open elbow joint arthrolysis can improve the ranges of elbow flexion and extension of elbow joint and improve the function of the elbow joint.

Key words: Elbow, Stiffness, Arthrolysis, Treatment Outcome
图1 肘关节张力性支具
表1 对照组与观察组患者术前一般资料比较
组别 例数 性别 侧别 年龄（岁，±s） 肘关节僵硬时长（月，±s） 屈伸活动度（°，±s） 旋转活动度（°，±s） Mayo肘关节功能评分（分，±s）
（男/女） （左/右）
对照组 21 13/8 9/12 38.19±12.25 15.14±9.48 32.14±29.60 114.05±47.2 53.57±7.93
观察组 19 10/9 9/10 41.26±11.05 10.63±5.01 23.95±16.63 110.26±57.46 49.21±8.54
F值   0.351 0.082 0.830 1.211 1.092 0.530 1.124
P值   0.554 0.775 0.421 0.106 0.283 0.941 0.160
表2 对照组与观察组患者术后屈伸、旋转活动度和Mayo肘关节功能评分比较（±s）
组别 例数 屈伸活动度（°） 旋转活动度（°） Mayo肘关节功能评分（分）
对照组 21 95.71±10.87 142.14±34.91 72.62±6.05
观察组 19 107.47±14.13 136.32±42.75 80.79±9.61
F值   2.966 0.562 1.456
P值   0.005 0.910 0.029
图2 患者，男性，38岁，诊断为肱骨髁间骨折术后肘关节僵硬，术前患者肘关节存在屈曲受限，屈曲约70°（A）；术前X线片显示肱尺关节异位骨化（B、C）；开放性松解术后给予佩戴张力性支具（D）；术后9个月复查，肘关节屈伸明显较前好转（伸直0°，屈曲130°）（E、F）；复查X线示肱尺关节异位骨化减少，内固定位置良好（缝合锚钉对外侧尺副韧带进行缝合固定）（G、H）
[1]
Evans PJ, Nandi S, Maschke S, et al. Prevention and treatment of elbow stiffness[J]. J Hand Surg,2009,34（4）:769-778.
[2]
Morrey BF, Askew LJ, Chao EY. A biomechanical study of normal functional elbow motion[J]. J Bone Joint Surg（Am）,1981,63（6）:872-877.
[3]
张堃,宋哲,王晨.创伤性肘关节僵硬的诊疗现状和展望[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2018,6（4）:244-246.
[4]
Cai J, Wang W, Yan H, et al. Complications of open elbow arthrolysis in post-traumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review[J]. PLoS One,2015,10（9）:e0138547.
[5]
Morrey BF, Adams RA. Semiconstrained arthroplasty for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis of the elbow.[J]. J Bone Joint Surg（Am）,1992,74（4）:479-490.
[6]
郭祁,何大炜,孙宁,等.创伤后肘关节僵硬553例回顾性分析[J].中华外科杂志,2015,53（2）:85-89.
[7]
Zheng W, Liu J, Song J, et al. Risk factors for development of severe post-traumatic elbow stiffness.[J]. Int Orthop,2018,42（3）:595-600.
[8]
花克涵,陈辰,李庭,等.肱骨髁间骨折切开复位内固定术后肘关节僵硬的危险因素分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2019（11）:966-972.
[9]
Sun C, Zhou X, Yao C, et al. The timing of open surgical release of post-traumatic elbow stiffness:a systematic review[J]. Medicine,2017,96（49）:e9121.
[10]
Ruan HJ, Liu S, Fan CY, et al. Open arthrolysis and hinged external fixation for posttraumatic ankylosed elbows[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2013,133（2）:179-185.
[11]
Mittal R. Posttraumatic stiff elbow[J]. Indian J Orthop,2017,51（1）:4-13.
[12]
Viveen J, Doornberg JN, Kodde IF, et al. Continuous passive motion and physical therapy （CPM） versus physical therapy （PT） versus delayed physical therapy （DPT） after surgical release for elbow contractures; a study protocol for a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2017,18（1）:484.
[13]
McGrath MS, Ulrich SD, Bonutti PM, et al. Evaluation of static progressive stretch for the treatment of wrist stiffness[J]. J Hand Surg,2008,33（9）:1498-1504.
[14]
Veltman ES, Doornberg JN, Eygendaal D, et al. Static progressive versus dynamic splinting for posttraumatic elbow stiffness: a systematic review of 232 patients[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2015,135（5）:613-617.
[15]
Lindenhovius AL, Doornberg JN, Brouwer KM, et al. A prospective randomized controlled trial of dynamic versus static progressive elbow splinting for posttraumatic elbow stiffness.[J]. J Bone Joint Surg（Am）,2012,94（8）:694-700.
[16]
Sun Z, Cui H, Ruan J, et al. What Range of Motion and Functional Results Can Be Expected After Open Arthrolysis with Hinged External Fixation For Severe Posttraumatic Elbow Stiffness?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,2019,477（10）:2319-2328.
[17]
查晔军,蒋协远,王满宜,等.可活动铰链式外固定支架在肘关节松解术中的应用[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2010（11）:1014-1020.
[1] 刘正宇, 刘春风, 王振. 改良后外侧入路半髋置换治疗股骨颈骨折的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 409-413.
[2] 刘昌盛, 江思, 童娟. 可视化超声引导下针刀治疗狭窄性腱鞘炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 160-166.
[3] 朴成林, 蓝炘, 司振铎, 李强, 冯健, 安峰铎, 冷建军. 胰十二指肠切除联合肝切除术疗效分析：附5例报告（附视频）[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 363-367.
[4] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[5] 许月芳, 刘旺, 曾妙甜, 郭宇姝. 多粘菌素B和多粘菌素E治疗外科多重耐药菌感染临床疗效及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 700-703.
[6] 王曦, 关鹏飞. 双钢板内固定治疗肱骨远1/3骨折的有限元分析及基于肘关节功能和肘关节活动度评估疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 230-237.
[7] 周世成, 王雁冰, 任广凯, 吴丹凯. 微钢板重建肱骨外侧髁治疗Bryan-MorreyⅢ型肱骨小头骨折[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 121-126.
[8] 冷昆鹏, 孟钰童, 单磊, 刘洋, 周君琳. 不同手术入路治疗肱骨远端冠状面骨折的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 127-134.
[9] 白云鹏, 孙卫兵, 王苗, 丁浩亮, 孙健. 肘关节镜桡侧腕短伸肌腱松解联合关节清理术治疗顽固性网球肘[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 135-139.
[10] 陈逍堃, 竺枫, 何信坤, 包丞州, 阮健. 同种异体肌腱双束重建肘关节外侧韧带治疗肘关节慢性后外侧旋转不稳定的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 140-146.
[11] 张昌鹏, 王韦韦, 廖长胜, 李锡勇, 韩鹏飞, 李园. 内外侧联合入路和外侧入路治疗肘关节恐怖三联征疗效Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 147-156.
[12] 肖丹, 陈辰, 查晔军, 公茂琪, 花克涵, 孙伟桐, 蒋协远. 改良松解术治疗创伤后肘关节僵硬的疗效及危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-263.
[13] 史凡凡, 吴孝琦, 罗飞, 赵玉华, 张承旻, 方青. 个体化睡眠垫在重度僵硬型脊柱畸形头颅-骨盆牵引中的应用[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 308-314.
[14] 常文利, 刘亚芳, 宿晓雷, 陈广先, 张学磊, 赵建勇. 尺神经原位松解术与松解皮下前移术治疗中度肘管综合征的前瞻性对比研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 111-116.
[15] 陈仁杰, 鲁谊. 肘关节骨关节炎手术治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 57-64.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号