切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 237 -242. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.03.009

所属专题: 文献

论著

肱骨近端Neer 3部分或4部分骨折治疗的加速康复研究
樊守刚1, 李开南1,(), 母建松1, 汪学军1, 陈刚1   
  1. 1. 610081 成都大学附属医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-17 出版日期:2020-08-05
  • 通信作者: 李开南
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划资助项目(2016YFC0105806)

Fast track surgery study for treatment of proximal humeral fractures of Neer part-3 or 4

Shougang Fan1, Kainan Li1,(), Jiansong Mu1, Xuejun Wang1, Gang Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthorpaedics, Affiliated Hospital & Clinical Medical College of Chengdu University, Chengdu 610081, China
  • Received:2020-01-17 Published:2020-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Kainan Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Kainan, Email:
引用本文:

樊守刚, 李开南, 母建松, 汪学军, 陈刚. 肱骨近端Neer 3部分或4部分骨折治疗的加速康复研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 237-242.

Shougang Fan, Kainan Li, Jiansong Mu, Xuejun Wang, Gang Chen. Fast track surgery study for treatment of proximal humeral fractures of Neer part-3 or 4[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(03): 237-242.

目的

研究加速康复理念在严重肱骨近端骨折治疗中应用的意义。

方法

成都大学附属医院2017年1月至2020年1月应用加速康复方法治疗37例Neer分型属于3部分或4部分骨折的肱骨近端骨折患者,其中采用骨折切开复位内固定术29例(内固定组)、人工肱骨头置换手术8例(关节置换组)。从手术时间、术中出血量、手术操作难度、术后患者骨愈合情况以及术后肩关节功能情况进行对比分析,评估手术治疗疗效并总结手术治疗体会及加速康复经验。

结果

内固定组和关节置换组患者在平均手术时间、平均出血量、平均住院时间和引流管放置时间上差异无统计学意义。加速康复理念始终贯穿于术前病情评估、术中细节处理、术后功能锻炼等整个治疗过程中。术后随访,内固定组有27例术后3个月时达到骨愈合,1例因术后2个月时外伤再发骨折行翻修手术,1例发生骨折延迟愈合,予患肢悬吊,术后5个月时达到骨愈合。关节置换组8例患者均在术后3 ~ 4个月达到术后骨性愈合,术后无肩峰骨折及肩胛骨骨折病例。两组患者术后视觉模拟评分无显著差异,内固定组患肢肩关节功能评分在术后3个月、6个月及1年时明显优于关节置换组(P<0.05)。

结论

严重的肱骨近端骨折应根据不同的骨折类型选择手术方案。加速康复治疗理念自始至终贯穿于肱骨近端骨折的诊治过程中,对术后疗效影响显著。

Background

Severe proximal humeral fracture often occurs in the high energy trauma, many of which are accompanied with osteoporosis. The humeral head often has serious displacement and less bone mass, which is difficult to fix. It is also often accompanied with rotator cuff injury, resulting in different degrees of postoperative shoulder joint dysfunction. The concept of fast track surgery (FTS) is of great significance to the postoperative curative effect and functional reconstruction of proximal humeral fracture.

Objective

To retrospectively analyze and study the significance of fast track surgery in the treatment of severe proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

From January 2017 to January 2020, 37 cases of proximal humeral fractures classified by Neer part-3 or 4 fractures were treated with FTS. Among them, 29 cases were treated with open reduction and internal fixation (internal fixation group) , and 8 cases were treated with artificial humeral head replacement (arthroplasty group) . The operation time, intraoperative hemorrhage, operation difficulty, bone healing and shoulder joint function were compared and analyzed. The therapeutic effect of operation was evaluated and the experience of operation and FTS was summarized.

Results

There was no significant difference in the mean operation time, mean bleeding volume, mean hospitalization time and mean tube placement time between the internal fixation group and the joint replacement group. The concept of FTS runs through the whole treatment process, such as preoperative condition evaluation, intraoperative detail treatment, and postoperative functional exercise. In the internal fixation group, 27 cases achieved bone union at 3 months after operation, 1 case underwent revision operation due to the second fracture at 2 months after operation, 1 case had delayed fracture union, and achieved bone union at 5 months after the limb suspension. In the arthroplasty group, 8 patients achieved postoperative bone union within 3 to 4 months without acromial fracture or scapular fracture. There was no significant difference in VAS score of postoperative pain between the two groups. The shoulder function score in the internal fixation group was significantly better than that in the arthroplasty group at 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after operation (P<0.05) .

Conclusions

For severe proximal humeral fracture, the operation plan should be selected according to different fracture types. The concept of FTS should be valued throughout the process of diagnosis and treatment of proximal humeral fractures, and it has a significant impact on the postoperative effect. Neer part-3 fractures are recommended to be treated with open reduction and internal fixation, while Neer part- 4 fractures, especially severely comminuted humeral head fracture, humeral head dislocation and cartilage damage of humeral head, can be treated with shoulder arthroplasty. Spitted or comminuted humeral head fractures are the major indications of shoulder replacement. The classification of split-type humeral head fracture is not perfect, and the operation plan and prognosis were not effectively evaluated. Animal experiments or clinical experimental studies are further required.

图1 X线片(图A)及CT(图B)提示骨折断端骨性连接,骨折线已消失,骨折愈合
图2 术前(图A)及术后(图B)肱骨近端解剖锁定接骨板固定肱骨近端骨折
图3 术前(图A)及术后(图B)肱骨近端解剖锁定接骨板结合拉力螺钉固定肱骨近端骨折
图4 术前(图A)及术后(图B)肱骨头置换术治疗肱骨近端骨折
[1]
Lowry V, Bureau NJ, Desmeules F, et al. Acute proximal humeral fractures in adults[J]. J Hand Ther,2017,30(2):158-166.
[2]
Antonios T, Bakti N, Nzeako O, et al. Outcomes following fixation for proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma,2019,10(3):468-473.
[3]
Robinson CM, Stirling PHC, Goudie EB, et al. Complications and long-term outcomes of open reduction and plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2019,101(23):2129-2139.
[4]
Pautasso A, Lea S, Arpaia A, et al. Six-year experience with antegrade intramedullary nail for the treatment of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures[J]. Musculoskelet Surg,2018,102(Suppl 1):67-74.
[5]
Douleh DG, Stoneback JW, Bravman JT. Successful open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humerus fracture after dysvascular subcoracoid humeral head dislocation: a case report[J]. JBJS Case Connect,2020,10(1): e0313.
[6]
Katthagen JC, Lutz O, Voigt C, et al. Cement augmentation of humeral head screws reduces early implant-related complications after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures[J]. Obere Extrem,2018,13(2):123-129.
[7]
Katthagen JC, Schliemann B, Michel PA, et al. Clinical application and outcomes of upper extremity double plating[J]. Z Orthop Unfall,2020,158(2):227-237.
[8]
Monica J, Vredenburgh Z, Korsh J, et al. Acute shoulder injuries in adults[J]. Am Fam Physician,2016,94(2):119-127.
[9]
唐佶颖, 陶忠亮, 李军, 等. 同期和延期修复肱骨近端骨折合并的肩袖全层破裂疗效比较[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2019(9):1141-1146.
[10]
Hashiguchi H, Iwashita S, Ohkubo A, et al. The outcome of hemiarthroplasty for proximal humeral fractures is dependent on the status of the rotator cuff[J]. Int Orthop,2015,39(6):1115-1119.
[11]
Herzberg G, Tebaa E. Combined three-part humeral anterior fracture-dislocation and humeral shaft fracture treated with one-stage long stem shoulder hemiarthroplasty in an active elderly patient--A case report and review of literature[J]. SICOT J,2017,3:62.
[12]
Mellstrand Navarro C, Brolund A, Ekholm C, et al. Treatment of humerus fractures in the elderly: A systematic review covering effectiveness, safety, economic aspects and evolution of practice[J]. PLoS One,2018,13(12):e0207815.
[13]
Saleh HE, Pennings AL, ElMaraghy AW. Venous thromboembolism after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2013,22(10):1440-1448.
[14]
Torchia MT, Austin DC, Cozzolino N, et al. Acute versus delayed reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures in the elderly population: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2019,28(4):765-773.
[15]
Scheibel M, Peters P,Moro F, et al. Head-split fractures of theproximal humerus[J]. Obere Extremitaet, 2019, 14(2):93-102.
[1] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[2] 齐红哲, 彭军, 封国超, 刘光波, 赵宋华, 白克文, 周家宁, 李双成, 周雪峰, 陈华. 将加速康复外科理念应用于跟腱断裂微创治疗的效果观察[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(03): 217-222.
[3] 吴建永. 单中心2 000例心脏死亡器官捐献肾移植发展与创新[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 0-.
[4] 张翼飞, 郭强, 赖华健, 钟文文, 叶雷, 马波, 瞿虎, 尧冰, 邱剑光, 王德娟. 加速康复外科在儿童尿道下裂围术期的应用效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 367-371.
[5] 赖华健, 钟文文, 郭强, 李俊涛, 张翼飞, 叶雷, 马波, 尧冰, 瞿虎, 邱剑光, 王德娟. 二次腹腔镜肾盂成形术治疗肾盂输尿管连接部梗阻疗效分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 228-232.
[6] 郑华蓉, 刘俊, 郑艳, 陈玉莲, 廖子敏. 加速康复外科理念下的集束化护理模式在腹股沟疝修补术中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 643-646.
[7] 贾雪敏, 刘海元. 预康复研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 252-256.
[8] 李骞, 成凯, 李传富, 齐硕, 丁成明, 贺军, 陈国栋. ERAS背景下机器人与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的对比分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 73-78.
[9] 吕瑶, 张婵, 陈建华, 张鸣青. 压力控制容量保证通气模式在腹腔镜肝细胞癌切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 528-533.
[10] 郭佳胤, 徐杰, 刘作金. 腹腔镜下ALPPS右半肝切除一例(附视频)[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 345-347.
[11] 宗宇宁, 薛海鹏, 韩天宇, 张昊, 王帅, 马翔宇, 纪振钢, 周大鹏. 解剖状骨水泥占位器在治疗内侧柱缺失型肱骨近端骨折中的实用性的有限元分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 242-251.
[12] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[13] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[14] 中华医学会骨科分会关节学组. 中国髋、膝关节置换日间手术围手术期管理专家共识[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 321-332.
[15] 杨杨, 刘永志, 刘军峰, 周雪涛, 张东升. 回顾性分析完全胸腔镜下肋骨骨折内固定术治疗肋骨骨折患者的临床效果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 137-142.
阅读次数
全文


摘要