切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 232 -236. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.03.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

肘关节粘连松解术中减少射频消融的使用对术后疗效的影响
杨春喜1,(), 杜琳1, 刘晓琳1, 张炜1, 赵耀超1, 王友1   
  1. 1. 200001 上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院骨关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-15 出版日期:2020-08-05
  • 通信作者: 杨春喜
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科委引导类课题面上项目(16411971700)

The effect of reduced radiofrequency ablation on postoperative drainage of elbow joint arthrolysis

Chunxi Yang1,(), Lin Du1, Xiaolin Liu1, Wei Zhang1, Yaochao Zhao1, You Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200001, China
  • Received:2020-04-15 Published:2020-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Chunxi Yang
引用本文:

杨春喜, 杜琳, 刘晓琳, 张炜, 赵耀超, 王友. 肘关节粘连松解术中减少射频消融的使用对术后疗效的影响[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 232-236.

Chunxi Yang, Lin Du, Xiaolin Liu, Wei Zhang, Yaochao Zhao, You Wang. The effect of reduced radiofrequency ablation on postoperative drainage of elbow joint arthrolysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(03): 232-236.

目的

对比在肘关节镜下粘连松解术使用射频消融或刨刀进行关节囊松解、炎性滑膜切除对术后关节引流量的影响。

方法

将上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院收治的骨关节炎性肘关节粘连患者24例随机分为2组,每组12例。射频消融组:使用射频消融进行滑膜切除和关节松解;刨刀组:使用刨刀进行滑膜切除和关节松解。对比术后关节引流量、关节屈伸活动度、关节功能评分等。

结果

刨刀组术后引流量为(32.9±12.3)ml显著少于射频消融组(110.0±31.4)ml(P=0.00)。术后引流管留置时间射频消融组为(3.1±1.3)d,显著多于刨刀组的(1.3±0.5)d(P=0.00),但两组间关节活动度、功能评分恢复情况差异无统计学意义。

结论

进行肘关节镜下粘连松解术时,射频消融的过多使用会增加术后引流量,使用刨刀进行滑膜切除和松解优于射频消融。

Background

The incidence of elbow osteoarthritis in the adult is nearly 2%, and it can cause elbow joint adhesion, which is manifested by pain in elbow joints, accompanied by various degrees of flexion, extension, and rotation disorders. Elbow joint arthrolysis has attracted much attention in recent years, and the effect of the operation is affirmative. Due to the narrow joint cavity of the elbow joint, extensive joint capsule release and synovial clearance are needed in this operation. There is often more joint exudation after operation, even the incision is delayed to heal. Radiofrequency ablation has been widely used in arthroscopic surgery for joint capsule release, synovial cleaning, hemostasis, etc. However, radiofrequency ablation can cut through the local instantaneous high temperature of the knife head, which will increase the temperature of surrounding tissues and liquid, and even cause extensive thermal damage. Elbow joint space is narrow, which may lead to thermal injury more easily. In addition, radiofrequency ablation or planer knife is needed for extensive synovial clearance, joint capsule release and resection, and ligament insertion release. Therefore, the influence of radiofrequency ablation and planer on the amount of joint exudation after arthrolysis of elbow joint needs to be confirmed.

Objective

To compare the effect of radiofrequency ablation or planer blade on the postoperative joint drainage in arthroscopic elbow arthrolysis.

Methods

A total of 24 patients with osteoarthritic elbow adhesions were randomly divided into 2 groups with 12 patients in each group. In the experimental group, radiofrequency ablation was used for synovial resection and joint release. In the control group, synovial resection and joint release were performed with a plane knife. The postoperative joint drainage, joint flexion and extension range and joint function score were compared.

Results

The postoperative drainage volume was (32.9±12.3) ml in the control group, which was significantly lower than that in the experimental group, which was (110.0± 31.4) ml (P=0.00) . The postoperative drainage tube indwining time in the experimental group was (3.1±1.3) days, which was significantly higher than that in the control group, which was (1.3±0.5) days (P=0.00) . However, there was no statistical difference in the functional score and recovery of joint range of motion between the two groups.

Conclusion

The excessive use of radiofrequency ablation can increase the postoperative drainage, and the use of planer blade for synovectomy and capsular release is better than radiofrequency ablation.

表1 两组患者术前、术后MEPI评分对比(分,±s)
图1 随机对照产生流程图
表2 两组患者术前、术后屈伸活动度对比(°,±s)
表3 两组患者术后引流量和引流管留置时间对比(±s)
[1]
Kwak JM, Kholinne E, Sun Y, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of the computed tomography-based radiographic classification of primary elbow osteoarthritis: comparison with plain radiograph-based classification and clinical assessment[J]. Osteoarthritis Cartilage,2019, 27(7):1057-1063.
[2]
Kim DM, Han M, Jeon IH, et al. Range-of-motion improvement and complication rate in open and arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: a systematic review[J]. Int Orthop,2020, 44(2):329-339.
[3]
Kroonen LT, Piper SL, Ghatan AC. Arthroscopic management of elbow osteoarthritis[J]. J Hand Surg Am,2017, 42(8):640-650.
[4]
Kwak JM, Kholinne E, Sun Y, et al. Clinical outcome of osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: comparison of arthroscopic and open procedure[J]. Arthroscopy,2019, 35(4):1083-1089.
[5]
Kwak JM, Kim H, Sun Y, et al. Arthroscopic osteocapsular arthroplasty for advanced-stage primary osteoarthritis of the elbow using a computed tomography-based classification[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2020, 29(5):989-995.
[6]
Akca F, Hubay M, Zima E, et al. High-volume lesions using a new second-generation open irrigation radiofrequency catheter are associated with the development of inhomogeneous lesions[J]. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol,2014, 37(7):864-873.
[7]
Noticewala MS, Levi MA, Ahmad CS, et al. Arthroscopic elbow osteocapsular arthroplasty[J]. Arthrosc Tech,2017, 6(6):e2111-e2118.
[8]
Noticewala MS, Trofa DP, Vance DD, et al. Elbow arthroscopy: 30-day postoperative complication profile and associated risk factors[J]. Arthroscopy,2018, 34(2):414-420.
[9]
Smith J, Field LD. Elbow arthroscopy made simple: indications and techniques[J]. Arthroscopy,2019, 35(7):1952-1953.
[10]
Huber M, Eder C, Mueller M, et al. Temperature profile of radiofrequency probe application in wrist arthroscopy: monopolar versus bipolar[J]. Arthroscopy,2013, 29(4):645-652.
[11]
Huynh V, Barbier O, Bajard X, et al. Subacromial temperature profile during bipolar radiofrequency use in shoulder arthroscopy. Comparison of Coblation((R)) vs. VAPR((R)) [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res,2017, 103(4):489-491.
[12]
McCormick F, Alpaugh K, Nwachukwu BU, et al. Effect of radiofrequency use on hip arthroscopy irrigation fluid temperature [J]. Arthroscopy,2013, 29(2):336-342.
[13]
Haasters F, Helfen T, Bocker W, et al. The value of elbow arthroscopy in diagnosing and treatment of radial head fractures[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord,2019, 20(1):343.
[14]
Chivot M, Airaudi S, Galland A, et al. Analysis of parameters influencing intraarticular temperature during radiofrequency use in shoulder arthroscopy[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol,2019, 29(6):1205-1210.
[15]
Zhang S, Xu B, Huang Q, et al. Early removal of drainage tube after fast-track primary total knee arthroplasty[J]. J Knee Surg,2017, 30(6):571-576.
[1] 杨水华, 何桂丹, 覃桂灿, 梁蒙凤, 罗艳合, 李雪芹, 唐娟松. 胎儿孤立性完全型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图特征及高分辨率血流联合时间-空间相关成像的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1061-1067.
[2] 张宝富, 俞劲, 叶菁菁, 俞建根, 马晓辉, 刘喜旺. 先天性原发隔异位型肺静脉异位引流的超声心动图诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1074-1080.
[3] 闫文, 谢兴文, 顾玉彪, 雷宁波, 马成, 于文霞, 高亚雄, 张磊. 微小RNA与全膝关节置换术后深静脉血栓的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 842-846.
[4] 樊绪国, 赵永刚, 杨砚伟. 腓骨在膝骨关节炎作用的研究观点[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 855-859.
[5] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[6] 李善武, 叶永杰, 王兵, 王子呓, 银毅, 孙官军, 张大刚. 胫骨高位截骨与单髁置换的早期疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 882-888.
[7] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[8] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[9] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[10] 张中斌, 付琨朋, 朱凯, 张玉, 李华. 胫骨高位截骨术与富血小板血浆治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 633-641.
[11] 鲁鑫, 许佳怡, 刘洋, 杨琴, 鞠雯雯, 徐缨龙. 早期LC术与PTCD续贯LC术治疗急性胆囊炎对患者肝功能及预后的影响比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 648-650.
[12] 李静如, 王江玲, 吴向阳. 简易负压引流在腹股沟疝术后浅部感染中的疗效分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 745-749.
[13] 王旭, 师绍敏, 毛燕, 季上, 刘亚玲. 肝酶代谢与骨关节炎相关性的研究进展[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 379-384.
[14] 周晓强, 孙超, 虞宵, 金宇杰, 李志强, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 同一患者同期行全膝和单髁置换术的早期临床疗效[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 275-281.
[15] 马聪, 李雪靖, 郑晓佐, 张晓阳, 段坤峰, 刘国强, 郄素会. 关节腔内注射富血小板血浆与透明质酸钠治疗Ⅰ-Ⅲ期膝骨关节炎的对比研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 282-288.
阅读次数
全文


摘要