切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 226 -231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.03.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下"三角布钉"结合改良Mason-Allen技术治疗巨大"L"或"U"型肩袖损伤
康汇1, 李剑1, 王涛1, 石立田1, 陈旭旭1, 王微1,()   
  1. 1. 710054 西安交通大学附属红会医院运动医学诊疗中心肩肘病区
  • 收稿日期:2020-05-07 出版日期:2020-08-05
  • 通信作者: 王微
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81702210)

Clinical outcome of arthroscopic "triangular inserting anchors" with modified Mason-Allen technique for treatment of massive U- or L- shaped rotator cuff tears

Hui Kang1, Jian Li1, Tao Wang1, Litian Shi1, Xuxu Chen1, Wei Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Shoulder and Elbow of Sports Medicine, Honghui Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710054, China
  • Received:2020-05-07 Published:2020-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Wei Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Wang Wei,Email:
引用本文:

康汇, 李剑, 王涛, 石立田, 陈旭旭, 王微. 关节镜下"三角布钉"结合改良Mason-Allen技术治疗巨大"L"或"U"型肩袖损伤[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 226-231.

Hui Kang, Jian Li, Tao Wang, Litian Shi, Xuxu Chen, Wei Wang. Clinical outcome of arthroscopic "triangular inserting anchors" with modified Mason-Allen technique for treatment of massive U- or L- shaped rotator cuff tears[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(03): 226-231.

目的

评估在关节镜下"三角布钉"结合改良Mason-Aallen技术在临床中治疗巨大"L"或"U"型肩袖损伤的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2015年1月至2019年1月,西安交通大学附属红会医院收治的86例巨大"L"或"U"型肩袖损伤患者临床资料,其中男56例、女30例;年龄40 ~ 65岁,平均(52.5±2.5)岁。根据DeOrio和Cofield分型巨大肩袖损伤,且为"L"或"U"型。应用关节镜下"三角布钉"结合改良Mason-Allen技术治疗,记录肩关节活动度及并发症,手术前后采用Constant评分及视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)评价肩关节功能。

结果

术前症状持续时间1 ~ 23个月,平均(6.2±2.5)个月;86例患者均获24 ~ 72个月随访,平均(29.3±4.5)个月;均无感染等并发症;术后12个月随访时超声检查,75例肩袖完整,8例部分损伤,3例出现全层撕裂后再次行关节镜手术治疗;末次随访肩关节活动度:前屈(170.7±3.5)°,外展(155.8±3.8)°,外旋(39.4±3.4)°,内旋(40.5±3.3)°;Constant评分由术前(31.2±1.2)分提高至术后(82.5±3.2)分(P<0.05);VAS由术前(7.8±3.2)分减少至术后(1.3±0.5)分(P<0.05)。

结论

关节镜下"三角布钉"结合改良Mason-Allen技术治疗巨大肩袖损伤有效,便于操作,可以减轻疼痛,改善肩关节功能,对于治疗巨大"L"或"U"型肩袖损伤是一种新的选择方法,值得临床推广。

Background

Rotator cuff injury is an important cause of shoulder pain. With increasing age, the incidence grows continuously, reaching 16% to 34% in people after 30 years old. According to DeOrio & Cofield classification, the tear with its size of over 5 cm is considered as massive rotator cuff injury. Four years after primary rotator cuff injury without treatment, 50% of the patients may rapidly develop into massive rotator cuff injury which often involve two or more rotator cuff tendons at the same time, accompanied by tendon degeneration. With the progress and maturity of the diagnosis and treatment technology of shoulder arthroscopy, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has become a development tendency. In recent years, with the continuous development of arthroscopic-related materials, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has made great progress and achieved the same therapeutic effect as open surgery. However, the treatment of massive rotator cuff injury remains a challenge. The shape of tear is critical to the selection of suture methods. The corresponding suture methods were selected for tears of different shapes. For L- or U-shaped tear, many scholars adopted improved Mason-Allen technique and achieved good therapeutic effect. However, for massive L- or U-shaped rotator cuff tears, there are many factors affecting postoperative healing and clinical efficacy, and in view of the "L" or "U" shaped tear, many scholars technology improved Mason-Allen, has obtained the good curative effect. But for the huge "L" or "U" type of rotator cuff injury, there are more factors influencing the postoperative clinical curative effect and healing. Scholars are still exploring and improving the suture technology in order to obtain better clinical efficacy.

Objective

To investigate the clinical outcome of arthroscopic "triangular inserting anchors" with modified Mason-Allen technique for massive U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears.

Methods

From January 2015 to January 2019, the clinical data of 86 patients with massive U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears were retrospectively analyzed. There were 56 males and 30 females, and the ages ranged from 40 to 65 (52.5±2.5) years . All patients were massive U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears according the rating system of DeOrio and Cofield, and received the treatment of arthroscopic "triangular inserting anchors" with modified Mason-allen technique. The postoperative complications and shoulder range of motion were recorded. The shoulder function was evaluated by Constant-Murley score system and visual analogue score (VAS) before and after the operation.

Results

The duration of symptoms was 1 to 23 (6.2±2.5) months before the operation. All patients were followed up for 24 to 72 (29.3±4.5) months without infection. Ultrasound examination was performed 12 months after the operation, and there were 75 patients with intact rotator cuff, 8 patients with partial thickness tears, and 3 patients with full-thickness tears. The 3 cases of full-thickness tear received arthroscopic surgeries again. In the last follow-up, the shoulder anteflexion was (170.7±3.5) °, the abduction was (155.8±3.8) °, the external rotation was (39.4±3.4) ° and the internal rotation was (40.5±3.3) °. The mean Constant score improved from (31.2±1.2) points to (82.5±3.2) points (P<0.05) , and the mean VSA score improved from (7.8±3.2) to (1.3±0.5) (P<0.05) .

Conclusions

Arthroscopic "triangular inserting anchors" with modified Mason-Allen technique for massive U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears was effective and simple. It can relieve the pain and improve the shoulder function, which was available for massive U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears and worthy to clinical application.

图1 三角布钉结合改良Mason-Allen技术示意图 图A:爱惜邦线穿过肌腱;图B:置入第1枚锚钉;图C:置入外侧2枚锚钉;图D:打结缝合
图2 关节镜下三角布钉结合改良Mason-Allen技术 图A:红色箭头指示肌腱编织线穿过肌腱边对边缝合;图B:置入第1枚锚钉做边对边缝合;图C:置入外侧2枚锚钉形成"三角布钉";图D:改良Mason-Allen技术打结缝合完成
表1 86例患者术前及术后末次随访肩关节活动度比较(°,±s)
表2 86例患者术前及术后末次随访Constant评分及VAS评分比较(分,±s)
[1]
Via AG, De Cupis M, Spoliti M, et al. Clinical and biological aspects of rotator cuff tears[J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J, 2013,3(2):70-79.
[2]
Deorio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1984,66(4):563-567.
[3]
Zingg PO, Jost B, Sukthankar A, et al. Clinical and structural outcomes of nonoperative management of massive rotator cuff tears[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007,89(9):1928-1934.
[4]
Arce G, Bak K, Bain G, et al. Management of disorders of the rotator cuff: proceedingsof the ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensusmeeting[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013,29(11):1840-1850.
[5]
Burkhart SS, Danaceau SM, Pearce CE. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: Analysis of results by tear size and by repair technique-margin convergence versus direct tendon-to-bone repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2001,17(9):905-912.
[6]
Christopher KJ,Felix HS. Arthroscopic repair of large and massive rotator cuff tears[J]. Arthroscopy, 2003,19(6):564-571.
[7]
Eugene MW,William TP,Vivek A. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: 4- to 10-year results[J]. Arthroscopy, 2004,20(1):5-12.
[8]
Jung SW, Kim DH, Kang SH, et al. Arthroscopic modified Mason-Allen technique for large U- or L-shaped rotator cuff tears[J].Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2017,25(7):2129-2137.
[9]
Tao SS, Kaltenbach J. Arthroscopic placement of a modified Mason-Allen Stitch[J]. Arthroscopy, 2006, 22(11): 1248(e1-e3).
[10]
Shin SJ, Kook SH, Rao N, et al. Clinical outcomes of modified mason-allen single-row repair for bursal-sided partial-thickness rotator cuff tears[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015,43(8):1976-1982.
[11]
Graham P. Rotator cuff tear(review)[J]. Orthop Nurs, 2018,37(2): 154-156.
[12]
Constant CR, Murley AH.A clinical method of functionalassessment of the shoulder[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1987, 214:160-164.
[13]
Gohar AN, Mutaz J, Paul H. Accuracy of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging for detection of full thickness rotator cuff tears[J]. Int J Shoulder Surg, 2009,3 (4): 94-97.
[14]
Habermeyer P, Krieter C, Tang KL, et al. A new arthroscopic classification of articular-sided supraspinatus footprint lesions: a prospective comparison with Snyder's and Ellman'sclassification[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2008,17(6):909-913.
[15]
Jean K, Hisham A, Jean DW. Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears[J]. Obere Extremität,2018,13(4):246-254.
[16]
Asheesh B,Joshua D, Russell FW, et al. Massive tears of the rotator cuff[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010,92(9):1894-1908.
[17]
Barbara M, Bryan W, Gilles W. Natural history of infraspinatus fatty infiltration in rotator cuff tears[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010,19(5):757-763.
[18]
Paul S, Wm GF. The role of superior capsule reconstruction in rotator cuff tears[J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2018,49(1):93-101.
[19]
Ma HH, Chen KH, Chiang ER, et al. Does arthroscopic suture-spanning augmentation of single-row repair reduce the retear rate of massive rotator cuff tear?[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2019,47(6):1420.
[20]
Gerber C, Schneeberger AG, Beck M, et al. Mechanical strength of repairs of the rotator cuff[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1994,76(3): 371-380.
[21]
Esquivel AO, Duncan, DD, Dobrasevic N, et al. Load to failure and stiffness: Anchor placement and suture pattern effects on load to failure in rotator cuff repairs (Article)[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2015,3(4):1-6.
[22]
Ma CB, Lyn C, Joseph W, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs: double-row compared with single-row fixation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am , 2006,88(2):403-410.
[23]
Dennis L, Nicolas JD, Hauschild G, et al. In vivo blood flow after rotator cuff reconstruction in a sheep model: comparison of single versus double row[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2015,23 (2):470-477.
[1] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[2] 肖志满, 庄锡琪, 龚煜. 关节镜下Lasso-loop Gould术式治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的早期疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 280-284.
[3] 蔡雨琦, 史尉利, 陶立元, 曹建夫, 崔国庆, 杨渝平. 支持带松解联合外侧成形治疗髌骨外侧过度挤压综合征[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 186-192.
[4] 张骏, 李强, 孟柏屹, 李成宇. 关节镜松解联合肩袖修复治疗肩袖损伤合并继发冻结肩[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-7.
[5] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[6] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[7] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[8] 韩伟峰, 王典, 陈艺丹, 曾峥. 关节镜下半月板成形术与康复训练治疗中年退行性内侧半月板撕裂的疗效比较[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 134-140.
[9] 王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[10] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[11] 唐晓俞, 邓凯文, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 王小芃. 关节镜下V-Y结缝合方式与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖损伤的比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 107-114.
[12] 白云鹏, 孙卫兵, 王苗, 丁浩亮, 孙健. 肘关节镜桡侧腕短伸肌腱松解联合关节清理术治疗顽固性网球肘[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 135-139.
[13] 吴念儒, 王蕾. 反式肩关节置换治疗巨大肩袖损伤与其手术进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 177-183.
[14] 黄丹蕾, 叶志扬, 王俊, 翁蔚宗, 王光泽, 刘好源, 黄建明. 关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位的初步临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 34-39.
[15] 李广峰, 李王, 尹志峰, 王思成, 张文薷, 彭勇, 杜暠, 曹中华, 张友忠, 刘仲祥, 刘望, 刘祥飞. 切开复位与全关节镜下空心钉内固定治疗Mutch II型肱骨大结节骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 56-60.
阅读次数
全文


摘要