切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 243 -247. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.03.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

外固定支架结合克氏针治疗老年桡骨远端开放性骨折的疗效分析
柴雷子1, 宋财1,(), 刘杰1, 田浩然1, 张伟1   
  1. 1. 236800 亳州市人民医院创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-01-16 出版日期:2020-08-05
  • 通信作者: 宋财
  • 基金资助:
    国家卫生计生委医药卫生科技发展研究中心(W2015QJ058)

Clinical efficacy analysis of external fixators with Kirschner wires for treatment of open distal radius fracture in elderly patients

Leizi Chai1, Cai Song1,(), Jie Liu1, Haoran Tian1, Wei Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Bozhou People's Hospital, Bozhou 236800, China
  • Received:2020-01-16 Published:2020-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Cai Song
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Song Cai, Email:
引用本文:

柴雷子, 宋财, 刘杰, 田浩然, 张伟. 外固定支架结合克氏针治疗老年桡骨远端开放性骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 243-247.

Leizi Chai, Cai Song, Jie Liu, Haoran Tian, Wei Zhang. Clinical efficacy analysis of external fixators with Kirschner wires for treatment of open distal radius fracture in elderly patients[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(03): 243-247.

目的

探讨外固定支架结合克氏针治疗老年桡骨远端开放性骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2018年2月至2019年8月期间亳州市人民医院使用外固定支架结合克氏针治疗的13例老年桡骨远端开放性骨折患者资料,其中男8例、女5例;年龄为62 ~ 84岁,平均68.3岁;左侧9例,右侧4例。按Gustilo分型:Ⅱ型7例,ⅢA型5例,ⅢB型1例。

结果

13例患者术后获得6 ~ 15个月(平均10个月)随访。所有患者均获得愈合,愈合时间6 ~ 12周,平均10.8周。主要并发症:复位丢失3例(23.1%),经及时调整外固定支架后改善;关节僵硬4例(30.1%),经康复理疗后症状好转;创伤性关节炎2例(15.4%),经康复科理疗及药物治疗后症状好转;针道感染2例(15.4%),经换药后感染控制。末次随访时参考Gartland-Werley评分标准评价腕关节功能恢复情况:优5例,良6例,一般2例,差0例,优良率84.6%。

结论

外固定支架结合克氏针治疗老年桡骨远端开放性骨折疗效满意,值得临床推广。

Background

Distal radial fracture is one of the common clinical fractures, which often occur in elderly patients and are mainly closed fractures. However, open distal radial fracture is relatively rare. In recent years, traffic injuries are raising with the development of social economy in China, and as the power-assisted electric vehicle is popularized among the elderly in this region, the population of elderly open distal radial fractures grows. External fixators have been widely adopted for treatment of closed distal radial fractures in clinical practice, and achieved satisfactory clinical efficacy. The reports of external fixators in the treatment of open distal radial fractures are rare.

Objective

To explore the clinical efficacy of external fixators with Kirschner wires for treatment of open distal radial fracture in elderly patients.

Methods

From February 2018 to August 2019, 13 elderly patients with open distal radial fractures were treated with external fixators combined with Kirschner wires. The were 8 males and 5 females, and their ages ranged from 62 to 84 years (meanly 68.3 years) . There were 9 cases on the left side and 4 cases on the right side. According to Gustilo classification, there were 7 cases of type Ⅱ, 5 cases of type ⅢA and 1 case of type ⅢB.

Results

All the patients were followed up for 6 to 15 months (meanly 10 months) . All fractures healed after an average time of 10.8 weeks (from 6 to 12 weeks) . The main complications were as follows: 3 cases (23.1%) had reduction loss, and improved after timely adjustment of their external fixators; 4 cases (30.1%) developed joint stiffness, and recovered after physical therapy; 2 (15.4%) cases had traumatic wrist arthritis, which improved after physical and drug therapy; 2 (15.4%) cases had pin site infection, and recovered after regular wound dressing. The wrist function restoration was assessed according to Gartland-Werley criteria. In the last follow-up, there were 5 excellent cases, 6 good cases, 2 moderate cases and no poor case, and the excellent and good rate was 84.6%.

Conclusions

External fixators with Kirschner wires for treatment of open distal radial fractures in elderly patients can obtain good clinical results, and deserves to be popularized clinically.

图1 患者,男,65岁,骑电动三轮车翻车后受伤
图2 患者正位X线片提示桡骨远端骨折
图3 术后腕关节正位(图A)、侧位(图B)X线片示右桡骨远端关节面高度、掌倾角及尺偏角恢复
[1]
Wang D, Shan L, Zhou JL. Locking plate versus external fixation for type distal radius fractures: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials[J]. Chin J Traumatol, 2018,21(2): 113-117.
[2]
Saving J, Enocson A, Ponzer S, et al. External fixation versus volar locking plate for unstable dorsally displaced distal radius fractures: a 3-year follow up of a randomized control study[J]. J Hand Surg Am ,2019,44(1): 18-26.
[3]
Roh YH, Lee BK, Baek JR. A randomized comparison of volar plate and external fixation for intra-articular distal radius fractures[J]. J Hand Surg,2015,40(1): 34-41.
[4]
王谦,周峰,王秋根,等.桡骨远端骨折的治疗进展[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2015,3(1):5-8.
[5]
姜保国,张殿英,傅中国,等.老年桡骨远端骨折的治疗方法[J].中华骨科杂志,2004,24(11):645-648.
[6]
Rhee PC, Medoff RJ, Shin AY. Complex distal radius fractures: an anatomic algorithm for surgical management[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2017,25(2): 77-88.
[7]
Aldemir C, Duygun F. Is it possible to avoid intra-articular screw penetration with minimal use of fluoroscopy in the application of distal radius volar plate? [J]. Eklem Hastalik Cerrahis,2017,18(1):2-6.
[8]
Regazzoni P. A preliminary report of 20 cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1996,78(4):588-592.
[9]
Jeudy J, Steiger V, Boyer P, et al.Treatment of complex fractures of the distal radius:a prospective randomised comparison of external fixation "versus" locked volar plating[J]. Injury,2012,43(2):174-179.
[10]
Yanging Z, Yanbin Z, Xiong Z, et al.Comparison of radiographic and functional results of die-punch fracture of distal radius between volar locking plating (VLP) and external fixation (EF)[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2019,14(1):373.
[11]
Micic I,Khplinne E,Sun Y, et al. The role of additional K-Wires on AO Type C distal radius fracture treatment with external fixator in young population[J]. Adv Orthop,2019,2019:8273018.
[12]
曹发奇,周武,夏天,等.跨关节外固定支架治疗老年AO分型桡骨远端骨折术后并发症分析[J].中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(11):960-963.
[13]
Yu X, Yu Y, Shao X,et al. Volar locking plate versus external fixation with optional additional K-wire for treatment of AO type C2/C3 fractures: a retrospective comparative study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019,14(1):271.
[14]
Xu GG, Chan SP, Puhaindran ME,et al.Prospective randomised study of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: comparison between external fixation and plate fixation[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore,2009,38(7):600-606.
[15]
Richard MJ, Wartinbee DA, Riboh J, et al. Analysis of the complications of Palmar plating versus external fixation for fractures of the distal radius[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2011,36(10):1614-1620.
[16]
Fakoor M, Fakoor M, Mohammadhoseini P.Displaced intra-articular fractures of the distal radius: open reduction with internal fixation versus bridging external fixation[J]. Trauma Mon, 2015,20(3):e17631.
[17]
Duramaz A, Bilgili MG, Karaali E, et al. Volar locking plate versus K-wire-supported external fixation in the treatment of AO/ASIF type C distal radius fractures: A comparison of functional and radiological outcomes[J]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg, 2018,24(3):255-262.
[18]
Saving J, Enocson A, Ponzer S, et al. External fixation versus locking plate for unstable dorsally displaced distal radius fracture-a 3-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2019, 44(1):18-26.
[19]
Ma C, Deng Q, Pu H, et al. External fixation is more suitable for intra-articular fractures of the distal radius in elderly patients[J]. Bone Res,2016,21,4:16017.
[20]
Jorge-Mora AA, Cecilia-López D, Rodríguez-Vega V, et al. Comparison between external fixators and fixed-angle volar-locking plates in the treatment of distal radius fractures[J]. J Hand Microsurg,2012,4(2):50-54.
[1] 阮洁, 刘冬, 刘兴会. 胎儿宫内治疗的国内外发展现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(01): 10-15.
[2] 向锋, 张锡平, 陈侠甫, 戴涛, 李艳军, 文捷. 矩形钢丝环扎联合8字钢丝张力带与传统克氏针钢丝张力带对治疗髌骨横形骨折的早中期疗效比较[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(03): 251-254.
[3] 邓欢, 曹博, 崔昊, 刘贵宾, 宋立强, 李航航, 赵瑞阳, 陈凛, 卫勃. 腹部闭合性外伤与开放性外伤的围手术期临床特征分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(01): 63-66.
[4] 燕飞, 赵东旭, 金泽鉴, 胡斯乐, 王永刚, 苗雷, 宋鹤天, 刘斌, 赵胡日查. TightRope锥状韧带单束重建联合两种肩锁关节修复方式治疗急性肩锁关节脱位临床效果对比观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 27-33.
[5] 冷昆鹏, 孟钰童, 刘洋, 尹博, 周君琳. 钩钢板治疗不稳定尺骨远端骨折合并桡骨远端骨折的疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 344-349.
[6] 白志钢, 新苏雅拉图, 谢迎光, 奥其. 肘关节僵硬手术松解治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 175-180.
[7] 陈邱明, 袁邦清, 吴贤群, 胡晓芳, 魏梁锋, 王飞红, 王守森. 开放性颅脑损伤早期临床救治策略[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(04): 207-210.
[8] 郇宇, 胡世颉, 吴霜, 武秀权, 何鑫, 陈燕伟, 杜伟, 费舟, 李兵. 非火器开放性颅脑损伤临床特征分析及死亡相关因素探讨[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2021, 07(03): 146-150.
[9] 张峻, 赵建民, 姚晓克, 吉浩宇, 越瑞祥. 增加CT对桡骨远端骨折分型的可靠性及可重复性评价[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 264-272.
[10] 鲁宁, 魏立友, 李亮, 张玉龙. 老年桡骨远端骨折小夹板治疗后早期腕关节功能恢复的相关因素分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 222-228.
[11] 左照光, 曾文波, 汪国栋, 蔡贤华, 刘曦明. 缝合锚与克氏针张力带内固定治疗第五跖骨基底部骨折的比较研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2019, 05(05): 250-254.
[12] 吕鹏飞, 裴征, 张清华, 刘家帮. 老年桡骨远端关节内骨折保守与掌侧锁定钢板手术治疗的疗效比较[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(06): 487-492.
[13] 张福勇, 王晓东, 甄允方, 郭志雄, 戴进, 方建峰, 袁泉文, 宿广昊, 朱伦庆, 祝振华. 儿童开放性肱骨髁上骨折与Gartland Ⅲ型肱骨髁上骨折的临床治疗效果[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(02): 95-102.
[14] 张功林, 师富贵, 王行高, 胡军, 冯致举, 何如祥, 王世东, 郑明. ⅢC型开放性胫骨骨折软组织缺损的处理[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(07): 493-497.
[15] 陈义藩, 郑宁. 肥胖对桡骨远端骨折锁定钢板治疗效果的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2019, 05(04): 201-204.
阅读次数
全文


摘要