切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 348 -354. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2019.04.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

经肘前血管神经间隙入路结合微型钢板治疗冠状突骨折
李广峰1, 方阳1, 张友忠1, 王思成1, 彭勇1, 杨国庆1, 尹志峰1, 刘祥飞1, 杜暠1, 李王1, 曹中华1,()   
  1. 1. 200941 上海中冶医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2019-11-05
  • 通信作者: 曹中华
  • 基金资助:
    上海市宝山区医学特色专科和社区项目建设(BSZK-2018-B06)

Anterior elbow neurovascular space approach combined with mini-plate for treatment of ulnar coronoid process fractures

Guangfeng Li1, Yang Fang1, Youzhong Zhang1, Sicheng Wang1, Yong Peng1, Guoqing Yang1, Zhifeng Yin1, Xiangfei Liu1, Hao Du1, Wang Li1, Zhonghua Cao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Zhongye Hospital, Shanghai 200941, China
  • Received:2018-03-16 Published:2019-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Zhonghua Cao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Cao Zhonghua, Email:
引用本文:

李广峰, 方阳, 张友忠, 王思成, 彭勇, 杨国庆, 尹志峰, 刘祥飞, 杜暠, 李王, 曹中华. 经肘前血管神经间隙入路结合微型钢板治疗冠状突骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(04): 348-354.

Guangfeng Li, Yang Fang, Youzhong Zhang, Sicheng Wang, Yong Peng, Guoqing Yang, Zhifeng Yin, Xiangfei Liu, Hao Du, Wang Li, Zhonghua Cao. Anterior elbow neurovascular space approach combined with mini-plate for treatment of ulnar coronoid process fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(04): 348-354.

目的

介绍一种经肘前入路结合微型锁定钢板用于治疗尺骨冠状突骨折的手术方法。

方法

选取上海中冶医院骨科2014年1月至2016年1月收治的单侧尺骨冠状突闭合性骨折患者15例,男9例、女6例,年龄17~65岁,平均32岁。根据Regan-Morrey分类:II型5例、III型10例。通过肘前肱动脉、正中神经间隙入路,采用微型钢板对骨折进行解剖复位和固定。对伴有肘关节明显不稳患者,取另一个切口修复外侧副韧带。

结果

所有患者均获随访,随访时间12~36个月,平均23个月。所有患者骨折均愈合,末次随访肘关节屈伸弧为137°±14°,前臂旋前/旋后恢复至127°±13°,与正常侧比较,功能性结果差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。根据Regand-Morrey分级,损伤臂功能恢复优14例,良1例,优良率100%。轻度异位骨化1例,肘关节功能未受损。

结论

经肘前血管神经间隙入路结合微型钢板固定冠状突骨折简单、安全、创伤小、暴露率高、预后满意。

Background

The coracoid process plays an essential role in the stability of the elbow joint due to its unique anatomical features. Coronary process fracture is a sort of intra-articular fracture, and although it is uncommon, its injury is often accompanied by the dislocation of the elbow joint and ligament damage. Improper treatment will produce adverse impacts on its functional restoration. Coracoid process fracture has become a core issue of elbow trauma and instability. Surgical treatment for fracture reduction, fixation, and ligament repair is essential to restore good elbow function.In recent years, medial and lateral approaches have been reported in the literatures regarding surgical approaches. However, a generally accepted method has not been discovered. Reichel et al. described an anterior approach through the space between the biceps and the medial bicipital neurovascular bundle, but the branches of the brachial artery did interfere with the exposure of surgical field and the operation as well. The brachial blood vessels and median nerve are separated between the capitellum and the capitulum ulnae of the pronator teres, and through this space, it is less likely to damage the vascular and nerve bundles.

Methods

Ⅰ. General information.From January 2014 to January 2016, 15 patients with coronoid process fractures were selected as the study subjects (9 males and 6 females; aged 17-65 years with an average of 32 years) in the Department of orthopedics of Shanghai Zhongye Hospital. All patients were closed unilateral fractures. According to Regan-Morrey classification, there were 10 cases of type II and 5 cases of type III. No osteofascial compartment syndrome was discovered and all the patients received surgery 3 to 7 days after the initial injury (averaged 5.3 days) . This study has been approved by the Hospital Medical Research Ethics Committee, and has obtained consent and signed consent from the participants.Ⅱ. Inclusive and exclusive criteria.Inclusion criteria: (1) age of ≥17 years; (2) fresh closed fractures; (3) without vascular and nerve injury; (4) excellent elbow joint function score before injury; (5) with anteroposterior and lateral views of X-ray films and 3D CT reconstruction of the elbow joint and diagnosis of coronoid process fracture; (6) with surgical treatment indications. Exclusion criteria: (1) age of<17 years; (2) pathological fractures; (3) open fractures; (4) history of elbow joint trauma or surgery; (5) patients combined with severe physical and mental disorders; (6) patients combined with radial head fractures.Ⅲ.Operative methods. 1. Preoperative preparation: All patients underwent preoperative detumescence treatment. Approximately 5 days after the injury, the soft tissue condition of the elbow joint was suitable for surgical treatment. X-ray and CT examinations were performed before operation, and the fracture type was determined for appropriate fixation method, mainly the mini-plate. The collateral ligament was repaired with anchors for those with collateral lateral ligament injury. The preoperative examination was conducted to exclude surgical contraindications. Antibiotics were used once to prevent infection before surgery. 2. Surgical procedure: Under general anesthesia or brachial plexus block anesthesia, the patient was placed in the supine position. The S-shaped incision was made at 2 cm above the inside of the elbow flexion crease. Through the crease, the incision extended distally along the radial side of the forearm to approximately 4 cm beyond the flexion crease. The important veins were protected without removing the cephalic vein, Rosenthal's vein and median cubital vein, and the medial cutaneous nerve of the forearm was exposed after blunt subcutaneous dissection. The deep fascia, biceps brachii, biceps brachii insertion, and distal lateral pronator was exposed as well. The bicipital aponeurosis was longitudinally separated to expose the arteries and veins and nerves of the proximal humerus. Extending distally from the space between the anterior pronator and the humeral head, the brachioradialis and the distal end of pronator was separated and exposed. Due to the loosen structure and absence of neurovascular branch, there was a certain gap between the radial artery and the ulnar nerve. To fully expose the brachialis, the brachial artery, biceps brachii and brachioradialis were pulled toward the radial side, while the medial nerves and pronator were pulled toward the ulnar side. The fracture fragments and basal part of coronoid process were fully exposed. Under direct vision, the fracture was anatomically reduced and fixed with a mini-plate. Two patients presented with lateral instability of the elbow joint.Ⅳ. Perioperative management. Indomethacin was given before and after surgery to prevent heterotopic ossification (HO) . The patients received anti-inflammation and detumescence with a local cold compress for 3-5 days after the operation. The stability of the fracture end and elbow joint was observed during operation. For those with good fixation effect, the forearm was flexed in 90° with sling protection. The active flexion and extension of the elbow joint started after 2 to 3 days. For those with poor fixation in the operation, the elbow joint was fixed at 90° of flexion with plaster. The passive exercise was initiated until the active flexion and extension of the elbow joint were restored as soon as possible. Regular follow-ups were performed 4 weeks, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery.Ⅴ. Observational index.The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and complications were recorded. The efficacy was evaluated according to the Mayo elbow joint function score.Ⅵ. Statistical analysis.SPSS 19.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The data were expressed as mean ± standard deviation. The statistical significance of each group was evaluated by a 2-tailed t-test. A value of P<0.05 was considered the statistical difference.

Results

All surgeries were successfully completed without vascular damage. All fractures were anatomically reduced and rigidly fixed. The average follow-up period was 23 months (12 - 36 months) . The fracture healing time averaged 15 weeks (13-18 weeks) . All incisions healed well without deep infections or swelling of the forearms. In the last follow-up, the flexion and extension of the elbow was (137±14) °, and the forearm pronation/supination was restored to (127±13) °. According to the functional evaluation system of the coronoid process, 14 cases were excellent, and 1 case was good. According to the Mayo elbow function score, the functional assessment results averaged 94.8 points (84-98 points) . There was no significant difference in the recovery of elbow joint function between the affected side and the healthy side (P>0.05) . One patient with mild myositis ossificans, and recovered after postoperative functional rehabilitation. No other complications such as elbow dislocation, subluxation, traumatic arthritis, etc. occurred. All patients resumed their previous work during the final follow-up.

Conclusions

The antecubital brachial artery and median nerve space approach combined with mini-plate fixation in the treatment of coronary process fracture is simple, safe and minimal trauma with high exposure rate and satisfactory prognosis.

表1 患者基本信息及随访情况
图1 典型病例:术前X线及CT片 图A:肘正侧位片;图B:肘部CT平扫;图C:肘部CT三维重建
图2 尺冠状突骨折内固定肘前正中入路示意图 图A:肘部内侧尺侧到外侧桡侧的S形切口;图B:切开皮下组织暴露肱二头肌和肱二头肌腱膜,以及神经血管结构;图C:肱动脉与正中神经之间的空间;图D:肱动脉、肱二头肌和肱桡肌侧向回缩,正中神经和旋前肌内侧移位;图E:纵向切开肱肌和肌腱
图3 术后3个月正(图A)、 侧(图B)位X线片
图4 术后1年正(图A)、侧(图B)位X线片、患肢功能照片(图C)
[1]
宝成,袁天祥,马信龙,等.肘前侧人路治疗尺骨冠突骨折的解剖与临床研究[J].中华骨科杂志, 2015, 35(8):859-864.
[2]
Zhu XZ, Wang X, Ma Z. Comment on the anterior approach for coronoid processfracture[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(1):123-124.
[3]
Reichel LM, Milam GS, Reitman CA. Anterior approach for operative fixationof coronoid fractures in complex elbow instability[J]. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg, 2012, 16(1):98-104.
[4]
Adams JE, Sanchezsotelo J, Th KC, et al. Fractures of thecoronoid: morphology based upon computer tomography scanning[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21:782-788.
[5]
Ramirez MA, Stein JA, Murthi AM. Varus posteromedial instability [J]. Hand Clin, 2015, 31(4):557-563.
[6]
Sang KL, Kim HY, Kim KJ, et al. Coronoid plate fixation of type IIand III coronoid process fractures: outcome and prognostic factors [J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2012, 22:213-219.
[7]
赵国红,谢振军,孙华伟,等.经肘前路内固定治疗尺骨冠状突骨折的疗效[J].实用临床医药杂志,2018, 19(5):93-95.
[8]
Park SM, Lee JS,Jung JY, et al. How should anteromedial coronoid facet fracture be managed?A surgical strategy based on O'Driscoll classification and ligament injury [J]. J shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(1):74-82.
[9]
公茂琪,蒋协远.肘关节损伤三联征的治疗[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2018, 38(1):60-64.
[10]
支中正,黄晓微,吴良浩,等.肘关节后外侧旋转不稳定一例及文献回顾[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2016, 4(3):179-182.
[11]
Zeiders GJ, Patel MK. Management of unstable elbows following complex fracture- dislocations-the" terrible triad" injury[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2008, 90 (Suppl 4):75-84.
[12]
Garrigues GE, Wray WH 3rd, Lindenhovius AL, et al. Fixation of the coronoid pmcess in elbow fracture-dislocations[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93(20):1873-1881.
[13]
Chemama B, Bonnevialle N, Peter O, et al. Terrible triadinjury of the elbow: how to improve outcomes?[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2014, 96:147.
[14]
樊军,罗意,隆晓涛,等.肘关节"恐怖三联征"的治疗:成组病例报告[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2016, 4(2):103-108.
[15]
董宇启.肘内侧冠状突修复的重要性[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(2):159.
[16]
Zhu XZ, Wang X, Ma Z. Comment on the anterior approach for coronoid processfracture[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24:123-124.
[17]
Peach C, Stanley D. Surgical approaches to the elbow[J]. Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26:297-302.
[18]
Shukla DR, Koehler SM, Guerra SM, et al. A novel approach for coronoid fractures[J]. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg, 2014, 18(4):189-193.
[19]
Piagkou M, Tasigiorgos S, Lappas D, et al. Median to ulnar nerve anastomosis:a review of the literature[J]. Chirurgia(Bucur), 2012, 107(4):442-446.
[20]
徐永丰,夏剑,许永武,等.改良肘关节前人路微型钢板内固定治疗尺骨冠状突骨折[J].中华手外科杂志, 2017, 33(3):176-178.
[21]
Ameur NE, Rebouh M, Oberlin C. Anterior transbrachial approach of the coro-noid apophysis[J]. Chir Main, 1999, 18:220.
[22]
Han SH, Yoon HK, Rhee SY, et al. Anterior approach for fixation of iso-lated type III coronoid process fracture[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2013, 23:395-405.
[23]
向明,杨国勇,胡晓川,等. 肘关节前方血管神经间人路治疗尺骨冠状突骨折的中期研[J] .中华骨科杂志, 2018, 38(1):8-15.
[24]
连霄,曾云记.经肘前方入路应用微型锁定钢板治疗Regan-Morrey m型尺骨冠状突骨折[J] .中国骨伤, 2017, 30(1):9-13.
[25]
杨小华,陈伟,李国平.肘前侧神经血管间隙入路治疗尺骨冠状突骨折[J].中国修复重建外科杂志, 2016, 30(5):537-540.
[26]
魏万富,林枫松,刘欣,等.钢板内固定治疗O'Driscoll Ⅱ型尺骨冠状突骨折[J/CD] .中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2017, 5(4):293-298.
[27]
胡晓川,向明,陈杭,等.尺骨冠状突前内侧面骨折伴肘关节外侧副韧带损伤的手术治疗[J/CD] .中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(2):132-138.
[1] 任雨昊, 刘晋元, 吕欣, 尹芸生, 冯毅, 赵斌, 王小虎. 套索缝合技术治疗肘关节"恐怖三联征"中的冠状突骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 18-23.
[2] 唐晓俞, 王志刚. 陈旧性肘关节恐怖三联征伴关节僵硬的手术治疗[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(01): 43-50.
[3] 黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 孙鲁宁. 改良钥匙孔固定术治疗肱二头肌长头腱断裂[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 253-258.
[4] 段鑫, 邹敏, 王俊博, 姚晓克, 陈志超, 李志力, 李建华, 胡江海. Kaplan入路结合微型锁定钢板治疗肱骨远端冠状面骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 06(04): 260-265.
[5] 查晔军. 肘关节内翻-后内侧旋转不稳定[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 159-159.
阅读次数
全文


摘要