切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (03) : 253 -258. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2019.03.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良钥匙孔固定术治疗肱二头肌长头腱断裂
黄瑶1, 袁滨1, 束昊1, 孙鲁宁1,()   
  1. 1. 210029 南京中医药大学附属医院运动医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2019-08-05
  • 通信作者: 孙鲁宁
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(81772352)

Treatment of long head of biceps tendon rupture with modified key-hole technique

Yao Huang1, Bin Yuan1, Hao Shu1, Luning Sun1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2018-03-16 Published:2019-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Luning Sun
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Sun Luning, Email:
引用本文:

黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 孙鲁宁. 改良钥匙孔固定术治疗肱二头肌长头腱断裂[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(03): 253-258.

Yao Huang, Bin Yuan, Hao Shu, Luning Sun. Treatment of long head of biceps tendon rupture with modified key-hole technique[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(03): 253-258.

目的

观察一种新型的改良钥匙孔固定术治疗肱二头肌长头腱(long head of biceps,LHB)断裂的疗效。

方法

自2015年4月至2017年7月南京中医药大学附属医院对9例有肌力下降和鼓眼畸形的LHB断裂的患者行钥匙孔固定术结合髓外皮质骨微型钢板悬吊式固定,手术前后采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale/score,VAS)、肘关节旋后和屈曲肌力、美国加州大学肩关节评分(the university of California at Los Angeles shoulder rating scale,UCLA)和美国肩肘外科协会评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons'form,ASES)等评估手术效果。

结果

9例LHB断裂患者均获得术后1年随访,术后1年所有患者旋后和屈肘肌力Ⅴ级,肩痛明显减轻,UCLA和ASES评分优良率均为100%,VAS、UCLA和ASES评分差异均具有统计学意义,术后1年无钢板脱落及固定失效发生。

结论

改良钥匙孔固定术治疗LHB断裂具有操作难度小、安全性高、固定可靠等优点,值得临床推广。

Background

One third of the proximal long head of biceps (LHB) strides into the shoulder joint at a large angle, and its pathological changes are the common cause of shoulder pain. The pathological changes of LHB include tendinitis, tendon abrasion, SLAP injury, partial or complete rupture. Isolated LHB lesions are rare, often accompanied by rotator cuff tear or subacromial impingement. Tenodesis is a reliable and effective method for the treatment of LHB lesions. Many surgical methods have been reported for long head tendon fixation of biceps brachii muscle, including open, small incision or complete endoscopic surgery, high or low tendon fixation, bone tunnel fixation, soft tissue fixation, key hole fixation, anchor fixation or interface screw fixation, etc.. In 2011, Siebenlist et al. reported a new method of fixing LHB by suspending a mini-plate on the inner surface of the proximal humerus cortex, and obtained better biomechanical results in a short time. However, we believe that this fixation technique only relies on single cortical bone fixation. Tendons only contact with the surface of the cortex and the contact area is small, which may be harmful to tendon healing. Because the technique needs to pull the guide needle through the opposite side of the soft tissue when reversing the steel plate, there is a risk of axillary nerve injury. Therefore, we improved the method and combined key-hole technique to transfer the mini-plate placed in the medulla to the ipsilateral cortical bone surface. It was used in 9 cases of LHB rupture with pop-eye deformity and decreased muscle strength. The short-term effect was satisfactory.

Methods

I. General information.From April 2015 to July 2017, 9 patients with pop-eye deformity caused by rupture of LHB and decreased elbow flexion strength were treated with modified key-hole suspension fixation. Among the 9 patients, 8 were male and 1 was female, all were manual workers; aged 43-65 years; 9 were right shoulder; 6 were treated after complaining of shoulder pain and bouncing after lifting heavy objects; 3 were right upper limb pop-eye deformity suddenly without obvious cause for long-term shoulder pain; all patients complained reduced elbow flexion strength. Operative indications: (1) Simple rupture of LHB, without any other disease of shoulder joint; (2) Patients complaining of pain, affecting life and demanding improvement of symptoms; (3) Reduced elbow flexion strength, patients demanding improvement of elbow flexion strength. Relative contraindication of operation: arthroscopic operation is recommended if there are other diseases of shoulder joint. II. Operative methods.The operation was performed under general intravenous anesthesia. The patient was placed in a beach chair position. The affected limbs were placed in the abduction of 20 degrees, elbow flexion of 90 degrees and forearm supination of 90 degrees. The incision starts at 2 cm from the lateral coracoid process and runs laterally and distally along the anterior edge of deltoid muscle, which is about 5 cm in length. The cephalic vein was pull ed medially.The tendon sheath of biceps brachii long head was opened under direct vision.The torn long head of biceps was easily found (sometimes contracture of the torn end to the deep layer of pectoralis major tendon) . After electrocoagulation of the branches of the anterior humeral circumflex artery, a 4.0 mm drill was drilled vertically into the medullary cavity in the proximal cortex of the humerus along the distal extension line from the intertubercular sulcus and the upper edge of the pectoralis major tendon, slightly to the head. The second hole was then drilled with a 4.0 mm bit at the proximal 2 cm of the upper edge of the first drill, slightly toward the tail. The torn ends of tendonwere trimmed and the biceps brachii tendon was tensioned at elbow flexion to of 90 degrees, make the junction of tendon abdomen level with the lower edge of pectoralis major tendon. The stump of tendon was excised parallel to the proximal hole, and the end of tendon was woven with 2 No. 5 ethibond suture of 2.5 cm. Put the curved hollow guide through the bottom hole and through the top hole, extend the guide wire loop in the guide. Put the folded No.2 ethibond suture into the guide wire loop, pull out the curved hollow guide and pull the blind end of No.2 ethibond out of the hole in the distal cortex of bone. Put the tendon braiding line into the far blind end coil of No.2 ethibond, pull the two free ends and weave it. The thread is pulled into the medullary cavity from the lower foramen and out of the upper foramen. The long head tendon is pulled into the medullary cavity from the distal foramen. After slightly pulling out the proximal foramen (Fig. 1C) , the loop of the mini-steel plate with loop is cut off. Then the two ends of the tendon knitting thread are respectively passed through the central two holes of the mini-steel plate, bending the elbow of 90 degrees and pronating the forearm back. The corresponding sutures are knotted slightly on the mini-steel plate. When elbow joint is flexed and extended, the mini-plate is suspended on the surface of proximal bone hole to complete the suspension and fixation of LHB. After washing the incision, stop bleeding and suture the incision layer by layer. Antibiotics were routinely administered half an hour before operation and 24 hours after operation.III. Rehabilitation.The upper limb is suspended at 90 degrees for 6 weeks. Passive motion training can be started the next day after operation. Active elbow flexion is prohibited within 6 weeks and elbow flexion weight training is prohibited within 12 weeks.IV. Observation indicators and evaluation of therapeutic effect.After 3 months and 12 months of follow-up, radiographs of shoulder joint were performed to observe whether there were plate displacement, osteolysis under plate and pop-eye signs. VAS score, flexor strength and supinator strength of elbow joint, UCLA shoulder score and ASES score were used to evaluate the effect of operation at 1 year follow-up.V. Statistical methods.Using SPSS19 software, the mean was expressed by ±s. The difference between the two groups was analyzed by t test, and P <0.05 was considered to have statistical significance.

Results

There were no complications in 9 patients during and after operation. All patients were followed up for 1 year. There was no plate loosening, plate osteolysis and pop-eye sign found. One year after operation, all patients had grade V supination and elbow flexion strength. Shoulder pain was significantly relieved. The excellent and good rates of UCLA shoulder score and ASES score were 100%. VAS, UCLA shoulder score and ASES score had significant differences.

Conclusions

Modified keyhole fixation for the treatment of LHB rupture has the advantages of low operation difficulty, high safety and reliable fixation, which is worthy of clinical promotion.

图1 手术步骤示意图(自绘图) 图A:编织LHB末端;图B:胸大肌肌腱上方钻孔两处;图C:上方孔拉出LHB;图D:Endobutton悬吊固定LHB
表1 改良钥匙孔技术治疗LHB断裂后手术前的功能评分比较(n=9)
图2 患者,男性,65岁,右侧LHB断裂 图A:屈肘位鼓眼畸形;图B:术中编织LHB断端;图C:髓外钢板重建LHB;图D:术后X线片见内固定位置满意,钢板下方可见第一处钻孔
[1]
Alpantaki K,McLaughlin D,Karagogeos D, et al. Sympathetic and sensory neural elements in the tendon of the long head of the biceps[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2005, 87(7):1580-1583.
[2]
Elser F,Braun S,Dewing CB, et al. Anatomy, function, injuries, and treatment of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(4):581-592.
[3]
Gaskill TR,Braun S,Millett PJ. Multimedia article. The rotator interval: pathology and management[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(4):556-567.
[4]
Frost A,Zafar MS,Maffulli N. Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the management of pathologic lesions of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2009, 37(4):828-833.
[5]
Mazzocca AD,Bicos J,Santangelo S, et al. The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis[J]. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(11):1296-1306.
[6]
Siebenlist S,Lenich A,Buchholz A, et al. Biomechanical in vitro validation of intramedullary cortical button fixation for distal biceps tendon repair: a new technique[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39(8):1762-1768.
[7]
Urita A,Funakoshi T,Amano T, et al. Predictive factors of long head of the biceps tendon disorders-the bicipital groove morphology and subscapularis tendon tear[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(3):384-389.
[8]
Zabrzynski J,Paczesny L,Lapaj L, et al. Process of neovascularization compared with pain intensity in tendinopathy of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon associated with concomitant shoulder disorders, after arthroscopic treatment[M]. Warsz: Folia Morphol, 2017.
[9]
Depalma AF,Callery GE. Bicipital tenosynovitis[J]. Clin Orthop, 1954, 3:69-85.
[10]
Yedinak PR,Holbrook BG. Bicipital tenosynovitis[J]. Rocky Mt Med J, 1954, 51(3):185-191.
[11]
Bhatia DN,van Rooyen KS,de Beer JF. Direct arthroscopy of the bicipital groove: a new approach to evaluation and treatment of bicipital groove and biceps tendon pathology[J]. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(3):368, e361-366.
[12]
Galasso O,Gasparini G,De Benedetto M, et al. Tenotomy versus tenodesis in the treatment of the long head of biceps brachii tendon lesions[J]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord ,2012, 13:205.
[13]
Osbahr DC,Diamond AB,Speer KP. The cosmetic appearance of the biceps muscle after long-head tenotomy versus tenodesis[J]. Arthroscopy, 2002, 18(5):483-487.
[14]
Kane P,Hsaio P,Tucker B, et al. Open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: reliable treatment for all biceps tendon pathology[J]. Orthopedics, 2015, 38(1):37-41.
[15]
Lo IK,Burkhart SS. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using a bioabsorbable interference screw[J]. Arthroscopy, 2004, 20(1):85-95.
[16]
Crenshaw AH,Kilgore WE. Surgical treatment of bicipital tenosynovitis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1966, 48(8):1496-1502.
[17]
Eakin CL,Faber KJ,Hawkins RJ, et al. Biceps tendon disorders in athletes[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 1999, 7(5):300-310.
[18]
Golish SR,Caldwell PE 3rd,Miller MD, et al. Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(10):1103-1108.
[19]
Ozalay M,Akpinar S,Karaeminogullari O, et al. Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques[J]. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(8):992-998.
[20]
Buchholz A,Martetschlager F,Siebenlist S, et al. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(5):845-853.
[21]
Elkousy HA,Fluhme DJ,O'Connor DP, et al. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using the percutaneous, intra-articular trans-tendon technique: preliminary results[J]. Orthopedics, 2005, 28(11):1316-1319.
[22]
Becker DA,Cofield RH. Tenodesis of the long head of the biceps brachii for chronic bicipital tendinitis. Long-term results[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1989, 71(3):376-381.
[23]
Moon SC,Cho NS,Rhee YG. Analysis of "hidden lesions" of the extra-articular biceps after subpectoral biceps tenodesis: the subpectoral portion as the optimal tenodesis site[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(1):63-68.
[1] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[2] 周春林, 韩元龙, 丁飞, 吴玮杰. 踝关节骨折内固定术后形态变化及功能影响因素[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 736-740.
[3] 夏效泳, 王立超, 朱治国, 丛云海, 史宗新. 深度塌陷性胫骨平台骨折的形态特点和治疗策略[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 625-632.
[4] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[5] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[6] 喻海波, 张春军. 腹腔镜腹腔内补片修补术治疗腹壁疝补片固定方法的选择与应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 274-279.
[7] 左楠, 刘岩, 孙大辉, 刘哲闻, 杨光. 胸大肌三角肌入路与经三角肌外侧入路治疗肱骨近端骨折的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 252-257.
[8] 李立, 王红莉, 常红, 张艳. 肱骨近端骨折术后功能康复策略现状及新理念下的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 284-287.
[9] 王竹, 王庚启, 郑军, 端磊, 徐冰, 唐熙晨, 吴泊逸, 王秋根, 王建东, 曹雷, 毕春, 邓国英. 肘关节外侧入路治疗肱骨小头骨折的治疗体会及经验总结[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 235-241.
[10] 傅佰圣, 李庆虎, 王大伟, 陶扶林, 王永会. 扩髓清创联合单边外固定架治疗长骨骨折髓内钉术后慢性感染的研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 289-294.
[11] 金宇杰, 虞宵, 周晓强, 李志强, 徐人杰, 张向鑫, 陈广祥. 动力交叉钉系统治疗股骨颈骨折其内固定位置与临床疗效的相关性研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 193-200.
[12] 王云鹭, 李锡勇, 刘伦, 张鹏, 韩鹏飞, 李晓东. TTIE中桡骨头骨折切开复位内固定与桡骨头置换疗效对比的Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 240-246.
[13] 杨杨, 刘永志, 刘军峰, 周雪涛, 张东升. 回顾性分析完全胸腔镜下肋骨骨折内固定术治疗肋骨骨折患者的临床效果[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 137-142.
[14] 江凯乐, 杨异. 肋骨骨折的手术治疗进展及存在问题[J]. 中华胸部外科电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 149-152.
[15] 陈雄焕, 胡培阳. 3D打印模型在骨盆骨折外固定训练中的效果研究[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2023, 09(03): 163-165.
阅读次数
全文


摘要