切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2026, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03) : 135 -142. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2026.03.002

论著

血流限制训练对肩袖撕裂术后肌力、功能恢复及重返活动时间的影响
胡永恒, 齐岩松, 马秉贤()   
  1. 010017 呼和浩特,内蒙古自治区人民医院骨科中心(运动医学中心)
  • 收稿日期:2026-04-09 出版日期:2026-08-05
  • 通信作者: 马秉贤
  • 基金资助:
    内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(2025YFSH0045)

Effects of blood flow restriction training on muscle strength, functional recovery, and time to return to activity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair

Yongheng Hu, Yansong Qi, Bingxian Ma()   

  1. Orthopedics Center (Sports Medicine Center) , Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region People's Hospital, Hohhot 010017, China
  • Received:2026-04-09 Published:2026-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Bingxian Ma
引用本文:

胡永恒, 齐岩松, 马秉贤. 血流限制训练对肩袖撕裂术后肌力、功能恢复及重返活动时间的影响[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2026, 14(03): 135-142.

Yongheng Hu, Yansong Qi, Bingxian Ma. Effects of blood flow restriction training on muscle strength, functional recovery, and time to return to activity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2026, 14(03): 135-142.

目的

探讨低强度血流限制训练(blood flow restriction training,BFRT)对中小肩袖撕裂患者关节镜术后肌力、肩关节功能及重返活动时间的影响。

方法

将2022年1月至2024年12月于本院接受关节镜下肩袖修复术患者分为BFRT组(n=37)和对照组(n=35)。两组均接受标准术后康复方案,BFRT组于术后第2周起在低强度(20% 1-RM)抗阻训练中施加个体化血流限制(压力为肢体闭塞压力的50%)。分别于术前、术后8周及术后24周,采用等速肌力测试系统评估肩关节外旋与前屈峰力矩,采用美国肩肘外科医师评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeon's form, ASES)评估肩关节功能,并记录患者重返日常生活及轻度活动的时间。

结果

BFRT组术后8周的外旋峰力矩[(10.48±0.75) N . m,(8.93±0.88) N . m,P<0.001]、前屈峰力矩[(16.58±0.87)N . m,(14.08±1.06)N . m,P<0.001]均显著大于对照组,BFRT组术后8周的ASES评分显著大于对照组[(74.38±2.99)分,(67.80±3.48)分,P<0.001];BFRT组术后6个月的外旋峰力矩[(14.30± 0.82) N . m,(11.82±1.04) N . m,P<0.001]、前屈峰力矩[(22.51± 1.06)N . m,(19.21±1.34)N . m,P<0.001]均显著大于对照组,BFRT组术后6个月的ASES评分显著大于对照组[(88.08±2.43)分,(81.23±3.15)分,P<0.001];BFRT组患者重返日常生活[(3.60± 0.38)周,(4.95±0.50)周,P<0.001]及轻度活动时间[(7.93±0.47)周,(9.81± 0.66)周,P<0.001]均显著低于对照组。

结论

BFRT可提高术后的肩关节周围肌肉的峰力矩和肩关节功能主观评分,缩短患者重返活动时间,BFRT对肌肉功能的促进作用是其取得上述结果的潜在原因。

Background

Rotator cuff injury is one of the most common causes of shoulder pain and functional impairment, and its incidence increases substantially with age. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair has become the gold-standard treatment for rotator cuff tears; however, surgical success does not necessarily result in optimal functional recovery. A considerable proportion of patients continue to experience persistent pain, muscle weakness, and restricted range of motion after surgery, leading to unsatisfactory outcomes. Postoperative rehabilitation is a critical component of rotator cuff repair and requires an appropriate balance between the biological requirements of tendon healing and the rehabilitative goal of functional recovery. To protect the repaired tendon during early healing, conventional rehabilitation protocols typically involve strict immobilization during the early postoperative period, followed by cautious, progressive, low-load exercise. However, this strategy inevitably results in rapid disuse atrophy and loss of strength in the periarticular shoulder muscles. Blood flow restriction training (BFRT) , developed in Japan in 1966, combines low-load resistance exercise with tourniquet-mediated restriction of arterial inflow and venous outflow. By partially restricting blood flow to the limb, BFRT can induce substantial gains in muscle strength and hypertrophy at low exercise intensities. BFRT has been increasingly used in postoperative orthopaedic rehabilitation and can improve muscle strength, particularly when low-load BFRT produces effects comparable to those of high-load resistance training. Low-intensity BFRT induces acute hemodynamic responses in the affected limb, with systolic blood pressure decreasing significantly after exercise and then returning to baseline. It may therefore be a suitable option for patients unable to tolerate high-intensity rehabilitation. BFRT has also demonstrated beneficial effects on joint pain and limb stability, suggesting that it may provide an alternative approach to enhancing muscle strength and accelerating recovery after rotator cuff repair. Numerous studies of lower-extremity BFRT have confirmed its effectiveness in improving muscle strength, muscle size, and endurance. Nevertheless, its clinical value in rehabilitation after shoulder arthroscopy remains insufficiently investigated.

Objective

To investigate the effects of low-intensity BFRT on muscle strength, shoulder function, and time to return to activity after arthroscopic repair of small- to medium-sized rotator cuff tears.

Methods

Patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff repair at our institution between January 2022 and December 2024 were assigned to a BFRT group (n = 37) or a control group (n = 35) . Both groups received a standardized postoperative rehabilitation program. Beginning in the second postoperative week, the BFRT group underwent low-intensity resistance training at 20% of the one-repetition maximum, combined with individualized blood flow restriction at 50% of the limb occlusion pressure. Peak torque during shoulder external rotation and forward flexion was measured using an isokinetic strength-testing system preoperatively and at 8 and 24 weeks postoperatively. Shoulder function was evaluated using the American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) score. The time required to return to activities of daily living and light physical activity was also recorded.

Results

At 8 weeks postoperatively, the BFRT group demonstrated significantly greater peak torque during external rotation than the control group [ (10.48±0.75) N . m, (8.93±0.88) N . m, P < 0.001] and significantly greater peak torque during forward flexion [ (16.58±0.87) N . m, (14.08±1.06) N . m, P < 0.001] . The ASES score at 8 weeks was also significantly higher in the BFRT group than in the control group [ (74.38±2.99) points, (67.80±3.48) points, P < 0.001] . At 6 months postoperatively, the BFRT group continued to demonstrate significantly greater external-rotation peak torque [ (14.30±0.82) N . m, (11.82±1.04) N . m, P < 0.001] and forward-flexion peak torque [ (22.51±1.06) N . m, (19.21±1.34) N . m, P < 0.001] . The 6-month ASES score was significantly higher in the BFRT group [ (88.08±2.43) points, (81.23±3.15) points, P < 0.001] . Patients in the BFRT group returned to activities of daily living significantly earlier than those in the control group [ (3.60±0.38) weeks, (4.95±0.50) weeks, P < 0.001] . They returned to light physical activity earlier as well [ (7.93±0.47) weeks, (9.81±0.66) weeks, P < 0.001] .

Conclusion

BFRT improves peak torque of the periarticular shoulder muscles and patient-reported shoulder function after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair while shortening the time required to return to activity. The beneficial effects of BFRT on muscle performance may underlie these improvements.

图1 肩关节前屈等速肌力训练
图2 肩关节外旋等速肌力训练
表1 两组患者的一般情况资料及术前基线情况比较(±s
表2 两组患者等速肌力测试结果比较(N·m,±s
表3 两组患者ASES总分及亚评分的比较(分,±s
表4 两组患者重返活动时间及比较(周,±s
[1]
曲洋,蒋浩然,邢博涵,等. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(4): 289-291.
[2]
梁洁浩,高大伟,陈亮,等. 早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤术后中-长期影响的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 9(3): 220-228.
[3]
陈涛,吉万波,姜宏,等.镜下肩袖修复术后腱骨愈合的研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2025,33(15):1391-1395,1401.
[4]
Baumann AN, Oleson C, Curtis DP, et al. The incidence of postoperative shoulder stiffness after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a systematic review[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(4):e37199.
[5]
白楚冉,李照文,李培金,等.巨大肩袖撕裂关节镜修复术后康复研究进展[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2025,40(11):1158-1161.
[6]
Loenneke JP, Thiebaud RS, Fahs CA, et al. Effect of cuff type on arterial occlusion[J]. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging, 2013, 33(4):325-327.
[7]
Wortman RJ, Brown SM, Savage-elliott I, et al. Blood Flow Restriction Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2021, 49(7):1938-1944.
[8]
Nicolay RW, Moore LK, DeSena TD, et al. Upper extremity injuries in crossfit athletes—a review of the current literature[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2022, 15(5):402-410.
[9]
Watson R, Sullivan B, Stone A, et al. Blood Flow Restriction Therapy: An Evidence-Based Approach to Postoperative Rehabilitation[J]. JBJS Rev, 2022, 10(10):2090-2098.
[10]
张达宽,李永杰,韩立宝,等.血流限制训练预防与治疗足踝部损伤[J].中国组织工程研究,2025,29(12):2553-2559.
[11]
Tollefson LV, Schoenecker J, Solie B, et al. Lower Extremity Blood Flow Restriction Training in Athletes Significantly Improves Strength-Related Outcomes in 58% of Studies Compared to Non-Blood Flow Restriction Control[J]. Arthroscopy, 2025, 41(8):3241-3254,e1.
[12]
Ma F, He J, Wang Y. Blood flow restriction combined with resistance training on muscle strength and thickness improvement in young adults: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression[J]. Front Physiol, 2024, 15:1379605.
[13]
Sripathi P, Agrawal DK. Rotator Cuff Injury: Pathogenesis, Biomechanics, and Repair[J]. J Orthop Sports Med, 2024, 6(4):231-248.
[14]
张一翀,陈建海.美国肩肘外科治疗师协会:关于肩关节镜下肩袖修复术后康复的共识声明(续)[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2018,6(2):139-150.
[15]
Vanwye WR, Weatherholt AM, Mikesky AE. Blood flow restriction training: implementation into clinical practice[J]. Int J Exerc Sci, 2017, 10(5):649-654.
[16]
Loenneke JP, Wilson JM, Marín PJ, et al. Low intensity blood flow restriction training: a meta-analysis[J]. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2012, 112(5): 1849-1859.
[17]
Geng Y, Wu X, Zhang Y, et al. Potential Moderators of the Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on Muscle Strength and Hypertrophy: A Meta-analysis Based on a Comparison with High-Load Resistance Training[J]. Sports Med Open, 2024, 10(1):58.
[18]
Routledge JC, Saber AY, Pennington N, et al. Re-tear rates following rotator cuff repair surgery[J]. Cureus, 2023, 15(1):e34426.
[19]
Zhang J, Chang H, Cui H, et al. Comparative analysis of high-intensity resistance training and blood flow restriction training on enhancing upper limb muscle strength and mass[J]. Front Physiol, 2025, 16:1568616.
[20]
Lin YT, Wong CM, Chen YC, et al. Differential training benefits and motor unit remodeling in wrist force precision tasks following high and low load blood flow restriction exercises under volumematched conditions[J]. J Neuroeng Rehabil, 2024, 21(1):123.
[21]
Kara D, Ozcakar L, Demirci S, et al. Blood flow restriction training in patients with rotator cufftendinopathy: a randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled trial[J]. Clin J Sport Med, 2024, 34(1):10-16.
[22]
Takarada Y, Nakamura Y, Aruga S, et al. Rapid increase in plasma growth hormone after low-intensity resistance exercise with vascular occlusion[J]. J Appl Physiol, 2000, 88(1):61-65.
[23]
Sinnott MJ, Schneider N, Vanguri P. Effects of Blood Flow Restriction Training on the Upper Extremities: A Scoping Review[J]. Cureus, 2025, 17(3):e79876.
[24]
Anderson KD, Rask DM, Bates TJ, et al. Overall safety and risks associated with blood flow restriction therapy: a literature review[J]. Mil Med, 2022, 187(9-10):1059-1064.
[25]
de Queiros VS, Dantas M, Neto GR, et al. Application and side effects of blood flow restriction technique: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey of professionals[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(18):e25794.
[26]
Minniti MC, Statkevich AP, Kelly RL, et al. The safety of blood flow restriction training as a therapeutic intervention for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2020, 48(7):1773-1785.
[27]
Kwon S, Bae KC, Yon CJ, et al. Current Narrative Review-Application of Blood Flow Restriction Exercise in Clinical Knee Problems[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2025, 61(8):1377.
[28]
Cristina-Oliveira M, Meireles K, Spranger MD, et al. Clinical safety of blood flow-restricted training? A comprehensive review of altered muscle metaboreflex in cardiovascular disease during ischemic exercise[J]. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, 2020, 318(1):H90-H109.
[29]
Safford DW, Shah KM, Breidenbach F, et al. Effects of Low-Load Blood Flow Restriction Training on Rotator Cuff Strength and Hypertrophy: Case Series[J]. Int J Sports Phys Ther, 2024, 19(6):735-744.
[30]
Laurentino GC, Loenneke JP, Teixeira EL, et al. The effect of cuff width on muscle adaptations after blood flow restriction training[J]. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2016, 48(5):920-925.
[31]
Hill EC, Housh TJ, Keller JL, et al. Patterns of responses and time-course of changes in muscle size and strength during low-load blood flow restriction resistance training in women[J]. Eur J Appl Physiol, 2021, 121(5):1473-1485.
[32]
Brandner CR, Kidgell DJ, Warmington SA. Unilateral bicep curl hemodynamics: low-pressure continuous vs high-pressure intermittent blood flow restriction[J]. Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2015, 25(6):770-777.
[33]
Roehl T, Lambert BS, Ankersen J, et al. Optimal blood flow restriction occlusion pressure for shoulder muscle recruitment with upper extremity exercise[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2023, 51(7):1859-1871.
[1] 胡庆中, 赵嘉文, 李瑞, 刘文权, 黄白妙, 牟志伟. 肌肉能量技术在反式全肩关节置换术后早期的作用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 261-265.
[2] 蒋鲁燕, 沈鸣雁, 张园园, 李皖, 郭冬仙, 万鹏夏. 基于加速康复外科理念下腕踝针疗法在肝移植患者术后胃肠功能障碍中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 241-246.
[3] 陈劲岩, 李铸, 徐骁, 鲁迪. 肝移植肌少症多维干预与康复策略[J/OL]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 215-221.
[4] 王文青, 孙宇, 吴恺明. α-氰基丙烯酸异丁酯医用胶在腹腔镜腹股沟疝手术切口管理中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 390-393.
[5] 高敬, 余安, 冯莉, 薛振峰. 智能镇痛与常规镇痛对腹股沟疝修补术后患者的镇痛效果比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 405-409.
[6] 张沂虎, 但素平, 张兴聪, 王聪懿, 陈栋. 超声引导下竖脊肌平面阻滞复合全麻对胸腔镜肺结节切除术后镇痛效果及康复的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 670-675.
[7] 张静文, 马静, 杨轲, 贺晶, 王萍. 全程系统化肺康复管理在肺癌合并COPD患者单孔胸腔镜肺叶切除术中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(04): 680-683.
[8] 张璐, 王颖, 钱航, 刘雪萍, 代芬. 心肺交互呼吸康复训练用于主动脉夹层合并慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者术后康复随机对照研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 386-391.
[9] 张双双, 杨秀华, 黄山, 贾蓉, 吴迪, 丁静, 余皓月. 痰液诱导联合主动呼吸循环技术对改善慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺功能与康复依从性的96例临床研究[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2026, 19(03): 470-475.
[10] 林婉琪, 任芳菲, 钟伟航, 杨卿, 马玲, 陈海丽, 向莎, 陈孟娇, 朱丽萍, 何心念, 张献玲. 基于多维度评估的前瞻性干预策略在肝癌肝移植围手术期的应用及效果[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2026, 15(04): 612-618.
[11] 薛文, 段虎斌. 脑机接口联合神经调控在创伤性脑损伤继发脑功能障碍康复中的应用现状及展望[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 129-135.
[12] 李鑫, 宋晓宇, 李光磊. 基于卷积神经网络的X线在椎体压缩性骨折康复中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2026, 12(03): 143-149.
[13] 章妙玉, 李远美, 黄嫦玉. 基于脑-肠轴非药物康复干预在便秘型肠易激综合征的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(03): 284-288.
[14] 孔琴, 岳慧玲, 侯卫华, 郑智, 何阿祥, 赵松, 陆群峰. 基于互联网技术赋能的医护康协作模式在前交叉韧带重建术后患者康复中的应用与评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(04): 265-274.
[15] 郭格, 谢亚娜, 唐冲, 关振鹏, 李晓. 本体感觉治疗在膝骨关节炎康复中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(03): 228-233.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?