切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 226 -231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2025.04.006

论著

带袢钛板与锁骨钩板治疗肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅲ、Ⅳ型脱位的对比研究
高晓红, 王雪臣, 刘世炎, 孟小光, 徐凤松, 史福东()   
  1. 063000 唐山市人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-26 出版日期:2025-11-05
  • 通信作者: 史福东

A comparative study on the treatment of Rockwood type Ⅲ and Ⅳ dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with titanium plates with loops and clavicular hook plates

Xiaohong Gao, Xuechen Wang, Shiyan Liu, Xiaoguang Meng, Fengsong Xu, Fudong Shi()   

  1. Department of Orthopedics,Tangshan People's Hospital, Tangshan 063000, China
  • Received:2025-06-26 Published:2025-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Fudong Shi
引用本文:

高晓红, 王雪臣, 刘世炎, 孟小光, 徐凤松, 史福东. 带袢钛板与锁骨钩板治疗肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅲ、Ⅳ型脱位的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 226-231.

Xiaohong Gao, Xuechen Wang, Shiyan Liu, Xiaoguang Meng, Fengsong Xu, Fudong Shi. A comparative study on the treatment of Rockwood type Ⅲ and Ⅳ dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint with titanium plates with loops and clavicular hook plates[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(04): 226-231.

目的

通过回顾性研究比较锁骨钩板与带袢钛板治疗Rockwood Ⅲ、Ⅳ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。

方法

纳入2020年3月至2023年3月于唐山市第二医院和唐山市人民医院接受锁骨钩板或者带袢钛板治疗的Rockwood Ⅲ、Ⅳ型患者共55例,对患者的手术时间、关节功能评分、术后疼痛和并发症方面进行对比。

结果

带袢钛板组平均手术时间为(61.67±6.60)min,显著长于钩板组(38.51±5.61)min(P<0.05)。术后视觉模拟评分方面,带袢钛板组为(2.07±1.14)分,高于钩板组的(1.20±0.96)分(P<0.05)。肩关节功能评估显示,带袢钛板组在前屈上举(142.16° vs 137.22°)和外展上举(142.71° vs 106.31°)活动度方面均显著优于钩板组(P<0.05)。Constant-Murley评分带袢钛板组(89.86±4.41)分明显高于钩板组(73.43±6.63)分(P<0.05)。并发症方面,带袢钛板组出现1例复位丢失,钩板组发生2例肩峰下撞击和3例肩峰下溶解,组间差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术中出血量无显著差异,带袢钛板组(57.10±6.11)ml,钩板组(53.90±5.57)ml,P>0.05。

结论

带袢钛板手术方法治疗Rockwood Ⅲ、Ⅳ型肩锁关节脱位在临床疗效中优于锁骨钩板手术方法。

Background

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation (AC dislocation) is a common bone and joint injury in clinical practice, with an annual incidence rate of 18 per 10,000. It is more prevalent in men aged 20 to 39. Traffic accidents and sports activities are the main causes of the disease. The trauma mechanism is the injury of the coracoclavicular ligament caused by the direct or indirect stress transmission of the shoulder to the acromioclavicular joint. This then leads to dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint and the loss of its normal anatomical alignment structure. Most patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation require surgical treatment. Currently, the main surgical methods are clavicular hook plate internal fixation and titanium plate internal fixation with loops. The clavicular hook plate is a classic surgical treatment method. Its principle is to restore the normal anatomical alignment of the acromioclavicular joint through open reduction, and then place the hook plate under the acromion. The upward displacement of the clavicular side is corrected and fixed through the lever principle. Based on the long-term follow-up results, Liu Zhenhuang, Zhou Haibing, Hu Yongbin et al. believe that the hook plate remains an effective surgical method for treating acromioclavicular joint dislocation. However, compared with other methods, the clinical effect of clavicular hook plate surgery is associated with complications such as subacromial synovitis, subacromial impaction, and subacromial surface wear. The Fixation of titanium plates with loops is Elastic Fixation. Its main therapeutic principle is to use loops and high-intensity risks to restore the stability of the coracoclavicular ligament and thereby maintain the reduction of the acromioclavicular joint. This surgical procedure can be performed under arthroscopy or, under the surveillance of image enhancement, through small incisions around the coracoid process for reduction and fixation. The results of the clinical report show that it has the advantages of small surgical trauma, reliable fixation, simple operation, and no need for secondary removal of internal fixation. Of course, titanium plates with loops also have complications such as bone tract fractures and loss of reduction. At present, there is still controversy over the clinical efficacy comparison of the two surgical methods in Rockwood type Ⅲ and type Ⅳ.

Objective

To compare the clinical efficacy of clavicular hook plates and titanium plates with loops in the treatment of Rockwood typeⅢ andⅣ acromioclavicular joint dislocation through a retrospective study.

Methods

A total of 55 patients with Rockwood type Ⅲ and Ⅳ who received clavicular hook plate or titanium plate with loop treatment at Tangshan Second Hospital and Tangshan People's Hospital from March 2020 to March 2023 were included. The operation time, joint function score, postoperative pain and complications of the patients were compared.

Results

The average operation time of the loop titanium plate group was (61.67±6.60) minutes, which was significantly longer than that of the hook plate group (38.51±5.61) minutes (P<0.05). In terms of the postoperative VAS score, the group of the titanium plate with loops was (2.07±1.14) points, which was higher than that of the hook plate group (1.20±0.96) points (P<0.05). The assessment of shoulder joint function showed that the titanium plate with loops group with loops was significantly superior to the hook plate group in terms of range of motion in both forward flexion and elevation (142.16° vs 137.22°) and abduction and elevation (142.71° vs 106.31°) (P<0.05). The Constant-Murley score of the titanium plate with loops group (89.86±4.41) points was significantly higher than that of the hook plate group (73.43±6.63) points (P<0.05). In terms of complications, one case of reduction loss occurred in the titanium plate group with loops, while two cases of subacromial impaction and three cases of subacromial dissolution occurred in the hook plate group. The differences between the groups were statistically significant (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss between the two groups [titanium plate with loops group (57.10±6.11) ml, hook plate group (53.90±5.57) ml, P>0.05].

Conclusion

The surgical method with loop titanium plate for treating Rockwood type Ⅲ and Ⅳ acromioclavicular joint dislocation is superior to the hook plate surgical method in clinical efficacy.

图1 钩板组术前(图A)、术后(图B)X线片
图2 带袢钛板术中(图A)与术后(图B)
图3 带袢钛板组术前(图A)、术后(图B)X线片
表1 两组患者手术相关资料比较(±s)
表2 两组患者功能比较(±s)
表3 两组患者并发症方面比较
[1]
Chillemi C, Franceschini V, Dei Giudici L, et al. Epidemiology of isolated acromioclavicular joint dislocation [J]. Emerg Med Int, 2013, 2013:171609.
[2]
刘镇煌,黄长明,范华强,等.肩锁关节脱位钩板固定的并发症与对策[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2023,31(2):111-116.
[3]
周海兵,罗志军,张善征,等.两种钢板内固定治疗创伤性肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J].临床骨科杂志,2025,28(2):224-227.
[4]
胡勇斌,万春飞,张利勇,等.改良带袢钛板悬吊固定治疗肩锁关节脱位的近中期疗效[J].中国临床医学,2023,30(6):1015-1020.
[5]
Fraser-Moodie JA, Shortt NL, Robinson CM. Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br200890(6):697-707.
[6]
Kim SH, Koh KH. Treatment of Rockwood TypeⅢ Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation [J]. Clin Shoulder Elbow, 2018, 21(1):48-55.
[7]
Chen CH, Dong QR, Zhou RK, et al. Effects of hook plate on shoulder function after treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2014, 7(9):2564-2570.
[8]
陈利,王锦海,董浩男,等.锁骨钩板在肩锁关节脱位治疗中的不足及改良[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2024,12 (4):377-381.
[9]
Shih CM, Huang KC, Pan CC, et al. Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with clavicle hook plates in different lengths [J]. Int Orthop, 2015, 39(11):2239-2244.
[10]
Xu D, Luo P, Chen J, et al. Outcomes of surgery for acromioclavicular joint dislocation using different angled hook plates: a prospective study [J]. Int Orthop, 2017, 41(12):2605-2611.
[11]
刘畅,王跃,何永兵,等.不同长度及材质锁骨钩板内固定治疗肩锁关节脱位三维有限元分析[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(3):303-305.
[12]
何洁铭,王嘉.急性肩关节脱位Rockwood Ⅲ~Ⅴ型手术治疗中锁骨钩板和袢钛板应用效果的比较分析[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2020,8 (1):11-15.
[13]
Gupta S, Jangir L, Meena RP, et al. Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation RePair Using Double Endobutton Technique: Analysis of Functional Outcome[J]. Asian J Orthop Res,2023,6(2):64-72.
[14]
何国文,高大伟,陈亮,等.Endobutton带袢钛板内固定与锁骨钩板内固定治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的中长期疗效观察[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2022,10 (2):105-110.
[15]
刘挺,周彬,王冶,等.改良TightRoPe袢钛板解剖重建喙锁韧带治疗Rockwood Ⅲ~Ⅴ型肩锁关节脱位[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2024,39(9):924-927.
[16]
Sun LJ, Lu D, Tao ZY, et al. Analysis of risk factors for loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the suture-button [J]. J Orthop Sci, 2019, 24(5):817-821.
[17]
季斌,冯萍,赵增斌,等. TightRoPe与钩板治疗肩锁关节脱位的比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志,2022,30(10):877-882.
[18]
Vajapey SP, Bong MR, Peindl RD, et al. Evaluation of the Clavicle Hook Plate for Treatment of Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation: A Cadaveric Study [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2020, 34(1):e20-e25.
[19]
王斌,高益,沈鹏飞,等. 改良双Endobutton钢板技术治疗Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位[J]. 实用医学杂志,2014,30(2):222.
[20]
邱东新,赖敏锋,杨显鑫. Nice结联合锁骨小骨道双袢钛板内固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效观察[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(9):971-973.
[21]
Taleb H, Afshar A, Shariyate MJ, et al. Comparison of Short-Term Clinical Outcomes of Hook Plate and Continuous Loop Double Endobutton Fixations in Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation [J]. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 2019, 7(6):545-550.
[22]
Drampalos E, Oikonomidis L, Oakley J, et al. Management of acromioclavicular joint dislocation by double Endobutton technique[J]. Inter J Orthop Sci,2022,8 (3):334-337.
[23]
洪乐金,张晓农,孙忠良,等. 锁骨钩板与Endobutton带袢钛板治疗肩锁关节脱位的效果对照[J].中国医疗器械信息,2024,30(4):69-71.
[24]
刘磊,年坤党,陆超峰,等.钩板治疗肩锁关节脱位内固定取出术后肩锁关节复位丢失的影响因素分析[J].全科医学临床与教育,2023,21(10):880-883.
[25]
邱东新,赖敏锋,王云清.改良袢钛板与钩板内固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2024,39(9):974-977.
[1] 深圳市医学会乳腺病学分会, 深圳市医学会肿瘤学分会, 深圳市医师协会乳腺专科医师分会, 深圳市健康管理协会乳房健康与康复管理专业委员会, 深圳市抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会, 深圳市抗癌协会肿瘤放射治疗专业委员会, 深圳市中西医结合学会甲状腺乳腺病专业委员会. 乳腺癌新辅助治疗的疗效预测和疗效评价专家共识(2025版)[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 321-330.
[2] 祖力皮喀尔·图孙尼亚孜, 何荣东, 蒋铁民, 温浩. 老年单纯胆总管结石患者行腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术和内镜逆行胰胆管造影联合十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术的临床疗效与危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 325-331.
[3] 王思竣, 王琼, 李珂雨, 袁新普, 张硕珉, 马睿, 谢天宇, 张朝军. 胃上部癌新辅助化疗联合免疫治疗后实施近端胃切除术的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 637-641.
[4] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[5] 杨梦媛, 白启轩, 赵晓琳, 黄坤, 李珍, 曹世长, 程建平. ESD治疗腔内突出型结直肠肿瘤与大肠侧向发育型肿瘤的临床效果对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 405-408.
[6] 刘丽辉, 白玉新, 张进, 冯巍, 黄琰琰, 邹梦斯, 刘彩红. 血清生物标志物联合检测对支气管哮喘患儿生物靶向治疗效果的预测意义[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(05): 796-801.
[7] 张宇涵, 吴添庆, 高汶卿, 郑梽楷, 贺珉睿, 周仲国. 不可切除性肝内胆管癌不同治疗方式疗效和安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(06): 939-947.
[8] 唐玥, 陈家璐, 覃德龙, 李宗龙, 汤朝晖, 全志伟. 腹腔镜肝切除治疗复发性肝癌的焦点与难点问题探讨[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 667-672.
[9] 杨钰泽, 徐家豪, 杨一石, 王明达, 杨田. 肝细胞癌新辅助治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 515-521.
[10] 王祯延, 邢国圣, 张震, 王朝阳, 马永祥, 乌新林. 中老年直肠癌患者腹腔镜下经自然腔道取标本手术与传统腹部小切口取标本手术的短期疗效及肛门功能对比[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(05): 436-444.
[11] 赵雪超, 佟向阳, 刘大诚, 张强. 切开复位内固定术联合不同韧带修复方式治疗踝关节骨折合并下胫腓前韧带断裂的疗效[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(05): 309-314.
[12] 张峥祥, 高龙, 李文. 柴胡疏肝散对胃食管反流病患者的效果及细胞因子、肠道菌群水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 590-593.
[13] 李朋娟, 李红阁, 张秦俊. 健脾化湿汤加减治疗脾胃湿热型幽门螺杆菌相关性慢性非萎缩性胃炎的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(06): 599-603.
[14] 王明辉, 李群, 李文波, 王静, 马增翼, 吴文明, 李灵敏, 张保娟, 孙奎林, 刘晓峰. 内镜下组织胶注射在食管静脉曲张喷射性出血的疗效[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2025, 15(05): 499-503.
[15] 王春增, 拾坤, 薛有地, 伦智法, 岳璇, 马超, 刘光旺. 脊髓型颈椎病患者术前心理状态对颈前入路术后疗效的影响[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 284-291.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?