切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 142 -147. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.02.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位
刘中帆1, 曾浩1, 裴泳榕1, 王靖1, 翁晓军1,()   
  1. 1. 410005 长沙,湖南省人民医院(湖南师范大学第一附属医院)骨关节与运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-23 出版日期:2021-05-05
  • 通信作者: 翁晓军
  • 基金资助:
    长沙市科技局基础研究项目(kq1801094)

Arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Zhongfan Liu1, Hao Zeng1, Yongrong Pei1, Jing Wang1, Xiaojun Weng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Bone, Joint and Sports Medicine, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha 410005, China
  • Received:2021-01-23 Published:2021-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojun Weng
引用本文:

刘中帆, 曾浩, 裴泳榕, 王靖, 翁晓军. 关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 142-147.

Zhongfan Liu, Hao Zeng, Yongrong Pei, Jing Wang, Xiaojun Weng. Arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(02): 142-147.

目的

探讨关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位的手术方法和临床效果。

方法

2019年6月至2020年6月本院收治12例肩锁关节脱位患者,其中男9例、女3例;年龄31 ~ 65岁,平均(41.7±2.5)岁;左侧3例,右侧9例;受伤至手术时间2 ~ 7 d,平均(4.2±1.7)d。术前X线片和三维CT显示肩锁关节完全脱位,Rockwood分型III型8例、Ⅳ型1例、V型3例。所有患者均在关节镜下行肩锁关节复位细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线固定术。所有患者术后第1天、1个月、6个月复查X线和三维CT,术前和术后1、3、6个月分别进行美国肩肘外科医师评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons,ASES)、Constant评分、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)、肩关节活动度评估。

结果

所有患者术后均获随访,随访时间7 ~ 10个月,ASES评分、Constant评分术后第1、3、6个月与术前比较明显增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。VAS评分术后第1、3、6个月与术前比较明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。肩关节前屈、外展活动度术后第1、3、6个月与术前比较明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1个月三维CT测量情况:骨道直径(2.34±0.12)mm,复位无丢失。末次随访X线片和三维CT显示所有患者均未出现复位丢失和喙突或锁骨骨折。1例患者术后2个月出现继发性冻结肩,予以盂肱关节注射倍他米松后缓解。

结论

关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位具有创伤小、锁骨和喙突骨量损失小、复位和固定可靠的优点,潜在降低再骨折和复位丢失的发生率。

Background

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation is a common disease of orthopedics. It is difficult to immobilize after manual reduction and has a higher operation rate. The safety and efficacy of arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation have been confirmed. However, a few patients still have complications such as iatrogenic fracture and reduction loss, which are related to the thick bone canals of coracoid process and clavicle, or the decreased bone strength due to repeated drilling processes.

Objective

To investigate the surgical method and clinical efficacy of arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Methods

From June 2019 to June 2020, a total of 12 patients (9 males and 3 females) with acromioclavicular joint dislocations were admitted and treated. The ages ranged from 31 to 65 (41.7±2.5) years old. There were 3 left cases and 9 right cases. The time from injury to operation was 2 to 7 (4.2±1.7) days. Preoperative X-ray and CT scan showed complete dislocations of acromioclavicular joint. According to Rockwood classification, there were 8 type III cases, 1 type IV case and and 3 type V cases. All patients underwent arthroscopic reduction and double-Endobutton fixation with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel, and received postoperative re-examinations including X-ray and 3D CT immediately after the operation and on the 1st day, 1st month, and 6th month after operation. All patients were assessed using the rating scale of American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) , Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS) and shoulder range of motion before operation, and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation.

Results

The ASES scores and Constant scores significantly increased in the 1st , 3rd and 6th months after operation compared with hose before operation, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05) . The VAS scores decreased significantly in the 1st , 3rd and 6th months after operation (P<0.05) . The ranges of motion of shoulder flexion and abduction significantly improved in the 1st, 3rd and 6th months after operation (P<0.05) . One month after surgery, the diameter of bone tunnel was (2.34±0.12) mm measured by 3D CT without reduction loss. At the last follow-up, the X-ray films and CT scans of all patients showed no reduction loss or fractures of coracoid process or clavicle. One patient had secondary frozen shoulder 2 months after operation which was relieved by injecting betamethasone into the glenohumeral joint.

Conclusion

The arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III - V acromioclavicular joint dislocations has the advantages of minimal trauma, less bone loss of clavicle and coracoid process, and reliable reduction and fixation, and can potentially reduce the incidence of refracture and reduction loss.

图1 使用Arthrex定位导向器定位(图A),空心钻头从喙突基底部中间位置穿出(图B),探勾调整Endobutton钢板方向(图C),固定后Endobutton钢板横置于喙突基底部中间位置(图D)
图2 镍合金导丝环形袢将2根对折好的爱惜邦导引线(1正1反共4股)依次引入喙突、锁骨2.4 mm直径骨道(图A),Fiberwire缝线(D)两线尾分别穿过Endobutton钢板(C)2、3孔后由导引线袢环(A)自锁骨上表面骨道口引入后经过骨道牵至肩关节前上方入口皮肤外(图B),Fiberwire缝线(F)两线尾分别穿过Endobutton钢板(E)1、4孔,已位于肩关节前上方入口皮肤外的Fiberwire缝线(D)两线尾分别穿过Endobutton钢板(E)2、3孔后继续返穿1、4孔(图C),2根Fiberwire缝线的4个线尾由导引线(B)袢环通过喙突、锁骨骨道引至锁骨上表面骨道口外后,继续分别穿过Endobutton钢板(C)1、4孔,拉动Fiberwire缝线(D)线尾,脱位的肩锁关节逐步复位(图D)
表1 患者术前与术后ASES评分、Constant评分、VAS评分及肩关节活动度比较(±s
图3 术前X线片示:Rockwood V型肩锁关节脱位(图A),术后X线片示:肩锁关节完全复位,Endobutton钢板位置好(图B),术后三维CT示:肩锁关节完全复位,Endobutton钢板位置好(图C),术后三维CT示:骨道位置合适,Endobutton钢板贴合好(图D)
[1]
Gowd AK, Liu JN, Cabarcas BC, et al. Current concepts in the operative management of acromioclavicular dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative techniques[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 47: 2745-2758.
[2]
Pan ZX, Zhang HX, Sun C, et al. Arthroscopy-assisted reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by Endobutton fixation for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(1): 9-16.
[3]
Chen K,Xu B,Lao YJ,et al. Risk factors related to the loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the EndoButton device[J] . Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(4): 345.
[4]
van Bergen CJA, van Bemmel AF, Alta TDW, et al. New insights in the treatment of acromioclavicular separation[J]. World J Orthop, 2017, 8(12): 861-873.
[5]
Ding ML, Ni JD, Hu JZ, et al. Rare complication of clavicular hook plate: clavicle fracture at the medial end of the plate[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(7): e18-e20.
[6]
Struhl S. Double endobutton technique for repair of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 8(4): 175-179.
[7]
Xu J, Liu H, Lu W, et al. A retrospective comparative study of arthroscopic fixation in acute Rockwood type IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation: single versus double paired Endobutton technique[J]. BMC Musculoskel Dis, 2018, 19(1): 1-6.
[8]
赵立连,卢明峰,许挺,等. 关节镜下双Endobutton钮扣钢板内固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(1): 71-78.
[9]
Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, et al. Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(7): 1628-1634.
[10]
Komatsu F, Mori R, Uchio Y. Optimum surgical suture material and methods to obtain high tensile strength at knots: problems of conventional knots and the reinforcement effect of adhesive agent[J]. J Orthop SCI, 2006, 11(1): 70-74.
[11]
Wright PB, Kosmopoulos V, Cote RE, et al. FiberWire® is superior in strength to stainless steel wire for tension band fixation of transverse patellar fractures[J]. Injury, 2009, 40(11): 1200-1203.
[12]
Camarda L, La Gattuta A, Butera M, et al. FiberWire tension band for patellar fractures[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2016, 17(1): 75-80.
[13]
Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Chowaniec DM, et al. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39(10): 2218-2225.
[14]
Saccomanno MF, De Ieso C, Milano G. Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation[J]. Joints, 2014, 2(2): 87-92.
[15]
Struhl S, Wolfson TS. Continuous loop double endobutton reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(10): 2437-2444.
[1] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[2] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[3] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[4] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[5] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[6] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[7] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[8] 吴俊贤, 曾俊杰, 许有银, 苑博. 体外冲击波疗法辅助治疗肩袖修补术后关节僵硬[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 571-576.
[9] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[10] 邬春虎, 马玉海, 陈长松, 尹华东, 朱晓峰, 何剑星, 刘彧. 冲击波联合富血小板血浆对骨关节炎软骨损伤的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 334-339.
[11] 张程, 何海军, 张光熠, 熊冰朗, 田天照, 孙诗艺, 吴子轩. 抗凝剂预防膝关节镜术后血栓发生的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 340-347.
[12] 龙珂, 戴祝, 刘全辉. 关节镜下肩袖修补联合喙突成形治疗肩袖撕裂合并喙突下囊肿[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 198-203.
[13] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[14] 黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 218-223.
[15] 张镇斌, 闫兆龙, 王功腾, 张文琦, 王旭凤, 李广兴, 孙华强, 李树锋. 关节镜对胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的效果研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
阅读次数
全文


摘要