切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (02) : 142 -147. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.02.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位
刘中帆1, 曾浩1, 裴泳榕1, 王靖1, 翁晓军1,()   
  1. 1. 410005 长沙,湖南省人民医院(湖南师范大学第一附属医院)骨关节与运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-23 出版日期:2021-05-05
  • 通信作者: 翁晓军
  • 基金资助:
    长沙市科技局基础研究项目(kq1801094)

Arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Zhongfan Liu1, Hao Zeng1, Yongrong Pei1, Jing Wang1, Xiaojun Weng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Bone, Joint and Sports Medicine, Hunan Provincial People's Hospital, Changsha 410005, China
  • Received:2021-01-23 Published:2021-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Xiaojun Weng
引用本文:

刘中帆, 曾浩, 裴泳榕, 王靖, 翁晓军. 关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 142-147.

Zhongfan Liu, Hao Zeng, Yongrong Pei, Jing Wang, Xiaojun Weng. Arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(02): 142-147.

目的

探讨关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位的手术方法和临床效果。

方法

2019年6月至2020年6月本院收治12例肩锁关节脱位患者,其中男9例、女3例;年龄31 ~ 65岁,平均(41.7±2.5)岁;左侧3例,右侧9例;受伤至手术时间2 ~ 7 d,平均(4.2±1.7)d。术前X线片和三维CT显示肩锁关节完全脱位,Rockwood分型III型8例、Ⅳ型1例、V型3例。所有患者均在关节镜下行肩锁关节复位细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线固定术。所有患者术后第1天、1个月、6个月复查X线和三维CT,术前和术后1、3、6个月分别进行美国肩肘外科医师评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons,ASES)、Constant评分、视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)、肩关节活动度评估。

结果

所有患者术后均获随访,随访时间7 ~ 10个月,ASES评分、Constant评分术后第1、3、6个月与术前比较明显增高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。VAS评分术后第1、3、6个月与术前比较明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。肩关节前屈、外展活动度术后第1、3、6个月与术前比较明显改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术后1个月三维CT测量情况:骨道直径(2.34±0.12)mm,复位无丢失。末次随访X线片和三维CT显示所有患者均未出现复位丢失和喙突或锁骨骨折。1例患者术后2个月出现继发性冻结肩,予以盂肱关节注射倍他米松后缓解。

结论

关节镜下细骨道双Endobutton钢板联合Fiberwire缝线治疗Rockwood III ~ V型肩锁关节脱位具有创伤小、锁骨和喙突骨量损失小、复位和固定可靠的优点,潜在降低再骨折和复位丢失的发生率。

Background

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation is a common disease of orthopedics. It is difficult to immobilize after manual reduction and has a higher operation rate. The safety and efficacy of arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation have been confirmed. However, a few patients still have complications such as iatrogenic fracture and reduction loss, which are related to the thick bone canals of coracoid process and clavicle, or the decreased bone strength due to repeated drilling processes.

Objective

To investigate the surgical method and clinical efficacy of arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocations.

Methods

From June 2019 to June 2020, a total of 12 patients (9 males and 3 females) with acromioclavicular joint dislocations were admitted and treated. The ages ranged from 31 to 65 (41.7±2.5) years old. There were 3 left cases and 9 right cases. The time from injury to operation was 2 to 7 (4.2±1.7) days. Preoperative X-ray and CT scan showed complete dislocations of acromioclavicular joint. According to Rockwood classification, there were 8 type III cases, 1 type IV case and and 3 type V cases. All patients underwent arthroscopic reduction and double-Endobutton fixation with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel, and received postoperative re-examinations including X-ray and 3D CT immediately after the operation and on the 1st day, 1st month, and 6th month after operation. All patients were assessed using the rating scale of American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) , Constant score, visual analogue scale (VAS) and shoulder range of motion before operation, and 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after operation.

Results

The ASES scores and Constant scores significantly increased in the 1st , 3rd and 6th months after operation compared with hose before operation, and there were statistical differences (P<0.05) . The VAS scores decreased significantly in the 1st , 3rd and 6th months after operation (P<0.05) . The ranges of motion of shoulder flexion and abduction significantly improved in the 1st, 3rd and 6th months after operation (P<0.05) . One month after surgery, the diameter of bone tunnel was (2.34±0.12) mm measured by 3D CT without reduction loss. At the last follow-up, the X-ray films and CT scans of all patients showed no reduction loss or fractures of coracoid process or clavicle. One patient had secondary frozen shoulder 2 months after operation which was relieved by injecting betamethasone into the glenohumeral joint.

Conclusion

The arthroscopic double-Endobutton with Fiberwire suture through tenuous bone tunnel in the treatment of Rockwood type III - V acromioclavicular joint dislocations has the advantages of minimal trauma, less bone loss of clavicle and coracoid process, and reliable reduction and fixation, and can potentially reduce the incidence of refracture and reduction loss.

图1 使用Arthrex定位导向器定位(图A),空心钻头从喙突基底部中间位置穿出(图B),探勾调整Endobutton钢板方向(图C),固定后Endobutton钢板横置于喙突基底部中间位置(图D)
图2 镍合金导丝环形袢将2根对折好的爱惜邦导引线(1正1反共4股)依次引入喙突、锁骨2.4 mm直径骨道(图A),Fiberwire缝线(D)两线尾分别穿过Endobutton钢板(C)2、3孔后由导引线袢环(A)自锁骨上表面骨道口引入后经过骨道牵至肩关节前上方入口皮肤外(图B),Fiberwire缝线(F)两线尾分别穿过Endobutton钢板(E)1、4孔,已位于肩关节前上方入口皮肤外的Fiberwire缝线(D)两线尾分别穿过Endobutton钢板(E)2、3孔后继续返穿1、4孔(图C),2根Fiberwire缝线的4个线尾由导引线(B)袢环通过喙突、锁骨骨道引至锁骨上表面骨道口外后,继续分别穿过Endobutton钢板(C)1、4孔,拉动Fiberwire缝线(D)线尾,脱位的肩锁关节逐步复位(图D)
表1 患者术前与术后ASES评分、Constant评分、VAS评分及肩关节活动度比较(±s
图3 术前X线片示:Rockwood V型肩锁关节脱位(图A),术后X线片示:肩锁关节完全复位,Endobutton钢板位置好(图B),术后三维CT示:肩锁关节完全复位,Endobutton钢板位置好(图C),术后三维CT示:骨道位置合适,Endobutton钢板贴合好(图D)
[1]
Gowd AK, Liu JN, Cabarcas BC, et al. Current concepts in the operative management of acromioclavicular dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of operative techniques[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2018, 47: 2745-2758.
[2]
Pan ZX, Zhang HX, Sun C, et al. Arthroscopy-assisted reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by Endobutton fixation for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2015, 135(1): 9-16.
[3]
Chen K,Xu B,Lao YJ,et al. Risk factors related to the loss of reduction after acromioclavicular joint dislocation treated with the EndoButton device[J] . Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9(4): 345.
[4]
van Bergen CJA, van Bemmel AF, Alta TDW, et al. New insights in the treatment of acromioclavicular separation[J]. World J Orthop, 2017, 8(12): 861-873.
[5]
Ding ML, Ni JD, Hu JZ, et al. Rare complication of clavicular hook plate: clavicle fracture at the medial end of the plate[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(7): e18-e20.
[6]
Struhl S. Double endobutton technique for repair of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 8(4): 175-179.
[7]
Xu J, Liu H, Lu W, et al. A retrospective comparative study of arthroscopic fixation in acute Rockwood type IV acromioclavicular joint dislocation: single versus double paired Endobutton technique[J]. BMC Musculoskel Dis, 2018, 19(1): 1-6.
[8]
赵立连,卢明峰,许挺,等. 关节镜下双Endobutton钮扣钢板内固定治疗急性肩锁关节脱位[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2019, 35(1): 71-78.
[9]
Milewski MD, Tompkins M, Giugale JM, et al. Complications related to anatomic reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2012, 40(7): 1628-1634.
[10]
Komatsu F, Mori R, Uchio Y. Optimum surgical suture material and methods to obtain high tensile strength at knots: problems of conventional knots and the reinforcement effect of adhesive agent[J]. J Orthop SCI, 2006, 11(1): 70-74.
[11]
Wright PB, Kosmopoulos V, Cote RE, et al. FiberWire® is superior in strength to stainless steel wire for tension band fixation of transverse patellar fractures[J]. Injury, 2009, 40(11): 1200-1203.
[12]
Camarda L, La Gattuta A, Butera M, et al. FiberWire tension band for patellar fractures[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2016, 17(1): 75-80.
[13]
Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Chowaniec DM, et al. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39(10): 2218-2225.
[14]
Saccomanno MF, De Ieso C, Milano G. Acromioclavicular joint instability: anatomy, biomechanics and evaluation[J]. Joints, 2014, 2(2): 87-92.
[15]
Struhl S, Wolfson TS. Continuous loop double endobutton reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(10): 2437-2444.
[1] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[2] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[3] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[4] 蔡雨琦, 史尉利, 陶立元, 曹建夫, 崔国庆, 杨渝平. 支持带松解联合外侧成形治疗髌骨外侧过度挤压综合征[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 186-192.
[5] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[6] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[7] 冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[8] 王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[9] 王利航, 孙官文, 包呼和, 倪熙宇, 张万印, 黄斐, 杨鹏波. 三种手术方式治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 332-343.
[10] 陈利, 王锦海, 董浩男, 李利军. 锁骨钩钢板在肩锁关节脱位治疗中的不足及改良[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 377-381.
[11] 王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[12] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[13] 蒋永东, 耿启砥, 吴宇峰, 高世华. 肩锁关节脱位的文献计量学分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 246-256.
[14] 唐晓俞, 唐小高, 王小芃, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 邓凯文. 喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位的趋势及争议[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 103-106.
[15] 唐晓俞, 邓凯文, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 王小芃. 关节镜下V-Y结缝合方式与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖损伤的比较[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 107-114.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?