切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (03) : 218 -223. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2023.03.005

论著

关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察
黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁()   
  1. 210029 南京中医药大学附属医院骨科运动医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-07 出版日期:2023-08-05
  • 通信作者: 孙鲁宁
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省自然科学基金(BK20191505)

Clinical observation of the treatment of type V SLAP injury with anchor repairment under arthroscope

Yao Huang, Bin Yuan, Hao Shu, Lei Wang, Luning Sun()   

  1. Department of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2023-05-07 Published:2023-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Luning Sun
引用本文:

黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊, 王磊, 孙鲁宁. 关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤临床观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 218-223.

Yao Huang, Bin Yuan, Hao Shu, Lei Wang, Luning Sun. Clinical observation of the treatment of type V SLAP injury with anchor repairment under arthroscope[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2023, 11(03): 218-223.

目的

探讨关节镜下带线锚钉修补术治疗Ⅴ型由前至后盂唇(superior labral anterior to posterior,SLAP)损伤的手术技术并观察临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2013年1月至2018年6月共12例Ⅴ型SLAP损伤患者,采用关节镜下带线锚钉技术修补盂唇,术后随访1年,手术前后采用疼痛视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、关节活动度(range of motion,ROM)、Rowe评分和美国肩肘协会评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons, ASES)等评估手术效果。

结果

12例患者VAS评分术前和术后6个月、术后1年相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROM(外旋)术后6个月与健侧相比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),术后1年与健侧相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。Rowe和ASES评分术前和术后1年相比差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

关节镜下带线锚钉修补手术治疗Ⅴ型SLAP损伤能够改善患者肩关节疼痛和功能,具有良好临床疗效。

Background

Superior labral anterior to posterior (SLAP) injury is a lesion of the upper lip of the shoulder joint that often causes pain or even instability in the shoulder joint during specific movements. In 1990, Snyder divided the upper glenoid lip injuries into four types based on the injuries described by Andrews and named them SLAP injuries. The most common type II injury was the avulsion of the upper glenoid lip and the long head tendon of the biceps muscle from the glenoid pelvis. In 1995, Maffet et al. added three SLAP injuries to the Snyder classification, totaling seven types of injuries. Bankart injury is an avulsion injury in the anterior and inferior glenohumeral ligament complex of the shoulder glenoid and labial. According to the classification of Maffet, type V SLAP injury refers to the continued upward extension of the Bankart injury and the separation of the LHB stop, that is, type II SLAP injury combined with Bankart injury. The incidence of type V SLAP injuries is about 4%-15% of all SLAP injuries, and Gartsman believes that the incidence of type V SLAP injuries in chronic forward shoulder instability is about 57%. Compared with Type II SLAP injury and Bankart injury surgery, Type V SLAP injury surgery requires the management of both anterior labial and upper labial biceps tendon complex tears, more extensive tear repair and insertion of more anchors, more line crosses, and management of multiple sutures, and requires more technical requirements. In addition, the implant site or the crossing site of the anchor is not appropriate, which may lead to too tight suture, leading to external rotation of the shoulder joint after surgery.

Objective

To investigate the surgical technique and clinical efficacy of arthroscopic suture anchor repair for type Ⅴ SLAP injury.

Methods

A total of 12 patients with type Ⅴ SLAP injury from January 2013 to June 2018 were retrospectively analyzed, and their labral injuries were repaired with suture anchor under arthroscopy. They were followed up for 1 year after surgery. The visual analogue scale, range of motion, Rowe score and ASES score were used to evaluate the surgical effect.

Results

The VAS scores of 12 patients 6 months and 1 year after surgery were statistically different before surgery (P<0.05) . The ROM of external rotation 6 months after surgery was statistically different compared with the unaffected side (P<0.05) but not statistically significant compared with the unaffected side 1 year after surgery (P>0.05) . The scores of Rowe and ASES before surgery were statistically different from 1 year after surgery (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

Arthroscopic suture anchor repair for type Ⅴ injury can attenuate shoulder pain and improve function with good clinical efficacy.

图1 带线锚钉修复右肩5~11点区域V型SLAP损伤 图A:1枚带线锚钉放置于12点位置修复LHB-盂唇复合体;图B:修复Bankart损伤的第1枚锚钉放置于5点钟方向;图C:修复Bankart损伤的第2枚锚钉放置于3点半钟方向;图D:修复Bankart损伤的第3枚锚钉放置于2点钟方向注:SLAP为由前至后盂唇;LHB为肱二头肌长头腱
图2 带线锚钉修复左肩6~12点区域V型SLAP损伤 图A:盂唇撕裂涉及6点钟方向;图B-C:后外下入路于6点钟方向置入锚钉并过线;图D:打结固定撕裂的盂唇和腋囊注:SLAP为由前至后盂唇
图3 带线锚钉固定V型SLAP损伤 图A:褥式缝合固定Bankart损伤;图B:Bankart损伤处打结后LHB-盂唇复合体打结固定注:SLAP为由前至后盂唇;LHB为肱二头肌长头腱
图4 置钉、缝合及打结过程 图A:12点位置置钉过线,不打结;图B:前方置钉及过线;图C:自下而上打结;图D:最后12点方向打结
表1 Ⅴ型SLAP损伤术前和术后的功能评分表(n=12)
[1]
Snyder SJ,Karzel RP,Del Pizzo W.SLAP lesions of the shoulder[J]. Arthroscopy,1990,6(4):274-279.
[2]
Andrews JR,Carson WG Jr,McLeod WD.Glenoid labrum tears related to the long head of the biceps[J]. Am J Sports Med,1985,13(5):337-341.
[3]
Maffet MW,Gartsman GM,Moseley B.Superior labrum-biceps tendon complex lesions of the shoulder[J]. Am J Sports Med,1995,23(1):93-98.
[4]
Bents RT,Skeete KD.The correlation of the Buford complex and SLAP lesions[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2005,14(6):565-569.
[5]
Kim TK,Queale WS,Cosgarea AJ.Clinical features of the different types of SLAP lesions: an analysis of one hundred and thirty-nine cases[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2003,85-A(1):66-71.
[6]
Snyder SJ,Banas MP,Karzel RP.An analysis of 140 injuries to the superior glenoid labrum[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,1995,4(4):243-248.
[7]
Rhee YG,Lee DH,Lim CT.Unstable isolated SLAP lesion: clinical presentation and outcome of arthroscopic fixation[J]. Arthroscopy ,2005,21(9):1099.
[8]
Gartsman GM,Roddey TS,Hammerman SM.Arthroscopic treatment of anterior-inferior glenohumeral instability.Two to five-year follow-up[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000,82-A(7):991-1003.
[9]
Zhang M,Zhou J,Zhang Y.Influence of Scapula Training Exercises on Shoulder Joint Function After Surgery for Rotator Cuff Injury[J]. Med Sci Monit,2020,26:e925758.
[10]
Moroder P,Danzinger V,Maziak N.Characteristics of functional shoulder instability[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2020,29(1):68-78.
[11]
Roy JS,MacDermid JC,Woodhouse LJ.Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires[J]. Arthritis Rheum,2009,61(5):623-632.
[12]
McMahon PJ,Burkart A,Musahl V.Glenohumeral translations are increased after a type II superior labrum anterior-posterior lesion: a cadaveric study of severity of passive stabilizer injury[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2004,13(1):39-44.
[13]
Mihata T,McGarry MH,Tibone JE.Biomechanical assessment of Type II superior labral anterior-posterior (SLAP) lesions associated with anterior shoulder capsular laxity as seen in throwers: a cadaveric study[J]. Am J Sports Med,2008,36(8):1604-1610.
[14]
Pappas AM,Goss TP,Kleinman PK.Symptomatic shoulder instability due to lesions of the glenoid labrum[J]. Am J Sports Med,1983,11(5):279-288.
[15]
Gartsman GM,Hammerman SM.Superior labrum,anterior and posterior lesions.When and how to treat them[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2000,19(1):115-124.
[16]
Hitchcock HH,Bechtol CO.Painful shoulder; observations on the role of the tendon of the long head of the biceps brachii in its causation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1948, 30(2):263-273.
[17]
Gleason PD,Beall DP,Sanders TG.The transverse humeral ligament: a separate anatomical structure or a continuation of the osseous attachment of the rotator cuff?[J]. Am J Sports Med,2006,34(1):72-77.
[18]
Warner JJ,McMahon PJ.The role of the long head of the biceps brachii in superior stability of the glenohumeral joint[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1995,77(3):366-372.
[19]
Kim SH,Ha KI,Kim HS.Electromyographic activity of the biceps brachii muscle in shoulders with anterior instability[J]. Arthroscopy,2001,17(8):864-868.
[20]
Rodosky MW,Harner CD,Fu FH.The role of the long head of the biceps muscle and superior glenoid labrum in anterior stability of the shoulder[J]. Am J Sports Med,1994,22(1):121-130.
[21]
Itoi E,Kuechle DK,Newman SR.Stabilising function of the biceps in stable and unstable shoulders[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Brie,1993,75(4):546-550.
[22]
McGlynn FJ,Caspari RB.Arthroscopic findings in the subluxating shoulder[J]. Clin Orthop Related Res,1984,(183):173-178.
[23]
Cho HL,Lee CK,Hwang TH.Arthroscopic repair of combined Bankart and SLAP lesions: operative techniques and clinical results[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2010, 2(1):39-46.
[24]
Morgan CD,Burkhart SS,Palmeri M.Type II SLAP lesions: three subtypes and their relationships to superior instability and rotator cuff tears[J]. Arthroscopy,1998,14(6):553-565.
[25]
Kim DS,Yi CH,Yoon YS.Arthroscopic repair for combined Bankart and superior labral anterior posterior lesions: a comparative study between primary and recurrent anterior dislocation in the shoulder[J]. Int Orthop,2011,35(8):1187-1195.
[1] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[2] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[3] 王杰, 袁泉, 王玥琦, 乔佳君, 谭春丽, 夏仲元, 刘守尧. 溃疡油在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果及安全性观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(06): 480-484.
[4] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[5] 聂生军, 王钰, 王毅, 鲜小庆, 马生成. 复方倍他米松局部注射联合光动力疗法治疗小型瘢痕疙瘩的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 404-410.
[6] 李义亮, 苏拉依曼·牙库甫, 麦麦提艾力·麦麦提明, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 机器人与腹腔镜食管裂孔疝修补术联合Nissen 胃底折叠术短期疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 512-517.
[7] 杨万荣, 任治坤, 时新颍. 沙丁胺醇雾化吸入脾多肽治疗AECOPD的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 609-612.
[8] 危用洋, 黄俊甫, 辛万鹏, 易思清, 涂书举, 方康, 李勇, 肖卫东. 三种术式治疗胰腺颈体部良性或低度恶性肿瘤的临床疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 515-519.
[9] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[10] 冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[11] 王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[12] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[13] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[14] 黄福秀, 张宁宁, 李晨阳, 李淑玲, 陈超. 单纯电切、单纯电凝与电凝电切术对扁平肠息肉疗效及不良事件发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 310-314.
[15] 王楠钧, 马燕, 李隆松, 牛晓彤, 刘圣圳, 毕雅维, 苏松, 柴宁莉, 令狐恩强. 不同年龄段胃低级别上皮内瘤变患者内镜下射频消融术的疗效对比分析[J/OL]. 中华胃肠内镜电子杂志, 2024, 11(04): 238-242.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?