切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 24 -29. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.01.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

"中国结"缝合技术在镜下治疗肩胛下肌腱损伤的临床应用
吴清泉1, 郑佳鹏1,(), 肖棋1, 邓辉云1, 林达生1   
  1. 1. 363000 漳州,解放军联勤保障部队第909医院全军骨科中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-09-24 出版日期:2021-02-05
  • 通信作者: 郑佳鹏
  • 基金资助:
    厦门大学附属东南医院青年苗圃基金(18Y014)

Clinical application of "Chinese knot" suture technique in treatment of subscapularis tendon tears under shoulder arthroscopy

Qingquan Wu1, Jiapeng Zheng1,(), Qi Xiao1, Huiyun Deng1, Dasheng Lin1   

  1. 1. Orthopaedic Center of People's liberation Army, the 909th Hospital of PLA (Southeast Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University) , Zhangzhou 363000, China
  • Received:2020-09-24 Published:2021-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Jiapeng Zheng
引用本文:

吴清泉, 郑佳鹏, 肖棋, 邓辉云, 林达生. "中国结"缝合技术在镜下治疗肩胛下肌腱损伤的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 24-29.

Qingquan Wu, Jiapeng Zheng, Qi Xiao, Huiyun Deng, Dasheng Lin. Clinical application of "Chinese knot" suture technique in treatment of subscapularis tendon tears under shoulder arthroscopy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(01): 24-29.

目的

探讨肩关节镜下"中国结"缝合技术治疗肩胛下肌腱撕裂的早期疗效。

方法

回顾性分析本院2018年2月至2019年1月21例采用"中国结"缝合技术治疗肩胛下肌腱损伤的病例。分别于术前及术后3、6、12个月采用美国加州大学肩关节评分系统(University of California at Los Angeles,UCLA)评分和Constant评分系统进行疗效评价。术前、术后1年均行肩关节MRI检查评估肩胛下肌腱的情况。

结果

随访时间12~15个月,平均(13.2±3.8)个月。UCLA肩关节评分由术前(9.78±1.88)分,增加至术后1年随访时的(29.44±2.56)分;Constant评分由术前(31.34±3.89)分增加至术后1年随访时的(78.97±5.84)分;两项指标差异均有统计学意义(P< 0. 01) 。MacNab优良率术后1年随访时为90. 47%。Bear Hug test(+) 、Belly press test(+)患者例数在术后呈现显著性下降,所有21例患者均于随访期观察到肩胛下肌腱连续的MRI影像,未发生血管损伤、神经损伤、锚钉拔出、感染等并发症。

结论

"中国结"缝合技术在镜下治疗肩胛下肌腱损伤具有简单、快捷的特点,临床效果可靠。

Background

In recent years, arthroscopic surgery has been widely used in the treatment of rotator cuff injury. Arthroscopic surgery for the treatment of subscapularis tendon tears has more difficulties and challenges when compared with that for supraspinatus or infraspinatus tendon tears. Most of the subscapularis tendon tears are related to degeneration, and the tendon quality is poor. At present, many improved suture methods were invented for the repair, but the operation is difficult. Different suture and fixation techniques have their own advantages and disadvantages. How to make the operation more simple and reduce the retear rate after operation is an urgent problem to be solved. Objective To investigate the early curative efficacy of "Chinese knot" suture technique for treatment of subscapularis tendon tears under shoulder arthroscopy.

Methods

Twenty-one cases of subscapularis tendon tears were treated with "Chinese knot" suture technique from February 2018 to January 2019. The Bear Hug test, Belly press test, UCLA scores and Constant-Murley score were recorded before operation and in the 3rd month, 6th month and 12th month after operation, and they were used to evaluate the clinical efficacy. The Shoulder joint MRI examination was performed before operation and 1 year after operation to evaluate the subscapularis tendon condition.

Results

The follow-up time was 12 to 15 months with an average time of (13.2 ± 3.8) months. Before the operation and 1 year after operation, the mean UCLA score was (9.78 ± 1.88) points vs. (29.44 ± 2.56) points, and the mean constant score was (31.34± 3.89) points vs. (78.97 ± 5.84) points, respectively. The differences of the two indexes before and after operation were statistically significant (P<0.05) . The MacNab excellent and good rate was 90.47% at 1 year after operation. Patients with positive Bear Hug test and positive Belly press test showed a significant decrease after operation. All 21 patients had continuous subscapularis MRI images in the follow up. No complications such as vascular injury, nerve injury, anchor extraction or infection occurred.

Conclusion

The "Chinese knot" suture technique is simple and effective for subscapularis tendon repair, and its clinical effect is reliable.

图1 关节镜下确认肩胛下肌腱撕裂及镜下操作关键步骤 图A:关节镜下肩胛下肌腱撕裂的大小、形态;图B:评估肩胛下肌腱张力;图C:使用缝线对肩胛下肌腱进行牵引;图D:从肩胛下肌腱下表面将此爱惜邦缝线其中一尾端过线至肩胛下肌腱上表面;图E:第一入针点间距10 mm的肩胛下肌腱上表面再次入针;图F:在两入针点中间、前方5 mm位置进行第三次穿针过线从肌腱下表面将此爱惜邦缝线另中一尾端过线至肌腱上表面;图G:将2根缝线尾线套入线环中,两尾线收紧后形成锁环;图H:在"足印迹"外侧缘置入1枚无结外排可吸收锚钉,调整缝线张力合适后将2尾线锁定固定;图I:缝合后肩胛下肌腱镜下图像
图2 "中国结"缝合技术示意图 图A:肩胛下肌腱撕裂示意图;图B:从肩胛下肌腱下表面将此爱惜邦缝线其中一尾端过线至肩胛下肌腱上表面;图C:与第一入针点间距10 mm的肩胛下肌腱上表面再次入针;图D:与前两进针点中间向前5 mm处第3次进针,并从肌腱下表面将此爱惜邦缝线另中一尾端过线至肌腱上表面将爱惜邦中部线环过线至肌腱上表面;图E:"中国结"3个进针点示意图;图F:将爱惜邦两尾线套入线环中,并逐渐收紧尾线形成;图G:在"足印迹"外侧缘置入1枚无结外排可吸收锚钉,两个锁定环调整缝线张力合适后将2尾线锁定固定
表1 术前及术后随访临床疗效评估(分,±s)
图3 术前MRI证实肩胛下肌腱撕裂
图4 术后复查MRI:肩胛下肌腱形态肌张力良好
[1]
Lafosse L, Jost B, Reiland Y, et al. Structural Integrity and Clinical Outcomes After Arthroscopic Repair of Isolated Subscapularis Tears[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2007,9(6):1184-1193.
[2]
Burkhart SS,Tehrany AM. Arthroscopic subscapularis tendon repair[J]. Arthroscopy, 2002, 18(5):454-463.
[3]
Jain NB,Wilcox RB 3rd,Katz JN, et al. Clinical Examination of the Rotator Cuff[J]. PMR, 2013,5(1):45-56.
[4]
Barth JR,Burkhart SS,De Beer JF. The Bear-Hug Test: A New and Sensitive Test for Diagnosing a Subscapularis Tear[J]. Arthroscopy, 2006,22(10):1076-1084.
[5]
Scheibel M, Magosch P, Pritsch M, et al. The Belly-Off Sign: A New Clinical Diagnostic Sign for Subscapularis Lesions[J]. Arthroscopy, 2005, 21(10):1229-1235.
[6]
Zheng J,Xiao Q,Deng H, et al. The Chinese Knot Stich Technique Using a Footprint Ultrasuture Anchor for Rotator Cuff Repair[J]. Arthrosc Tech,2020,9(3):e321-326.
[7]
Keating JF, Waterworth P, Shaw-Dunn J, et al. The relative strengths of the rotator cuff muscles. A cadaver study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 1993, 75-B(1):137-140.
[8]
Codman EA. Complete rupture of the supraspinatus tendon. Operative treatment with report of two successful cases[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(3):347-349.
[9]
Nové-Josserand L, Collin P, Godenèche A, et al.Ten-year clinical and anatomic follow-upafter repair of anterosuperior rotator cuff tears: influence of the subscapularis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26(10):1826-1833.
[10]
Chuang MJ, Jancosko J, Nottage WM . Clinical Outcomes of Single-row Arthroscopic Revision Rotator Cuff Repair[J]. Orthopedics, 2014, 37(8):e692-e698.
[11]
Millett PJ, Warth RJ, Dornan GJ, et al. Clinical and structural outcomes after arthroscopic single-row versus double-row rotator cuff repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis of level I randomized clinical trials[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(4):586-597.
[12]
Dines JS, Bedi A, Elattrache NS, et al. Single-row versus doublerow rotator cuff repair: techniques and outcomes.[J]. J Am Academy Orthop Surg, 2010, 18(2):83-93.
[13]
Sano H, Tokunaga M, Noguchi M, et al. Tight medial knot tying may increase retearing risk after transosseous equivalent repair of rotator cuff tendon[J]. Biomed Mater Eng, 2017, 28(3):267-277.
[14]
Park JY, Lhee SH, Oh KS, et al. Clinical and Ultrasonographic Outcomes of Arthroscopic Suture Bridge Repair for Massive Rotator Cuff Tear[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(2):280-289.
[15]
Mitchell R, Pitts R, Kim YM, et al. Medial Meniscal Root Avulsion: A Biomechanical Comparison of 4 Different Repair Constructs[J]. Arthroscopy,2016, 32(1):111-119.
[16]
Heikenfeld R, Gigis I, Chytas A, et al. Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Isolated Subscapularis Tears: Clinical Results and Structural Integrity After 24 Months[J]. Arthroscopy, 2012, 28(12):1805-1811.
[17]
Ide J . Arthroscopic repair of traumatic combined rotator cuff tears involving the subscapularis tendon[J]. J. Bone Joint Surg Am, 2007, 89(11):2378-2388.
[1] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[2] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[3] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[4] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[5] 薛昶, 王翔, 冯利, 金鑫, 王治伟. 生物补片盆底修补术和直接缝合术在低位直肠癌患者盆底重建中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 327-329.
[6] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[7] 冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[8] 王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[9] 陈天鑫, 杨胜平, 朱瑜琪, 高云, 张帅. 多种手术方式治疗肩关节前向不稳定伴关节盂骨缺损的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 344-352.
[10] 张琛朋, 王靖, 曾塬杰, 高鹏, 陈昕彤. 反式全肩关节置换术的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 373-376.
[11] 王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[12] 白正林, 高明, 孟增东. 肩关节置换术后假体周围感染的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 271-276.
[13] 马明太, 居家宝, 张一翀, 丁镇涛, 张殿英, 付中国, 陈建海. 肱骨大结节骨折的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 277-280.
[14] 单磊, 周君琳. 同期修复肩袖撕裂结合锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的特点及疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 211-215.
[15] 赵静磊, 陈晓婷, 夏莹, 黄维佳, 周菊, 刘芳. 锁骨骨折切开复位内固定术后患者肩关节功能恢复的风险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 216-222.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?