切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (03) : 203 -208. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.03.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复治疗肩锁关节脱位
冯伟楼1, 张堃1, 朱养均1, 年跃文1, 冯东旭1, 黄伟1, 蔡枭1,()   
  1. 1. 710054 西安交通大学附属红会医院骨创伤医院上肢病区
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-19 出版日期:2020-08-05
  • 通信作者: 蔡枭
  • 基金资助:
    陕西省科技厅社发公关项目(2018JQ3040)

Modified titanium cable system combined with acromioclavicular ligament repair for acromioclavicular joint dislocation

Weilou Feng1, Kun Zhang1, Yangjun Zhu1, Yuewen Nian1, Dongxu Feng1, Wei Huang1, Xiao Cai1,()   

  1. 1. Ward of Upper Limb, Orthopedic Traumatic Hospital, Honghui Hospital, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710054, China
  • Received:2020-04-19 Published:2020-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Xiao Cai
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Cai Xiao,Email:
引用本文:

冯伟楼, 张堃, 朱养均, 年跃文, 冯东旭, 黄伟, 蔡枭. 改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复治疗肩锁关节脱位[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(03): 203-208.

Weilou Feng, Kun Zhang, Yangjun Zhu, Yuewen Nian, Dongxu Feng, Wei Huang, Xiao Cai. Modified titanium cable system combined with acromioclavicular ligament repair for acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(03): 203-208.

目的

研究改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复治疗肩锁关节脱位临床效果。

方法

对2014年1月至2019年3月期间在本院使用改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复进行治疗的21例肩锁关节脱位患者临床资料进行分析,包括脱位类型、受伤原因、手术时间、关节活动范围、X线片检查结果、美国肩肘协会评分(American shoulder and elbow surgeons,ASES)、Constant肩关节评分及Karlsson术后疗效评价。

结果

21例患者获得随访,随访时间(13.05 ±2.62)个月,手术时间(50.57±8.13)min,术前等待时间(2.71±1.35)d。肩关节活动范围:前屈(167.14±5.19)°,后伸(41.14±2.20)°,外展(167.24±7.07)°,外旋(52.10±4.99)°,内旋(83.33±3.61)°。ASES评分(94.19±4.01)分(86.67 ~ 100分),Constant评分(92.95±4.98)分(78 ~ 99分),根据Karlsson术后疗效评价标准:优为15例(71.4%)、良为6例(28.6%)。

结论

改良钛缆系统结合肩锁韧带修复技术治疗肩锁关节脱位可以获得良好的临床效果。

Background

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation is a common clinical shoulder injury, and it is more common in young patients. The treatment requirements are high. If improperly handled, it will cause shoulder pain and shoulder joint dysfunction. The current view is that for Rockwood type I and Ⅱ acromioclavicular joint dislocation, conservative treatment can achieve good results. For Rockwood type Ⅲ acromioclavicular joint dislocation, it depends on the specific situation, and Rockwood typeⅣ,Ⅴ, Ⅵ acromioclavicular joint dislocation should be treated surgically. However, there are various treatment methods for acromioclavicular joint surgery, and there is no unified understanding. At present, it is more inclined to anatomical reconstruction and minimally invasive surgery, including Tightrope technology, autologous/artificial tendon, and threaded anchors to reconstruct the coracoclavicular ligament, but there are disadvantages such as poor suture/tendon strength, subluxation of the acromioclavicular joint, and iatrogenic fracture.

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of modified titanium cable system combined with acromioclavicular ligament repair for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Methods

From January 2014 to March 2019, 21 patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation were treated with modified titanium cable system and acromioclavicular ligament repair in our hospital, and the clinical data, including dislocation type, injury causes, operation time, range of joint motion, X-ray findings, American shoulder and elbow association (ASES) score, Constant shoulder score, and Karlsson postoperative evaluation were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

All patients were followed up for (13.05±2.62) months.The operation time was (50.57±8.13) minutes, and the waiting time before surgery was (2.71±1.35) days. The ranges of shoulder motion were (167.14 ± 5.19) ° of forward flexion, (41.14 ± 2.20) °, abduction (167.24±7.07) ° of posterior extension, (52.10±4.99) ° external rotation, and (83.33 ± 3.61) ° internal rotation. The ASES score was (94.19±4.01) (86.67-100) points, and the Constant-Murley score was (92.95±4.98) (78-99) points. According to Karlsson's postoperative evaluation criteria, 15 cases (71.4%) were excellent and 6 cases (28.6%) were good.

Conclusions

Modified titanium cable system combined with acromioclavicular ligament repair technology can achieve good clinical results in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

图1 典型病例:患者男,47岁,骑自行车摔伤致左侧肩锁关节脱位(RockwoodⅤ型),术前左肩锁关节正位X线片示锁骨肩峰端完全脱位(图A),对侧肩锁关节关系良好(图B),手术取沙滩椅体位,触诊后勾勒肩锁关节和喙突位置(图C),手术取锁骨远端横形和喙突部位纵行切口(图D),用钛缆进行固定并修复肩锁韧带(图E-F),术中透视显示肩锁关节关系恢复(图G),剪除多余的钛缆后透视及术后X线片(图I)
[1]
葛喆, 张新潮. 肩锁关节脱位的手术治疗进展[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2017, 5(4): 308-312.
[2]
Chillemi C, Franceschini V, Dei Giudici L, et al. Epidemiology of isolated acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Emerg Med Int, 2013, 2013: 171609.
[3]
Mitev K, Zafiroski G, Mladenovski S, et al. Surgical outcomes after fixation of acromioclavicular joint dislocation with hook plate and coracoacromial ligament transfer technique[J]. Open Access Maced J Med Sci, 2019, 7(6): 1013-1015.
[4]
Li X, Ma R, Bedi A, et al. Management of acromioclavicular joint injuries[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014, 96(1): 73-84.
[5]
王博炜, 罗吉伟, 余斌. 肩锁关节脱位的治疗进展[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1): 1-5.
[6]
Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(2): 387-397.
[7]
Beitzel K, Mazzocca AD, Bak K, et al. ISAKOS upper extremity committee consensus statement on the need for diversification of the Rockwood classification for acromioclavicular joint injuries[J]. Arthroscopy,2014, 30(2):271-278.
[8]
金翔赟, 张增, 李广翼,等. 肩锁关节脱位的治疗进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2018, 39(2): 76-80.
[9]
卢旭华, 陈爱民, 侯春林, 等. 钛缆重建喙锁韧带术治疗肩锁关节全脱位[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2007, 9(9): 882-883.
[10]
Ye T, Ouyang Y, Chen A. Evaluation of coracoclavicular stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with multistrand titanium cables[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2014, 24(7):1061-1066.
[11]
Gao YS, Zhang YL, Ai ZS, et al. Transarticular fixation by hook plate versus coracoclavicular stabilization by single multistrand titanium cable for acute Rockwood grade-V acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a case-control study[J]. BMC Musculoskeletal Disord, 2015, 16(1):360.
[12]
骆林凯, 毕大卫. 钛缆在创伤骨科手术中的应用进展[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2019, 34(5): 555-557.
[13]
张磊, 陈亨树, 祁冀, 等. 喙突的解剖形态学测量及其临床意义[J]. 中国临床解剖学杂志, 2018, 36(6): 606-610.
[14]
Bhatia DN, de Beer JF, du Toit DF. Coracoid process anatomy: implications in radiographic imaging and surgery[J]. Clin Anat, 2007, 7(20):774-784.
[15]
庄辛, 雷军强, 郭奇虹, 等. 喙锁韧带重建的解剖放射学研究 [J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 7(3): 259-263.
[16]
皇甫小桥. 肩锁关节脱位的基础与临床相关研究[D]. 苏州,苏州大学, 2016.
[17]
Morikawa D, Dyrna F, Cote MP, et al. Repair of the entire superior acromioclavicular ligament complex best restores posterior translation and rotational stability[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019,27(12) :3764-3770 .
[18]
Hislop P, Sakata K, Ackland DC, et al. Acromioclavicular joint stabilization: A biomechanical study of bidirectional stability and strength[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(4): 2325967119836751.
[1] 黄晓文, 吕天润, 左强, 李翔, 刘久翔. 肩锁韧带缝线稳定联合锁骨钩钢板固定与袢钢板韧带全修复治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 127-133.
[2] 蒋永东, 耿启砥, 吴宇峰, 高世华. 肩锁关节脱位的文献计量学分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 246-256.
[3] 唐晓俞, 唐小高, 王小芃, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 邓凯文. 喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位的趋势及争议[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 103-106.
[4] 杨仁豪, 庄澄宇, 王蕾. Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位的治疗研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 88-93.
[5] 郭飞达, 陈晓俊, 邢文钊, 孙常胜, 李一然, 鹿青, 吴昊天. 非镜下专用定位/复位器辅助袢钢板治疗锁骨远端骨折和肩锁关节脱位的疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 40-48.
[6] 燕飞, 赵东旭, 金泽鉴, 胡斯乐, 王永刚, 苗雷, 宋鹤天, 刘斌, 赵胡日查. TightRope锥状韧带单束重建联合两种肩锁关节修复方式治疗急性肩锁关节脱位临床效果对比观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 27-33.
[7] 崔壮, 魏宽海, 陈滨, 胡岩君, 余斌. Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位治疗策略[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 279-283.
[8] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[9] 潘超, 张博, 韩磊, 刘俊阳, 崔鹏, 闫兵山, 田旭, 刘林涛, 东靖明. 肩锁关节脱位治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 186-191.
[10] 张涛, 崔进, 周启荣, 陈晓, 苏佳灿. 肩锁关节脱位的治疗进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 77-82.
[11] 郁凯. 陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的治疗[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 7-11.
[12] 王雄, 杨璐, 子树明, 魏文强, 梁志民, 顾峥嵘, 曹烈虎. TightRope钢板与锁骨钩钢板治疗Rockwood III型急性肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 300-306.
[13] 何国文, 高大伟, 陈亮, 胡栢均. 保守治疗与锁骨钩钢板内固定手术治疗Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的中长期疗效对比研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 110-114.
[14] 何国文, 高大伟, 陈亮, 胡栢均, 吴宇峰. Endobutton带袢钢板内固定与锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的中长期疗效观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 105-109.
[15] 张亚军, 党育, 杨剑, 张刘会, 谭利, 杨忠, 郁凯. 关节镜下喙锁和肩锁韧带重建治疗陈旧性Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 28-33.
阅读次数
全文


摘要