切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 151 -156. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.02.010

所属专题: 文献

论著

结节间沟高位腱固定治疗退变性肱二头肌腱损伤的临床疗效
桑伟林1, 朱力波1, 陆海明1, 王聪1, 马金忠1,()   
  1. 1. 201620 上海交通大学附属第一人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-08 出版日期:2020-05-05
  • 通信作者: 马金忠
  • 基金资助:
    上海市申康医院发展中心研究项目(SHDC12017121)

Clinical effect of high tendon fixation of intertubercular sulcus on degenerative biceps brachii tendon injury

Weilin Sang1, Libo Zhu1, Haiming Lu1, Cong Wang1, Jinzhong Ma1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai 201620, China
  • Received:2019-06-08 Published:2020-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Jinzhong Ma
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ma Jinzhong, Email:
引用本文:

桑伟林, 朱力波, 陆海明, 王聪, 马金忠. 结节间沟高位腱固定治疗退变性肱二头肌腱损伤的临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 151-156.

Weilin Sang, Libo Zhu, Haiming Lu, Cong Wang, Jinzhong Ma. Clinical effect of high tendon fixation of intertubercular sulcus on degenerative biceps brachii tendon injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(02): 151-156.

目的

探讨肱二头肌长头肌腱退变性损伤行肩关节镜下结节间沟高位腱固定的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析37例肱二头肌长头肌腱慢性退变性损伤病例,均为肱二头肌长头肌腱退变性撕裂且不伴肩袖撕裂,采用肩关节镜下结节间沟成形结合双线锚钉高位腱固定术。比较术前、术后3 d、14 d、1个月、3个月和6个月的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS),美国肩肘外科协会评分(rating scale of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons,ASES)和Constant评分,并统计并发症的发生情况。

结果

37例患者均获得了术后6个月的观察和随访,无一例出现大力水手征,2例在术后3个月和6个月仍存在轻度疼痛性肌痉挛。与术前相比,术后的VAS评分持续显著下降,尤其在术后1个月以后下降更为明显。肩关节ASES评分和Constant评分也较术前显著提高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

肩关节镜下结节间沟成形结合锚钉高位腱固定术是治疗退变性肱二头肌腱病变的有效手段。

Background

Although it is still controversial whether the biceps tendon plays a role in the stability of the glenohumeral joint, the lesion of the tendon or the SLAP injury of the tendon is the important reason of shoulder pain and motor dysfunction. At present, the treatment of long head tendon lesion of biceps brachii is often based on doctors’ surgical preferences, patient age and functional requirements. It is reported that myotenotomy or tenodesis has obtained better pain relief. Traumatic or degenerative injuries of the long head tendon of biceps brachii sometimes involves the superior labrum, and its treatment is also controversial, including repair, myotenotomy and tenodesis. Generally, glenoid labrum repair or tenodesis is applied for most young (<40 years old) patients with high postoperative motor function requirements, myotenotomy is applied for older patients with less functional requirements. However, for tenodesis, where to fix the tendon, how to fix it, and how to maintain the length-tension relationship of the tendon are still the focus of discussion and research, and various surgical methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. Fixation on the pectoralis may result in incomplete relief of postoperative pain due to residual diseased tendon tissue, while there is a risk of humeral fracture and neurovascular injury below the pectoral muscle. The soft tissue fixation of tendon is not firm enough, and the screw fixation through bone tunnel also has the possibility of tendon cutting and fracture. However, the results of clinical studies, animal experiments and biomechanical studies have found that the differences between various fixation methods are far less than we thought, and there are only slight differences. Therefore, using the simplest and most effective method for tendon fixation is undoubtedly an ideal choice.

Objective

To investigate the clinical effect of high tendon fixation of intertubercular sulcus under shoulder arthroscopy after long head tendon degenerative injury of biceps brachii.

Methods

Thirty-seven cases of chronic degenerative injury of long head tendon of biceps brachii were studied retrospectively. All of them were degenerative tears of long head tendon of biceps brachii without rotator cuff tears. The intertuberous sulcus formation with high tendon fixation using suture anchor was performed under shoulder arthroscopy. The VAS, ASES and Constant scores of shoulder joint were compared before operation, and on the 3rd day, 14th day and at 1st month, 3rd month and 6th month day after operation, and the incidence of complications was also counted.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were observed and followed up for 6 months without Popeye sign being found. Two patients still had mild painful muscle spasm at 3 and 6 months after operation. Compared with preoperative VAS score, postoperative VAS score continued to decline significantly, especially 1 month after operation. The ASES score and Constant score of shoulder joint were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05) .

Conclusions

Intertuberous sulcus formation under shoulder arthroscopy combined with high tendon fixation using suture anchor is an effective method to treat degenerative biceps tendon disease of the humerus.

图1 MRI显示结节间沟空虚肱二头肌腱损伤
图2 探查确认肱二头肌长头肌腱退变性撕裂
图3 挑开结节间沟内肌腱,进行结节间沟成形
图4 在结节间沟高位置入带线锚钉
图5 用双线锚钉进行肌腱的结节间沟固定
图6 术后6个月肩关节上举活动功能情况(图A);术后6个月肩关节外展活动功能情况(图B)
图7 手术前、后肩关节VAS评分
图8 手术前、后肩关节ASES评分和Constant评分
[1]
Frank RM, Cotter EJ, Strauss EJ, et al. Management of Biceps tendon pathology: from the glenoid to the radial tuberosity[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2018, 26(4): e77-e89.
[2]
Amouyel T,Le Moulec YP,Tarissi N,et al. Arthroscopic Biceps tenodesis using interference screw fixation in the bicipital groove [J] . Arthrosc Tech, 2017, 6(5): e1953-e1957.
[3]
Forsythe B, Zuke WA, Puzzitiello RN, et al. Arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with tenodesis screw[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2018, 7(5): e417-e422.
[4]
Ren YM, Duan YH, Sun YB, et al. Is arthroscopic repair superior to biceps tenotomy and tenodesis for type II SLAP lesions? A meta-analysis of RCTs and observational studies[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1): 48.
[5]
Calcei JG, Boddapati V, Altchek DW, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of injuries to the biceps and superior labral complex in overhead athletes[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2018, 11(1): 63-71.
[6]
Stathellis A, Brilakis E, Georgoulis JD, et al. Treatment of SLAP Lesions[J]. Open Orthop J, 2018, 12 : 288-294.
[7]
Hong CK, Yeh ML, Chang CH, et al. Comparison of changes in shoulder functions between biceps tenotomy and tenodesis in an animal model[J]. Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol, 2018, 15 : 17-22.
[8]
Tan H, Wang D, Lebaschi AH, et al. Comparison of bone tunnel and cortical surface tendon-to-bone healing in a rabbit model of biceps tenodesis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2018, 100(6): 479-486.
[9]
McCrum CL, Alluri RK, Batech M, et al. Complications of biceps tenodesis based on location, fixation, and indication: a review of 1526 shoulders[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(3): 461-469.
[10]
Poberaj B, Marjanovi B, Zupancic M, et al. Biomechanical comparison of the three techniques for arthroscopic suprapectoral bicepstenodesis: implant-free intraosseous tendon fixation with Cobra Guide, interference screw and suture anchor[J].Musculoskelet Surg, 2020, 104(1):49-57
[11]
Angelo RL. Surgical management of proximal long head biceps tendon disorders[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev, 2018, 26(4): 176-180.
[12]
Morse KW, Eno JJ, Altchek DW, et al. Injuries of the biceps and superior labral complex in overhead athletes[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2019, 12(2): 72-79.
[13]
Forsythe B, Agarwalla A, Puzzitiello RN, et al. Rates and risk factors for revision open and arthroscopic proximal biceps tenodesis[J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2019, 7(2): 2325967118825473.
[14]
Pouliquen L, Berhouet J, Istvan M, et al. Popeye sign: frequency and functional impact[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2018, 104(6): 817-822.
[15]
Corpus KT, Garcia GH, Liu JN, et al. Long head of biceps tendon management: a survey of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons[J]. HSS J, 2018, 14(1): 34-40.
[16]
Hassan S, Patel V. Biceps tenodesis versus biceps tenotomy for biceps tendinitis without rotator cuff tears[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2019, 10(2): 248-256.
[17]
Consigliere P, Salamat S, Kader N, et al. The X-Pulley technique for subpectoral long head of the biceps tenodesis using all-sutureAnchors[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2019, 8(2): e189-e197.
[18]
Hohmann E. Editorial commentary: shoulder subpectoral biceps tenodesis significantly increases the humeral fracture risk-Is this a reason to look for alternatives?[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(3): 814-815.
[19]
Kongmalai P. Arthroscopic extra-articular suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with knotless suture anchor[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2019, 29(2): 493-497.
[20]
Hong CK, Hsu KL, Kuan FC, et al. Biomechanical evaluation of a transtendinous all-suture anchor technique versus interference screw technique for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis in a cadaveric model[J]. Arthroscopy, 2018, 34(6): 1755-1761.
[21]
Hong CK, Chang CH, Chiang FL, et al. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis: double knotless screw fixation is superior to single knotless screw fixation[J].Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2018, 138(8): 1127-1134.
[22]
Urita A, Funakoshi T, Amano T, et al. Predictive factors of long head of the biceps tendon disorders-the bicipital groove morphology and subscapularis tendon tear[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016,25(3): 384-389.
[1] 张博, 林源, 王志为, 任世祥. 关节镜止点重建术治疗中老年肩关节盂唇损伤的初步疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 13(03): 273-277.
[2] 周传海, 李方奇, 侯景义, 周敏, 郭江, 于萌蕾, 亚穆罕默德·阿力克, 黎清悦, 杨睿. 回顾性分析影响SLAP损伤手术治疗方式的决策性因素[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 14-21.
阅读次数
全文


摘要