切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2019, Vol. 07 ›› Issue (04) : 294 -300. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2019.04.002

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位
何继业1, 张家红1, 蔡贵泉1, 王晖1, 王栋梁1,()   
  1. 1. 200092 上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-14 出版日期:2019-11-05
  • 通信作者: 王栋梁
  • 基金资助:
    上海市科委课题(13DZ1940704)

Arthroscopically-assisted triple bundles reconstruction for treatment of Rockwood type III acute acromioclavicular joint separations

Jiye He1, Jiahong Zhang1, Guiquan Cai1, Hui Wang1, Dongliang Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200092, China
  • Received:2019-06-14 Published:2019-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Dongliang Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author:Wang Dongliang, Email:
引用本文:

何继业, 张家红, 蔡贵泉, 王晖, 王栋梁. 关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2019, 07(04): 294-300.

Jiye He, Jiahong Zhang, Guiquan Cai, Hui Wang, Dongliang Wang. Arthroscopically-assisted triple bundles reconstruction for treatment of Rockwood type III acute acromioclavicular joint separations[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2019, 07(04): 294-300.

目的

探讨关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析上海交通大学医学院附属新华医院骨科采用关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗21例急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位患者的资料,均为闭合性损伤。术后3、6、12个月对所有患者进行术后临床效果和影像学评价。根据术后影像学资料评估复位再丢失情况,采用Constant评分和上肢功能(disabilities of arm,shoulder and hand,DASH)评分评估患者肩关节功能。探讨术中关节镜辅助治疗的意义和价值。

结果

术中关节镜探查发现4例合并软组织损伤,并进行一期镜下修复。所有患者术后均未发生喙突骨折和襻断裂。影像学评估提示术后6~12个月有6例患者(28.6%)出现轻度复位丢失,但与Constant评分和DASH评分无显著相关性,没有患者要求取出内固定。

结论

关节镜辅助下三束重建治疗急性Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位是一种创伤小、安全、临床效果确切的手术方法。急性肩锁关节脱位通常由高能量损伤造成,在手术中关节镜探查肩关节能发现合并的软组织损伤,并进行一期修复,有利于肩关节功能的恢复,避免二次手术。

Background

Acromioclavicular joint dislocation is a common shoulder joint injury, which is very common in traffic accidents and contact sports, and there are far more male patients than females. The gold standard for the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood type III has been controversial. Many studies have suggested that Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation can achieve better clinical result after conservative treatment, but some studies have found that there are still persistent pain and dysfunction in conservative treatment. Some authors advocate surgical treatment of type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation in young and active patients to restore normal shoulder function. Recent studies have shown that a controlled study of Rockwood type III patients has found that surgical treatment has better function and appearance than conservative treatment. Currently, commonly used hook plate for the treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation, postoperative complications including pain, acromion erosion, subacromial impingement, and the need for secondary surgery to remove implants. Some doctors have achieved good results with Endobutton single-bundle reconstruction. Studies have shown that acromioclavicular joint dislocation often associated with other soft tissue injuries of the shoulder joint. At present, there is no relevant research report on the clinical efficacy of triple bundles reconstruction (cone ligament, oblique ligament, acromioclavicular ligament) assisted by arthroscopy in the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Methods

1. General information:This study was included from January 2014 to March 2017. We used triple bundles reconstruction assisted by arthroscopy to treat 21 patients with Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation. There were 15 males and 6 females, aged 25-56, mean (34.70 ± 7.25) years old. Causes of injury: 12 cases of traffic injuries, 5 cases of falls, 4 cases of sports injuries. The time from injury to surgery was 1 to 5 days, with an average of (2.7 ± 2.5) days.2. Inclusion and exclusion criteria:Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with X-ray and CT showed a dislocation of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint; (2) closed injury within an injury time of 2 weeks; (3) age≥ 18 years old. Exclusion criteria: (1) Open fractures, multiple fractures, such as shoulder fractures, coracoid fractures, glenoid fractures, etc.; (2) combined with vascular and/or nerve injury; (3) no follow-up data.3. Surgical method:General anesthesia, beach chair position, the shoulder of the affected side was completely freed, and the back and head were safely fixed and protected. After sterile disinfection, the posterior approach of the shoulder joint was established, and the arthroscope entered the shoulder joint to probe the labrum, biceps tendon and rotator cuff. If a combined injury was found, a first-stage repair was performed immediately. Viewing from posterior portal, the under surface of coracoid was prepared from anterior working portal. The arthroscope was transferred to the subacromial space, rotator cuff was explored, and then the soft tissue under the clavicle was cleaned. The broken coracoclavicular ligament was observed and carefully protected and retained.A transverse incision was made above the distal end of the clavicle, about 4 cm. From the acromioclavicular joint to the proximal end of the clavicle 1.5 cm and 4 cm was drilled vertically above the clavicle with a 2.0 mm diameter Kirschner wire respectively. Using the Arthrex acromioclavicular joint locator under the monitoring of the lateral approach arthroscopy, centered at the base of the coracoid, drilled with a 4.0 mm K-wire hollow drill, using Arthrex special guide wire and No. 2 PDS line Fiber tape (Arthrex, USA) pulled the four ends from the coracoid into the tunnel, and the four ends of the two wires were pulled into the two clavicle tunnels and pulled out from the clavicle. Two Fiber tapes were placed under the coracoid with a Dog bone plate (Arthrex, USA) , and the four ends above the clavicle were carefully pulled, and the Dog bone plate was seated firmly under the coracoid. Use the periosteal stripper to force down and forward at the distal end of the clavicle, and at the same time top up the elbow joint to completely recover the acromioclavicular joint and continue to recover the acromioclavicular joint slightly. At this point, a 2.0 mm diameter K-wire was used to drive the distal clavicle from the outside of the shoulder to maintain the reduction. Firmly tighten the four ends of the Fiber tape and puncture the two stencils to the surface of the clavicle. Fix the Fiber tape knot, expose the acromioclavicular joint, find the stump of the acromioclavicular ligament, suture it with mattress-suture, and if the end of the ligament is completely avulsed, the distal end of the clavicle is drilled in the forward and backward direction to the No. 2 Fiber wire. The bone tunnel was sutured and fixed, and the temporary Kirschner wire was pulled out, the shoulder joint was moved, and the C-arm machine was fluoroscopy, the reduction was not lost, and the wound was finally closed layer by layer. 4. Postoperative treatment and evaluation of efficacy: The shoulder was in a sling for protection within 4 weeks after surgery. Passive motion was started within 2 weeks. Pendulum-like movement started after 2 weeks, and gradually started active activity training and strength exercises after 4 weeks step by step. 3 months after surgery resume normal exercise and work. Postoperative follow-up included symptoms such as pain, range of shoulder motion, signs of skin irritation, and subacromial impingement. Constant score was evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. The total score was 100 points: >86 was excellent, 71-85 was good, 56-70 was normal, and ≤50 was poor. The disabilities of arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) score was: 0-25 was excellent, 26-50 was good, 51-75 was moderate, and 76-100 was poor. X-ray of bilateral anterior-posterior, west point view, and bilateral weight-bearing view were taken at the first day after operation and the later follow-up. The Scheibel method was used to measure the reduction score of the acromioclavicular joint: the distance between the acromion and the lateral clavicle (ACD) and the distance between the coracoid and the clavicle (CCD) . ACD was the distance from the medial edge of the acromion to the midpoint of the lateral clavicle. CCD was the vertical distance from the upper edge of the coracoid to the lower edge of the clavicle. The gap increasing by ≤30% from the opposite was defined as a slight reduction loss, and >30% was defined as a severe reduction loss. 5. Statistical processing:The measurement data were expressed as mean±standard deviation. SPSS16.0 software was used for data processing. The Constant score and DASH score of the measurement data were compared by Wilcoxon signed rank sum test. The correlation between reduction loss and Constant score was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation test. P< 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

Twenty-one patients were included in this study. The injury to operation time was 1 to 5 days, with an average of (2.7 ± 2.5) days. All patients suffered from closed injuries. The operation time was 85-130 min, average (108.6±16.3) min, and the wounds healed primarily. No infection occurred. The postoperative shoulder functional score and quality of life score at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery are shown in Table 1. It can be seen from the table that the postoperative scores continue to increase over time. Constant score at 12 months follow-up shows, excellent in 18 cases, good in 2 cases, generally in 1 case, the excellent and good rate was 95.2%; according to DASH score, excellent in 17 cases, good in 2 cases, generally in 2 cases, the excellent rate is 90.5%. Postoperative radiological evaluation is shown in Table 2. One day after surgery, the acromioclavicular joint was well-reduction, and there was no difference compared with the healthy side (P=0.16) , but after 3 months, there was a slight loss of the reduction. There was a 0.9 mm reduction loss in acromioclavicular joint, and 0.8 mm between the coracoid and clavicle more than the healthy side, which is a slight reduction loss, but the displacement is no longer increased with time any more. Moreover, this reduction loss was not significantly associated with Constant score or the DASH score (P= 0.23) . No other complications occurred after the operation, such as deep infection, poor wound healing, coracoid fracture, acromioclavicular joint pain, internal fixation loosening, and no secondary surgery was needed to remove the internal fixation due to patient discomfort.

Conclusions

Arthroscopically assisted triple bundle reconstruction for the treatment of acute Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint separation is a minimally invasive, safe and clinically effective surgical procedure. Acute acromioclavicular joint separation is often caused by a high-energy injury. During the operation, arthroscopic exploration of the shoulder joint can find the concomitant soft tissue injury and a primary repair can be performed simultaneously, which is beneficial to the recovery of the shoulder joint function and secondary surgery can be avoided.

图1 患者,男,32岁,骑摩托车摔伤致Rockwood Ⅲ肩锁关节脱位,术前X线正位片(图A)示RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位,术前CT三维重建(图B)示锁骨向后上方脱位,术后1 d X线片(图C)和术后12个月X线片(图D)示复位良好,没有复位丢失
图2 患者,男,26岁,运动伤致右肩Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位(图A),术后1 d X线片(图B)示肩锁关节复位良好,术后12个月X线片(图C)示复位有轻度丢失
表1 患者术后肩关节功能评分及生命质量得分(分,±s)
表2 肩锁关节术后再移位的放射学评价(mm,±s)
[1]
Kaplan LD, Flanigan DC, Norwig J, et al. Prevalence and variance of shoulder injuries in elite collegiate football players[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2005,33(8):1142-1146.
[2]
Kelly BT, Barnes RP, Powell JW, et al. Shoulder injuries to quarterbacks in the national football league[J]. Am J Sports Med,2004,32(2):328-331.
[3]
Rolf O, Hann von Weyhern A, Ewers A, et al. Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood Ⅲ-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2008,128(10):1153-1157.
[4]
Bjerneld H, Hovelius L, Thorling J. Acromio-clavicular separations treated conservatively. a 5-year follow-up study[J]. Acta Orthop Scand, 1983,54(5):743-745.
[5]
Taft TN, Wilson FC, Oglesby JW. Dislocation of the acromioclavicular joint. An end-result study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1987,69(7):1045-1051.
[6]
Mouhsine E, Garofalo R, Crevoisier X, et al. Grade I and II acromioclavicular dislocations: results of conservative treatment[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2003,12(6):599-602.
[7]
Schlegel TF, Burks RT, Marcus RL, et al. A prospective evaluation of untreated acute grade Ⅲ acromioclavicular separations[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2001,29(6):699-703.
[8]
Wojtys EM, Nelson G. Conservative treatment of Grade Ⅲ acromioclavicular dislocations[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res,1991,(268):112-119.
[9]
Ryhänen J, Niemelä E, Kaarela O, et al. Stabilization of acute, complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations with a new C hook implant[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2003,12(5):442-445.
[10]
Gstettner C, Tauber M, Hitzl W, et al. Rockwood type Ⅲ acromioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008,17(2):220-225.
[11]
Lizaur A, Sanz-Reig J, Gonzalez-Parreño S. Long-term results of the surgical treatment of type Ⅲ acromioclavicular dislocations: an update of a previous report[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br),2011,93(8):1088-1092.
[12]
Korsten K, Gunning AC, Leenen LP. Operative or conservative treatment in patients with Rockwood type Ⅲ acromioclavicular dislocation: a systematic review and update of current literature[J]. Int Orthop, 2014,38(4):831-838.
[13]
Chen CH, Dong QR, Zhou, RK,et al. Effects of hook plate on shoulder function after treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Int J Clin Exp Med,2014, 7(9):2564-2570.
[14]
Tischer T, Salzmann GM, EI-Azab H,et al. Incidence of associated injuries with acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations types Ⅲ through V[J]. Am J Sports Med,2009,37(1):136-139.
[15]
Hootman JM. Acromioclavicular dislocation: conservative or surgical therapy[J]. J Athl Train,2004,39(1):10-11.
[16]
Bannister GC, Wallace WA, Stableforth PG, et al. The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br),1989,71(5):848-850.
[17]
Tauber M. Management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations: current concepts[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2013,133(7):985-995.
[18]
Galatz LM, Williams GR Jr. Fractures in Adults [M]. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005:1332.
[19]
Kennedy JC, Cameron H. Complete dislocation of the acromio-clavicular joint[J]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br),1954,36-B(2):202-208.
[20]
Beitzel K, Obopilwe E, Apostolakos J, et al. Rotational and translational stability of different methods for direct acromioclavicular ligament repair in anatomic acromioclavicular joint reconstruction[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2014,42(9):2141-2148.
[21]
Beitzel K, Cote MP, Apostolakos J, et al. Current concepts in the treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. Arthroscopy,2013,29(2):387-397.
[22]
Ma R, Smith PA, Smith MJ,et al. Managing and recognizing complications after treatment of acromioclavicular joint repair or reconstruction[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med,2015, 8(1):75-82.
[23]
Pan Z, Zhang H, Sun C,et al. Arthroscopy-assisted reconstruction of coracoclavicular ligament by Endobutton fixation for treatment of acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,2015,135(1):9-16.
[24]
Struhl S, Theodore S. Wolfson TS. Closed-Loop Double Endobutton Technique for Repair of Unstable Distal Clavicle Fractures[J]. Orthop J Sports Med,2016,4(7):2325967116657810.
[25]
Arrigoni P, Brady PC, Zottarelli L, et al. Associated lesions requiring additional surgical treatment in grade 3 acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]`. Arthroscopy, 2014,30(1):6-10.
[1] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[2] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[3] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[4] 肖志满, 庄锡琪, 龚煜. 关节镜下Lasso-loop Gould术式治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 280-284.
[5] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[6] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[7] 冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[8] 王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[9] 王利航, 孙官文, 包呼和, 倪熙宇, 张万印, 黄斐, 杨鹏波. 三种手术方式治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 332-343.
[10] 陈利, 王锦海, 董浩男, 李利军. 锁骨钩钢板在肩锁关节脱位治疗中的不足及改良[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 377-381.
[11] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[12] 蒋永东, 耿启砥, 吴宇峰, 高世华. 肩锁关节脱位的文献计量学分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 246-256.
[13] 王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[14] 唐晓俞, 唐小高, 王小芃, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 邓凯文. 喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位的趋势及争议[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 103-106.
[15] 唐晓俞, 邓凯文, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 王小芃. 关节镜下V-Y结缝合方式与缝线桥技术修复中型肩袖损伤的比较[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 107-114.
阅读次数
全文


摘要