切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 210 -217. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2025.04.004

论著

关节镜下肩袖修复术后肩痛管理策略对短期上肢功能恢复的影响
温宁1,(), 刘松浪2, 孙剑光2, 陈济卫3   
  1. 1514031 梅州市人民医院运动医学科
    2514031 梅州市人民医院关节外科
    3514031 梅州市人民医院甲状腺外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-24 出版日期:2025-11-05
  • 通信作者: 温宁
  • 基金资助:
    梅州市科技计划项目(2023C0301178)

Impact of shoulder pain management strategies after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on short-term upper extremity function recovery

Ning Wen1,(), Songlang Liu2, Jianguang Sun2, Jiwei Chen3   

  1. 1Department of Sports Medicine, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou 514031, China
    2Department of Joint Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou 514031, China
    3Department of Thyroid Surgery, Meizhou People's Hospital, Meizhou 514031, China
  • Received:2025-03-24 Published:2025-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Ning Wen
引用本文:

温宁, 刘松浪, 孙剑光, 陈济卫. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后肩痛管理策略对短期上肢功能恢复的影响[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 210-217.

Ning Wen, Songlang Liu, Jianguang Sun, Jiwei Chen. Impact of shoulder pain management strategies after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on short-term upper extremity function recovery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(04): 210-217.

目的

探究关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复后肩痛管理策略对上肢功能、日常生活能力等早期功能结局的影响。

方法

选取2022年8月至2024年11月于本院接受关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复术的80例患者。采用随机数字表法进行分组(由统计软件生成1~80随机数字,按入院顺序分配,奇数纳入常规组,偶数纳入管理组),常规组接受常规镇痛干预,管理组执行个性化多模式镇痛+心理干预+阶梯式康复训练。对比两组干预前与干预3个月后的富格迈耶上肢运动功能评分表(Fugl-Mmeyer assessment of upper extremity, FMA)、美国肩肘外科协会评分系统(American shoulder and elbow surgeons, ASES)、视觉模拟评分法(visual analogue scale, VAS)、肩关节活动度及改良Barthel指数(modified Barthel index,MBI)、肩袖愈合情况。

结果

干预后两组FMA、ASES评分均较前升高(P<0.05),且管理组FMA、ASES评分显著高于常规组(P<0.05);轻度疼痛亚组:两组VAS评分均降至1分以下,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);中度疼痛亚组:管理组VAS评分显著低于常规组(P<0.05);重度疼痛亚组:管理组VAS评分显著低于常规组(P<0.05)。干预后两组肩关节的前屈、外展、内旋及外旋活动度均较前提升,且管理组肩关节活动改善程度显著优于常规组(P<0.05);干预后两组MBI评分均较前上升,且管理组显著高于常规组(P<0.05);管理组再撕裂率为4.76%,显著低于常规组的21.05%(P<0.05),且管理组在撕裂位置分类上例数均低于常规组。

结论

针对关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复术患者采用肩痛管理策略,可显著提高上肢与肩关节功能,促进肩关节活动度恢复,降低撕裂再发生率,有效缓解疼痛并提升日常生活能力,有利于患者早期康复。

Background

The rotator cuff is a complex of four tendons that wrap around the head of the humerus, consisting of the anterior subscapularis muscle, the superior supraspinatus muscle, the posterior supraspinatus muscle, and the teres minor muscle. It is named for its shape, resembling a sleeve, and is crucial for maintaining the function and stability of the shoulder joint. Rotator cuff tear is an important cause of shoulder pain and limited joint movement. It is often triggered by factors such as overuse of the shoulder and external trauma, which can lead to weakened elasticity of the muscle tissue and result in partial or full-thickness tears of the shoulder muscle structure. Among them, athletes who repeatedly perform shoulder activities over a long period, such as swimmers, tennis players, and shot put players, are prone to injuries due to excessive use of the shoulder joint and significant mechanical pressure on the rotator cuff. The elderly are also a high-risk group for this disease. As people age, the rotator cuff tendons undergo degenerative changes, and minor injuries or impacts may cause acute rotator cuff tears. In addition to causing pain around the shoulder, rotator cuff tears can also affect the quality of life of patients due to shoulder dysfunction and increase their self-perceived burden. Epidemiological studies have shown that the incidence of rotator cuff tears accounts for 14%-32% of shoulder diseases and increases with age. At present, arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is the mainstream surgical method for treating rotator cuff tears in clinical practice. It has the advantages of minor trauma, quick recovery, and few complications. It can minimize the damage to shoulder joint tissues and facilitate the repair of rotator cuff tissues. Most patients can achieve shoulder joint function that is close to normal after this surgery. However, postoperative pain in patients remains an urgent clinical problem to be solved. Patients often resist rehabilitation exercises due to shoulder pain, which not only affects the recovery of upper limb function but may also lead to complications such as muscle atrophy and shoulder adhesions. Although the commonly used drug analgesic method in clinical practice can relieve pain, due to the limited analgesic effect and the different tolerance of patients, it is difficult to achieve the ideal analgesic state, which affects rehabilitation compliance.

Objective

To explore the impact of shoulder pain management strategies after arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair on early functional outcomes such as upper limb function and activities of daily living.

Methods

A total of 80 patients who underwent arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair in our hospital from August 2022 to November 2024 were selected. The groups were grouped by the random number table method (random numbers ranging from 1 to 80 were generated by statistical software and assigned according to the order of admission. Odd numbers were included in the conventional group and even numbers in the management group. The conventional group received conventional analgesic intervention, while the management group implemented personalized multimodal analgesia + psychological intervention + stepwise rehabilitation training. The Fugmeyer upper limb motor function scale (FMA), the evaluation criteria of the American society for shoulder and elbow surgery (ASES) scoring system, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, the range of motion of the shoulder joint, the modified Barthel index (MBI), and the rotator cuff healing conditions were compared between the two groups before the intervention and 3 months after the intervention.

Result

After the intervention, the FMA and ASES scores of both groups increased compared with those before (P<0.05), and the FMA and ASES scores of the management group were significantly higher than those of the conventional group (P<0.05). Mild pain subgroup: The VAS scores of both groups dropped below 1 point, and there was no statistically significant difference between the groups (P>0.05). Moderate pain subgroup: The VAS score of the management group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). In the severe pain subgroup, the VAS score of the management group was significantly lower than that of the conventional group (P<0.05). After the intervention, the ranges of motion of forward flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation of the shoulder joint in both groups were improved compared with before, and the improvement degree of shoulder joint motion in the management group was significantly better than that in the conventional group (P<0.05). After the intervention, the MBI scores of both groups increased compared with those before, and the management group was significantly higher than the conventional group (P<0.05). The re-tearing rate in the management group was 4.76%, significantly lower than 21.05% in the conventional group (P<0.05), and the number of cases classified by tear location in the management group was lower than that in the conventional group.

Conclusion

The application of shoulder pain management strategies for patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair can significantly improve the function of the upper limb and shoulder joint, promote the recovery of shoulder joint range of motion, reduce the recurrence rate of tear, effectively relievePainn and enhance the ability of daily living, which is conducive to the early rehabilitation of patients.

表1 两组患者临床资料比较
图1 疼痛管理策略流程图注:VAS为视觉模拟评分法;NSAIDs为非甾体类抗炎药
表2 两组患者FMA、ASES评分对比(分,±s)
表3 两组患者轻度疼痛程度的疗效比较(分,±s)
表4 两组患者中度疼痛程度的疗效比较(分,±s)
表5 两组患者重度疼痛程度的疗效比较(分,±s)
表6 两组患者肩关节活动度对比(°,±s)
表7 两组患者MBI评分对比(分,±s)
图2 肩袖修复术后超声图像注:图像中可清晰显示修复后的肩袖结构(HH)及冈上肌腱止点区域(GT),周围黄色箭头标记为肩袖修复靶区,明确修复组织与周围正常解剖结构的位置关系,GT为超声图像中冈上肌腱与肱骨头大结节止点的关键参照结构,可辅助判断肩袖修复后的解剖对位情况
表8 两组患者肩袖愈合评估[例(%)]
[1]
Hyde ZB, McMurtrie JT, Lee SR, et al. Partial rotator cuff repair versus debridement for irreparable rotator cuff tears: A systematic review[J]. J Orthop, 2023,49:167-171.
[2]
Werthel JD, Fleurette J, Besnard M, et al. Long-term results of revision rotator cuff repair for failed cuff repair: a minimum 10-year follow-up study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2024,33(2):300-305.
[3]
Guevara BG. Editorial Commentary: In Contrast to Chronic, Degenerative Rotator Cuff Tears, the Critical Shoulder Angle in Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tears Can Be Ignored[J]. Arthroscopy, 2023,39(2):232-233.
[4]
柏帆,向柄彦,周阳阳,等.保留残端骨髓刺激的镜下肩袖修复术[J].中国矫形外科杂志, 2024, 32(2):97-103.
[5]
Gatto L, Fernando A, Patel M, et al. Subacromial contact after acromioplasty in the rotator cuff deficient shoulder[J]. J Orthop Res, 2024,42(3):588-597.
[6]
王磊,田佳宁,周战辉,等.三种关节镜下肩袖修复技术的疗效比较及术后慢性疼痛的影响因素分析[J].中国内镜杂志, 2024, 30(8):42-51.
[7]
张凯搏,唐新,李箭,等.2019年美国骨科医师学会(AAOS)肩袖损伤临床实践指南解读[J].中国运动医学杂志,2020,39(5):403-412.
[8]
Hirayama K, Matsuda M, Teruya M, et al. Trends in amount of use to upper limb function in patients with subacute stroke: a cross-sectional study using segmental regression analysis[J]. BMC Neurol, 2023,23(1):429.
[9]
Fieseler G, Laudner K, Cornelius J, et al. Longitudinal Analysis of the ASES and Constant-Murley Scores, and the Internal Rotation/Shift and Jobe Tests Following Arthroscopic Repair of Supraspinatus Lesions[J]. J Pers Med, 2023,13(9):1304.
[10]
蒋颜,胡可慧,杨津,等.盆底肌筋膜手法联合磁电治疗女性慢性盆腔疼痛综合征的疗效观察[J].中国性科学, 2024, 33(4):75-79.
[11]
谈钊,王小英,蔡晓辉,等.手法松解术联合几丁糖治疗肩周炎[J].长春中医药大学学报, 2024, 40(8):883-887.
[12]
邹瑜聪,林炜明,周静,等.非医疗专业护工使用Barthel指数评估脑卒中患者日常生活活动能力的可行性分析[J].中国医药导报, 2024, 21(13):120-124.
[13]
李树,李旭旭,茹晋丽.肌肉骨骼超声和MRI检查在幼年特发性关节炎诊治中的应用进展[J].国际儿科学杂志, 2024, 51(11):767-771.
[14]
Yanik EL, Saccone NL, Aleem AW, et al. Factors associated with genetic markers for rotator cuff disease in patients with atraumatic rotator cuff tears[J]. J Orthop Res, 2024,42(5):934-941.
[15]
Hong G, Kong X, Zhang L, et al. Changes in the Lateral Acromion Angle in Rotator Cuff Tear Patients with Acromioplasty[J]. Orthop Surg, 2024,16(2):471-480.
[16]
Kokubu T, Mifune Y, Inui A. Clinical outcomes of medialized single-row repair with fascia lata graft augmentation for large and massive rotator cuff tears[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2024,33(3):e153-e161.
[17]
张旭超,徐卫东.反式全肩关节置换治疗不可修复性肩袖撕裂的临床应用及研究进展[J].中华骨科杂志, 2024, 44(14):987-994.
[18]
Butenschoen VM, Wriedt F, Meyer B, et al. Neurocognitive monitoring in patients undergoing opioid pain medication after spinal surgery: a feasibility study of a new monitoring method[J]. Acta Neurochir (Wien), 2023,165(2):335-340.
[19]
占云燕,林燕,吴珊珊.三阶梯止痛法联合心理护理在脊柱转移瘤难治性癌痛患者中的应用效果[J].中国医药导报, 2024, 21(6):168-171.
[20]
束美燕,秦洁,闵英,等.吸入性芳香疗法对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停低通气综合征术后疼痛影响[J].临床军医杂志,2023,51(3):266-268.
[21]
Pu T, Liu Y, Wang J, et al. Acupuncture and other traditional Chinese medicine therapies in the treatment of children’s tic syndrome: A network meta-analysis[J]. Front Neurosci, 2023,17:1156308.
[22]
王宏杰,白天宇,许月泠,等.经皮穴位电刺激联合多模式镇痛对全膝置换术后早期活动痛及静息痛的影响[J].北京中医药, 2024,43(7):723-728.
[23]
胡文帅,范文俊,赵进喜.关节镜与开放手术治疗老年肩峰撞击综合征合并全层肩袖损伤的疗效比较[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2023,38(7):709-713.
[24]
Silva GN, Brandão VGA, Perez MV, et al. Neuroinflammatory Approach to Surgical Trauma: Biomarkers and Mechanisms of Immune and Neuroendocrine Responses[J]. J Pers Med, 2024,14(8):829.
[25]
Takeda Y, Fujii K, Suzue N, et al. A modified Patte classification system for rotator cuff tendon retraction to predict reparability and tendon healing in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2024,32(6):1579-1590.
[26]
Tanaka R, Lo Vecchio S, Aliotta GE, et al. The Role of Peripheral N-Methyl-D-Asparate (NMDA) Receptors in Itch and Pain: A Narrative Review[J]. Eur J Pain, 2025,29(7):e70082.
[27]
Fang MQ. Functional assessment and influencing factors after staged functional training in patients with ankle fractures[J]. World J Clin Cases, 2024,12(21):4499-4507.
[1] 徐留海, 王颉, 田志鹏, 黄晶, 曾勇, 王茂朋, 刘丛钊, 周游. 影响盘状半月板损伤术后疗效的危险因素研究[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 528-534.
[2] 张志勇, 王俊义, 韩长旭, 孟晨阳, 刘明, 韩娇. 侧-侧修复术治疗放射状外侧半月板后根部撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 637-641.
[3] 袁超, 郑坤, 屈增辉, 喻元, 邓永军, 王薪华. 腕关节镜在桡骨远端关节内骨折内固定的应用[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 499-504.
[4] 李祖希, 吴昊, 邹国友. 肩袖修补术后延迟注射富血小板血浆的早期疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 359-365.
[5] 李政, 李雳, 欧传双, 杨琼, 李长树. 对比分析单束不同方式保残重建治疗前交叉韧带断裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 162-171.
[6] 胡海涛, 王虎虎, 贺加明, 刘鹏波, 高山松, 李宏伟, 胡杰. 经三后内侧入路关节镜治疗后交叉韧带胫骨止点撕脱骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 172-177.
[7] 王春久, 田向东, 谭冶彤, 薛志鹏, 张伟, 刘昂. 单平面胫骨高位截骨联合关节镜治疗内翻型膝骨关节炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 185-192.
[8] 管本科, 胡力轩, 刘宇. 关节镜下治疗胫骨平台骨折的应用现状及进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(02): 243-248.
[9] 杨浩, 王春岭, 席少华, 尹素然. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜手术治疗膝骨关节炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(06): 499-504.
[10] 王晶晶, 王辉, 李阿漫, 曾峥. 对肩峰下撞击综合征患者肩关节镜术后居家康复锻炼方案的应用效果与依从性分析[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2025, 20(03): 227-232.
[11] 肖济阳, 任东, 邢丹谋, 王欢, 陈焱, 张明. 创伤性肩关节后脱位的手术技术进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 193-196.
[12] 张靖杰, 江惠祥, 肖棋, 邓辉云, 吴清泉, 郑佳鹏. 改良缝线桥技术与传统缝线桥技术治疗肩袖损伤的临床疗效对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(04): 203-209.
[13] 陈旭升, 任先振, 唐志方, 康凯强, 李川, 袁礼波, 徐永清, 金涛, 王家旭. 关节镜下导航引导双袢固定的Eden-Hybbinette手术治疗复发性肩关节脱位[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 135-145.
[14] 唐洪, 刘俊利, 金正. 肩关节镜下肩袖撕裂修复围手术期焦虑及睡眠管理:一项前瞻性随机对照试验[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 163-169.
[15] 高健, 高雷, 贺飞帆, 陆杨, 高冲. 髓内钉和锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端合并肱骨干骨折的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 87-94.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?