切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (03) : 146 -154. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2025.03.003

论著

164例反式肩关节置换术的并发症分析
王识程, 狄正林, 刘华, 章军辉()   
  1. 315000 宁波市第六医院关节外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-20 出版日期:2025-08-05
  • 通信作者: 章军辉

Analysis of complications in 164 cases of reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Shicheng Wang, Zhenglin Di, Hua Liu, Junhui Zhang()   

  1. Department of Joint Surgery, Ningbo NO.6 Hospital, Ningbo 315000, China
  • Received:2025-01-20 Published:2025-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Junhui Zhang
引用本文:

王识程, 狄正林, 刘华, 章军辉. 164例反式肩关节置换术的并发症分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(03): 146-154.

Shicheng Wang, Zhenglin Di, Hua Liu, Junhui Zhang. Analysis of complications in 164 cases of reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(03): 146-154.

目的

分析探讨国内单中心反式肩关节置换术(reverse shoulder arthroplasty,RSA)的并发症发生情况。

方法

回顾了本院164例由单一主刀医生实施的RSA,患者的平均年龄为(70.2±7.98)岁(范围24~85岁),平均随访期为18.6个月(范围1~96个月),评估了与手术相关的并发症的发生率。

结果

总并发症共计25例,发生率为15.2%,其中主要并发症共计13例(7.9%),包括术中发生肩胛盂骨折2例(1.2%)、肱骨近端骨折4例(2.4%)、肱骨干骨折1例(0.6%)、术后出现假体脱位6例(3.6%),其中3例行翻修手术,包含了2例继发假体周围关节感染;次要并发症包括术后出现手指或腕部麻木8例(4.9%),术后出现切口周围疼痛2例(1.2%),术后出现切口愈合不良2例(1.2%)。其中13例主要并发症中有9例发生在前80例的手术中。

结论

这些结果证明RSA在国内应用中并发症可控,其成功实施的核心在于扎实的肩关节理论基础、严格的学习曲线管理及精准的技术细节把控,为该术式在国内的规范化开展提供了重要的循证依据。

Background

Since the mid-1980s, Professor Grammont's design and promotion of reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has initiated a new area in shoulder joint surgery. Following the FDA approval of RSA in the United States in 2003, its adoption has experienced explosive growth, and RSA has now become an indispensable option for treating various shoulder pathologies. Although initially developed for cuff tear arthropathy (CTA) due to the inability of conventional shoulder arthroplasty to effectively restore stability and function in such cases, its clinical success has expanded its applications to other shoulder conditions. These include massive rotator cuff tears (MRCT) , glenohumeral arthritis with intact rotator cuff, acute proximal humeral fractures, sequelae of proximal humeral fractures, proximal humeral tumors, inflammatory arthropathies, and revision surgeries following failed anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty. With the increasing utilization of RSA, complication rates have concurrently risen, reported to range between 15%-50%. However, given that RSA is frequently employed for clinically challenging conditions—many representing salvage procedures—the relatively high complication rates are not unexpected. Significant variations in reported complication rates exist across studies due to differing definitions of complications and prosthesis heterogeneity. Improvements in RSA concepts, designs, and surgical techniques have led to evolving complication profiles. For instance, early prosthesis designs were associated with higher rates of scapular notching, while contemporary designs have substantially reduced this complication. Consequently, modern prostheses and surgical techniques demonstrate significantly lower revision rates than earlier generations. Therefore, monitoring complication patterns and incidence remains crucial as RSA indications continue to expand and surgical techniques progress. Compared to international experience, RSA adoption in China began later, with limited complication-related research reported. Exceptionally constrained by single-center case volumes, there remains a paucity of domestic studies analyzing complications in cohorts exceeding 100 cases, highlighting the necessity for further investigation in this field.

Objective

To analyze and explore the occurrence of single-center reverse shoulder arthroplasty complications in China.

Methods

A review was conducted on 164 cases of RSA performed by a single surgeon in our hospital. The average age of the patients was (70.2±7.98) years (ranging from 24 to 85 years) , and the average follow-up period was 18.6 months (ranging from 1 to 96 months) . The incidence of surgery-related complications was evaluated.

Results

There were a total of 25 cases of total complications, with an incidence rate of (15.2%) . Among them, there were 13 cases (7.9%) of significant complications, including 2 cases (1.2%) of glenoid fractures during the operation, 4 cases (2.4%) of proximal humeral fractures, 1 case (0.6%) of humeral shaft fractures, and 6 cases (3.6%) of prosthesis dislocation after the operation. Among them, 3 cases underwent revision surgery. It included 2 cases of secondary periprosthetic joint infection. Secondary complications included numbness in fingers or wrists in 8 cases (4.9%) after the operation, pain around the incision in 2 cases (1.2%) after the operation, and poor incision healing in 2 cases (1.2%) after the operation. Among the 13 major complications, nine occurred during the operations of the first 80 cases.

Conclusion

These results prove that the complications of reverse shoulder joint replacement surgery are controllable in domestic applications. The core of its successful implementation lies in the solid theoretical foundation of the shoulder joint, strict management of the learning curve, and precise control of technical details, providing an important evidence-based basis for the standardized development of this surgical method in China.

表1 并发症总结
图1 患者女,70岁,因"固定性前脱位"行RSA,术中出现明显的肩胛盂骨折(图A),但不累及中央孔,肩胛盂基座假体固定牢靠(图B),术中透视(图C)及术后复查拍片(图D)示假体位置良好,后期未出现假体松动等并发症注:RSA为反式肩关节置换术
图2 患者女,67岁,因"肩关节发育不良"行RSA(图A),术中使用电动钻扩髓时出现肱骨干骨折,用上肢加压钢板内固定,术后拍片示骨折复位固定良好(图B-C),术后12周复查拍片示骨折基本愈合,骨折线模糊(图D)注:RSA为反式肩关节置换术
图3 患者男,70岁,因"巨大肩袖撕裂关节镜术后"行RSA(图A),术后3年开始出现复发性脱位(图B-C),行翻修手术,术后拍片示假体位置良好(图D),无再发脱位注:RSA为反式肩关节置换术
图4 患者男,71岁,因"肩袖撕裂关节病"行RSA(图A),术后7年因复发性脱位(图B)行翻修术(图C),术后1个月余出现假体周围感染,行清创+假体取出旷置术(图D),拟二期行翻修手术注:RSA为反式肩关节置换术
[1]
Baulot E, Sirveaux F, Boileau P, et al. Grammont's idea: The story of Paul Grammont’s functional surgery concept and the development of the reverse principle[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(9):2425-2431.
[2]
Kim SH, Wise BL, Zhang Y, et al. Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93(24):2249-2254.
[3]
Schairer WW, Nwachukwu BU, Lyman S, et al. National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(1):91-97.
[4]
Best MJ, Aziz KT, Wilckens JH, et al. Increasing incidence of primary reverse and anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2021, 30(5):1159-1166.
[5]
Ecklund KJ. Rotator cuff tear arthropathy[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2007, 15(6):340-349.
[6]
Ek ET, Neukom L, Catanzaro S, et al. Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for massive irreparable rotator cuff tears in patients younger than 65 years old: results after five to fifteen years[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(9):1199-1208.
[7]
Lenarz C, Shishani Y, McCrum C, et al. Is reverse shoulder arthroplasty appropriate for the treatment of fractures in the older patient? Early observations[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(12):3324-3331.
[8]
Raiss P, Edwards TB, da Silva MR, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of nonunions of the surgical neck of the proximal part of the humerus (type-3 fracture sequelae)[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014, 96(24):2070-2076.
[9]
Young AA, Smith MM, Bacle G, et al. Early results of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2011, 93(20):1915-1923.
[10]
Boileau P, Watkinson D, Hatzidakis AM, et al. Neer Award 2005: The Grammont reverse shoulder prosthesis: results in cuff tear arthritis, fracture sequelae, and revision arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15(5):527-540.
[11]
Shah SS, Gaal BT, Roche AM, et al. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I[J]. JSES Int, 2020, 4(4):929-943.
[12]
Bacle G, Nove-Josserand L, Garaud P, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Follow-up of a Previous Study[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2017, 99(6):454-461.
[13]
Ascione F, Domos P, Guarrella V, et al. Long-term humeral complications after Grammont-style reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(6):1065-1071.
[14]
Zumstein MA, Pinedo M, Old J, et al. Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(1):146-157.
[15]
Kim SC, Kim IS, Jang MC, et al. Complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a concise review[J]. Clin Shoulder Elbow, 2021, 24(1):42-52.
[16]
Van Tongel A, Levy O, Atoun E, et al. Bony increased-offset reversed shoulder arthroplasty: minimizing scapular impingement while maximizing glenoid fixation[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(8):2389-2390.
[17]
Kang JR, Dubiel MJ, Cofield RH, et al. Primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty using contemporary implants is associated with very low reoperation rates[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(6S):S175-S180.
[18]
Shah SS, Roche AM, Sullivan SW, et al. The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part II[J]. JSES Int, 2021, 5(1):121-137.
[19]
Wierks C, Skolasky RL, Ji JH, et al. Reverse total shoulder replacement: intraoperative and early postoperative complications[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(1):225-234.
[20]
Barco R, Savvidou OD, Sperling JW, et al. Complications in reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J]. EFORT Open Rev, 2016, 1(3):72-80.
[21]
Groh GI, Groh GM. Complications rates, reoperation rates, and the learning curve in reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(3):388-394.
[22]
Kempton LB, Ankerson E, Wiater JM. A complication-based learning curve from 200 reverse shoulder arthroplasties[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2011, 469(9):2496-2504.
[23]
Chin PY, Sperling JW, Cofield RH, et al. Complications of total shoulder arthroplasty: are they fewer or different?[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2006, 15(1):19-22.
[24]
Hammond JW, Queale WS. Surgeon experience and clinical and economic outcomes for shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2003, 85(12):2318-2324.
[25]
Walch G, Bacle G, Ladermann A, et al. Do the indications, results, and complications of reverse shoulder arthroplasty change with surgeon’s experience?[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(11):1470-1477.
[26]
Choi S, Bae JH, Kwon YS, et al. Clinical outcomes and complications of cementless reverse total shoulder arthroplasty during the early learning curve period[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2019, 14(1):53.
[27]
Cho CH, Song KS, Koo TW. Clinical Outcomes and Complications during the Learning Curve for Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: An Analysis of the First 40 Cases[J]. Clin Orthop Surg, 2017, 9(2):213-217.
[28]
Dolci A, Melis B, Verona M, et al. Complications and Intraoperative Fractures in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review[J]. Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil, 2021, 12:2151-4585.
[29]
Galvin JW, Kim R, Ment A, et al. Outcomes and complications of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with minimum of 2 years’ follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2022, 31(11):e534-e544.
[30]
Chae J, Siljander M, Wiater JM. Instability in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2018, 26(17):587-596.
[31]
Roche C, Flurin PH, Wright T, et al. An evaluation of the relationships between reverse shoulder design parameters and range of motion, impingement, and stability[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2009, 18(5):734-741.
[32]
Ladermann A, Williams MD, Melis B, et al. Objective evaluation of lengthening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2009, 18(4):588-595.
[33]
Matthewson G, Kooner S, Kwapisz A, et al. The effect of subscapularis repair on dislocation rates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a meta-analysis and systematic review[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(5):989-997.
[34]
Teusink MJ, Pappou IP, Schwartz DG, et al. Results of closed management of acute dislocation after reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(4):621-627.
[35]
Wagner ER, Houdek MT, Elhassan BT, et al. What Are Risk Factors for Intraoperative Humerus Fractures During Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty and Do They Influence Outcomes?[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2015, 473(10):3228-3234.
[36]
Brusalis CM, Taylor SA. Periprosthetic Fractures in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: Current Concepts and Advances in Management[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2020, 13(4):509-519.
[37]
Schick S, Elphingstone J, Murali S, et al. The incidence of shoulder arthroplasty infection presents a substantial economic burden in the United States: a predictive model[J]. JSES Int, 2023, 7(4):636-641.
[38]
Somerson JS, Hsu JE, Neradilek MB, et al. Analysis of 4063 complications of shoulder arthroplasty reported to the US Food and Drug Administration from 2012 to 2016[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(11):1978-1986.
[39]
Contreras ES, Frantz TL, Bishop JY, et al. Periprosthetic Infection After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: a Review[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2020, 13(6):757-768.
[40]
Moeini S, Rasmussen JV, Salomonsson B, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has a higher risk of revision due to infection than anatomical shoulder arthroplasty: 17 730 primary shoulder arthroplasties from the Nordic Arthroplasty Register Association[J]. Bone Joint J, 2019, 101-B(10):702-707.
[41]
Patel A, Calfee RP, Plante M, et al. Propionibacterium acnes colonization of the human shoulder[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2009, 18(6):897-902.
[42]
Morris BJ, O'Connor DP, Torres D, et al. Risk factors for periprosthetic infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(2):161-166.
[43]
Lung BE, Kanjiya S, Bisogno M, et al. Preoperative indications for total shoulder arthroplasty predict adverse postoperative complications[J]. JSES Open Access, 2019, 3(2):99-107.
[44]
Nazzal EM, Herman ZJ, Como M, et al. Shoulder Periprosthetic Joint Infection: Principles of Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2024, 106(23):2265-2275.
[45]
Seok HG, Park JJ, Park SG, et al. Risk Factors for Periprosthetic Joint Infection after Shoulder Arthroplasty: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. J Clin Med, 2022, 11(14):4077.
[46]
Jensen ML, Jensen SL, Bolder M, et al. Previous rotator cuff repair increases the risk of revision surgery for periprosthetic joint infection after reverse shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2023, 32(1):111-120.
[47]
Hsu JE, Bumgarner RE, Matsen FA 3rd, et al. Propionibacterium in Shoulder Arthroplasty: What We Think We Know Today[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2016, 98(7):597-606.
[48]
Kolakowski L, Lai JK, Duvall GT, et al. Neer Award 2018: Benzoyl peroxide effectively decreases preoperative Cutibacterium acnes shoulder burden: a prospective randomized controlled trial[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(9):1539-1544.
[49]
Hsu JE, Whitson AJ, Van Dyke R, et al. Dynamics of Cutibacterium repopulation onto the skin surface of the shoulder after chlorhexidine application[J]. Int Orthop, 2023, 47(6):1511-1515.
[50]
Nowinski RJ, Gillespie RJ, Shishani Y, et al. Antibiotic-loaded bone cement reduces deep infection rates for primary reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a retrospective, cohort study of 501 shoulders[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(3):324-328.
[51]
Gorbaty J, Chan PH, McElvany MD, et al. Tranexamic acid is not associated with decreased infection risk after primary shoulder arthroplasty: a cohort study of 9276 patients[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2023, 32(3):581-588.
[52]
Miquel J, Huang TB, Athwal GS, et al. Vancomycin is effective in preventing Cutibacterium acnes growth in a mimetic shoulder arthroplasty[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2022, 31(1):159-164.
[53]
Belay ES, Danilkowicz R, Bullock G, et al. Single-stage versus two-stage revision for shoulder periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020, 29(12):2476-2486.
[54]
Carofino BC, Brogan DM, Kircher MF, et al. Iatrogenic nerve injuries during shoulder surgery[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2013, 95(18):1667-1674.
[55]
Nagda SH, Rogers KJ, Sestokas AK, et al. Neer Award 2005: Peripheral nerve function during shoulder arthroplasty using intraoperative nerve monitoring[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16(3 Suppl):S2-S8.
[56]
Ball CM. Neurologic complications of shoulder joint replacement[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2017, 26(12):2125-2132.
[57]
Parisien RL, Yi PH, Hou L, et al. The risk of nerve injury during anatomical and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: an intraoperative neuromonitoring study[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(7):1122-1127.
[58]
Leschinger T, Hackl M, Buess E, et al. The risk of suprascapular and axillary nerve injury in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: An anatomic study[J]. Injury, 2017, 48(10):2042-2049.
[59]
Friedman RJ, Barcel DA, Eichinger JK. Scapular Notching in Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2019, 27(6):200-209.
[60]
Di Martino A, Pederiva D, Bordini B, et al. What is the middle term survival of reverse shoulder arthroplasty? A retrospective observational registry-based study[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2023, 33(6):2639-2644.
[1] 张佳宁, 任予. 上臂输液港在乳腺癌患者中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 175-178.
[2] 菅锎宇, 常如玉, 王达, 顼倩茹, 蒋麟, 贾宝雷, 邱宇轩, 梁峰. 进展期食管胃结合部癌不同手术方式的近期疗效研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 517-522.
[3] 杨敏, 辛林璞, 杜峻峰. 三精准管理方案对直肠癌造口术后造口并发症的预防效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 531-534.
[4] 刘小娜, 史博慧, 马晓霞, 陈瑶, 郝娜. 乳腺癌不同手术方式对术后并发症及康复影响的对比观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 551-554.
[5] 欧阳骏骏, 蔡宝, 徐冰. 经脐单孔及常规腹腔镜阑尾切除术对阑尾炎患儿的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 566-569.
[6] 邓吟咏, 钟洁, 蒋理立, 杨婕. 结直肠肿瘤手术后并发症的预测与预防:基于临床研究的最新进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 579-583.
[7] 谢学海, 杨尹默. 我国胰头癌腹腔镜手术的现状、存在问题与展望[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 478-482.
[8] 唐健雄, 李绍杰. 我国腹腔镜疝外科治疗现状、问题与未来[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 355-358.
[9] 宁国龙, 左伟, 侯强强. 两种不同手术方案治疗Meckel憩室肠重复畸形患儿的回顾性研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 380-383.
[10] 辛林璞, 杨敏, 杜峻峰. 五定四观察循证方案对直肠癌造口患者生活质量与应用效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 409-412.
[11] 赵燕玲, 王珩, 秦勤, 李静. 不同手术在食管裂孔疝合并胃食管反流病患者中的应用观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 421-424.
[12] 李盼, 张华秦. 不同腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的疗效比较研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 388-391.
[13] 马文明, 梁朝朝. 肾脏肿瘤保留肾单位手术的技术进展[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 404-411.
[14] 李兴旺, 钟永红, 刘占振, 李月玮, 李庆忠, 姚坤厚, 黄亮. 经肛微创手术(TAMIS)的学习曲线分析[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 353-358.
[15] 王美, 赵勇, 张健, 张俐娜, 丁健华, 曹煜. 基于CT测量肾周脂肪面积对Lap-ISR吻合口并发症的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(05): 367-373.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?