切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2025, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (02) : 95 -100. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2025.02.005

论著

肱骨近端骨折内固定术后内翻畸形的影像学参数分析
王冰1,(), 李守玺1, 张亮银1, 吕长举1, 朱沛1, 张正鹏1   
  1. 1. 730900 白银市第一人民医院(甘肃中医药大学第三附属医院)手足显微外科
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-18 出版日期:2025-05-05
  • 通信作者: 王冰
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省自然科学基金(25JRRD002)

Analysis of radiographic parameters of varus deformity after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures

Bing Wang1,(), Shouxi Li1, Liangyin Zhang1, Changju Lyu1, Pei Zhu1, Zhengpeng Zhang1   

  1. 1. Department of Hand and Foot Microsurgery,Baiyin First People's Hospital,The Third Affiliated of Gansu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Baiyin 730900,China
  • Received:2025-04-18 Published:2025-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Bing Wang
引用本文:

王冰, 李守玺, 张亮银, 吕长举, 朱沛, 张正鹏. 肱骨近端骨折内固定术后内翻畸形的影像学参数分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 95-100.

Bing Wang, Shouxi Li, Liangyin Zhang, Changju Lyu, Pei Zhu, Zhengpeng Zhang. Analysis of radiographic parameters of varus deformity after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2025, 13(02): 95-100.

目的

探讨肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板内固定术后肱骨头内翻畸形的影像学特征及其相关性。

方法

回顾性分析2014年9月至2024年9月期间手术治疗的肱骨近端骨折锁定钢板内固定患者,并筛选出53例术后肱骨头内翻患者,其中男22例、女31例,平均年龄(61.3±5.4)岁。通过术后1年肩胛骨正位X片测量以下参数:(1)肱骨头干角(head shaft angle,HSA);(2)大结节-肩峰距离(distance of great tuberosity to acromion,GT-AC);(3)内侧皮质嵌插值(medial impact, MI);(4)旋转中心高度差(height difference of rotation center of humeral head and glenoid,);(5)大结节-肱骨头距离(distance of humeral head to great tuberosity,HHGT)。采用Pearson相关性分析评估各影像学指标之间的关联性。

结果

HSA与GT-AC呈显著正相关(r=0.694, P<0.001),HSA与MI呈显著负相关(r=-0.986, P<0.001),关节面-大结节距离(r=0.063,P=0.656)及r=0.015, P=0.912)与内翻程度无显著相关性。

结论

MI短缩和GT-AC减小与肱骨头内翻呈显著相关,在临床对肱骨近端骨折术后肱骨头内翻的评估,应考虑这些伴随的影像学特征及其潜在病理机制。

Background

Proximal humeral fractures are common upper limb fractures and have a high incidence among middle-aged and older adults, usually caused by low-energy falls. With the intensification of global population aging, the incidence of proximal humeral fractures is also increasing.Recent epidemiological studies have pointed out that the majority of proximal humeral fractures are displaced. Elderly patients, due to osteoporosis and decreased bone density, tend to have more complex fractures when they occur and face more challenges in the treatment process. For displaced and unstable proximal humeral fractures, open reduction and internal fixation remain the preferred treatment methods when bone quality permits. Open reduction and internal fixation not only help restore the anatomical position of the fracture site but also effectively relieve pain and promote early rehabilitation. Proximal humeral fractures are often accompanied by relatively obvious osteoporosis, which makes internal fixation treatment face many difficulties. Osteoporosis leads to bone fragility in the fracture area, which affects the stability of the fixation device and increases the risk of postoperative complications. The most common complication after internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures is the varus deformity of the humeral head. Varus not only affects postoperative shoulder joint function but may also lead to complications such as subacromial impingement, internal fixation failure, and screw protrusion due to changes in the rotation center of the humeral head, resulting in pain and functional disorders in patients. Clinically, for cases with medial cortical fragmentation, methods such as enhancing the internal fixation torque through intramedullary nails or increasing stability through intramedullary fibular bone grafting can prevent the inversion and collapse of the humeral head after surgery. Although these measures can effectively prevent the occurrence of humeral head varus and collapse, the mechanism of changes in the bony structure and internal fixation of the proximal humerus caused by humeral head varus has not been fully clarified so far. The occurrence of varus deformity may be closely related to multiple factors such as fracture type, postoperative reduction condition, bone condition, and the choice of internal fixation. Therefore, in-depth research on the pathological mechanism and imaging manifestations of inversion after proximal humeral fracture surgery has practical clinical significance. Through imaging measurements, especially the evaluation of geometric indicators after humeral head inversion, a basis can be provided for further optimizing the treatment plan.

Objective

To investigate the radiographic characteristics and correlations of varus deformity following locking plate fixation for proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with locking plate internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures who underwent surgical treatment from September 2014 to September 2024. A total of 53 patients with humeral head inversion after surgery (22 males and 31 females, with an average age of 61.3 years±5.4 years) were screened out. The following parameters were measured by anterior-position X-ray films of the scapula one year after surgery:(1)Humeral head trunk angle (HSA); (2)Large nodule - acromial distance (GT-AC); (3)Medial cortical interpolation(MI); (4)Rotation center height difference(); (5)Large nodule - humeral head distance. Pearson correlation analysis was used to assess the relationships between various imaging indicators.

Results

HSA was significantly positively correlated with GT-AC (r=0.694, P<0.001), HSA was significantly negatively correlated with MI (r= -0.986, P<0.001), articular surface-large nodule distance (r=0.063, P=0.656),and r=0.015, P=0.912) had no significant correlation with the degree of inversion.

Conclusion

The shortening of medial cortical intercalation and the reduction of the distance between the large nodule and the acromion is significantly associated with humeral head inversion. In the clinical assessment of humeral head inversion after proximal humeral fracture surgery, these concomitant pathological mechanisms should be considered.

图1 HSA的测量:首先画出肱骨解剖颈线(蓝色线条),自肱骨头关节面中点作垂线至解剖颈线与肱骨干轴线成角为肱骨头干角(两条红线间成角) 注:HSA为肱骨头干角
图2 肱骨近端测量指标示意:红色平行线间距表示肩峰下缘与肱骨大结节顶点之间距离;黄线为肱骨头关节面最高点切线,其与肱骨大结节间距为红黄线条之间的距离;蓝色平行线为肱骨头内翻后干骺端嵌插距离;绿色平行线间距为肱骨头旋转中心和关节盂旋转中心的高度差
表1 肱骨近端骨折测量指标之间的相关性
图3 不同肱骨近端测量值的散点图示意 注:HSA为肱骨头干角;GT-AC为大结节至肩峰距离;MI为内侧皮质嵌插值; 为旋转中心高度差;HH-GT为大结节至肱骨头距离
[1]
Iglesias-Rodríguez S,Domínguez-Prado DM, García-Reza A, et al.Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures[J]. J Orthop Surg Res,2021,16(1): 402.
[2]
Walter N,Dominik K, Steven M, et al.Proximal humerus fracturesepidemiology, comparison of mortality rates after surgical versus non-surgical treatment, and analysis of risk factors based on Medicare registry data[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2023, 12(2): 103-112.
[3]
白露, 姜保国,王天兵.等. 307例肱骨近端骨折的临床特点分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2011,13(8): 742-745.
[4]
Patel AH, Wilder J, Ofa SA, et al.How age and gender influence proximal humerus fracture management in patients older than fifty years[J]. JSES Int, 2021,6(2): 253-258.
[5]
Cheng T,Galicia K, Patel PP, et al. A nationwide analysis of geriatric proximal humerus fractures: trends, outcomes, and cost[J].Trauma Surg Acute Care Open, 2023, 8(1): 001055.
[6]
Garcia-Reza A,Dominguez-Prado DM, Iglesias-Nuñez C, et al.Analysis of predictors of mortality after surgical and nonsurgical management in proximal humerus fractures[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2021,22(1): 43.
[7]
天津市天津医院,中国医师协会骨科医师分会肩肘外科学组,国际矫形与创伤外科学会(SICOT)中国部肩肘外科委员会,等.老年肱骨近端骨折诊疗策略中国专家共识(2024年版)[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(3):193-204.
[8]
Baker H,PGutbrod J, Cahill M, et al.Optimal Treatment of Proximal Humeral Fractures in the Elderly: Risks and Management Challenges[J]. Orthop Res Rev, 2023,15:129-137.
[9]
Jung SW, Jeon M, Lee CH. Characteristics and functional outcomes of varus displaced proximal humerus fractures[J]. J Orthop Sci,2025,30(1):152-158.
[10]
白露, 付中国,王天兵,等.肱骨近端骨折术后肱骨头内翻畸形愈合对肩关节功能的影响[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2012,28(2): 4.
[11]
Bai L,Fu ZG, Wang TB, et al.Radiological evaluation of reduction loss in unstable proximal humeral fractures treated with locking plates[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2014,100(3): 271-274.
[12]
Martinez-Catalan N,Boileau P. The Role of Intramedullary Nailing for Proximal Humerus Fractures: What Works and What Does Not[J]. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med, 2023,16(2): 85-94.
[13]
石金柱,黄强,张玉富,等. 解剖锁定钢板结合异体腓骨髓腔内结构植骨治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2017,5(4): 6.
[14]
Scheer JH, Tillander BM, Dånmark I, et al.Solely sutures is a reliable fixation for valgus-impacted proximal humeral fractures[J].J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2020, 15: 130-135.
[15]
Gardner MJ, Weil Y, Barke JU, et al.The importance of medial support in locked plating of proximal humerus fractures[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2007, 21(3): 185-191.
[16]
Chalmers CE, Wright DJ, Patel NA, et al.Biomechanical investigation of arm position on deforming muscular forces in proximal humerus fractures[J]. Clin Shoulder Elbow, 2022,25(4):282-287.
[17]
Bergdahl C,Bergdahl C, Wennergren D, et al.Mortality after a proximal humeral fracture[J]. Bone Joint J, 2020,102-B(11):1484-1490.
[18]
Fleischhacker E,Siebenbürger G, Helfen T, et al.Varus malposition relates to functional outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation for proximal humeral fractures: A retrospective comparative cohort study with minimum 2 years follow-up[J]. Injury, 2021,52(3):506-510.
[19]
Critchley O,MacLean S, Hasan A, et al.Risk factors for intraarticular involvement in proximal humeral fractures[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2023, 143(3):1341-1351.
[20]
Osterhoff G, Hoch A, Wanner GA, et al.Calcar comminution as prognostic factor of clinical outcome after locking plate fixation of proximal humeral fractures[J]. Injury, 2012,43(10):1651-1656.
[21]
Kavuri V,Bowden B, Kumar N, et al.Complications Associated with Locking Plate of Proximal Humerus Fractures[J]. Indian J Orthop, 2018,52(2):108-116.
[22]
Gallant A, Van Isterdael T, Karelse A, et al.Rotational Analysis of Varus-type Proximal Humerus Fractures: Implications for Fracture Reduction[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2025,28:S1058-2746(25)00258-7.
[23]
Kantharaju H, Gawhale SK, Prasanna Kumar GS,et al.Factors Influencing the Varus Deformity of Humeral Head in Proximal Humerus Fractures and Its Relation to Functional Outcome[J].Indian J Orthop, 2021, 55(3):702-707.
[24]
Furuhata R,Matsumura N, Tsujisaka R,et al.Risk factors and prognosis of humeral head inferior subluxation in proximal humeral fractures after osteosynthesis[J]. JSES Int, 2021,5(4):739-744.
[25]
Nie W, Wang Z, Gu F,et al.Effects of fibular strut augmentation for the open reduction and internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2022,17(1):322-327.
[26]
Greenberg A, Rosinsky PJ, Gafni N,et al.Proximal humeral nail for treatment of 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures in the elderly population: effective and safe in experienced hands[J]. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol, 2021, 31(4):769-777.
[1] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[2] 罗鸣, 袁志, 樊俊俊, 廖炳辉, 党海峰, 郑天雷, 白灵心. 关节镜辅助经皮微创钢板内固定治疗胫骨平台骨折[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 46-54.
[3] 倪立桐, 李世俊. 学龄前孤独症谱系障碍患儿杏仁核体积及白质纤维连接研究[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2025, 21(01): 29-36.
[4] 阳敏, 廖江秀, 章国智, 张晔, 范林军. 常规超声联合临床特征对甲状腺微小乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的术前诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 396-400.
[5] 王华, 曹素娥, 吴建杰, 狄金明. 膀胱炎性肌纤维母细胞瘤四例诊治报告并文献复习[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 547-552.
[6] 高健, 高雷, 贺飞帆, 陆杨, 高冲. 髓内钉和锁定钢板治疗肱骨近端合并肱骨干骨折的对比研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(02): 87-94.
[7] 王昱傑, 张殿英. 仿生杠杆结构在骨折诊疗中的创新研究与应用[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 6-15.
[8] 周令尧, 赵斌志, 刘洋, 周君琳, 赵彦瑞. 术前应用氨甲环酸在老年肱骨近端骨折内固定治疗围术期中的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 26-32.
[9] 周钰涵, 李阳, 史浩冉, 赵晨成, 段广斌. 肱骨近端骨折的临床治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2025, 13(01): 56-61.
[10] 张超, 吴雨桐, 杨子飞, 杨鹤. 不稳定老年股骨粗隆间骨折PFNA内固定术后颈干角丢失原因分析及处理策略[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 129-138.
[11] 孙开旺, 屈建国, 赵春秀. LCP与PFNA内固定治疗股骨粗隆间不稳定性骨折的效果观察[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(03): 147-152.
[12] 邓瑞晨, 肖洪岩, 魏新运, 杨伟胤, 谢云岗. 基于下肢生物力学评估经皮微创空心螺钉内固定治疗跟骨骨折的临床研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2025, 11(01): 46-51.
[13] 于同, 矫健航, 姜炜博, 王中汉, 王洋, 伍旭辉, 吴敏飞. 体位复位与椎板切除减压内固定术治疗胸腰段爆裂性骨折的对比性研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 331-339.
[14] 喻蓉, 周伟力, 雷青, 陈松, 陈立, 刘峰, 丁州, 阳宏奇, 王康, 王大鹏. 改良的内外侧环抱锁定钢板在复杂胫骨平台骨折治疗中的临床疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 764-770.
[15] 王育伟, 杨琼, 丁文华, 邱景景, 耿玉荣. 脑小血管病排尿障碍研究进展及机制探讨[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 606-610.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?