切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 34 -39. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2024.01.006

论著

关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位的初步临床疗效
黄丹蕾1, 叶志扬1, 王俊1, 翁蔚宗1, 王光泽1, 刘好源1, 黄建明1,()   
  1. 1. 361003 厦门大学附属成功医院骨科中心(中国人民解放军陆军第七十三集团军医院)
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-13 出版日期:2024-02-05
  • 通信作者: 黄建明
  • 基金资助:
    厦门市医疗卫生指导性项目(3502Z20224ZD1235); 厦门市医疗卫生科技计划项目(3502Z20194052); 厦门市创伤骨科重点专科(2015347); 厦门市优势亚专科(2018296)

Preliminary clinical effect of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation with the long head of the biceps tendon for anterior shoulder instability (ASA-LHBT) in the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation

Danlei Huang1, Zhiyang Ye1, Jun Wang1, Weizong Weng1, Guangze Wang1, Haoyuan Liu1, Jianming Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University (the 73rd Group Military Hospital of People's Liberation Army), Xiamen 361003, China
  • Received:2023-06-13 Published:2024-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Jianming Huang
引用本文:

黄丹蕾, 叶志扬, 王俊, 翁蔚宗, 王光泽, 刘好源, 黄建明. 关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位的初步临床疗效[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 34-39.

Danlei Huang, Zhiyang Ye, Jun Wang, Weizong Weng, Guangze Wang, Haoyuan Liu, Jianming Huang. Preliminary clinical effect of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation with the long head of the biceps tendon for anterior shoulder instability (ASA-LHBT) in the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(01): 34-39.

目的

探究关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗肩胛盂骨缺损13.5%~20%的初步临床效果。

方法

回顾性研究2020年6月至2021年6月采用关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗的25例肩盂骨缺损13.5%~20%的复发性肩关节脱位患者。采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Rowe评分、美国肩肘外科协会评分(rating scale of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons, ASES)以及患侧肩关节主动活动度进行评估。

结果

患者术后随访期间无再发脱位,患者VAS疼痛评分(0.52±0.65)分较术前(2.88±1.01)分有所下降,Rowe评分、ASES评分两项评分体系(93.60±3.69)分、(94.93±3.42)分较术前(50.60±9.39)分、(65.93±5.38)分显著提高,临床评分差异具有统计学意义;患者肩关节术前、术后的内旋主动活动度对比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),前屈、外展、体侧外旋、90°外展外旋角度术前与术后2年在统计学上有显著相关性(P<0.05)。

结论

关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗肩胛盂骨缺损13.5%~20%可以取得满意的疗效。

Background

Recurrent shoulder dislocation often occurs due to the lack of timely treatment after the initial dislocation caused by trauma or violent sports activities. Although the glenohumeral joint is reduced, the structures maintaining shoulder joint stability remain unrepaired, such as glenoid bone defects and labral injuries. Subsequent trauma or improper movement patterns may lead to recurrent shoulder dislocation. In recent years, with the advancement of arthroscopic techniques, various surgical approaches have been developed to treat recurrent shoulder dislocation. The most common procedures include soft tissue repair, represented by Bankart repair, and bone repair, represented by Latarjet surgery. Previous studies have indicated that the failure rate of surgery, primarily attributed to significant bone defects, reaches 67%. It has been demonstrated that when glenoid bone defects exceed 20%, bone repair surgery can achieve better shoulder joint stability. For patients with high demands for physical activity, a subcritical bone defect threshold of 13.5% has been proposed, suggesting Latarjet surgery or combined procedures for defects exceeding this threshold. However, controversy remains regarding the surgical treatment of bone defects of varying degrees. Patients with glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20% may face the risk of "over-treatment" with Latarjet techniques, while Bankart repair alone may result in a higher redislocation rate.

Objective

To explore the preliminary clinical efficacy of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation with the long head of the biceps tendon for anterior shoulder instability (ASA-LHBT) in the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation in the treatment of glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20% in recurrent shoulder dislocation.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 25 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation and glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20%, treated with arthroscopic long head of biceps tendon transposition with subscapularis muscle reinforcement technique from June 2020 to June 2021. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Rowe score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) rating scale, and active range of motion of the affected shoulder joint were evaluated.

Results

During the postoperative follow-up period, there were no recurrent dislocations. The VAS pain score of the patients (0.52±0.65) points decreased compared to preoperative scores (2.88±1.01) points. The Rowe score and ASES score showed significant improvements (93.60±3.69) points and (94.93±3.42) points, respectively compared to preoperative scores (50.60±9.39) points and (65.93±5.38) points, respectively, with statistically significant differences in clinical scores. The comparison of pre-and postoperative internal rotation active range of motion of the shoulder joint showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05), and there were significant correlations in forward flexion, abduction, lateral rotation, and 90° abduction external rotation angles between preoperative and 2-year postoperative periods (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

Arthroscopic long head of biceps tendon transposition with subscapularis muscle reinforcement technique is effective in treating glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20%.

图1 LHBT切断后,从前上入路拉出以高强度缝线编织注:LHBT为肱二头肌长头腱
图2 肩盂骨隧道,克氏针定位后使用4.5 mm钻头钻取
图3 LHBT拉进肩胛盂骨隧道注:LHBT为肱二头肌长头腱
图4 患者术后2年肩部活动接近正常(左侧为患侧) 图A:前屈上举;图B:背手;图C:外旋;图D:外展90°外旋
图5 术后2年MRI显示肩胛下肌无损伤,骨软骨未见明显退变(图A-C为不同层面磁共振图像)
表1 术前、术后2年随访时VAS、Rowe、ASES评分比较(分,±s)
表2 术前与术后2年随访时肩关节活动度比较(°,±s)
[1]
Boileau P, Mercier N, Old J. Arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet (2B3) Procedure: How to Do It and Tricks To Make it Easier and Safe [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010, 41(3): 381-392.
[2]
Levy DM, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. History of surgical intervention of anterior shoulder instability [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(6): e139-150.
[3]
Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion [J]. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(7): 677-694.
[4]
Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, et al. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000, 82(1): 35-46.
[5]
Shaha JS, Cook JB, Song DJ, et al. Redefining "Critical" Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Functional Outcomes Worsen With "Subcritical" Bone Loss [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(7): 1719-1725.
[6]
Baudi P, Righi P, Bolognesi D, et al. How to identify and calculate glenoid bone deficit [J]. Chir Organi Mov, 2005, 90(2): 145-152.
[7]
Huang J, Huang D, Wang J, et al. Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon for Anterior Shoulder Instability [J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2022, 11(5): e805-e811.
[8]
Lafosse L, Boyle S, Gutierrez-Aramberri M,et al. Arthroscopic latarjet procedure [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010, 41(3): 393-405.
[9]
Shin SJ, Koh YW, Bui C, et al. What Is the Critical Value of Glenoid Bone Loss at Which Soft Tissue Bankart Repair Does Not Restore Glenohumeral Translation, Restricts Range of Motion, and Leads to Abnormal Humeral Head Position? [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(11): 2784-2791.
[10]
Nakagawa S, Mae T, Sato S, et al. Risk Factors for the Postoperative Recurrence of Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Athletes [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2017, 5(9): 2325967117726494.
[11]
Hurley E, Jamal MS, Ali ZS, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(2): e33-e39.
[12]
Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(8): 1755-1763.
[13]
Flurin PH, Antoni M, Métais P, et al. Revision of failed Latarjet with the Eden-Hybinette surgical technique [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2020, 106(2): 223-227.
[14]
Willemot L, De Boey S, Van Tongel A, et al. Analysis of failures after the Bristow-Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability [J]. Int Orthop, 2019, 43(8): 1899-1907.
[15]
Butt U, Charalambous CP. Complications associated with open coracoid transfer procedures for shoulder instability [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(8): 1110-1119.
[16]
Smucny M, Miniaci A. A New Option for Glenoid Reconstruction in Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability [J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2017, 46(4): 199-202.
[17]
Ranalletta M, Tanoira I, Bertona A, et al. Autologous Tricortical Iliac Bone Graft for Failed Latarjet Procedures [J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2019, 8(3): e283-e289.
[18]
Maiotti M, Russo R, Zanini A, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation: an alternative technique treating anterior shoulder instability with bone loss [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(6): 898-906.
[19]
Boileau P, Mercier N, Roussanne Y, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure: the development and early results of a safe and reproducible technique [J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(11): 1434-1450.
[20]
Ren S, Zhang X, Zhou R,et al. Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation combined with capsulolabral reconstruction is safe and reliable [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(12): 3997-4004.
[21]
Schröter S, Krämer M, Welke B, et al. The effect of the arthroscopic augmentation of the subscapularis tendon on shoulder instability and range of motion: A biomechanical study [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2016, 38: 75-83.
[22]
Russo R, Maiotti M, Taverna E. Arthroscopic bone graft procedure combined with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation (ASA) for recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone defect: a cadaver study [J]. J Exp Orthop, 2018, 5(1): 5.
[23]
Garcia GH, Wu HH, Liu JN, et al. Outcomes of the Remplissage Procedure and Its Effects on Return to Sports: Average 5-Year Follow-up [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(5): 1124-1130.
[1] 纪小孟, 刘璠, 唐晓波, 卞为伟, 董佩龙, 刘振鲁. 两种手术方式治疗肩袖撕裂合并粘连性肩关节囊炎[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 561-567.
[2] 苏介茂, 齐岩松, 王永祥, 魏宝刚, 马秉贤, 张鹏飞, 魏兴华, 徐永胜. 关节镜手术在早中期膝骨关节炎治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 646-652.
[3] 李程, 朱梁, 庞勇, 查国春, 仇尚, 孙伟, 冯硕. 侧侧缝合联合无结缝线桥技术治疗大型L型肩袖撕裂[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 301-306.
[4] 蔡雨琦, 史尉利, 陶立元, 曹建夫, 崔国庆, 杨渝平. 支持带松解联合外侧成形治疗髌骨外侧过度挤压综合征[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 186-192.
[5] 肖志满, 庄锡琪, 龚煜. 关节镜下Lasso-loop Gould术式治疗踝关节外侧不稳定的早期疗效[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 280-284.
[6] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[7] 韩伟峰, 王典, 陈艺丹, 曾峥. 关节镜下半月板成形术与康复训练治疗中年退行性内侧半月板撕裂的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 134-140.
[8] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[9] 冯亚飞, 唐诗添, 唐福宽, 周亮. 关节镜下mLSRS 技术及双排缝线桥技术治疗大型肩袖撕裂的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 295-301.
[10] 王友健, 陶然, 陆跃, 马洪冬. 退行性中、小型肩袖撕裂两种临床治疗效果对比[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 302-308.
[11] 严肃, 束昊, 吉同岳, 孙鲁宁. 肱二头肌长头腱切断与保留对中老年患者的中、小型退变性肩袖撕裂修补术后疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 309-318.
[12] 陈天鑫, 杨胜平, 朱瑜琪, 高云, 张帅. 多种手术方式治疗肩关节前向不稳定伴关节盂骨缺损的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 344-352.
[13] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[14] 王涵宇, 王蕾. Bankart损伤的关节镜下修复进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 262-270.
[15] 孙明策, 韩世焕. 海藻酸盐水凝胶支架在颅骨缺损修复中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 310-314.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?