切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 34 -39. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2024.01.006

论著

关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位的初步临床疗效
黄丹蕾1, 叶志扬1, 王俊1, 翁蔚宗1, 王光泽1, 刘好源1, 黄建明1,()   
  1. 1. 361003 厦门大学附属成功医院骨科中心(中国人民解放军陆军第七十三集团军医院)
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-13 出版日期:2024-02-05
  • 通信作者: 黄建明
  • 基金资助:
    厦门市医疗卫生指导性项目(3502Z20224ZD1235); 厦门市医疗卫生科技计划项目(3502Z20194052); 厦门市创伤骨科重点专科(2015347); 厦门市优势亚专科(2018296)

Preliminary clinical effect of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation with the long head of the biceps tendon for anterior shoulder instability (ASA-LHBT) in the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation

Danlei Huang1, Zhiyang Ye1, Jun Wang1, Weizong Weng1, Guangze Wang1, Haoyuan Liu1, Jianming Huang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Chenggong Hospital of Xiamen University (the 73rd Group Military Hospital of People's Liberation Army), Xiamen 361003, China
  • Received:2023-06-13 Published:2024-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Jianming Huang
引用本文:

黄丹蕾, 叶志扬, 王俊, 翁蔚宗, 王光泽, 刘好源, 黄建明. 关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗复发性肩关节脱位的初步临床疗效[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 34-39.

Danlei Huang, Zhiyang Ye, Jun Wang, Weizong Weng, Guangze Wang, Haoyuan Liu, Jianming Huang. Preliminary clinical effect of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation with the long head of the biceps tendon for anterior shoulder instability (ASA-LHBT) in the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(01): 34-39.

目的

探究关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗肩胛盂骨缺损13.5%~20%的初步临床效果。

方法

回顾性研究2020年6月至2021年6月采用关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗的25例肩盂骨缺损13.5%~20%的复发性肩关节脱位患者。采用视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、Rowe评分、美国肩肘外科协会评分(rating scale of the American shoulder and elbow surgeons, ASES)以及患侧肩关节主动活动度进行评估。

结果

患者术后随访期间无再发脱位,患者VAS疼痛评分(0.52±0.65)分较术前(2.88±1.01)分有所下降,Rowe评分、ASES评分两项评分体系(93.60±3.69)分、(94.93±3.42)分较术前(50.60±9.39)分、(65.93±5.38)分显著提高,临床评分差异具有统计学意义;患者肩关节术前、术后的内旋主动活动度对比差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05),前屈、外展、体侧外旋、90°外展外旋角度术前与术后2年在统计学上有显著相关性(P<0.05)。

结论

关节镜下肱二头肌长头腱转位肩胛下肌增强技术治疗肩胛盂骨缺损13.5%~20%可以取得满意的疗效。

Background

Recurrent shoulder dislocation often occurs due to the lack of timely treatment after the initial dislocation caused by trauma or violent sports activities. Although the glenohumeral joint is reduced, the structures maintaining shoulder joint stability remain unrepaired, such as glenoid bone defects and labral injuries. Subsequent trauma or improper movement patterns may lead to recurrent shoulder dislocation. In recent years, with the advancement of arthroscopic techniques, various surgical approaches have been developed to treat recurrent shoulder dislocation. The most common procedures include soft tissue repair, represented by Bankart repair, and bone repair, represented by Latarjet surgery. Previous studies have indicated that the failure rate of surgery, primarily attributed to significant bone defects, reaches 67%. It has been demonstrated that when glenoid bone defects exceed 20%, bone repair surgery can achieve better shoulder joint stability. For patients with high demands for physical activity, a subcritical bone defect threshold of 13.5% has been proposed, suggesting Latarjet surgery or combined procedures for defects exceeding this threshold. However, controversy remains regarding the surgical treatment of bone defects of varying degrees. Patients with glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20% may face the risk of "over-treatment" with Latarjet techniques, while Bankart repair alone may result in a higher redislocation rate.

Objective

To explore the preliminary clinical efficacy of arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation with the long head of the biceps tendon for anterior shoulder instability (ASA-LHBT) in the treatment of recurrent shoulder dislocation in the treatment of glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20% in recurrent shoulder dislocation.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 25 patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation and glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20%, treated with arthroscopic long head of biceps tendon transposition with subscapularis muscle reinforcement technique from June 2020 to June 2021. Visual analogue scale (VAS), Rowe score, American shoulder and elbow surgeons (ASES) rating scale, and active range of motion of the affected shoulder joint were evaluated.

Results

During the postoperative follow-up period, there were no recurrent dislocations. The VAS pain score of the patients (0.52±0.65) points decreased compared to preoperative scores (2.88±1.01) points. The Rowe score and ASES score showed significant improvements (93.60±3.69) points and (94.93±3.42) points, respectively compared to preoperative scores (50.60±9.39) points and (65.93±5.38) points, respectively, with statistically significant differences in clinical scores. The comparison of pre-and postoperative internal rotation active range of motion of the shoulder joint showed statistically significant differences (P<0.05), and there were significant correlations in forward flexion, abduction, lateral rotation, and 90° abduction external rotation angles between preoperative and 2-year postoperative periods (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

Arthroscopic long head of biceps tendon transposition with subscapularis muscle reinforcement technique is effective in treating glenoid bone defects ranging from 13.5% to 20%.

图1 LHBT切断后,从前上入路拉出以高强度缝线编织注:LHBT为肱二头肌长头腱
图2 肩盂骨隧道,克氏针定位后使用4.5 mm钻头钻取
图3 LHBT拉进肩胛盂骨隧道注:LHBT为肱二头肌长头腱
图4 患者术后2年肩部活动接近正常(左侧为患侧) 图A:前屈上举;图B:背手;图C:外旋;图D:外展90°外旋
图5 术后2年MRI显示肩胛下肌无损伤,骨软骨未见明显退变(图A-C为不同层面磁共振图像)
表1 术前、术后2年随访时VAS、Rowe、ASES评分比较(分,±s)
表2 术前与术后2年随访时肩关节活动度比较(°,±s)
[1]
Boileau P, Mercier N, Old J. Arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet (2B3) Procedure: How to Do It and Tricks To Make it Easier and Safe [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010, 41(3): 381-392.
[2]
Levy DM, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr. History of surgical intervention of anterior shoulder instability [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(6): e139-150.
[3]
Burkhart SS, De Beer JF. Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion [J]. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(7): 677-694.
[4]
Itoi E, Lee SB, Berglund LJ, et al. The effect of a glenoid defect on anteroinferior stability of the shoulder after Bankart repair: a cadaveric study [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2000, 82(1): 35-46.
[5]
Shaha JS, Cook JB, Song DJ, et al. Redefining "Critical" Bone Loss in Shoulder Instability: Functional Outcomes Worsen With "Subcritical" Bone Loss [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(7): 1719-1725.
[6]
Baudi P, Righi P, Bolognesi D, et al. How to identify and calculate glenoid bone deficit [J]. Chir Organi Mov, 2005, 90(2): 145-152.
[7]
Huang J, Huang D, Wang J, et al. Arthroscopic Subscapularis Augmentation Using the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon for Anterior Shoulder Instability [J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2022, 11(5): e805-e811.
[8]
Lafosse L, Boyle S, Gutierrez-Aramberri M,et al. Arthroscopic latarjet procedure [J]. Orthop Clin North Am, 2010, 41(3): 393-405.
[9]
Shin SJ, Koh YW, Bui C, et al. What Is the Critical Value of Glenoid Bone Loss at Which Soft Tissue Bankart Repair Does Not Restore Glenohumeral Translation, Restricts Range of Motion, and Leads to Abnormal Humeral Head Position? [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(11): 2784-2791.
[10]
Nakagawa S, Mae T, Sato S, et al. Risk Factors for the Postoperative Recurrence of Instability After Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Athletes [J]. Orthop J Sports Med, 2017, 5(9): 2325967117726494.
[11]
Hurley E, Jamal MS, Ali ZS, et al. Long-term outcomes of the Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: a systematic review of studies at 10-year follow-up [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(2): e33-e39.
[12]
Boileau P, Villalba M, Héry JY, et al. Risk factors for recurrence of shoulder instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(8): 1755-1763.
[13]
Flurin PH, Antoni M, Métais P, et al. Revision of failed Latarjet with the Eden-Hybinette surgical technique [J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2020, 106(2): 223-227.
[14]
Willemot L, De Boey S, Van Tongel A, et al. Analysis of failures after the Bristow-Latarjet procedure for recurrent shoulder instability [J]. Int Orthop, 2019, 43(8): 1899-1907.
[15]
Butt U, Charalambous CP. Complications associated with open coracoid transfer procedures for shoulder instability [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2012, 21(8): 1110-1119.
[16]
Smucny M, Miniaci A. A New Option for Glenoid Reconstruction in Recurrent Anterior Shoulder Instability [J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2017, 46(4): 199-202.
[17]
Ranalletta M, Tanoira I, Bertona A, et al. Autologous Tricortical Iliac Bone Graft for Failed Latarjet Procedures [J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2019, 8(3): e283-e289.
[18]
Maiotti M, Russo R, Zanini A, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart repair and subscapularis augmentation: an alternative technique treating anterior shoulder instability with bone loss [J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2016, 25(6): 898-906.
[19]
Boileau P, Mercier N, Roussanne Y, et al. Arthroscopic Bankart-Bristow-Latarjet procedure: the development and early results of a safe and reproducible technique [J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(11): 1434-1450.
[20]
Ren S, Zhang X, Zhou R,et al. Arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation combined with capsulolabral reconstruction is safe and reliable [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2019, 27(12): 3997-4004.
[21]
Schröter S, Krämer M, Welke B, et al. The effect of the arthroscopic augmentation of the subscapularis tendon on shoulder instability and range of motion: A biomechanical study [J]. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon), 2016, 38: 75-83.
[22]
Russo R, Maiotti M, Taverna E. Arthroscopic bone graft procedure combined with arthroscopic subscapularis augmentation (ASA) for recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone defect: a cadaver study [J]. J Exp Orthop, 2018, 5(1): 5.
[23]
Garcia GH, Wu HH, Liu JN, et al. Outcomes of the Remplissage Procedure and Its Effects on Return to Sports: Average 5-Year Follow-up [J]. Am J Sports Med, 2016, 44(5): 1124-1130.
[1] 张骏, 李强, 孟柏屹, 李成宇. 关节镜松解联合肩袖修复治疗肩袖损伤合并继发冻结肩[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-7.
[2] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[3] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[4] 肖志满, 龚煜, 谢景凌, 刘斌伟. 上下肢关节镜手术后患者下肢深静脉血栓发生的对比研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 601-606.
[5] 杨国栋, 张辉, 郭珈, 曲迪, 张静, 戚超. 外侧半月板后角撕裂是否修复的术后疗效对比[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[6] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[7] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[8] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[9] 吴俊贤, 曾俊杰, 许有银, 苑博. 体外冲击波疗法辅助治疗肩袖修补术后关节僵硬[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 571-576.
[10] 齐伟亚, 方杰, 吴衡, 刘波. 掌侧小切口联合腕关节镜治疗AO-C型桡骨远端骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 577-582.
[11] 李昊, 韦秀湘, 钟晓霞. 聚焦高黏附力骨黏合剂,促进口腔硬组织修复[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[12] 崔德栋, 周敏, 周传海, 龙毅, 侯景义, 杨睿. 肩关节特殊体查试验对肩胛下肌腱撕裂诊断的价值[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 14-20.
[13] 商培洋, 石文俊, 章筛林, 成翔宇, 石继祥, 罗涛. 关节镜肩袖修补术中注射富血小板血浆治疗肩袖滑囊面部分撕裂的临床疗效观察[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 304-312.
[14] 张镇斌, 闫兆龙, 王功腾, 张文琦, 王旭凤, 李广兴, 孙华强, 李树锋. 关节镜对胫骨高位截骨术治疗膝骨关节炎的效果研究[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 218-225.
[15] 刘世航, 周帅, 秦士吉, 程晓东, 丁凯, 王海程, 李超, 卢军丽, 吕红芝. 矿化胶原在骨缺损治疗中应用的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(12): 1320-1324.
阅读次数
全文


摘要