切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -26. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2024.01.004

论著

3D导板技术在反肩关节置换中的应用
谢鹏1, 丁国强2, 郑翰2, 魏有康2, 刘晗2, 卢冰2,()   
  1. 1. 610075 成都中医药大学医学与生命科学学院
    2. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院四川省人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-07 出版日期:2024-02-05
  • 通信作者: 卢冰
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅2022年重大科技专项基金(22ZDYF1682)

Application of 3D guide plate technology in reverse shoulder joint replacement

Peng Xie1, Guoqiang Ding2, Han Zheng2, Youkang Wei2, Han Liu2, Bing Lu2,()   

  1. 1. School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2023-06-07 Published:2024-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Bing Lu
引用本文:

谢鹏, 丁国强, 郑翰, 魏有康, 刘晗, 卢冰. 3D导板技术在反肩关节置换中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 21-26.

Peng Xie, Guoqiang Ding, Han Zheng, Youkang Wei, Han Liu, Bing Lu. Application of 3D guide plate technology in reverse shoulder joint replacement[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(01): 21-26.

目的

研究探讨3D导板技术在反肩关节置换中的应用效果。

方法

选取2020年10月至2022年10月本院收治的29例行反肩关节置换术患者为对象,随机数字表法分为观察组11例、对照组18例。观察组:男2例、女9例;年龄46~83岁,平均年龄(65.27±11.56)岁;ASA分级:I级2例、II级5例、Ⅲ级3例、Ⅳ级1例;手术位置:左肩2例、右肩9例;原发疾病:肱骨粉碎性骨折5例、肱骨头坏死1例、肩关节骨性关节炎2例、肩袖型关节病3例。对照组:男6例、女12例;年龄52~80岁,平均年龄(65.00±9.99)岁;ASA分级:I级1例、II级12例、Ⅲ级5例;手术位置:左肩7例、右肩11例;原发疾病:肱骨粉碎性骨折12例、肩关节骨性关节炎3例、肩袖型关节病3例。组间一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组采用3D打印导板技术进行反肩关节置换术治疗,对照组行常规反肩关节置换术治疗。

结果

对两组患者手术进行情况、并发症发生率、肩关节活动功能评分、生活质量评分进行评估对比。观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量、开始下床活动时间均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为0.00%(0/11),低于对照组患者为33.33%(6/18,P<0.05)。术后3个月,观察组Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分包括疼痛、活动度评分均高于对照组(P<0.05),而Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分中的日常生活活动、肌力评分以及术后3个月观察组世界卫生组织生活质量-100量表各项评分的比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

3D导板技术可以较好的应用在反肩关节置换中,能够减少手术时间、术中出血量,有利于患者早期下地,缓解疼痛,降低术后并发症发生率,改善患者的肩关节活动度。

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a common joint replacement in orthopedic clinics. The main indications of this operation include proximal humeral comminution, humeral head necrosis, shoulder osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthritis, etc. Due to the severe fracture or lesion, the prosthesis is implanted through replacement during the operation. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has promising applications in treating various shoulder diseases due to its advantages of an excellent postoperative rehabilitation effect, faster functional recovery, and good local appearance. However, the anatomical structure of the shoulder joint is complex, especially in patients with bone diseases, and defects or deformities often accompany the glenoid. Therefore, treating the glenoid side in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is difficult. If the position of the glenoid base is not good, postoperative complications such as joint loosening and joint detachment are prone to occur, affecting patients' prognosis. In recent years, with the improvement of orthopedic surgical techniques and the application of 3D printing technology, preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction of the implanted prosthesis and preparation of physical composite models of the fracture site can significantly improve the matching degree of the implanted prosthesis, thereby improving the surgical effect. This technology also provides new ideas for the improvement of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Objective

To investigate the application effect of 3D navigation template technology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 29 patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty in our hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were included in this study. Using a random number table, they were randomly divided into an observation group (n=11) and a control group (n=18). In the observation group, there were 2 males and 9 females, with an age range of 46 to 83 years and an average age of (65.27±11.56) years. The ASA classification was grade I in 2 cases, grade II in 5 cases, grade III in 3 cases, and grade IV in 1 case. The surgical positions were 2 cases in the left shoulder and 9 cases in the right shoulder, with primary diseases including comminuted fractures of the humerus in 5 cases, avascular necrosis of the humeral head in 1 case, osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint in 2 cases, and shoulder cuff-related joint disease in 3 cases. In the control group, there were 6 males and 12 females, with an age range of 52 to 80 years and an average age of (65.00±9.99) years. The ASA classification was grade I in 1 case, grade II in 12 cases, and grade III in 5 cases. The surgical positions were 7 cases in the left shoulder and 11 cases in the right shoulder, with primary diseases including comminuted fractures of the humerus in 12 cases, osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint in 3 cases, and shoulder cuff-related joint disease in 3 cases. The two groups had no statistically significant difference in general data (P>0.05). The observation group underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using 3D printing navigation template technology, while the control group underwent conventional reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Results

The surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, and time to initiate ambulation in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate in the observation group was 0.00% (0/11), which was lower than that in the control group (33.33%, 6/18, P<0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, the Constant-Murley shoulder joint function scores, including pain and mobility scores, were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores for daily life activities, muscle strength, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 scale between the two groups at 3 months postoperatively (P>0.05) .

Conclusion

3D navigation template technology can be effectively applied in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, reducing surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss, facilitating early mobilization, alleviating pain, lowering the incidence of postoperative complications, and improving shoulder joint mobility.

表1 两组患者ASA分级对比
表2 两组患者病种对比
图1 3D打印技术打印出患者肩胛骨及导板的应用 图A:计算机设计患者肩盂中心螺钉导板侧位;图B:计算机设计患者肩盂中心螺钉导板正位;图C:3D打印出导板及患者肩胛骨;图D:术中安放3D导板,打入中心螺钉导针;图E:术后检查,患者中心螺钉位置良好,肩盂基座位置良好
表3 两组患者手术进行情况比较(±s)
表4 两组患者并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表5 两组患者Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分比较(分,±s)
表6 两组患者生活质量评分比较(分,±s)
[1]
Takahashi T, Sato T, Manabe J, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty and synthetic mesh for reconstruction of the shoulder joint after malignant bone tumor resection: A case report[J]. Medicine, 2021, 22(12):232-237.
[2]
代飞, 东靖眀, 杨金松,等. 反肩与半肩关节置换术治疗老年肱骨近端三或四部分骨折的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2022, 42(4):204-212.
[3]
Page R, Beazley J, Graves S, et al. Effect of glenosphere size on reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rate: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR)[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2022,31(6):311-314.
[4]
韩巍, 张腾, 黄强,等. 锥形束CT引导机器人辅助反肩关节肩盂基座螺钉导针置入精准度研究[J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2021, 40(3):723-727.
[5]
包献丰, 赵永军, 佘亚峰. PHILOS内固定与半肩关节置换治疗肱骨近端复杂性骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志, 2021,13(4):1013-1017.
[6]
姜春岩, 赵阳. 人工肩关节置换治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折的术式选择及影响因素[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2021, 37(11):632-627.
[7]
杨茂赓,刘义,杨浩,等. 半肩关节置换与反式全肩关节置换治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折的Meta分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(10):900-905.
[8]
黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊,等. 反式全肩关节假体置换治疗巨大不可修复肩袖撕裂[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(1):623-627.
[9]
陈国能, 姜文学, 陈扬. 反式肩关节置换术治疗肩关节结核1例[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(1):102-103.
[10]
赵巍, 米尔阿地力·麦麦提依明, 宝尔江·阿斯哈尔,等. 3D打印导航模板与个性化定制假体在3例复杂关节置换术中的应用[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2021,39(12):283-286.
[11]
李建安, 林枫松, 卜国云,等. 反肩关节置换治疗肱骨近端骨折的并发症:假体周围骨吸收和无菌性假体松动[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2022, 26(15):711-717.
[12]
Duan X, Wang B, Yang L, et al. Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Orthopedic Treatment[J]. Biomed Res Int20212021:9892456.
[13]
Haleem A, Javaid M. Role of CT and MRI in the design and development of orthopaedic model using additive manufacturing[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma20189(3):213-217.
[14]
Bartels D, Marigi E, Sperling J, et al. Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Anatomical Glenoid Component Loosening Was Not Universally Successful: A Detailed Analysis of 127 Consecutive Shoulders[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2021, 103(10):879-886.
[15]
Duncan JM, Nahas S, Akhtar K, et al. The Use of a 3D Printer in Pre-operative Planning for a Patient Requiring Acetabular Reconstructive Surgery[J]. J Orthop Case Rep20155(1):23-25.
[16]
谢尚举,王拓,胡华辉,等.反肩关节置换治疗终末期肩袖关节病的早期临床疗效[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(11):54-58.
[17]
Al Najjar M, Mehta SS, Monga P. Three dimensional scapular prints for evaluating glenoid morphology: An exploratory study[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma20189(3):230-235.
[18]
Fucentese SF, Meier P, Jud L, et al. Accuracy of 3D-planned patient specific instrumentation in high tibial open wedge valgisation osteotomy[J]. J Exp Orthop20207(1):7.
[19]
Van Genechten W, Van Tilborg W, Van den Bempt M, et al. Feasibility and 3D Planning of a Novel Patient-Specific Instrumentation Technique in Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy[J]. J Knee Surg202134(14):1560-1569.
[20]
李奉龙,姜春岩.导航下反肩关节置换术中肩盂基座螺钉置入精确性与安全性研究[J].中国运动医学杂志,2019,38(1):31-35.
[21]
陆嫣. 对1例行3D打印定制反肩关节置换术后发生桡神经损伤的患者进行护理的方法和体会[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2022, 20(1):193-196.
[22]
王战, 严晓波, 林秾,等. 3D打印全肩胛骨反肩关节置换术在肩胛骨肿瘤治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022,36(7):817-822.
[23]
Italia KR, Green N, Maharaj J, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of glenoid joint line restoration with glenoid bone grafting and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with significant glenoid bone loss[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg202130(3):599-608.
[1] 夏传龙, 迟健, 丛强, 连杰, 崔峻, 陈彦玲. 富血小板血浆联合关节镜治疗半月板损伤的临床疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 877-881.
[2] 陆闻青, 陈昕怡, 任雪飞. 遗传代谢病儿童肝移植受者术后生活质量调查研究[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 287-292.
[3] 李梅, 孔珊珊. Robocare护理模式联合高频胸壁振荡在腹腔镜腹壁切口疝修补术的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 619-624.
[4] 王静, 庞冬, 高赫, 刘金. 护理能力与应对方式在造口患者造口影响与生活质量间的中介效应[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 468-472.
[5] 彭国兵, 费建平. 影响患者永久性结肠造口的状况及因素[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 264-268.
[6] 邓美云, 马兰, 胡惠惠. 双环节协同护理模式在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 346-349.
[7] 矫珺, 程萌, 矫春峰. 改良呼吸康复训练对肺癌肺叶切除术后呼吸功能和生活质量的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 709-711.
[8] 潘玥, 夏婷, 王燕, 顾娟. 肺结节患者生活质量影响因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 272-274.
[9] 谢海玲, 冯琳丽, 王燕精, 周娃梅. 呼吸运动锻炼对COPD患者呼吸肌力量、运动能力及生活质量的影响[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(02): 269-271.
[10] 陈显金, 吴芹芹, 何长春, 张庆华. 利用多模态医学数据和机器学习构建脑出血预后预测模型的研究[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 193-198.
[11] 孙晗, 武侠. 成人肠易激综合征患者肠道菌群特征与不同分型患者生活质量和精神症状的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 461-465.
[12] 王小娜, 谭微, 李悦, 姜文艳. 预测性护理对结直肠癌根治术患者围手术期生活质量、情绪及并发症的影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 525-529.
[13] 蒋媛, 闫晶, 王俭, 买买提·依斯热依力, 艾克拜尔·艾力, 王永康, 阿巴伯克力·乌斯曼, 李义亮, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 延续性护理对减重代谢术后改善患者胃食管反流病症状、生活质量及减重效果的疗效[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 160-165.
[14] 刘芬, 胡传国. 胃食管反流病患者口腔健康相关生活质量现状及影响因素[J]. 中华胃食管反流病电子杂志, 2023, 10(03): 139-143.
[15] 邱凤仪, 吴丹, 杨华, 张桂娟, 中国肥胖代谢外科研究协作组. 减重手术后患者健康相关生活质量评估工具的研究进展[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(04): 293-298.
阅读次数
全文


摘要