切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2024, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (01) : 21 -26. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2024.01.004

论著

3D导板技术在反肩关节置换中的应用
谢鹏1, 丁国强2, 郑翰2, 魏有康2, 刘晗2, 卢冰2,()   
  1. 1. 610075 成都中医药大学医学与生命科学学院
    2. 610072 成都,四川省医学科学院四川省人民医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-07 出版日期:2024-02-05
  • 通信作者: 卢冰
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅2022年重大科技专项基金(22ZDYF1682)

Application of 3D guide plate technology in reverse shoulder joint replacement

Peng Xie1, Guoqiang Ding2, Han Zheng2, Youkang Wei2, Han Liu2, Bing Lu2,()   

  1. 1. School of Medicine and Life Sciences, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 610075, China
    2. Department of Orthopedics, Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, Chengdu 610072, China
  • Received:2023-06-07 Published:2024-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Bing Lu
引用本文:

谢鹏, 丁国强, 郑翰, 魏有康, 刘晗, 卢冰. 3D导板技术在反肩关节置换中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 21-26.

Peng Xie, Guoqiang Ding, Han Zheng, Youkang Wei, Han Liu, Bing Lu. Application of 3D guide plate technology in reverse shoulder joint replacement[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2024, 12(01): 21-26.

目的

研究探讨3D导板技术在反肩关节置换中的应用效果。

方法

选取2020年10月至2022年10月本院收治的29例行反肩关节置换术患者为对象,随机数字表法分为观察组11例、对照组18例。观察组:男2例、女9例;年龄46~83岁,平均年龄(65.27±11.56)岁;ASA分级:I级2例、II级5例、Ⅲ级3例、Ⅳ级1例;手术位置:左肩2例、右肩9例;原发疾病:肱骨粉碎性骨折5例、肱骨头坏死1例、肩关节骨性关节炎2例、肩袖型关节病3例。对照组:男6例、女12例;年龄52~80岁,平均年龄(65.00±9.99)岁;ASA分级:I级1例、II级12例、Ⅲ级5例;手术位置:左肩7例、右肩11例;原发疾病:肱骨粉碎性骨折12例、肩关节骨性关节炎3例、肩袖型关节病3例。组间一般资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。观察组采用3D打印导板技术进行反肩关节置换术治疗,对照组行常规反肩关节置换术治疗。

结果

对两组患者手术进行情况、并发症发生率、肩关节活动功能评分、生活质量评分进行评估对比。观察组患者手术时间、术中出血量、开始下床活动时间均低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组术后并发症发生率为0.00%(0/11),低于对照组患者为33.33%(6/18,P<0.05)。术后3个月,观察组Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分包括疼痛、活动度评分均高于对照组(P<0.05),而Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分中的日常生活活动、肌力评分以及术后3个月观察组世界卫生组织生活质量-100量表各项评分的比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。

结论

3D导板技术可以较好的应用在反肩关节置换中,能够减少手术时间、术中出血量,有利于患者早期下地,缓解疼痛,降低术后并发症发生率,改善患者的肩关节活动度。

Background

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty is a common joint replacement in orthopedic clinics. The main indications of this operation include proximal humeral comminution, humeral head necrosis, shoulder osteoarthritis, rotator cuff arthritis, etc. Due to the severe fracture or lesion, the prosthesis is implanted through replacement during the operation. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty has promising applications in treating various shoulder diseases due to its advantages of an excellent postoperative rehabilitation effect, faster functional recovery, and good local appearance. However, the anatomical structure of the shoulder joint is complex, especially in patients with bone diseases, and defects or deformities often accompany the glenoid. Therefore, treating the glenoid side in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is difficult. If the position of the glenoid base is not good, postoperative complications such as joint loosening and joint detachment are prone to occur, affecting patients' prognosis. In recent years, with the improvement of orthopedic surgical techniques and the application of 3D printing technology, preoperative three-dimensional reconstruction of the implanted prosthesis and preparation of physical composite models of the fracture site can significantly improve the matching degree of the implanted prosthesis, thereby improving the surgical effect. This technology also provides new ideas for the improvement of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Objective

To investigate the application effect of 3D navigation template technology in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Methods

A total of 29 patients who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty in our hospital from October 2020 to October 2022 were included in this study. Using a random number table, they were randomly divided into an observation group (n=11) and a control group (n=18). In the observation group, there were 2 males and 9 females, with an age range of 46 to 83 years and an average age of (65.27±11.56) years. The ASA classification was grade I in 2 cases, grade II in 5 cases, grade III in 3 cases, and grade IV in 1 case. The surgical positions were 2 cases in the left shoulder and 9 cases in the right shoulder, with primary diseases including comminuted fractures of the humerus in 5 cases, avascular necrosis of the humeral head in 1 case, osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint in 2 cases, and shoulder cuff-related joint disease in 3 cases. In the control group, there were 6 males and 12 females, with an age range of 52 to 80 years and an average age of (65.00±9.99) years. The ASA classification was grade I in 1 case, grade II in 12 cases, and grade III in 5 cases. The surgical positions were 7 cases in the left shoulder and 11 cases in the right shoulder, with primary diseases including comminuted fractures of the humerus in 12 cases, osteoarthritis of the shoulder joint in 3 cases, and shoulder cuff-related joint disease in 3 cases. The two groups had no statistically significant difference in general data (P>0.05). The observation group underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty using 3D printing navigation template technology, while the control group underwent conventional reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Results

The surgical duration, intraoperative blood loss, and time to initiate ambulation in the observation group were all lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The postoperative complication rate in the observation group was 0.00% (0/11), which was lower than that in the control group (33.33%, 6/18, P<0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, the Constant-Murley shoulder joint function scores, including pain and mobility scores, were higher in the observation group than in the control group (P<0.05). However, there was no statistically significant difference in the scores for daily life activities, muscle strength, and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 scale between the two groups at 3 months postoperatively (P>0.05) .

Conclusion

3D navigation template technology can be effectively applied in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, reducing surgical duration and intraoperative blood loss, facilitating early mobilization, alleviating pain, lowering the incidence of postoperative complications, and improving shoulder joint mobility.

表1 两组患者ASA分级对比
表2 两组患者病种对比
图1 3D打印技术打印出患者肩胛骨及导板的应用 图A:计算机设计患者肩盂中心螺钉导板侧位;图B:计算机设计患者肩盂中心螺钉导板正位;图C:3D打印出导板及患者肩胛骨;图D:术中安放3D导板,打入中心螺钉导针;图E:术后检查,患者中心螺钉位置良好,肩盂基座位置良好
表3 两组患者手术进行情况比较(±s)
表4 两组患者并发症发生率比较[例(%)]
表5 两组患者Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分比较(分,±s)
表6 两组患者生活质量评分比较(分,±s)
[1]
Takahashi T, Sato T, Manabe J, et al. Reverse shoulder arthroplasty and synthetic mesh for reconstruction of the shoulder joint after malignant bone tumor resection: A case report[J]. Medicine, 2021, 22(12):232-237.
[2]
代飞, 东靖眀, 杨金松,等. 反肩与半肩关节置换术治疗老年肱骨近端三或四部分骨折的临床疗效比较[J]. 中华骨科杂志, 2022, 42(4):204-212.
[3]
Page R, Beazley J, Graves S, et al. Effect of glenosphere size on reverse shoulder arthroplasty revision rate: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry (AOANJRR)[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2022,31(6):311-314.
[4]
韩巍, 张腾, 黄强,等. 锥形束CT引导机器人辅助反肩关节肩盂基座螺钉导针置入精准度研究[J]. 北京生物医学工程, 2021, 40(3):723-727.
[5]
包献丰, 赵永军, 佘亚峰. PHILOS内固定与半肩关节置换治疗肱骨近端复杂性骨折的疗效比较[J]. 中国骨科临床与基础研究杂志, 2021,13(4):1013-1017.
[6]
姜春岩, 赵阳. 人工肩关节置换治疗复杂肱骨近端骨折的术式选择及影响因素[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2021, 37(11):632-627.
[7]
杨茂赓,刘义,杨浩,等. 半肩关节置换与反式全肩关节置换治疗老年复杂肱骨近端骨折的Meta分析[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2021, 23(10):900-905.
[8]
黄瑶, 袁滨, 束昊,等. 反式全肩关节假体置换治疗巨大不可修复肩袖撕裂[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(1):623-627.
[9]
陈国能, 姜文学, 陈扬. 反式肩关节置换术治疗肩关节结核1例[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2022,37(1):102-103.
[10]
赵巍, 米尔阿地力·麦麦提依明, 宝尔江·阿斯哈尔,等. 3D打印导航模板与个性化定制假体在3例复杂关节置换术中的应用[J]. 中国骨与关节损伤杂志, 2021,39(12):283-286.
[11]
李建安, 林枫松, 卜国云,等. 反肩关节置换治疗肱骨近端骨折的并发症:假体周围骨吸收和无菌性假体松动[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2022, 26(15):711-717.
[12]
Duan X, Wang B, Yang L, et al. Applications of 3D Printing Technology in Orthopedic Treatment[J]. Biomed Res Int20212021:9892456.
[13]
Haleem A, Javaid M. Role of CT and MRI in the design and development of orthopaedic model using additive manufacturing[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma20189(3):213-217.
[14]
Bartels D, Marigi E, Sperling J, et al. Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Anatomical Glenoid Component Loosening Was Not Universally Successful: A Detailed Analysis of 127 Consecutive Shoulders[J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2021, 103(10):879-886.
[15]
Duncan JM, Nahas S, Akhtar K, et al. The Use of a 3D Printer in Pre-operative Planning for a Patient Requiring Acetabular Reconstructive Surgery[J]. J Orthop Case Rep20155(1):23-25.
[16]
谢尚举,王拓,胡华辉,等.反肩关节置换治疗终末期肩袖关节病的早期临床疗效[J].中国中医骨伤科杂志,2022,30(11):54-58.
[17]
Al Najjar M, Mehta SS, Monga P. Three dimensional scapular prints for evaluating glenoid morphology: An exploratory study[J]. J Clin Orthop Trauma20189(3):230-235.
[18]
Fucentese SF, Meier P, Jud L, et al. Accuracy of 3D-planned patient specific instrumentation in high tibial open wedge valgisation osteotomy[J]. J Exp Orthop20207(1):7.
[19]
Van Genechten W, Van Tilborg W, Van den Bempt M, et al. Feasibility and 3D Planning of a Novel Patient-Specific Instrumentation Technique in Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy[J]. J Knee Surg202134(14):1560-1569.
[20]
李奉龙,姜春岩.导航下反肩关节置换术中肩盂基座螺钉置入精确性与安全性研究[J].中国运动医学杂志,2019,38(1):31-35.
[21]
陆嫣. 对1例行3D打印定制反肩关节置换术后发生桡神经损伤的患者进行护理的方法和体会[J]. 当代医药论丛, 2022, 20(1):193-196.
[22]
王战, 严晓波, 林秾,等. 3D打印全肩胛骨反肩关节置换术在肩胛骨肿瘤治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2022,36(7):817-822.
[23]
Italia KR, Green N, Maharaj J, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of glenoid joint line restoration with glenoid bone grafting and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients with significant glenoid bone loss[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg202130(3):599-608.
[1] 陈翠萍, 李佩君, 杜景榕, 谢青梅, 许一宁, 卓姝妤, 李晓芳. 互联网联合上门护理在老年全髋关节置换术后的应用效果[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 676-681.
[2] 李萍, 陈慧, 庄君龙. 快速康复外科在机器人辅助腹腔镜膀胱切除回肠造口术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 249-253.
[3] 刘欣茹, 杜鹃, 代健健, 辛秀娟, 高梨梨. SBAR沟通模式在急诊腹股沟疝手术患者中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 451-455.
[4] 孙红燕, 李娟. 造口旁疝患者生活质量的影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 273-276.
[5] 张璇, 高杨, 房雅君, 姚艳玲. 保护性机械通气在肺癌胸腔镜肺段切除术中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 563-567.
[6] 马锦芳, 何正光, 郑劲平. 盐酸氨溴索雾化吸入治疗慢性阻塞性肺疾病黏痰症患者的疗效和安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 568-574.
[7] 陶银花, 张红杰, 王亚岚, 陈莲, 张珺. 间歇式气压治疗预防肺癌化疗下肢深静脉血栓的临床分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 605-608.
[8] 林建琴, 孔令敏, 陆银凤, 陈勇, 金凤, 叶磊, 陈方梅. PERMA模式对肺癌患者治疗获益感及生活质量的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 634-638.
[9] 罗孝平, 封敏, 黄川, 唐茜, 蒋艳, 胡莉丽. 渐进式抗阻训练干预在非小细胞肺癌中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 472-474.
[10] 李临川, 李戊阳, 程玉刚, 朱健康, 张光永. 近端胃切除术后消化道重建方式的现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(03): 135-140.
[11] 杭轶, 杨小勇, 李文美, 薛磊. 可控性低中心静脉压技术在肝切除术中应用的最适中心静脉压[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 813-817.
[12] 赵磊, 刘文志, 林峰, 于剑, 孙铭骏, 崔佑刚, 张旭, 衣宇鹏, 于宝胜, 冯宁. 深部热疗在改善结直肠癌术后辅助化疗副反应及生活质量中的作用研究[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 488-493.
[13] 林嘉敏, 丁海琦, 黄昌瑜, 陈旸, 黄颖, 张文明, 方心俞. 带间隔器生存可作为慢性PJI中无法耐受二期翻修病例的可选方案——一项单中心队列研究[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(02): 88-95.
[14] 高建平, 王辉, 王淑萍. 定期家庭随访对胸腔镜食管癌术后饮食恢复功能的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 188-192.
[15] 赖海洋, 吴可通, 刘洋, 李丹, 彭焘, 万源, 张波. 术前经动脉栓塞在椎体转移瘤切除术中的应用[J/OL]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 327-332.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?