切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 220 -228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.03.006

论著

早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤术后中-长期影响的Meta分析
梁洁浩1, 高大伟1,(), 陈亮1, 吴微1   
  1. 1. 528400 广州中医药大学附属中山中医院骨三科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-27 出版日期:2021-09-13
  • 通信作者: 高大伟
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技部2018重点研发项目(2018YFB1105600); 2020年度中山市第一批社会公益与基础研究项目(2020SYF03); 中山市新型研发机构产业化项目(2016F2FC0019)

Meta-analysis of the mid-and long-term effects of early and delayed rehabilitation on postoperative rotator cuff injury

Jiehao Liang1, Dawei Gao1,(), Liang Chen1, Wei Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Orthopedics, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan 528400, China
  • Received:2020-11-27 Published:2021-09-13
  • Corresponding author: Dawei Gao
引用本文:

梁洁浩, 高大伟, 陈亮, 吴微. 早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤术后中-长期影响的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 220-228.

Jiehao Liang, Dawei Gao, Liang Chen, Wei Wu. Meta-analysis of the mid-and long-term effects of early and delayed rehabilitation on postoperative rotator cuff injury[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(03): 220-228.

目的

通过Mate分析比较早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤患者术后中-长期的影响。

方法

检索国内、外截止2020年7月11日已发表的临床随机对照研究。所检索的数据库包括:中国知网、维普、万方、CBM、Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Embase等。由2位研究者独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和纳入文献的偏倚风险评价后,提取结局指标(VAS评分、Constan-Murley评分、SST评分、肩关节前屈角度、肩关节外展外旋角度、肩袖再撕裂),采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行数据分析。

结果

依据以上检索策略,共检索到相关文献641篇,最终纳入8篇文献,共720例患者。Mate分析结果显示,早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组在术后VAS评分[MD = 0.02, 95% CI= -0.10~0.14, P>0.05]、Constant-Murley评分[MD = 0.89, 95% CI = -1.47~3.26, P>0.05]、SST评分[MD = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.22~0.59, P>0.05]、肩关节前屈角度[MD = 1.11, 95% CI = -1.43~3.65, P>0.05]、肩关节外展外旋角度[MD = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.97~3.70, P>0.05]、肩袖再撕裂[MD = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.48~1.94, P>0.05]等6个术后指标的比较中均无明显差异。

结论

早期康复运动组患者术后中-长期肩袖再撕裂发生率与延迟康复运动组无明显差异,说明肩袖修补术后的早期康复运动同样安全;两组患者在术后中-长期VAS评分、Constant-Murley评分、SST评分、肩关节前屈角度、肩关节外展外旋角度等方面无明显差异,说明两组患者的术后疼痛、肩关节功能、自我感觉等无明显异常,提示肩袖损伤修补术后的早期康复运动同样有效。

Background

The rotator cuff consists of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis, attached to the greater or lesser tuberosity at the upper end of the humerus. The tendons of these four muscles around the shoulder joint form a cuff-like structure, which is figuratively called the rotator cuff. The injuries of these tendons and soft tissues are called rotator cuff injuries. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a clinically recognized and effective treatment for rotator cuff injury. Studies have illustrated that early rehabilitation is superior to delayed rehabilitation in shoulder motion, pain, and self-perception.

Objective

To compare the mid-and long-term effects of early rehabilitation and delayed rehabilitation on postoperative rotator cuff injury by MATE analysis.

Methods

The published domestic and foreign clinical randomized controlled trials were searched as of July 11, 2020. The databases searched include CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang Data, CBM, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, etc. Two investigators independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias in the included literatures. They then extracted the outcome indicators (VAS score, Constant-Murley score, SST score, flexion, abduction and external rotation, and retear) . Review Manager 5.3 software was utilized for data analysis.

Results

Based on the above search strategy, 641 relevant documents were retrieved, and 8 documents were finally included, with 720 patients. The results of Mate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the comparison of early rehabilitation group and delayed rehabilitation group in postoperative VAS score of [MD=0.02, 95% CI=-0.10~0.14, P>0.05], and the postoperative Constant-Murley score [MD=0.89, 95% CI=-1.47~3.26, P>0.05], postoperative SST score [MD=0.19, 95% CI= -0.22~0.59, P>0.05], postoperative shoulder flexion [MD=1.11, 95% CI =-1.43~3.65, P>0.05], postoperative shoulder abduction and external rotation [MD=1.36, 95% CI=0.97~3.70, P>0.05], postoperative rotator cuff retear [MD=0.96, 95% CI=0.48~1.94, P>0.05].

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the incidence of mid-and long-term rotator cuff retearing in the early mobilization group and the delayed rehabilitation group, indicating that early mobilization after rotator cuff repair was equally safe; the two groups of patients had medium and long-term VAS scores, There was no significant difference in Constant-Murley score, SST score, shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, and external rotation, indicating that the two groups of patients had no apparent abnormalities in postoperative pain, shoulder joint function, and self-feeling, suggesting early rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair is also effective.There was no significant difference in the incidence of mid-and long-term rotator cuff retear in the early rehabilitation and delayed rehabilitation groups, indicating that early rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair was equally safe. There were no significant differences between the two groups in mid-and long-term VAS scores, Constant-Murley scores, SST scores, shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, and external rotation, indicating that the two groups of patients had no apparent abnormalities in postoperative pain, shoulder joint function, and self-perception, suggesting that the early rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair is equally effective.

图1 文献筛选流程图
表1 纳入文献研究基本特征表
图2 Cochrane风险偏倚评估
图3 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月VAS评分森林图
图4 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月Constan-Murley评分森林图
图5 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月SST评分森林图
图6 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月肩关节前屈角度森林图
图7 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月肩关节外展外旋角度森林图
图8 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后肩袖再撕裂森林图
[1]
陈疾忤, 陈世益, Murrell GAC. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2004, 25(2):92-94.
[2]
武文帅,陈崇民.肩袖损伤诊疗进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2015,17(10):208-212.
[3]
张一翀, 陈建海. 美国肩肘外科治疗师协会:关于肩关节镜下肩袖修复术后康复共识声明[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1):59-63.
[4]
吴剑, 陈俊, 刘艳西,等. 快速康复外科理念在关节镜下治疗肩袖损伤中的应用[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1):87-90.
[5]
郑银家. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期及延迟康复治疗介入的疗效比较[J]. 双足与保健, 2018, 27(6):40.
[6]
黄成龙, 吴华, 陈刚,等. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期及延迟康复治疗介入的疗效比较[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(3):255-259.
[7]
郭锐, 王华军, 董云,等. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期与延迟被动运动的疗效比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(10):87-91.
[8]
郭绮琪. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期及延迟康复治疗介入的比较[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2019,10(7):10-11.
[9]
Sheps DM , Silveira A , Beaupre L , et al. Early active motion versus sling immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg, 2019, 35(3):749-760,e2.
[10]
Mazzocca AD , Arciero RA , Shea KP , et al. The effect of early range of motion on quality of life, clinical outcome, and repair integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg, 2017:S0749806316308891.
[11]
Roo PJD , Muermans S , Maroy M , et al. Passive mobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is not detrimental in the early postoperative period[J]. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 2015, 81(3):485-492.
[12]
Randelli P,Spennacchio P,Ragone V,et al.Complications associated with arthroscopic with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair:a literature review[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2012, 96(1): 9-16.
[13]
Chung SW, Huong CB, Kim SH, et al. Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome[J].Athroscopy, 2013,29(2): 290-300.
[14]
Frisella WA,Cuomo F. Basics of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [J]. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 8(4): 166-174.
[15]
Gartsman GM . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001,(390):95-106.
[16]
Arndt J , Clavert P , Mielcarek P , et al. Immediate passive motion versus immobilization after endoscopic supraspinatus tendon repair: a prospective randomized study[J]. Orthopaedics Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, 98(6):S131-S138.
[17]
Namdari S, Donegan RP, Chamberlain AM, et al. Factors affecting outcome after structural failure of repaired rotator cuff tears[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(2):99-105.
[18]
Barth J, Andrieu K, Fotiadis E, et al. Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2017,25(7):2196-2204.
[19]
Lee BG , Cho NS , Rhee YG . Effect of two rehabilitation protocols on range of motion and healing rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: aggressive versus limited early passive exercises.[J]. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg, 2012, 28(1):34-42.
[20]
侯森荣,杨伟毅,林炯同,等.刘军教授治疗肩袖损伤学术经验荟萃[J].中国中医急症,2018,27(11):2032-2035.
[21]
Koh TT, Daly A, Howard W, et al. Complex regional pain syndrome[J]. JBJS Rev,2014,(7):01874474-201402070-00004.
[1] 蚁淳, 袁冬生, 熊学军. 系统免疫炎症指数与骨密度降低和骨质疏松的关联[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 609-617.
[2] 李志文, 李远志, 李华, 方志远. 糖皮质激素治疗膝骨关节炎疗效的网状Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 484-496.
[3] 吴姗姗, 潘裕民, 刘晋, 张劲松, 乔莉. 睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者静脉血栓栓塞症发生率的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 312-317.
[4] 沈皓, 张驰, 韩旻轩, 陆晓庆, 周愉, 周莉丽. 骨皮质切开术对正畸治疗牙根吸收影响的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 175-184.
[5] 任甜甜, 张玉慧, 祁玲霞, 朱梅冬, 胡佳. 多学科疼痛管理对胸腔镜肺叶切除术后胸痛及应激反应的影响分析[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2024, 17(04): 630-633.
[6] 马振威, 宋润夫, 王兵. ERCP胆道内支架与骑跨十二指肠乳头支架置入治疗不可切除肝门部胆管癌疗效的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 807-812.
[7] 龚财芳, 赵俊宇, 游川. 围手术期肠内营养在肝癌肝切除患者中有效性及安全性的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 551-556.
[8] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[9] 严肃, 束昊, 吉同岳, 孙鲁宁. 肱二头肌长头腱切断与保留对中老年患者的中、小型退变性肩袖撕裂修补术后疗效影响[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 309-318.
[10] 谢娜, 纪东旭, 刘晨, 徐峰. 肩肱距离在肩痛患者诊断和治疗决策中的作用:一项回顾性的病例对照研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 326-331.
[11] 王洪, 王骏华, 范建楠. 人工智能技术在肩袖损伤中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 356-361.
[12] 胡子豪, 王喆, 陈建海, 齐岩松, 徐永胜. 聚合物材料在肩袖损伤治疗中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 362-368.
[13] 李婉玉, 张艳, 李冰冰. 肩袖损伤术后恐动症的研究现状[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 369-372.
[14] 王芳, 刘达, 左智炜, 盛金平, 陈庭进, 蒋锐. 定量CT与双能X线骨密度仪对骨质疏松诊断效能比较的Meta分析[J/OL]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2024, 10(06): 363-371.
[15] 周倩妹, 王宪娥, 徐筱, 老慧琳, 赵欣悦, 胡菁颖. 多元化系统护理对老年人群牙周健康指标影响的系统评价[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 500-506.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?