切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (03) : 220 -228. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.03.006

论著

早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤术后中-长期影响的Meta分析
梁洁浩1, 高大伟1,(), 陈亮1, 吴微1   
  1. 1. 528400 广州中医药大学附属中山中医院骨三科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-27 出版日期:2021-09-13
  • 通信作者: 高大伟
  • 基金资助:
    国家科技部2018重点研发项目(2018YFB1105600); 2020年度中山市第一批社会公益与基础研究项目(2020SYF03); 中山市新型研发机构产业化项目(2016F2FC0019)

Meta-analysis of the mid-and long-term effects of early and delayed rehabilitation on postoperative rotator cuff injury

Jiehao Liang1, Dawei Gao1,(), Liang Chen1, Wei Wu1   

  1. 1. Department of Joint Orthopedics, Zhongshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhongshan 528400, China
  • Received:2020-11-27 Published:2021-09-13
  • Corresponding author: Dawei Gao
引用本文:

梁洁浩, 高大伟, 陈亮, 吴微. 早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤术后中-长期影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 220-228.

Jiehao Liang, Dawei Gao, Liang Chen, Wei Wu. Meta-analysis of the mid-and long-term effects of early and delayed rehabilitation on postoperative rotator cuff injury[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(03): 220-228.

目的

通过Mate分析比较早期康复运动与延迟康复运动对肩袖损伤患者术后中-长期的影响。

方法

检索国内、外截止2020年7月11日已发表的临床随机对照研究。所检索的数据库包括:中国知网、维普、万方、CBM、Pubmed、Cochrane Library、Embase等。由2位研究者独立进行文献筛选、资料提取和纳入文献的偏倚风险评价后,提取结局指标(VAS评分、Constan-Murley评分、SST评分、肩关节前屈角度、肩关节外展外旋角度、肩袖再撕裂),采用Review Manager 5.3软件进行数据分析。

结果

依据以上检索策略,共检索到相关文献641篇,最终纳入8篇文献,共720例患者。Mate分析结果显示,早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组在术后VAS评分[MD = 0.02, 95% CI= -0.10~0.14, P>0.05]、Constant-Murley评分[MD = 0.89, 95% CI = -1.47~3.26, P>0.05]、SST评分[MD = 0.19, 95% CI = -0.22~0.59, P>0.05]、肩关节前屈角度[MD = 1.11, 95% CI = -1.43~3.65, P>0.05]、肩关节外展外旋角度[MD = 1.36, 95% CI = 0.97~3.70, P>0.05]、肩袖再撕裂[MD = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.48~1.94, P>0.05]等6个术后指标的比较中均无明显差异。

结论

早期康复运动组患者术后中-长期肩袖再撕裂发生率与延迟康复运动组无明显差异,说明肩袖修补术后的早期康复运动同样安全;两组患者在术后中-长期VAS评分、Constant-Murley评分、SST评分、肩关节前屈角度、肩关节外展外旋角度等方面无明显差异,说明两组患者的术后疼痛、肩关节功能、自我感觉等无明显异常,提示肩袖损伤修补术后的早期康复运动同样有效。

Background

The rotator cuff consists of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus, teres minor, and subscapularis, attached to the greater or lesser tuberosity at the upper end of the humerus. The tendons of these four muscles around the shoulder joint form a cuff-like structure, which is figuratively called the rotator cuff. The injuries of these tendons and soft tissues are called rotator cuff injuries. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is a clinically recognized and effective treatment for rotator cuff injury. Studies have illustrated that early rehabilitation is superior to delayed rehabilitation in shoulder motion, pain, and self-perception.

Objective

To compare the mid-and long-term effects of early rehabilitation and delayed rehabilitation on postoperative rotator cuff injury by MATE analysis.

Methods

The published domestic and foreign clinical randomized controlled trials were searched as of July 11, 2020. The databases searched include CNKI, CQVIP, Wanfang Data, CBM, Pubmed, Cochrane Library, Embase, etc. Two investigators independently conducted literature screening, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias in the included literatures. They then extracted the outcome indicators (VAS score, Constant-Murley score, SST score, flexion, abduction and external rotation, and retear) . Review Manager 5.3 software was utilized for data analysis.

Results

Based on the above search strategy, 641 relevant documents were retrieved, and 8 documents were finally included, with 720 patients. The results of Mate analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the comparison of early rehabilitation group and delayed rehabilitation group in postoperative VAS score of [MD=0.02, 95% CI=-0.10~0.14, P>0.05], and the postoperative Constant-Murley score [MD=0.89, 95% CI=-1.47~3.26, P>0.05], postoperative SST score [MD=0.19, 95% CI= -0.22~0.59, P>0.05], postoperative shoulder flexion [MD=1.11, 95% CI =-1.43~3.65, P>0.05], postoperative shoulder abduction and external rotation [MD=1.36, 95% CI=0.97~3.70, P>0.05], postoperative rotator cuff retear [MD=0.96, 95% CI=0.48~1.94, P>0.05].

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the incidence of mid-and long-term rotator cuff retearing in the early mobilization group and the delayed rehabilitation group, indicating that early mobilization after rotator cuff repair was equally safe; the two groups of patients had medium and long-term VAS scores, There was no significant difference in Constant-Murley score, SST score, shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, and external rotation, indicating that the two groups of patients had no apparent abnormalities in postoperative pain, shoulder joint function, and self-feeling, suggesting early rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair is also effective.There was no significant difference in the incidence of mid-and long-term rotator cuff retear in the early rehabilitation and delayed rehabilitation groups, indicating that early rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair was equally safe. There were no significant differences between the two groups in mid-and long-term VAS scores, Constant-Murley scores, SST scores, shoulder flexion, shoulder abduction, and external rotation, indicating that the two groups of patients had no apparent abnormalities in postoperative pain, shoulder joint function, and self-perception, suggesting that the early rehabilitation after rotator cuff repair is equally effective.

图1 文献筛选流程图
表1 纳入文献研究基本特征表
图2 Cochrane风险偏倚评估
图3 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月VAS评分森林图
图4 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月Constan-Murley评分森林图
图5 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月SST评分森林图
图6 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月肩关节前屈角度森林图
图7 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后6个月和12个月肩关节外展外旋角度森林图
图8 早期康复运动组与延迟康复运动组术后肩袖再撕裂森林图
[1]
陈疾忤, 陈世益, Murrell GAC. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2004, 25(2):92-94.
[2]
武文帅,陈崇民.肩袖损伤诊疗进展[J].辽宁中医药大学学报,2015,17(10):208-212.
[3]
张一翀, 陈建海. 美国肩肘外科治疗师协会:关于肩关节镜下肩袖修复术后康复共识声明[J/CD]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 6(1):59-63.
[4]
吴剑, 陈俊, 刘艳西,等. 快速康复外科理念在关节镜下治疗肩袖损伤中的应用[J/CD]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2018, 12(1):87-90.
[5]
郑银家. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期及延迟康复治疗介入的疗效比较[J]. 双足与保健, 2018, 27(6):40.
[6]
黄成龙, 吴华, 陈刚,等. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期及延迟康复治疗介入的疗效比较[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2015, 30(3):255-259.
[7]
郭锐, 王华军, 董云,等. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期与延迟被动运动的疗效比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2018, 34(10):87-91.
[8]
郭绮琪. 关节镜下肩袖修复术后早期及延迟康复治疗介入的比较[J]. 按摩与康复医学, 2019,10(7):10-11.
[9]
Sheps DM , Silveira A , Beaupre L , et al. Early active motion versus sling immobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg, 2019, 35(3):749-760,e2.
[10]
Mazzocca AD , Arciero RA , Shea KP , et al. The effect of early range of motion on quality of life, clinical outcome, and repair integrity after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg, 2017:S0749806316308891.
[11]
Roo PJD , Muermans S , Maroy M , et al. Passive mobilization after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair is not detrimental in the early postoperative period[J]. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica, 2015, 81(3):485-492.
[12]
Randelli P,Spennacchio P,Ragone V,et al.Complications associated with arthroscopic with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair:a literature review[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2012, 96(1): 9-16.
[13]
Chung SW, Huong CB, Kim SH, et al. Shoulder stiffness after rotator cuff repair: risk factors and influence on outcome[J].Athroscopy, 2013,29(2): 290-300.
[14]
Frisella WA,Cuomo F. Basics of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair [J]. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 8(4): 166-174.
[15]
Gartsman GM . Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2001,(390):95-106.
[16]
Arndt J , Clavert P , Mielcarek P , et al. Immediate passive motion versus immobilization after endoscopic supraspinatus tendon repair: a prospective randomized study[J]. Orthopaedics Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, 98(6):S131-S138.
[17]
Namdari S, Donegan RP, Chamberlain AM, et al. Factors affecting outcome after structural failure of repaired rotator cuff tears[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(2):99-105.
[18]
Barth J, Andrieu K, Fotiadis E, et al. Critical period and risk factors for retear following arthroscopic repair of the rotator cuff [J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2017,25(7):2196-2204.
[19]
Lee BG , Cho NS , Rhee YG . Effect of two rehabilitation protocols on range of motion and healing rates after arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: aggressive versus limited early passive exercises.[J]. Arthroscopy J Arthroscopic Relat Surg, 2012, 28(1):34-42.
[20]
侯森荣,杨伟毅,林炯同,等.刘军教授治疗肩袖损伤学术经验荟萃[J].中国中医急症,2018,27(11):2032-2035.
[21]
Koh TT, Daly A, Howard W, et al. Complex regional pain syndrome[J]. JBJS Rev,2014,(7):01874474-201402070-00004.
[1] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[2] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[3] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[4] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[5] 邢阳, 何爱珊, 康焱, 杨子波, 孟繁钢, 邬培慧. 前交叉韧带单束联合前外侧结构重建的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 508-519.
[6] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[7] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[8] 武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[9] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[10] 张蓉, 秦洪真, 杨晓冬, 刘爽, 刘明锋, 曹秀堂. 分化型甲状腺癌术后康复锻炼的临床应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 439-442.
[11] 刘佳铭, 孙晓容, 文健, 何晓丽, 任茂玲. 有氧运动对成人哮喘肺功能、生活质量以及哮喘控制影响的Meta分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 592-595.
[12] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[13] 杨海龙, 邓满军, 樊羿辰, 徐梦钰, 陈芳德, 吴威浩, 张生元. 腹腔镜胆总管探查术一期缝合术后胆漏危险因素Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 545-550.
[14] 阿依别克·吐尔得汉, 陈伦牮, 巴合体·卡力甫, 陈雄, 梦塬. 血清免疫抗原在包虫病诊断中的价值Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(03): 300-304.
[15] 徐红莉, 杨钰琳, 薛清, 张茜, 马丽虹, 邱振刚. 体外冲击波治疗非特异性腰痛疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 307-314.
阅读次数
全文


摘要