切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2021, Vol. 09 ›› Issue (01) : 42 -47. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2021.01.007

所属专题: 文献

论著

MultiLoc髓内钉技术在肱骨近端骨折中的应用和体会
鲍飞龙1, 姬广伟1, 亢世杰1, 黄东生1, 江涛1, 吕夫新1, 刘涛1,()   
  1. 1. 266035 山东大学齐鲁医院(青岛)创伤骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-07-06 出版日期:2021-02-05
  • 通信作者: 刘涛

Preliminary application and experience of MultiLoc intramedullary nail in the treament of proximal humerus fractures

Feilong Bao1, Guangwei Ji1, Shijie Kang1, Dongsheng Huang1, Tao Jiang1, Fuxin Lyu1, Tao Liu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Qilu Hospital (Qingdao) , Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Qingdao 266035, China
  • Received:2020-07-06 Published:2021-02-05
  • Corresponding author: Tao Liu
引用本文:

鲍飞龙, 姬广伟, 亢世杰, 黄东生, 江涛, 吕夫新, 刘涛. MultiLoc髓内钉技术在肱骨近端骨折中的应用和体会[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2021, 09(01): 42-47.

Feilong Bao, Guangwei Ji, Shijie Kang, Dongsheng Huang, Tao Jiang, Fuxin Lyu, Tao Liu. Preliminary application and experience of MultiLoc intramedullary nail in the treament of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2021, 09(01): 42-47.

目的

探讨MultiLoc髓内钉治疗肱骨近端Neer分型II、III、IV部分骨折中的技术应用以及临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2017年12月至2019年12月手术治疗的肱骨近端骨折患者共70例,具备完整随访资料者61例,其中男24例、女37例;年龄23~81岁,平均年龄(58.02±13.44)岁;Neer分型:II部分骨折17例,III部分骨折28例,IV部分骨折16例。分别观察包括性别、年龄、术中出血量、手术时间、骨折临床愈合时间、肩关节主观评分系统(subjective shoulder rating system SSRS)、美国加州大学肩关节评分系统(University of California at LosAngeles ,UCLA)(Ellman法)。

结果

61例患者获得随访,随访时间3~22个月,平均6.7个月,随访期间无内固定物断裂、感染、肱骨头缺血性坏死、内翻畸形愈合和螺钉切出等并发症。2例出现肩峰下撞击征,61例均临床愈合,愈合时间11~18周,平均(13.93±1.79)周。三组患者性别、骨折临床愈合时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);年龄、出血量、手术时间、SSRS、UCLA评分(Ellman法)差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。UCLA评分总体患者优良率为80.3%,其中II、III部分骨折优良率为86.7%,IV部分骨折优良率为62.5%。

结论

MultiLoc髓内钉内固定治疗肱骨近端Neer分型II、III部分骨折疗效满意,IV部分骨折虽有部分满意疗效,但整体疗效相对差。

Background

Proximal humeral fractures are common osteoporotic fractures, accounting for about 10% of the elderly fractures and 39.7% of adult humeral fractures. Consensus has been reached on the preferred surgical treatment for complex and unstable proximal humerus fractures. However, there are still disputes on which internal fixation method is more scientific and reasonable. In the case of osteoporosis, and medial comminuted fractures which lack of support, locking plate fixation is prone to secondary varus deformity and neck-shift angle loss. Some scholars reported that the curative effect of third-generation straight intramedullary nail in the treatment of Neer part-2, part-3 and part-4 proximal humeral fractures were satisfactory. Objective To investigate the technical application and clinical efficacy of MultiLoc intramedullary nail in the treatment of Neer part-2, part-3 and part-4 proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

From December 2017 to December 2019, 70 patients with proximal humeral fractures admitted to our trauma center were included in this study. There were 24 males and 37 females with an average age of (58.02±13.44) years (23 to 81 years) . According to Neer classification, there were 17 cases of part-2 fractures, 28 cases of part-3 fractures and 16 cases of part-4 fractures. The gender, age, intraoperative blood loss, operation duration, clinical healing time of fracture, subjective shoulder score system (SSRS) and UCLA shoulder score (Ellman method) was recorded.

Results

All the patients were followed up for an average of 6.7 months (3 to 22 months) , and there were no complications occurred, such as internal fixator fracture, infection, humeral head necrosis, varus deformity, screw cut-out, etc. Only 2 cases had subacromial impingement syndrome. All patients obtained clinical healing, and the mean healing duration was (13.93±1.79) weeks (11 to 18 weeks) . There were no significant differences in gender and clinical duration for fracture union, but the comparison results of age, blood loss, operation duration, SSRS scoring, and UCLA score had significant difference (P<0.05) . According to UCLA scoring system, the overall excellent and good rate was 80.3%, among which the excellent and good rate of Neer part-2 and part3 fractures was 86.7% while it was 62.5% in Neer part-4 fractures.

Conclusion

The curative efficacy of MultiLoc intramedullary nail for proximal humeral fractures of Neer part-2 and part-3 is satisfactory. For some of Neer part-4 fractures, the curative effect is satisfactory, but the overall effect was relatively poor.

表1 一般患者资料(±s)
表2 不同骨折类型临床表现(±s)
图1 典型病例:患者女性,71岁,右肱骨近端骨折III部分 图A-D:术前X线片、CT;图E-H:术后11个月X线片、CT;图I-L:术后11个月功能体位像
[1]
Okike K, Lee OC, Makanji H, et al. Factors associated with the decision for operative versus non-operative treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures in the elderly[J]. Injury, 2013, 44(4): 448-455.
[2]
张英泽. 临床创伤骨科流行病学[M]. 北京,人民卫生出版社,2014:16-32.
[3]
姜保国,陈建海. 肱骨近端骨折的治疗进展[J]. 北京大学学报:医学版, 2015,47(2):197-199.
[4]
Maier D, Jaeger M, Izadpanah K, et al. Proximal humeral fracture treatment in adults[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2014, 96(3): 251-261.
[5]
Sproul RC, Iyengar JJ, Devcic Z, et al. A systematic review of locking plate fixation of proximal humerus fractures[J]. Injury, 2011, 42(4): 408-413.
[6]
Zhu Y, Lu Y, Wang M, et al. Treatment of proximal humeral fracture with a proximal humeral nail[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(2): 297-302.
[7]
Nijs L, Stefaan JB, Meskens L, et al. Proximal Humerus Fractures: Intramedullary Nailing[J]. Tech Orthop, 2013, 28(4):321-325.
[8]
Hessmann MH, Nijs S, Mittlmeier T, et al. Internal fixation of fractures of the proximal humerus with the MultiLoc nail[J]. Oper Orthop Traumatol, 2012, 24(4-5): 418-431.
[9]
Neer CS 2nd. Displaced proximal humeral fractures. I. Classification and evaluation[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1970, 52(6): 1077-1089.
[10]
Boileau P, d'Ollonne T, Bessiere C, et al. Displaced humeral surgical neck fractures: classification and results of third-generation percutaneous intramedullary nailing[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2019, 28(2): 276-287.
[11]
Kohn D, Geyer M. The subjective shoulder rating system[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 1997, 116(6-7): 324-328.
[12]
Ellman H . Arthroscopic subacromial decompression: analysis of one- to three-year results[J]. Arthroscopy, 1987,3(3):174-181.
[13]
Roux A, Decroocq L, El Batti S, et al. Epidemiology of proximal humerus fractures managed in a trauma center[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2012, 98(6): 715-719.
[14]
Orman S, Mohamadi A, Serino J, et al. Comparison of surgical and non-surgical treatments for 3- and 4-part proximal humerus fractures: A network meta-analysis[J]. Shoulder Elbow, 2020, 12(2): 99-108.
[15]
Wendt KW, Jaeger M, Verbruggen J, et al. ESTES recommendations on proximal humerus fractures in the elderly[J]. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg, 2020,7(3).[published online ahead of print].
[16]
Padegimas EM, Chang G, Namjouyan K, et al. Failure to restore the calcar and locking screw cross-threading predicts varus collapse in proximal humerus fracture fixation[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2020, 29(2): 291-295.
[17]
Shin MJ, Kim H, Kim DM, et al. Role of inferomedial supporting screws for secondary varus deformity in non-osteoporotic proximal humerus fracture: A biomechanical study[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2020,13.[published online ahead of print].
[18]
Varga P, Inzana JA, Fletcher JWA, et al. Cement augmentation of calcar screws may provide the greatest reduction in predicted screw cut-out risk for proximal humerus plating based on validated parametric computational modelling: Augmenting proximal humerus fracture plating[J]. Bone Joint Res, 2020, 9(9): 534-542.
[19]
Li M, Wang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Intramedullary nail versus locking plate for treatment of proximal humeral fractures: A meta-analysis based on 1384 individuals[J]. J Int Med Res, 2018, 46(11): 4363-4376.
[20]
Pautasso A, Lea S, Arpaia A, et al. Six-year experience with antegrade intramedullary nail for the treatment of proximal and diaphyseal humeral fractures[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2018, 102(Suppl 1): 67-74.
[21]
Hettrich CM, Boraiah S, Dyke JP, et al. Quantitative assessment of the vascularity of the proximal part of the humerus[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2010, 92(4): 943-948.
[22]
Euler SA, Hengg C, Kolp D, et al. Lack of fifth anchoring point and violation of the insertion of the rotator cuff during antegrade humeral nailing: pitfalls in straight antegrade humeral nailing[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96-B(2): 249-253.
[23]
Pennington SD, Duralde XA. Locking plate fixation for proximal humerus fractures[J]. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ), 2014, 43(7): 302-308.
[24]
Kanchanatawan W, Suppauksorn S, Densiri-Aksorn W, et al. Fluoroscopic Technique for Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Proximal Humeral Fracture Using the Proximal Humeral Locking Plate: Proposal of "Plate" and "Screw" Views[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2017, 6(4): e1009-e1014.
[25]
Hao TD, Huat AWT. Surgical technique and early outcomes of intramedullary nailing of displaced proximal humeral fractures in an Asian population using a contemporary straight nail design[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2017, 25(2): 2309499017713934.
[1] 中华医学会骨科学分会关节外科学组, 广东省医学会骨质疏松和骨矿盐疾病分会, 广东省佛山市顺德区第三人民医院. 中国髋部脆性骨折术后抗骨质疏松药物临床干预指南(2023年版)[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 751-764.
[2] 刘瀚忠, 黄生辉, 万俊明, 李家春, 舒涛. 髌上入路和髌旁外侧入路髓内钉治疗胫骨骨折疗效比较[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 795-801.
[3] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[4] 孟繁宇, 周新社, 赵志, 裴立家, 刘犇. 侧位直接前方入路髋关节置换治疗偏瘫肢体股骨颈骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 865-870.
[5] 陈志超, 张志伟, 蒋勰, 顾祖超, 蒋菁芸, 许婷婷. 带线锚钉结合缝线捆扎固定髌骨下极粉碎性骨折[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 732-735.
[6] 伊喆, 王志新, 陈伟, 齐伟亚, 方杰, 石海飞, 赵夏, 赵喆, 竺枫, 盛伟, 陈焱, 张宇昊, 朱瑾, 殷耀斌, 杨勇, 陈山林, 刘波. 机器人辅助无移位急性舟骨骨折经皮内固定的诊疗与手术操作规范[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 464-468.
[7] 米洁, 陈晨, 李佳玲, 裴海娜, 张恒博, 李飞, 李东杰. 儿童头面部外伤特点分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(06): 511-515.
[8] 张华, 孙宇, 乡世健, 李樱媚, 王小群. 循环肿瘤细胞预测晚期胃肠癌患者化疗药物敏感性的研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 422-425.
[9] 中国医师协会结直肠肿瘤专业委员会, 中国抗癌协会大肠癌专业委员会, 北京整合医学学会结直肠肿瘤分会. 吲哚菁绿近红外荧光血管成像技术应用于腹腔镜结直肠手术中吻合口血供判断中国专家共识(2023版)[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 441-447.
[10] 丁晨梦, 胡雪慧, 闫沛, 程乔. 髋部骨折术后患者居家康复体验质性研究的Meta整合[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 365-372.
[11] 姜里蛟, 张峰, 周玉萍. 多学科诊疗模式救治老年急性非静脉曲张性上消化道大出血患者的临床观察[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 520-524.
[12] 梁文龙, 曹杰, 黄庆, 林泳, 黄红丽, 杨平, 李冠炜, 胡鹤. 信迪利单抗联合瑞戈非尼治疗晚期结直肠癌的疗效与安全性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 409-413.
[13] 朱翔宇, 王建美, 张辉, 叶红英. 无创左心室压力-应变循环技术在左心室功能参数与肝硬化的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 494-498.
[14] 薛念余, 张盛敏, 吴凌恒, 沙蕾, 童揽月, 沈崔琴, 李朝军, 杜联芳. 研究血清胆红素对2型糖尿病患者心脏结构发生改变前心肌功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1004-1009.
[15] 李莹倩, 李华山. 基于真实世界的完全性直肠脱垂治疗方式评价[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 700-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要