切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 352 -357. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.04.011

所属专题: 文献

论著

锁定钢板内固定联合植骨在老年肱骨近端骨折患者治疗中的应用研究
周磊1, 王海涛1, 王华1,()   
  1. 1. 132000 吉林,北华大学附属医院骨外科
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-24 出版日期:2020-11-05
  • 通信作者: 王华

Application of locking plate internal fixation combined with bone grafting in the treatment of elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures

Lei Zhou1, Haitao Wang1, Hua Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Beihua University, Jilin 132000, China
  • Received:2020-03-24 Published:2020-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Hua Wang
引用本文:

周磊, 王海涛, 王华. 锁定钢板内固定联合植骨在老年肱骨近端骨折患者治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 352-357.

Lei Zhou, Haitao Wang, Hua Wang. Application of locking plate internal fixation combined with bone grafting in the treatment of elderly patients with proximal humeral fractures[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(04): 352-357.

目的

探究锁定钢板内固定联合植骨在老年肱骨近端骨折患者治疗中的应用。

方法

将2017年5月至2019年5月入住本院接受治疗的68例老年肱骨近端骨折患者作为本次的研究对象,依据采用治疗方式的不同分为研究组与对照组,每组患者34例。对照组患者采用普通的钢板内固定术;研究组患者采用锁定钢板内固定联合植骨的治疗方式。比较两组患者的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)、SF-36评分以及肩功能评分,比较两组患者的治疗效果、手术时间、术中出血量以及住院时间,比较两组患者并发症的发生及术后肱骨头内翻畸形的发生情况。

结果

术后3个月,研究组患者的VAS评分与对照组比较显著较低,SF-36评分与肩功能评分显著高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组患者的优良率与对照组比较显著较高(P<0.05);研究组患者的手术时间以及住院时间与对照组比较显著较短,术中出血量显著少于对照组(P<0.05);研究组患者并发症的总发生率与对照组比较显著较低(P<0.05);研究组内翻畸形发生率显著少于对照组(P<0.05)。

结论

在老年肱骨近端骨折患者临床诊疗的过程中,采用锁定钢板内固定联合植骨治疗,能够有效降低患者的疼痛程度,显著改善患者的生活质量状况,对于患者肩功能的恢复有积极的促进作用,同时能够减少并发症及内翻畸形情况出现,利于患者预后。

Background

In clinical treatment, proximal humeral fracture is a relatively common type of fracture, especially in the elderly population. The osteoporosis of elderly patients is more serious, which brings many difficulties to the clinical treatment, leading to invalid conservative treatment. In the process of traditional conservative treatment, patients may suffer from complications such as pain, infection, poor prognosis, and skin necrosis around the incision. Some patients with severe conditions may develop into joint dysfunction and persistent pain, which has a high disability rate. Currently, open reduction and internal fixation is the main treatment method, but the application of simple plate often leads to the fixation failure or the occurrence of fracture relocation, as well as postoperative complications. In recent years, locking plate fixation combined with bone grafting has been gradually applied in the treatment of elderly proximal humeral fractures, while there are relatively few reports.

Objective

To explore the application of locking plate combined with bone grafting in the treatment of elderly proximal humeral fractures.

Methods

From May 2017 to May 2019, a total of 68 elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures admitted to our hospital were selected as the subjects of this study. According to different treatment methods, they were equally divided into the research group and the control group. Patients in the control group were treated with conventional plate fixation, while patients in the research group were treated with locking plate fixation combined with bone grafting. The VAS score, SF-36 score and shoulder function score of two groups were compared, as well as the treatment effect, operation time, intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay. The occurrence of complications and postoperative varus deformity of humeral head in the two groups were compared as well.

Results

Three months after surgery, the VAS score of the research group was significantly lower than that of the control group, and the SF-36 score and shoulder function score were significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05) . The excellent and good rate of the research group was significantly higher than that of the control group (P<0.05) . The duration of surgery and hospitalization in the research group was significantly shorter than that in the control group, and the intraoperative blood loss was significantly less than that in the control group (P<0.05) . The overall incidence of complications in the research group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05) . The incidence of varus deformity in the research group was significantly less than that in the control group (P<0.05) .

Conclusion

In the process of clinical diagnosis and treatment of elderly proximal humeral fractures, locking plate fixation with bone grafting can effectively reduce the level of pain and significantly improve the patient’s quality of life. It has a positive role in promoting the recovery and reduce the occurrence of complications and varus deformity, which is conducive to the prognosis of patients.

图1 患者术前X线片
图2 患者术后1个月X线片
表1 两组患者手术前后的VAS、SF-36以及肩功能评分比较(分,±s)
表2 两组患者的治疗效果比较[例(%)]
表3 两组患者手术时间、术中出血量、住院时间比较(±s)
表4 两组患者并发症的发生情况[例(%)]
表5 两组患者术后内翻畸形出现情况对比
[1]
张施展,张卫国,徐钧,等.结构性植骨联合锁定钢板治疗股骨距粉碎性股骨转子间骨折的临床研究[J]. 重庆医学,2017,41(14):53-55.
[2]
贾亚超,徐佳,汪春阳,等.内固定联合植骨治疗肱骨远端骨不连[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2018,20(10):855-859.
[3]
胡居正,石展英,杨成志,等.骨搬移后对合端植骨内固定治疗下肢大段骨缺损的临床研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2018,38(5):280-287.
[4]
李明静,李凡,徐剑,等.克氏针内固定及植骨术治疗儿童陈旧性肱骨外髁骨折[J]. 中华手外科杂志,2018,34(1):17-18.
[5]
刘涛,鲍飞龙,亢世杰,等.掌背侧联合内固定治疗桡骨远端四部分骨折的策略和效果[J]. 中华外科杂志,2018,56(3):183-188.
[6]
孙鲁琨,许春涛,刘华,等. "U"形钛棒系统节段内固定联合峡部植骨治疗单纯性腰椎峡部裂[J]. 中国组织工程研究,2018,22(15):2340-2344.
[7]
张岩,张彬,李甲振,等.Erdheim-Chester病手术治疗的近期疗效[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2018,32(8):59-64.
[8]
王善玺,李军,黄富国,等.距下关节撑开植骨融合术在跟骨骨折畸形愈合治疗中的应用研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志,2017,36(6):120-124.
[9]
刘俊,危蕾,廖苏平,等.掌侧锁定钢板联合外固定支架治疗桡骨远端C2、C3型骨折[J]. 中华手外科杂志,2018,34(1):67-68.
[10]
刘键,王先安,陈科,等.一期后路病灶清除植骨椎弓根钉棒系统内固定治疗老年胸腰椎结核效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志,2018,63(17):4179-4182.
[11]
余鑫,贾硕,吴宏日,等.抗生素骨水泥被覆锁定钢板在膜诱导技术治疗胫骨创伤后骨感染中的运用[J]. 中华创伤杂志,2017,33(6):539-543.
[12]
汪李军,史源欣,邵伟忠,等.肱骨远端关节外解剖锁定加压钢板内固定治疗肱骨干中下段骨折[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志,2017,19(10):907-910.
[13]
邹云龙,刘宇龙,李野,等.颈椎椎弓根置钉精确度的临床研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2017,37(4):226-235.
[14]
徐明,郑凯,于秀淳,等.胫骨近端骨巨细胞瘤的多中心大样本回顾性研究[J]. 中华骨科杂志,2017,37(6):321-328.
[15]
张鑫,李春光,樊健,等.桡骨远端C3型骨折植骨对掌侧钢板内固定预后的影响[J]. 中华实验外科杂志,2018,35(12):2317.
[1] 金鑫, 谢卯, 刘芸, 杨操, 杨述华, 许伟华. 个性化股骨导向器辅助初次全髋关节置换的随机对照研究[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 780-787.
[2] 易晨, 张亚东, 董茜, 唐海阔, 刘志国. 应用骨盖技术拔除下颌低位骨性埋伏阻生第三磨牙的疗效观察[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 424-429.
[3] 杜滨和, 徐楠, 杨云川, 崔培元. 5项改良衰弱指数预测胰十二指肠切除术近期预后的价值探讨[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 444-448.
[4] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[5] 逄世江, 黄艳艳, 朱冠烈. 改良π形吻合在腹腔镜全胃切除消化道重建中的安全性和有效性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 66-69.
[6] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[7] 陈大敏, 曹晓刚, 曹能琦. 肥胖对胃癌患者手术治疗效果的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 651-653.
[8] 陈垚, 徐伯群, 高志慧. 改良式中间上入路根治术治疗甲状腺癌的有效性安全性研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 619-622.
[9] 曹智, 朱希望, 王尉, 张辉, 杨成林, 张小明. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术中不同肾盂内压力与围术期并发症相关性研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 616-620.
[10] 代格格, 杨丽, 胡媛媛, 周文婷. 手术室综合干预在老年腹股沟疝患者中的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 759-763.
[11] 王敏, 蒋家斌, 李茂新. 预警宣教联合个性化疼痛管理对腹股沟疝手术患者的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 764-767.
[12] 戴玮, 江桂林, 车兆平, 张姣, 王星星, 赵海涛. 无缝手术护理在腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术围手术期的应用效果[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 778-781.
[13] 叶晋生, 路夷平, 梁燕凯, 于淼, 冀祯, 贺志坚, 张洪海, 王洁. 腹腔镜下应用生物补片修补直肠术后盆底缺损的疗效[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 688-691.
[14] 袁伟, 张修稳, 潘宏波, 章军, 王虎, 黄敏. 平片式与填充式腹股沟疝修补术的疗效比较[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 697-701.
[15] 夏松, 姚嗣会, 汪勇刚. 经腹腹膜前与疝环充填式疝修补术治疗腹股沟疝的对照研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 702-705.
阅读次数
全文


摘要