切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 307 -313. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.04.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

肩袖撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性研究
陈建1,()   
  1. 1. 610016 成都,四川现代医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-01 出版日期:2020-11-05
  • 通信作者: 陈建

Correlation study of shoulder strength and shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears

Jian Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Sichuan Modern Hospital, Chengdu 610016, China
  • Received:2020-04-01 Published:2020-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Jian Chen
引用本文:

陈建. 肩袖撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 307-313.

Jian Chen. Correlation study of shoulder strength and shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(04): 307-313.

目的

探讨肩袖撕裂患者手术前肩部力量和肩部功能状况及两者之间的关系。

方法

选择2016年3月至2019年7月在本院进行手术治疗的全层肩袖撕裂患者243例。在患者手术前应用等速肌力测试检测患者肩部力量,应用临床评分系统测量患者肩部功能。根据患者撕裂程度大小将患者分为4组:小型撕裂组、中型撕裂组、大型撕裂组、巨大型撕裂组。分析每组患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性。

结果

在肩袖小型撕裂患者中,外展力量和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)存在负相关(r=-0.307,P=0.018);在肩袖中型撕裂患者中,外展力量和美国加州大学肩关节评分系统( University of California at Los Angeles ,UCLA)(r=0.262,P=0.015)、SF-36躯体健康总评(physical component summary,PCS)(r=0.226,P=0.038)存在正相关;外旋力量和UCLA评分存在正相关(r=0.289,P=0.007);在肩袖大型撕裂患者中,外展力量和Constant评分(r=0.282,P=0.043)、加州大学肩关节评分系统(American shoulder and elbow surgeon' form , ASES)(r=0.309,P=0.026)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.317,P=0.022)存在正相关;外旋力量和UCLA评分(r=0.288,P=0.038)、Constant评分(r=0.293,P=0.035)、ASES评分(r=0.329,P=0.017)存在正相关;内旋力量和UCLA评分(r =0.383,P=0.005)、Constant评分(r=0.401,P=0.003)、ASES评分(r=0.314,P=0.023)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.285,P=0.041)、SF-36精神健康总评(mental component summary , MCS)(r=0.304,P=0.028)存在正相关;在肩袖巨大型撕裂患者中,外展力量和VAS评分(r=-0.308,P=0.035)存在负相关,和UCLA评分(r=0.413,P=0.004)、Constant评分(r=0.489,P=0.000)、ASES评分(r=0.473,P=0.001)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.772,P=0.000)、SF-36 MCS评分(r=0.293,P=0.046)存在正相关;外旋力量和VAS评分(r=-0.292,P=0.046)存在负相关,和UCLA评分(r=0.629,P=0.000)、Constant评分(r=0.413,P=0.004)、ASES评分(r=0.695,P=0.000)、SF-36 PCS评分(r=0.583,P=0.000)存在正相关;内旋力量和VAS评分(r=-0.309,P=0.035)存在负相关,和UCLA评分(r=0.512,P=0.000)、Constant评分(r=0.709,P=0.000)、ASES评分(r=0.802,P=0.000)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.501,P=0.000)存在正相关。

结论

撕裂程度可能是决定患者肩部力量和肩部功能相关程度的关键因素,部分修复不可修复的巨大撕裂非常重要。

Background

Rotator cuff tear is one of the main causes of shoulder function reduction in middle-aged and elderly people. Shoulder muscle strength is one of the essential factors to ensure shoulder stability. It is important to determine the degree of influence of insufficient shoulder strength on patients' symptoms to guide clinical treatment. Currently, the extent to which inadequate shoulder strength affects shoulder joint function in rotator cuff tears has not been determined.

Objective

To investigate the relationship between shoulder strength and shoulder function before rotator cuff tear surgery.

Methods

We selected 243 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from March 2016 to July 2019. Isokinetic muscle strength test is used to measure the patient's shoulder strength before surgery, and the clinical scoring system is used to measure the patient’s shoulder function. According to the degree of tear, the patients were divided into 4 groups: small tear group, medium tear group, large tear group, and massive tear group. The correlation between shoulder strength and shoulder function of each group of patients was analyzed.

Results

There was a negative correlation between abduction function and VAS score in patients of small tear group (r=-0.307, P=0.018) . In patients of medium tear group, the abduction function and UCLA score (r=0.262, P=0.015) , SF-36 PCS score (r=0.226, P=0.038) were positively correlated, and the external rotation function and UCLA score are positively correlated (r= 0.289, P=0.007) . In patients of large tear group, the abduction function and Constant score (r=0.282, P=0.043) , ASES score (r=0.309, P=0.026) , SF-36PCS score (r=0.317, P=0.022) were positively correlated. The external rotation function and UCLA score (r=0.288, P=0.038) , Constant score (r=0.293, P=0.035) , ASES score (r=0.329, P=0.017) were positively correlated. The internal rotation strength and UCLA score (r=0.383, P=0.005) , Constant score (r=0.401, P=0.003) , ASES score (r=0.314, P=0.023) , SF-36PCS score (r=0.285, P=0.041) , SF-36 MCS score (r=0.304 , P=0.028) were positively correlated. In patients of massive tear group, the abduction function and VAS score (r=-0.308, P=0.035) were negatively correlated. It was positively correlated with UCLA score (r=0.413, P=0.004) , Constant score (r=0.489, P=0.000) , ASES score (r=0.473, P=0.001) , SF-36PCS score (r=0.772, P=0.000) , and SF-36 MCS score (r = 0.293, P=0.046) . The external rotation function and VAS score (r = -0.292, P =0.046) were negatively correlated. It was positively correlated with UCLA score (r=0.629, P=0.000) , Constant score (r= 0.413, P=0.004) , ASES score (r=0.695, P=0.000) , and SF-36 PCS score (r=0.583, P=0.000) . There was a negative correlation between the internal rotation function and VAS score (r=-0.309, P=0.035) . It was positively correlated with UCLA score (r=0.512, P=0.000) , Constant score (r=0.709, P=0.000) , ASES score (r=0.802, P=0.000) , and SF-36PCS score (r=0.501, P=0.000) .

Conclusion

The tear degree may be a key factor in determining the degree of correlation between shoulder strength and shoulder function. The partial repair of irreparable large tear is of great importance.

表1 不同撕裂程度患者的社会人口学因素及病史比较
表2 不同撕裂程度患者的肩部肌力与肩关节活动度比较(±s)
表3 不同撕裂程度患者肩部功能与生活质量比较(分,±s)
表4 肩袖小型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=59)
表5 肩袖中型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=85)
表6 肩袖大型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=52)
表7 肩袖巨大型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=47)
[1]
孙亚英,陈疾忤,陈世益,等.关节镜辅助下背阔肌腱转位治疗后上方肩袖巨大撕裂的疗效及相关影响因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(12):1082-1088.
[2]
张士伟,马秀林,齐禹森,等.关节镜下修复肩袖撕裂:改善肌肉萎缩与上肢功能的评价[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(19):2996-3001.
[3]
DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1984 ,66(4):563-567.
[4]
Jchener LA,McClure PW,Sennett BJ.American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2002,11(6):587-594.
[5]
Choo A,McCarthy M ,Pichika R,et al.Muscle gene expression patterns in human rotator cuff pathology [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(18):1558-1565.
[6]
Ye T,Ouyang Y,Chen A.Evaluation of coracoclavicular stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with multistrand titanium cables[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ,2014,24(7):1061-1066.
[7]
Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M.Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction[J]. J Bone Joint Surg,1986,68(8):1136-1144.
[8]
李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113.
[9]
McCabe RA,Nicholas SJ,Montgomery KD,et al.The effect of rotator cuff tear size on shoulder strength and range of motion[J]. J Orthop Sports Physical Therapy,2005,35(3):130-135.
[10]
Hams A,Evans K, Adams R, et al. Reduced Shoulder Strength and Change in Range of Motion Are Risk Factors for Shoulder Injury in Water Polo Players[J]. Phys Ther Sport,2019,40:231-237.
[11]
MacDermid JC,Ramos J,Drosdowech D,et al.The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life[J]. Shoulder Elbow Surg,2004,13(6):593-598.
[12]
McLaine SJ,Bird ML,Ginn KA,et al. Shoulder extension strength: a potential risk factor for shoulder pain in young swimmers? [J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2019,22(5):516-520.
[1] 何金梅, 尹立雪, 谭静, 张文军, 王锐, 任梅, 廖明娇. 超声心肌做功技术对2型糖尿病患者潜在左心室心肌收缩功能损伤的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1029-1035.
[2] 赵红娟, 赵博文, 潘美, 纪园园, 彭晓慧, 陈冉. 应用多普勒超声定量分析正常中晚孕期胎儿左心室收缩舒张时间指数[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 951-958.
[3] 金姗, 丁雪晏, 蔡绮哲, 李一丹, 赵智玲, 郭兮恒, 吕秀章. 左心室压力-应变环对阻塞型睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者心肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 575-580.
[4] 吴赤球, 韦曙东, 张辉, 严许清, 梅朵卓嘎, 余丹. 驻不同海拔高度高原人员习服后心脏结构和功能变化的超声心动图评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 588-593.
[5] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 沈玉琴, 李炎菲海, 王海蕊, 范思涵, 纪学芹. 胎儿心脏定量分析技术对正常胎儿心脏形态及收缩功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 598-604.
[6] 董红华, 郭艮春, 江磊, 吴雪飞, 马飞翔, 李海凤. 骨科康复一体化模式在踝关节骨折快速康复中的应用[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 802-807.
[7] 李凤仪, 李若凡, 高旭, 张超凡. 目标导向液体干预对老年胃肠道肿瘤患者术后血流动力学、胃肠功能恢复的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 29-32.
[8] 甄子铂, 刘金虎. 基于列线图模型探究静脉全身麻醉腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后肠道功能紊乱的影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 61-65.
[9] 方钟进, 黄华生, 陈早庆, 郁兆存, 郑哲明, 谢永康, 陈仲宁, 邹演辉, 刘乾海, 陈镇宏. 负压组合式输尿管镜联合输尿管软镜与经皮肾镜治疗复杂性肾结石的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 601-604.
[10] 邱红生, 林树体, 梁朝莹, 劳世高, 何荷. 模拟现实步态训练对膝关节前交叉韧带损伤的功能恢复及对跌倒恐惧的影响[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(06): 343-350.
[11] 陆猛桂, 黄斌, 李秋林, 何媛梅. 蜂蛰伤患者发生多器官功能障碍综合征的危险因素分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 1010-1015.
[12] 郑秀丽, 倪敏. 功能性便秘患者的直肠肛门抑制反射特征分析100例[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 870-875.
[13] 王飞飞, 王光林, 孟泽松, 李保坤, 曹龙飞, 张娟, 周超熙, 丁源一, 王贵英. 敲低IMPDH1对结肠癌SW480、HT29细胞生物功能的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 884-890.
[14] 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识编写组. 静脉淋巴功能不全临床专家共识[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 630-638.
[15] 周加军, 余永武, 周涵, 刘勇, 张凌. 甲状旁腺切除对继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进患者骨密度及骨代谢的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 706-710.
阅读次数
全文


摘要