切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (04) : 307 -313. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.04.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

肩袖撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性研究
陈建1,()   
  1. 1. 610016 成都,四川现代医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-01 出版日期:2020-11-05
  • 通信作者: 陈建

Correlation study of shoulder strength and shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears

Jian Chen1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Sichuan Modern Hospital, Chengdu 610016, China
  • Received:2020-04-01 Published:2020-11-05
  • Corresponding author: Jian Chen
引用本文:

陈建. 肩袖撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(04): 307-313.

Jian Chen. Correlation study of shoulder strength and shoulder function in patients with rotator cuff tears[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(04): 307-313.

目的

探讨肩袖撕裂患者手术前肩部力量和肩部功能状况及两者之间的关系。

方法

选择2016年3月至2019年7月在本院进行手术治疗的全层肩袖撕裂患者243例。在患者手术前应用等速肌力测试检测患者肩部力量,应用临床评分系统测量患者肩部功能。根据患者撕裂程度大小将患者分为4组:小型撕裂组、中型撕裂组、大型撕裂组、巨大型撕裂组。分析每组患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性。

结果

在肩袖小型撕裂患者中,外展力量和视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS)存在负相关(r=-0.307,P=0.018);在肩袖中型撕裂患者中,外展力量和美国加州大学肩关节评分系统( University of California at Los Angeles ,UCLA)(r=0.262,P=0.015)、SF-36躯体健康总评(physical component summary,PCS)(r=0.226,P=0.038)存在正相关;外旋力量和UCLA评分存在正相关(r=0.289,P=0.007);在肩袖大型撕裂患者中,外展力量和Constant评分(r=0.282,P=0.043)、加州大学肩关节评分系统(American shoulder and elbow surgeon' form , ASES)(r=0.309,P=0.026)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.317,P=0.022)存在正相关;外旋力量和UCLA评分(r=0.288,P=0.038)、Constant评分(r=0.293,P=0.035)、ASES评分(r=0.329,P=0.017)存在正相关;内旋力量和UCLA评分(r =0.383,P=0.005)、Constant评分(r=0.401,P=0.003)、ASES评分(r=0.314,P=0.023)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.285,P=0.041)、SF-36精神健康总评(mental component summary , MCS)(r=0.304,P=0.028)存在正相关;在肩袖巨大型撕裂患者中,外展力量和VAS评分(r=-0.308,P=0.035)存在负相关,和UCLA评分(r=0.413,P=0.004)、Constant评分(r=0.489,P=0.000)、ASES评分(r=0.473,P=0.001)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.772,P=0.000)、SF-36 MCS评分(r=0.293,P=0.046)存在正相关;外旋力量和VAS评分(r=-0.292,P=0.046)存在负相关,和UCLA评分(r=0.629,P=0.000)、Constant评分(r=0.413,P=0.004)、ASES评分(r=0.695,P=0.000)、SF-36 PCS评分(r=0.583,P=0.000)存在正相关;内旋力量和VAS评分(r=-0.309,P=0.035)存在负相关,和UCLA评分(r=0.512,P=0.000)、Constant评分(r=0.709,P=0.000)、ASES评分(r=0.802,P=0.000)、SF-36PCS评分(r=0.501,P=0.000)存在正相关。

结论

撕裂程度可能是决定患者肩部力量和肩部功能相关程度的关键因素,部分修复不可修复的巨大撕裂非常重要。

Background

Rotator cuff tear is one of the main causes of shoulder function reduction in middle-aged and elderly people. Shoulder muscle strength is one of the essential factors to ensure shoulder stability. It is important to determine the degree of influence of insufficient shoulder strength on patients' symptoms to guide clinical treatment. Currently, the extent to which inadequate shoulder strength affects shoulder joint function in rotator cuff tears has not been determined.

Objective

To investigate the relationship between shoulder strength and shoulder function before rotator cuff tear surgery.

Methods

We selected 243 patients with full-thickness rotator cuff tear who underwent surgical treatment in our hospital from March 2016 to July 2019. Isokinetic muscle strength test is used to measure the patient's shoulder strength before surgery, and the clinical scoring system is used to measure the patient’s shoulder function. According to the degree of tear, the patients were divided into 4 groups: small tear group, medium tear group, large tear group, and massive tear group. The correlation between shoulder strength and shoulder function of each group of patients was analyzed.

Results

There was a negative correlation between abduction function and VAS score in patients of small tear group (r=-0.307, P=0.018) . In patients of medium tear group, the abduction function and UCLA score (r=0.262, P=0.015) , SF-36 PCS score (r=0.226, P=0.038) were positively correlated, and the external rotation function and UCLA score are positively correlated (r= 0.289, P=0.007) . In patients of large tear group, the abduction function and Constant score (r=0.282, P=0.043) , ASES score (r=0.309, P=0.026) , SF-36PCS score (r=0.317, P=0.022) were positively correlated. The external rotation function and UCLA score (r=0.288, P=0.038) , Constant score (r=0.293, P=0.035) , ASES score (r=0.329, P=0.017) were positively correlated. The internal rotation strength and UCLA score (r=0.383, P=0.005) , Constant score (r=0.401, P=0.003) , ASES score (r=0.314, P=0.023) , SF-36PCS score (r=0.285, P=0.041) , SF-36 MCS score (r=0.304 , P=0.028) were positively correlated. In patients of massive tear group, the abduction function and VAS score (r=-0.308, P=0.035) were negatively correlated. It was positively correlated with UCLA score (r=0.413, P=0.004) , Constant score (r=0.489, P=0.000) , ASES score (r=0.473, P=0.001) , SF-36PCS score (r=0.772, P=0.000) , and SF-36 MCS score (r = 0.293, P=0.046) . The external rotation function and VAS score (r = -0.292, P =0.046) were negatively correlated. It was positively correlated with UCLA score (r=0.629, P=0.000) , Constant score (r= 0.413, P=0.004) , ASES score (r=0.695, P=0.000) , and SF-36 PCS score (r=0.583, P=0.000) . There was a negative correlation between the internal rotation function and VAS score (r=-0.309, P=0.035) . It was positively correlated with UCLA score (r=0.512, P=0.000) , Constant score (r=0.709, P=0.000) , ASES score (r=0.802, P=0.000) , and SF-36PCS score (r=0.501, P=0.000) .

Conclusion

The tear degree may be a key factor in determining the degree of correlation between shoulder strength and shoulder function. The partial repair of irreparable large tear is of great importance.

表1 不同撕裂程度患者的社会人口学因素及病史比较
表2 不同撕裂程度患者的肩部肌力与肩关节活动度比较(±s)
表3 不同撕裂程度患者肩部功能与生活质量比较(分,±s)
表4 肩袖小型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=59)
表5 肩袖中型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=85)
表6 肩袖大型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=52)
表7 肩袖巨大型撕裂患者肩部力量和肩部功能的相关性(n=47)
[1]
孙亚英,陈疾忤,陈世益,等.关节镜辅助下背阔肌腱转位治疗后上方肩袖巨大撕裂的疗效及相关影响因素分析[J].中华创伤杂志,2018,34(12):1082-1088.
[2]
张士伟,马秀林,齐禹森,等.关节镜下修复肩袖撕裂:改善肌肉萎缩与上肢功能的评价[J].中国组织工程研究,2019,23(19):2996-3001.
[3]
DeOrio JK, Cofield RH. Results of a second attempt at surgical repair of a failed initial rotator-cuff repair[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,1984 ,66(4):563-567.
[4]
Jchener LA,McClure PW,Sennett BJ.American shoulder and elbow surgeons standardized shoulder assessment form, patient self-report section: reliability, validity, and responsiveness[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg,2002,11(6):587-594.
[5]
Choo A,McCarthy M ,Pichika R,et al.Muscle gene expression patterns in human rotator cuff pathology [J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2014,96(18):1558-1565.
[6]
Ye T,Ouyang Y,Chen A.Evaluation of coracoclavicular stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with multistrand titanium cables[J].Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ,2014,24(7):1061-1066.
[7]
Ellman H, Hanker G, Bayer M.Repair of the rotator cuff. End-result study of factors influencing reconstruction[J]. J Bone Joint Surg,1986,68(8):1136-1144.
[8]
李鲁,王红妹,沈毅.SF-36健康调查量表中文版的研制及其性能测试[J].中华预防医学杂志,2002,36(2):109-113.
[9]
McCabe RA,Nicholas SJ,Montgomery KD,et al.The effect of rotator cuff tear size on shoulder strength and range of motion[J]. J Orthop Sports Physical Therapy,2005,35(3):130-135.
[10]
Hams A,Evans K, Adams R, et al. Reduced Shoulder Strength and Change in Range of Motion Are Risk Factors for Shoulder Injury in Water Polo Players[J]. Phys Ther Sport,2019,40:231-237.
[11]
MacDermid JC,Ramos J,Drosdowech D,et al.The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life[J]. Shoulder Elbow Surg,2004,13(6):593-598.
[12]
McLaine SJ,Bird ML,Ginn KA,et al. Shoulder extension strength: a potential risk factor for shoulder pain in young swimmers? [J]. J Sci Med Sport, 2019,22(5):516-520.
[1] 陈芬, 葛贝贝, 王小贤, 李明霞, 徐芳, 史坚, 郭冠军, 方爱娟, 史中青, 戚占如, 陈慧, 姚静. 左束支传导阻滞性心肌病心脏电-机械重构的实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 978-985.
[2] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[3] 莫莹, 李文秀, 李刚, 王霄芳, 王强, 丁文虹. 超声心动图在三尖瓣下移畸形中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 702-708.
[4] 张洁, 罗小霞, 余鸿. 系统性免疫炎症指数对急性胰腺炎患者并发器官功能损伤的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 68-71.
[5] 关小玲, 周文营, 陈洪平. PTAAR在乙肝相关慢加急性肝衰竭患者短期预后中的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 841-845.
[6] 吴警, 吐尔洪江·吐逊, 温浩. 肝切除术前肝功能评估新进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 889-893.
[7] 傅斌生, 冯啸, 杨卿, 曾凯宁, 姚嘉, 唐晖, 刘剑戎, 魏绪霞, 易慧敏, 易述红, 陈规划, 杨扬. 脂肪变性供肝在成人劈离式肝移植中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 789-794.
[8] 王妍, 李征, 卓奇峰, 周陈杰, 吉顺荣, 徐晓武, 陈洁, 虞先濬. 微小无功能性胰腺神经内分泌瘤外科治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 607-614.
[9] 伍细蓉, 徐立文, 陈亚琼. 基于LPR和FARI构建肝衰竭患者生存预后模型[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 675-681.
[10] 王玲, 樊文彬, 倪嘉淳, 蔡增进. 功能性便秘与焦虑抑郁共病的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 411-416.
[11] 陈意志. 核磁共振钆造影剂导致的肾源性系统性纤维化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 358-358.
[12] 韩俊岭, 王刚, 马厉英, 连颖, 徐慧. 维生素D 联合匹维溴铵治疗腹泻型肠易激综合征患者疗效及对肠道屏障功能指标的影响研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 560-564.
[13] 张家珺, 张海涛, 苏菲菲. 径向壁应变分析在冠心病诊疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 687-691.
[14] 闫维, 张二明, 张克, 安欣华, 向平超. 北京市石景山区40岁及以上居民早期慢性阻塞性肺疾病异质性及影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 533-540.
[15] 李文哲, 王毅, 崔建, 郑启航, 王靖彦, 于湘友. 新疆维吾尔自治区重症患者急性肾功能异常的危险因素分析[J/OL]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 269-276.
阅读次数
全文


摘要