切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 162 -168. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.02.012

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜技术治疗原发性肘关节骨关节炎术后残余症状分析和预防措施
刘刚1, 李佳琪1, 胡冬梅1, 郑立诚1, 弋卓君1, 臧永辉1, 王春艳1, 康斌1, 石波1, 唐诗添1,()   
  1. 1. 621001 绵阳市中心医院运动损伤科
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-18 出版日期:2020-05-05
  • 通信作者: 唐诗添
  • 基金资助:
    绵阳市科技计划项目(15S-01-2)

Analysis and prevention of postoperative residual symptoms of patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow after arthroscopic treatment

Gang Liu1, Jiaqi Li1, Dongmei Hu1, Licheng Zheng1, Zhuojun Yi1, Yonghui Zang1, Chunyan Wang1, Bin Kang1, Bo Shi1, Shitian Tang1,()   

  1. 1. Investigation Performed at the Sports Medicine Center,Mianyang Central Hospital, Mianyang 621001 ,China
  • Received:2019-03-18 Published:2020-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Shitian Tang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Tang Shitian, Email:
引用本文:

刘刚, 李佳琪, 胡冬梅, 郑立诚, 弋卓君, 臧永辉, 王春艳, 康斌, 石波, 唐诗添. 关节镜技术治疗原发性肘关节骨关节炎术后残余症状分析和预防措施[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 162-168.

Gang Liu, Jiaqi Li, Dongmei Hu, Licheng Zheng, Zhuojun Yi, Yonghui Zang, Chunyan Wang, Bin Kang, Bo Shi, Shitian Tang. Analysis and prevention of postoperative residual symptoms of patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow after arthroscopic treatment[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(02): 162-168.

目的

探讨关节镜技术治疗原发性肘关节骨关节炎(osteoarthritis,OA)术后残余症状和预防措施。

方法

回顾性分析2016年1月至2018年9月,采用肘关节镜技术对本院骨科收治的28例原发性肘关节OA患者行关节清理和松解手术治疗,其中男26例、女2例,平均年龄为51.6岁(33 ~ 74岁)。依据肘关节临床症状和CT造影结果对肘关节OA进行分期:Ⅰ期4例,Ⅱ期7例,Ⅲa期11例,Ⅲb期6例,Ⅳ期0例。合并尺神经炎患者10例。通过视觉模拟评分(visual analogue score,VAS)、运动弧、Mayo肘关节功能评分(Mayo elbow performance score,MEPS)对肘关节术后疗效进行评估。采用秩和检验方法进行组间比较,检验水准α=0.05。

结果

28例患者均获得门诊随访,平均随访时间12.5个月(6 ~ 23个月)。末次随访时,88.9%(85% ~ 100%)的满意度和62%患者重返原工作,78.6%(22/28例)肘关节OA患者术后伴有残余症状,活动受限11例(39.3%)、疼痛感6例(21.4%)、疲劳感14例(50%)、酸胀感14例(50%)、弹响感2例(7.1%)、麻木感3例(10.7%)。随着肘关节OA分期进展,残余症状发生率越高。各期患者VAS评分、运动弧和MEPS评分改善差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),Ⅲb期患者VAS评分高于其余三组,MEPS评分和运动弧低于其余三组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。

结论

尽管肘关节镜技术能够让肘关节OA患者获得满意疗效,但是肘关节OA患者术后肘关节残余症状仍不可忽视,这可能与肘关节OA疾病进展有关,只有术前临床功能、影像学技术的详尽评估和手术指征的良好把握才能获得更好的临床疗效。

Background

Symptomatic primary elbow osteoarthritis (OA) is a common clinical disease, and the diagnosis rate of patients over 40 years old in the United States is as high as 3.5%. It is common in middle-aged men, and often seen among heavy-duty laborers such as stonemason, percussion drill user, etc., which may be related to the minor injury of humero-ulnar joint, and mainly manifest a series of symptoms such as terminal movement pain of the elbow, restricted mobility, mechanical lock, cubital tunnel syndrome, etc. At present, elbow arthroscopy has become the mainstream method for treatment of primary elbow OA due to its advantages such as wide-field vision, thorough cleaning, minimal trauma, low risk of joint stiffness, beautiful appearance, low risk of postoperative infection, and rapid recovery. The curative effects of massive domestic and foreign reports are satisfactory, which can greatly improve symptoms, mobility and function, especially the long-term clinical reports after elbow arthroscopic release surgery in which the effect has not decreased with time. Although this group of studies has achieved consistent good results, the incidence of residual symptoms is still high, which may be related to factors such as the disease progression of elbow OA, the level of arthroscopic technology, and the understanding of surgical indications. As matters stand, there are few reports on the analysis and prediction methods of residual symptoms after arthroscopy. There are many uncertain factors in the prediction of postoperative curative effect, which cannot guide and formulate individualized treatment plans.

Objective

To explore the postoperative residual symptoms of patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow after arthroscopic treatment and the precautionary measures.

Methods

From January 2016 to September 2018, 28 patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow who were admitted into our hospital underwent arthroscopic debridement and release, and their data were retrospectively analyzed. There were 26 males and 2 females, and the mean age was 51.6 years (33-74 years) . According to the symptoms of elbow joints and the results of CT angiography, the elbow OA were divided into four stages, and there were 4 cases of Stage Ⅰ, 7 cases of Stage Ⅱ, 11 cases of Stage Ⅲa, 6 cases of Stage Ⅲb and no case of Stage Ⅳ. There were 10 cases combined with ulnar neuritis. The visual analogue scale (VAS) , motion arc and Mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) were used to evaluate the postoperative function of elbow joint. The rank sum test was used to compare the data between groups with significance level α=0.05.

Results

All patients were followed up for 6-23 months with an average of 12.5 months. At the final follow-up, the satisfaction was 88.9%, and 62% of the patients returned to their previous work. Postoperative residual symptoms were found in 78.6% (22/28 cases) of those patients, including limited activity (11 cases, 39.3%) , pain (6 cases, 21.4%) , fatigue (14 cases, 50%) , soreness (14 cases, 50%) , clicking (2 cases, 7.1%) , and numbness (3 cases, 10.7%) . The incidence of residual symptoms increased with the staging progress of elbow osteoarthritis. At the final follow-up, there were no significant differences in VAS, motion arc or MEPS improvement between groups (P>0.05) . However, the mean VAS score of patients in Stage Ⅲb was higher than that in the other three groups, and the mean MEPS score and motion arc were lower than those in other three groups (P<0.05) .

Conclusions

Although patients with primary osteoarthritis of the elbow can obtain satisfactory results from arthroscopic debridement and release, the postoperative residual symptoms must not be overlooked, which are possibly related to disease progression. Only careful preoperative assessment of clinical function and imaging examination and strict control of surgical indications can provide better results.

图1 典型病例:患者,男,74岁,右利手,水电工人30年。肘关节活动受限3年,疼痛偶伴有麻木2个月。诊断为肘关节OA伴游离体形成,肘关节OA Ⅲb期术前VAS 3分,关节活动度90° ~ -40°,MEPS评分15分,行关节镜下肘关节清理和松解术 图A-B:肘关节CT造影;图C-D:术后X线正侧位片;图E-H:显露肘关节游离体、松解前方关节囊、肱骨髁成形、鹰嘴窝成形;图I-K:术后肘关节CT冠状位、矢状位和横断位;图L-O:术后1年肘关节功能像,术后VAS评分2分,关节活动度115° ~ -20°,MEPS评分65分
表1 患者术前、术后肘关节OA VAS评分比较(分,±s)
表2 患者术前、术后肘关节OA运动弧比较(°,±s)
表3 患者术前、术后肘关节OA MEPS评分比较(分,±s)
图2 根据OA分期患者残余症状发生情况
[1]
Stanley D. Prevalence and etiology of symptomatic elbow osteoarthritis[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1994, 3(6): 386-389.
[2]
Antuña SA, Morrey BF, Adams RA,et al. Ulnohumeral arthroplasty for primary degenerative arthritis of the elbow: long-term outcome and complications[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2002, 84(12): 2168-2173.
[3]
Oka Y, Ohta K, Saitoh I. Debridement arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the elbow[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1998, (351): 127-134.
[4]
Kurusawa H, Nakashita K, Nakashita H, et al. Pathogenesis and treatment of cubital tunnel syndrome caused by osteoarthritis of the elbow joint[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 1995, 4: 30-34.
[5]
Kelly EW, Morrey BF, O’Driscoll SW. Complications of elbow arthroscopy[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2001, 83 (1): 25-34.
[6]
Sochacki KR, Jack RA, Hirase T, et al. Arthroscopic debridement for primary degenerative osteoarthritis of the elbow leads to significant improvement in range of motion and clinical outcomes: a systematic review[J]. Arthroscopy, 2017, 33(12): 2255-2262.
[7]
李旭,鲁谊,李奉龙, 等. 关节镜治疗肘关节骨关节炎合并活动受限的中长期疗效分析[J]. 中国运动医学杂志, 2015, 34(10): 933-936.
[8]
Ahmad CS, Vitale MA. Elbow arthroscopy: setup, portal placement, and simple procedures[J]. Instr Course Lect, 2011, 60: 171-180.
[9]
Morrey BF. Functional evaluation of the elbow[M]. 2nd ed. Philadephia:W.B. Saunders Co, 1993: 82.
[10]
Papatheodorou LK, Baratz ME, Sotereanos DG. Elbow arthritis: current concepts[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2013, 38(3): 605-613.
[11]
Krishnan SG, Harkins DC, Pennington SD, et al. Arthroscopic ulnohumeral arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the elbow in patients under fifty years of age[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16(4): 443-448.
[12]
Kroonen LT, Piper SL, Ghatan AC. Arthroscopic management of elbow osteoarthritis[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2017, 42(8): 640-650.
[13]
Rettig LA, Hastings H, Feinberg JR. Primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: lack of radiographic evidence for morphologic predisposition, results of operative debridement at intermediate follow-up, and basis for a new radiographic classification system[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(1): 97-105.
[14]
Broberg MA, Morrey BF. Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture[J]. J Bone Jt Surg Am,1986,68:669-674.
[15]
Amini MH, Sykes JB, Olson ST, et al. Reliability testing of two classification systems for osteoarthritis and post-traumatic arthritis of the elbow[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(3): 353-357.
[16]
Kwak JM, Kholinne E, Sun Y,et al. Clinical outcome of osteocapsular arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: comparison of arthroscopic and open procedure[J]. Arthroscopy, 2019, 35(4): 1083-1089.
[17]
Lim TK, Koh KH, Lee HI, et al. Arthroscopic debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow: analysis of preoperative factors affecting outcome[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2014, 23(9):1381-1387.
[18]
Gramstad GD, Galatz LM. Management of elbow osteoarthritis[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2006, 88(2): 421-430.
[19]
Lubiatowski P, Ślęzak M, Wałecka J, et al. Prospective outcome assessment of arthroscopic arthrolysis for traumatic and degenerative elbow contracture[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(9): e269-e278.
[20]
Isa AD, Athwal GS, King GJW, et al. Arthroscopic debridement for primary elbow osteoarthritis with and without capsulectomy: a comparative cohort study[J]. Shoulder Elbow, 2018, 10(3): 223-231.
[21]
Miyake J, Shimada K, Oka K, et al Arthroscopic debridement in the treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the elbow, based on computer simulation[J]. Bone Joint J, 2014, 96(2): 237-241.
[22]
Park MJ, Chang MJ, Lee YB, et al. Surgical release for posttraumatic loss of elbow flexion[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2010, 92(16): 2692-2699.
[23]
Adams JE, Wolff LH, Merten SM, et al Osteoarthritis of the elbow: results of arthroscopic osteophyte resection and capsulectomy[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2008, 17(1): 126-131.
[24]
Kim SJ, Kim JW, Lee SH, et al. Retrospective comparative analysis of elbow arthroscopy used to treat primary osteoarthritis with and without release of the posterior band of the medial collateral ligament[J]. Arthroscopy, 2017, 33(8):1506-1511.
[25]
Cohen AP, Redden JF, Stanley D. Treatment of osteoarthritis of the elbow: a comparison of open and arthroscopic debridement[J]. Arthroscopy, 2000, 16(7): 701-706.
[26]
Hattori Y, Doi K, Sakamoto S,et al. Capsulectomy and debridement for primary osteoarthritis of the elbow through a medial trans-flexor approach[J]. J Hand Surg Am, 2011, 36(10): 1652-1658.
[27]
Krishnan SG, Harkins DC, Pennington SD,et al. Arthroscopic ulnohumeral arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis of the elbow in patients under fifty years of age[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2007, 16(4): 443-448.
[28]
Kim SJ, Shin SJ. Arthroscopic treatment for limitation of motion of the elbow[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2000, (375): 140-148.
[1] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[2] 欧阳剑锋, 李炳权, 叶永恒, 胡少宇, 向阳. 关节镜联合富血小板血浆治疗粘连性肩周炎的疗效[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 765-772.
[3] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[4] 马伟强, 马斌林, 吴中语, 张莹. microRNA在三阴性乳腺癌进展中发挥的作用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 111-114.
[5] 杨倩, 李翠芳, 张婉秋. 原发性肝癌自发性破裂出血急诊TACE术后的近远期预后及影响因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 33-36.
[6] 栗艳松, 冯会敏, 刘明超, 刘泽鹏, 姜秋霞. STIP1在三阴性乳腺癌组织中的表达及临床意义研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 52-56.
[7] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[8] 张其坤, 商福超, 李琪, 栗光明, 王孟龙. 联合脾切除对肝癌合并门静脉高压症患者根治性切除术后的生存获益分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 613-618.
[9] 张文华, 陶焠, 胡添松. 不同部位外生型肝癌临床病理特点及其对术后肝内复发和预后影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 651-655.
[10] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[11] 胡宝茹, 尚乃舰, 高迪. 中晚期肝细胞癌的DCE-MRI及DWI表现与免疫治疗预后的相关性分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 399-403.
[12] 陆萍, 邹健. 凝血和纤维蛋白溶解标志物的动态变化对急性胰腺炎患者预后的评估价值[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 427-432.
[13] 李永胜, 孙家和, 郭书伟, 卢义康, 刘洪洲. 高龄结直肠癌患者根治术后短期并发症及其影响因素[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 962-967.
[14] 王军, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 索利斌, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 腹膜后肿瘤切除术中大量输血患者的麻醉管理特点与分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 844-849.
[15] 索利斌, 刘鲲鹏, 姚兰, 张华, 魏越, 王军, 陈骏, 苗成利, 罗成华. 原发性腹膜后副神经节瘤切除术麻醉管理的特点和分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 771-776.
阅读次数
全文


摘要