切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 107 -112. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.02.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下四袢与双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood V型脱位疗效对比研究
许鉴1, 陆伟1,(), 王大平1, 朱伟民1, 欧阳侃1, 柳海峰1, 彭亮权1, 李皓1, 冯文哲1, 邓桢翰1   
  1. 1. 518000 深圳大学第一附属医院(深圳市第二人民医院)运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-20 出版日期:2020-05-05
  • 通信作者: 陆伟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金(2018A030310646)

Comparative effectiveness research of arthroscopic four-loop fixation versus double-loop fixation for treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood type V

Jian Xu1, Wei Lu1,(), Daping Wang1, Weimin Zhu1, Kan Ouyang1, Haifeng Liu1, Liangquan Peng1, Hao Li1, Wenzhe Feng1, Zhenhan Deng1   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Shenzhen Second People's Hospital) , Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2019-02-20 Published:2020-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Wei Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Wei, Email:
引用本文:

许鉴, 陆伟, 王大平, 朱伟民, 欧阳侃, 柳海峰, 彭亮权, 李皓, 冯文哲, 邓桢翰. 关节镜下四袢与双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood V型脱位疗效对比研究[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 107-112.

Jian Xu, Wei Lu, Daping Wang, Weimin Zhu, Kan Ouyang, Haifeng Liu, Liangquan Peng, Hao Li, Wenzhe Feng, Zhenhan Deng. Comparative effectiveness research of arthroscopic four-loop fixation versus double-loop fixation for treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood type V[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(02): 107-112.

目的

对比评估双骨道四袢与单骨道双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅴ型脱位疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2010年5月至2016年5月于深圳大学第一附属医院接受关节镜下双骨道四袢与单骨道双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅴ型脱位的所有患者,其中入选82例手术患者,四袢双骨道组与双袢单骨道组各41例。术后2年内随访观察患者的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS) 、患者恢复运动时间、恢复运动患者数量、Constant功能评分、Karlsson肩锁关节功能评分,并通过影像学观察评估喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙。

结果

术后2年内末次随访X线片显示四袢双骨道组患侧平均喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙与双袢单骨道组对比明显减小,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);双袢单骨道组患者健侧平均喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙与患侧对比明显减小,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);然而四袢双骨道组患者健侧平均喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙与患侧对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后末次随访患肢疼痛均有明显减轻,术前与术后VAS评分对比差异具有统计学意义,两组组间对比差异无统计学意义。四袢双骨道组重返运动的时间较双袢单骨道组明显缩短,重返患者数目明显多于双袢单骨道组,且Constant功能评分、Karlsson肩锁关节功能评分均明显优于双袢单骨道组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。四袢双骨道组并发症明显少于双袢单骨道组。

结论

采用关节镜下双骨道四袢固定治疗Rockwood V型脱位,方法固定可靠,并发症少,较双袢单骨道固定效果更佳,是治疗急性肩锁关节Rockwood V型脱位损伤较好的方法。

Background

The treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is mainly based on the Rockwood classification. For acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations severer than Rockwood type III, surgical treatment is often required. The Rockwood type V injuries are common, but the surgical treatment methods are controversial. The common surgical procedures include clavicular hook plate. In 2007, Struhl reported the first case of using loop plate Endobutton device for treatment of AC joint dislocation in open surgery. Several scholars have also used double-loop to fix the AC joint dislocation under arthroscopy, and achieved satisfactory results. The Endobutton plate could be confirmed located at the base of coracoid process under arthroscopy, which was relatively safer compared to open surgery. Not only that, arthroscopy can also diagnose and deal with other problems. However, the fixation methods are numerous, including double-loop fixation, four-loop fixation and triple-loop fixation, and the more commonly seen are double-loop and four-loop fixation. The efficacy of double-loop fixation versus four-loop fixation has not been compared.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of four-loop fixation through double bone tunnels versus double-loop fixation through single tunnel for treatment of acute AC joint dislocation of Rockwood type V.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with acute AC joint dislocation of Rockwood type V who had undergone arthroscopic double-loop fixation through single bone tunnel and four-loop fixation through double bone tunnels from May 2010 to May 2016. Eighty-two patients were included and divided into two groups according to different fixation types with 41 cases in each group. The patients were followed up for 2 years, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score, time of return to activities, number of patients return to activities, Constant-Murley scores as well as Karlsson were recorded as well. The Space between the coracoclavicular (CC) joint and AC joint was evaluated by imaging.

Results

The average CC joint and AC joint distances in the double paired Endobutton (DPE) group were significantly smaller than those of the single paired Endobutton (SPE) group in the last follow up within two years after operation (P<0.05) . The average AC and CC distances in the healthy shoulder joints were significantly smaller than those of the affected joints in the SPE group (P<0.05) . However, these values were not significantly different from those of the affected joints in the DPE group (P>0.05) . In the last postoperative follow-up, the pain of the affected limb was significantly reduced in both groups, and there was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative VAS scores, while there was no significant difference between the two groups.The time of returning to exercise was significantly shorter in the DPE group than in the SPE group, and the number of patients returning to exercise was significantly more than that in the SPE group. The Constant scores and Karlsson scores were significantly higher in the DPE group than in the SPE group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) . The complications in the DPE group were less than those in the SPE group.

Conclusions

Compared with the SPE group, the DPE group achieved better outcome with less complications in the treatment of acute AC joint dislocation of Rockwood type V under arthroscopy.

表1 两组患者一般资料对比
图1 骨道定位示意图[21]
图2 手术体位:沙滩椅位,标记肩关节标准后方入路和前外侧入路,以及肩锁关节上方2 cm与锁骨平行的小切口(图A);采用前交叉韧带定位导向器,钻制相应骨道(图B)
图3 术后影像学显示袢钢板固定位置良好,且对喙锁以及肩锁间隙进行测量 图A:单骨道双袢固定;图B:双骨道四袢固定
表2 两组患者术前和术后末次随访肩锁、喙锁间隙的大小对比(mm,±s)
图4 双袢单骨道组并发症发生 图A:袢钢板从喙突下表面滑出;图B:双袢钢板分离,肩锁关节出现Rockwood II型脱位;图C:锁骨端袢钢板下陷入锁骨皮质
表3 两组患者术后并发症、功能评分、疼痛评分比较
[1]
Gorbaty JD, Hsu JE, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: Rockwood classification of acromioclavicular joint separations[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(1): 283-287.
[2]
Eschler A, Rosler K, Rotter R, et al. Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: radiological correlation between Rockwood classification system and injury patterns in human cadaver species[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134(9): 1193-1198.
[3]
Bradley JP, Elkousy H. Decision making: operative versus nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2003, 22(2): 277-290.
[4]
Xue C, Song LJ, Zhang H, et al. Truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with 2 Endobutton devices for acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(6): e196-e202.
[5]
Rolf O, Hann VWA, Ewers A, et al. Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008, 128(10): 1153-1157.
[6]
Kienast B, Thietje R, Queitsch C,et al. Mid-term results after operative treatment of rockwood grade III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocations with an AC-hook-plate[J]. Eur J Med Res,2011,16(2): 52-56.
[7]
Struhl S. Double Endobutton technique for repair of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg,2007,(4): 175-179.
[8]
Chaudhary D, Jain V, Joshi D, et al. Arthroscopic fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint disruption using the TightRope device[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2015, 23(3): 309-314.
[9]
Loriaut P, Casabianca L, Alkhaili J,et al. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double button device: Clinical and MRI results[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8): 895-901.
[10]
Spoliti M, De Cupis M, Via AG, et al. All arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with fiberwire and endobutton system[J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J, 2014, 4(4): 398-403.
[11]
DeBerardino TM, Pensak MJ, Ferreira J, et al. Arthroscopic stabilization of acromioclavicular joint dislocation using the AC graftrope system[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(2 Suppl): 47-52.
[12]
Lu D, Wang T, Chen H, et al. A comparison of double Endobutton and triple Endobutton techniques for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(7): 891-895.
[13]
Ye G, Peng CA, Sun HB, et al. Treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft and endobutton technique[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2016, 12 : 47-51.
[14]
Struhl S, Wolfson TS. Continuous loop double endobutton Reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(10): 2437-2444.
[15]
Lim YW. Triple endobutton technique in acromioclavicular joint reduction and reconstruction[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2008, 37(4): 294-299.
[16]
Barth J, Duparc F, Andrieu K, et al. Is coracoclavicular stabilisation alone sufficient for the endoscopic treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types III, IV, and V)?[J] . Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8 Suppl): S297-S303.
[17]
Murena L, Vulcano E, Ratti C, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with double flip button[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(12): 1511-1515.
[18]
Clavert P, Meyer A, Boyer P, et al. Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8 Suppl): S313-S316.
[19]
Motta P, Maderni A, Bruno L, et al. Suture rupture in acromioclavicular joint dislocations treated with flip buttons[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(2): 294-298.
[20]
Torkaman A, Bagherifard A, Mokhatri T, et al. Double-button fixation system for management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 2016, 4(1): 41-46.
[21]
陆伟,王大平,朱伟民,等.关节镜下四骨道双束固定治疗急性肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅴ型脱位[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(3): 157-162.
[22]
Boileau P, Old J, Gastaud O, et al. All-arthroscopic weaver-dunn-chuinard procedure with double-button fixation for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(2): 149-160.
[23]
Bajnar L, Bartos R, Sedivy P. Arthroscopic stabilisation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TighRope device [J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2013, 80(6): 386-390.
[24]
Walz L, Salzmann GM, Fabbro T, et al. The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices: a biomechanical study[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36(12): 2398-2406.
[25]
Abat F, Sarasquete J, Natera LG, et al. Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair using coracoclavicular suspension devices in two different configurations[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2015, 16(3): 215-219.
[1] 许银峰, 盛璞义, 余世明, 张阳春. 偏心性髋臼旋转截骨术治疗发育性髋关节发育不良[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 568-574.
[2] 谢佳乐, 李琦, 芦升升, 姜劲松. 内侧膝骨关节炎伴胫股关节冠状半脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 653-657.
[3] 郭艳波, 马亮, 李刚, 阎伟, 骆帝, 岳亮, 吴伟山. 全膝关节置换术后胫股关节脱位的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 658-671.
[4] 夏文波, 冯左基, 胡建强. 休息位复位技术治疗肩关节前脱位50例[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 405-408.
[5] 黄晓文, 吕天润, 左强, 李翔, 刘久翔. 肩锁韧带缝线稳定联合锁骨钩钢板固定与袢钢板韧带全修复治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(02): 127-133.
[6] 陈利, 王锦海, 董浩男, 李利军. 锁骨钩钢板在肩锁关节脱位治疗中的不足及改良[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 377-381.
[7] 王利航, 孙官文, 包呼和, 倪熙宇, 张万印, 黄斐, 杨鹏波. 三种手术方式治疗肩锁关节脱位疗效的网状Meta 分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 332-343.
[8] 王晓梅, 刘宇, 董金磊, 刘凡孝, 王成龙, 李连欣. 单一前方入路内固定对肱骨近端骨折合并肱骨头后脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 319-325.
[9] 曲洋, 蒋浩然, 邢博涵, 张蒙, 张培训. 肩袖损伤的治疗进展[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(04): 289-291.
[10] 蒋永东, 耿启砥, 吴宇峰, 高世华. 肩锁关节脱位的文献计量学分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 246-256.
[11] 唐晓俞, 唐小高, 王小芃, 冯剑, 邹义源, 郑新波, 邓凯文. 喙锁韧带重建治疗肩锁关节脱位的趋势及争议[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 103-106.
[12] 郁凯, 闵先军. 胸锁关节脱位的诊治现状[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 10-13.
[13] 燕飞, 赵东旭, 金泽鉴, 胡斯乐, 王永刚, 苗雷, 宋鹤天, 刘斌, 赵胡日查. TightRope锥状韧带单束重建联合两种肩锁关节修复方式治疗急性肩锁关节脱位临床效果对比观察[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 27-33.
[14] 郭飞达, 陈晓俊, 邢文钊, 孙常胜, 李一然, 鹿青, 吴昊天. 非镜下专用定位/复位器辅助袢钢板治疗锁骨远端骨折和肩锁关节脱位的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(01): 40-48.
[15] 蒋永祥. 人工晶状体囊袋内脱位的手术治疗[J/OL]. 中华眼科医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(04): 1-1.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?