切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2020, Vol. 08 ›› Issue (02) : 107 -112. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2020.02.003

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下四袢与双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood V型脱位疗效对比研究
许鉴1, 陆伟1,(), 王大平1, 朱伟民1, 欧阳侃1, 柳海峰1, 彭亮权1, 李皓1, 冯文哲1, 邓桢翰1   
  1. 1. 518000 深圳大学第一附属医院(深圳市第二人民医院)运动医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-20 出版日期:2020-05-05
  • 通信作者: 陆伟
  • 基金资助:
    广东省自然科学基金(2018A030310646)

Comparative effectiveness research of arthroscopic four-loop fixation versus double-loop fixation for treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood type V

Jian Xu1, Wei Lu1,(), Daping Wang1, Weimin Zhu1, Kan Ouyang1, Haifeng Liu1, Liangquan Peng1, Hao Li1, Wenzhe Feng1, Zhenhan Deng1   

  1. 1. Department of Sports Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Shenzhen University (Shenzhen Second People's Hospital) , Shenzhen 518000, China
  • Received:2019-02-20 Published:2020-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Wei Lu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lu Wei, Email:
引用本文:

许鉴, 陆伟, 王大平, 朱伟民, 欧阳侃, 柳海峰, 彭亮权, 李皓, 冯文哲, 邓桢翰. 关节镜下四袢与双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood V型脱位疗效对比研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 107-112.

Jian Xu, Wei Lu, Daping Wang, Weimin Zhu, Kan Ouyang, Haifeng Liu, Liangquan Peng, Hao Li, Wenzhe Feng, Zhenhan Deng. Comparative effectiveness research of arthroscopic four-loop fixation versus double-loop fixation for treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation of Rockwood type V[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2020, 08(02): 107-112.

目的

对比评估双骨道四袢与单骨道双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅴ型脱位疗效。

方法

回顾性分析2010年5月至2016年5月于深圳大学第一附属医院接受关节镜下双骨道四袢与单骨道双袢固定修复急性肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅴ型脱位的所有患者,其中入选82例手术患者,四袢双骨道组与双袢单骨道组各41例。术后2年内随访观察患者的视觉模拟评分(visual analogue scale,VAS) 、患者恢复运动时间、恢复运动患者数量、Constant功能评分、Karlsson肩锁关节功能评分,并通过影像学观察评估喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙。

结果

术后2年内末次随访X线片显示四袢双骨道组患侧平均喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙与双袢单骨道组对比明显减小,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);双袢单骨道组患者健侧平均喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙与患侧对比明显减小,且差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);然而四袢双骨道组患者健侧平均喙锁关节和肩锁关节的间隙与患侧对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。两组患者术后末次随访患肢疼痛均有明显减轻,术前与术后VAS评分对比差异具有统计学意义,两组组间对比差异无统计学意义。四袢双骨道组重返运动的时间较双袢单骨道组明显缩短,重返患者数目明显多于双袢单骨道组,且Constant功能评分、Karlsson肩锁关节功能评分均明显优于双袢单骨道组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。四袢双骨道组并发症明显少于双袢单骨道组。

结论

采用关节镜下双骨道四袢固定治疗Rockwood V型脱位,方法固定可靠,并发症少,较双袢单骨道固定效果更佳,是治疗急性肩锁关节Rockwood V型脱位损伤较好的方法。

Background

The treatment of acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is mainly based on the Rockwood classification. For acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations severer than Rockwood type III, surgical treatment is often required. The Rockwood type V injuries are common, but the surgical treatment methods are controversial. The common surgical procedures include clavicular hook plate. In 2007, Struhl reported the first case of using loop plate Endobutton device for treatment of AC joint dislocation in open surgery. Several scholars have also used double-loop to fix the AC joint dislocation under arthroscopy, and achieved satisfactory results. The Endobutton plate could be confirmed located at the base of coracoid process under arthroscopy, which was relatively safer compared to open surgery. Not only that, arthroscopy can also diagnose and deal with other problems. However, the fixation methods are numerous, including double-loop fixation, four-loop fixation and triple-loop fixation, and the more commonly seen are double-loop and four-loop fixation. The efficacy of double-loop fixation versus four-loop fixation has not been compared.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of four-loop fixation through double bone tunnels versus double-loop fixation through single tunnel for treatment of acute AC joint dislocation of Rockwood type V.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients with acute AC joint dislocation of Rockwood type V who had undergone arthroscopic double-loop fixation through single bone tunnel and four-loop fixation through double bone tunnels from May 2010 to May 2016. Eighty-two patients were included and divided into two groups according to different fixation types with 41 cases in each group. The patients were followed up for 2 years, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score, time of return to activities, number of patients return to activities, Constant-Murley scores as well as Karlsson were recorded as well. The Space between the coracoclavicular (CC) joint and AC joint was evaluated by imaging.

Results

The average CC joint and AC joint distances in the double paired Endobutton (DPE) group were significantly smaller than those of the single paired Endobutton (SPE) group in the last follow up within two years after operation (P<0.05) . The average AC and CC distances in the healthy shoulder joints were significantly smaller than those of the affected joints in the SPE group (P<0.05) . However, these values were not significantly different from those of the affected joints in the DPE group (P>0.05) . In the last postoperative follow-up, the pain of the affected limb was significantly reduced in both groups, and there was a significant difference between preoperative and postoperative VAS scores, while there was no significant difference between the two groups.The time of returning to exercise was significantly shorter in the DPE group than in the SPE group, and the number of patients returning to exercise was significantly more than that in the SPE group. The Constant scores and Karlsson scores were significantly higher in the DPE group than in the SPE group, and the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05) . The complications in the DPE group were less than those in the SPE group.

Conclusions

Compared with the SPE group, the DPE group achieved better outcome with less complications in the treatment of acute AC joint dislocation of Rockwood type V under arthroscopy.

表1 两组患者一般资料对比
图1 骨道定位示意图[21]
图2 手术体位:沙滩椅位,标记肩关节标准后方入路和前外侧入路,以及肩锁关节上方2 cm与锁骨平行的小切口(图A);采用前交叉韧带定位导向器,钻制相应骨道(图B)
图3 术后影像学显示袢钢板固定位置良好,且对喙锁以及肩锁间隙进行测量 图A:单骨道双袢固定;图B:双骨道四袢固定
表2 两组患者术前和术后末次随访肩锁、喙锁间隙的大小对比(mm,±s)
图4 双袢单骨道组并发症发生 图A:袢钢板从喙突下表面滑出;图B:双袢钢板分离,肩锁关节出现Rockwood II型脱位;图C:锁骨端袢钢板下陷入锁骨皮质
表3 两组患者术后并发症、功能评分、疼痛评分比较
[1]
Gorbaty JD, Hsu JE, Gee AO. Classifications in brief: Rockwood classification of acromioclavicular joint separations[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2017, 475(1): 283-287.
[2]
Eschler A, Rosler K, Rotter R, et al. Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: radiological correlation between Rockwood classification system and injury patterns in human cadaver species[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014, 134(9): 1193-1198.
[3]
Bradley JP, Elkousy H. Decision making: operative versus nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries[J]. Clin Sports Med, 2003, 22(2): 277-290.
[4]
Xue C, Song LJ, Zhang H, et al. Truly anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction with 2 Endobutton devices for acute Rockwood type V acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2018, 27(6): e196-e202.
[5]
Rolf O, Hann VWA, Ewers A, et al. Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment[J]. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2008, 128(10): 1153-1157.
[6]
Kienast B, Thietje R, Queitsch C,et al. Mid-term results after operative treatment of rockwood grade III-V acromioclavicular joint dislocations with an AC-hook-plate[J]. Eur J Med Res,2011,16(2): 52-56.
[7]
Struhl S. Double Endobutton technique for repair of complete acromioclavicular joint dislocations[J]. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg,2007,(4): 175-179.
[8]
Chaudhary D, Jain V, Joshi D, et al. Arthroscopic fixation for acute acromioclavicular joint disruption using the TightRope device[J]. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong), 2015, 23(3): 309-314.
[9]
Loriaut P, Casabianca L, Alkhaili J,et al. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular dislocations using a double button device: Clinical and MRI results[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8): 895-901.
[10]
Spoliti M, De Cupis M, Via AG, et al. All arthroscopic stabilization of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with fiberwire and endobutton system[J]. Muscles Ligaments Tendons J, 2014, 4(4): 398-403.
[11]
DeBerardino TM, Pensak MJ, Ferreira J, et al. Arthroscopic stabilization of acromioclavicular joint dislocation using the AC graftrope system[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(2 Suppl): 47-52.
[12]
Lu D, Wang T, Chen H, et al. A comparison of double Endobutton and triple Endobutton techniques for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2016, 102(7): 891-895.
[13]
Ye G, Peng CA, Sun HB, et al. Treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint dislocation using autogenous semitendinosus tendon graft and endobutton technique[J]. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2016, 12 : 47-51.
[14]
Struhl S, Wolfson TS. Continuous loop double endobutton Reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2015, 43(10): 2437-2444.
[15]
Lim YW. Triple endobutton technique in acromioclavicular joint reduction and reconstruction[J]. Ann Acad Med Singapore, 2008, 37(4): 294-299.
[16]
Barth J, Duparc F, Andrieu K, et al. Is coracoclavicular stabilisation alone sufficient for the endoscopic treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation (Rockwood types III, IV, and V)?[J] . Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8 Suppl): S297-S303.
[17]
Murena L, Vulcano E, Ratti C, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation with double flip button[J]. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 2009, 17(12): 1511-1515.
[18]
Clavert P, Meyer A, Boyer P, et al. Complication rates and types of failure after arthroscopic acute acromioclavicular dislocation fixation. Prospective multicenter study of 116 cases[J]. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2015, 101(8 Suppl): S313-S316.
[19]
Motta P, Maderni A, Bruno L, et al. Suture rupture in acromioclavicular joint dislocations treated with flip buttons[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(2): 294-298.
[20]
Torkaman A, Bagherifard A, Mokhatri T, et al. Double-button fixation system for management of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Arch Bone Jt Surg, 2016, 4(1): 41-46.
[21]
陆伟,王大平,朱伟民,等.关节镜下四骨道双束固定治疗急性肩锁关节Rockwood Ⅴ型脱位[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志,2014,2(3): 157-162.
[22]
Boileau P, Old J, Gastaud O, et al. All-arthroscopic weaver-dunn-chuinard procedure with double-button fixation for chronic acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(2): 149-160.
[23]
Bajnar L, Bartos R, Sedivy P. Arthroscopic stabilisation of acute acromioclavicular dislocation using the TighRope device [J]. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech, 2013, 80(6): 386-390.
[24]
Walz L, Salzmann GM, Fabbro T, et al. The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices: a biomechanical study[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2008, 36(12): 2398-2406.
[25]
Abat F, Sarasquete J, Natera LG, et al. Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair using coracoclavicular suspension devices in two different configurations[J]. J Orthop Traumatol, 2015, 16(3): 215-219.
[1] 李康, 耿喜林, 汪玉良, 刘京升. 踝关节Logsplitter损伤诊治的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 566-570.
[2] 王启中, 李辉. 全髋关节置换术中假体位置安全区的研究进展[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 261-266.
[3] 杨仁瑞, 徐永清, 陈峻峰, 何鹏举, 金涛. 西南地区军队人员复发性肩关节脱位的临床特征分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 119-122.
[4] 何毅, 余东升. 年轻恒牙脱位性损伤的诊疗进展[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 400-406.
[5] 郑翰, 丁国强, 谢鹏, 卢冰. 切开Latarjet手术治疗复发性肩关节前脱位的随访研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 204-211.
[6] 刘有才, 张义君, 赵欣磊, 周家玄. Endobutton带袢钛板与钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位病例的疗效比较[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 212-217.
[7] 周海燕, 王秋根, 王庚启, 王健, 黄志海, 吴立生, 吴力军. 经鹰嘴骨折肘关节前脱位的诊疗策略[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 224-234.
[8] 崔壮, 魏宽海, 陈滨, 胡岩君, 余斌. Rockwood III型肩锁关节脱位治疗策略[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 279-283.
[9] 潘超, 张博, 韩磊, 刘俊阳, 崔鹏, 闫兵山, 田旭, 刘林涛, 东靖明. 肩锁关节脱位治疗的研究进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 186-191.
[10] 杨坤, 梁欢, 曹红京, 李月茹, 寇春梅, 汤虹, 王秀燕, 李林, 王元利, 丁小方. 耳穴贴压疗法在老年肩痹患者围手术期镇痛中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 150-154.
[11] 刘佳琳, 王晓宁, 黄晓虹, 刘佳, 李亘, 严彬. 新型患肢固定牵引带在肩关节镜手术侧卧牵引位中的应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 122-127.
[12] 吴宇顺, 刘诗滦, 卓鸿武, 肖靖, 潘玲, 李坚. 氨甲环酸对肩关节镜手术疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 63-70.
[13] 张涛, 崔进, 周启荣, 陈晓, 苏佳灿. 肩锁关节脱位的治疗进展[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 77-82.
[14] 李朋, 吴剑波, 王东, 赵峰, 田伟, 常峰, 张宇明. 关节镜治疗肩关节复发性前脱位伴纤维性Bankart损伤的疗效研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 12-17.
[15] 郁凯. 陈旧性肩锁关节脱位的治疗[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 7-11.
阅读次数
全文


摘要