切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (03) : 207 -213. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2018.03.008

所属专题: 文献

论著

肱骨尺侧结合前侧MIPPO入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨干下1/3骨折
林焱斌1,(), 叶友友1, 王海洋1, 庄研1, 李仁斌1, 熊国胜1, 李杰辉1   
  1. 1. 350007 厦门大学附属福州第二医院骨科
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-16 出版日期:2018-08-05
  • 通信作者: 林焱斌
  • 基金资助:
    福建省中青年骨干人才培养项目(2014-ZQN-34)

Ulnar approach combined with anterior MIPPO technique approaches and double plates for treatment of lower third humeral shaft fracture

Yanbin Lin1,(), Youyou Ye1, Haiyang Wang1, Yan Zhuang1, Renbin Li1, Guosheng Xiong1, Jiehui Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Orthopaedics, Affiliated Fuzhou Second Hospital of Xiamen University, Fuzhou 350007, China
  • Received:2018-03-16 Published:2018-08-05
  • Corresponding author: Yanbin Lin
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Lin Yanbin, Email:
引用本文:

林焱斌, 叶友友, 王海洋, 庄研, 李仁斌, 熊国胜, 李杰辉. 肱骨尺侧结合前侧MIPPO入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨干下1/3骨折[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 06(03): 207-213.

Yanbin Lin, Youyou Ye, Haiyang Wang, Yan Zhuang, Renbin Li, Guosheng Xiong, Jiehui Li. Ulnar approach combined with anterior MIPPO technique approaches and double plates for treatment of lower third humeral shaft fracture[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(03): 207-213.

目的

观察肱骨尺侧结合前侧微创经皮钢板内固定(MIPPO)入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨干下1/3骨折的临床疗效。

方法

回顾性分析自2012年1月至2015年5月入住本科,诊断为"肱骨干下1/3骨折"的20例患者。全部采用肱骨尺侧结合前侧MIPPO入路双钢板内固定治疗。统计手术时间,术中出血量,术后观察桡神经、尺神经、肌皮神经功能,骨折愈合时间,采用Neer肩关节功能评分及Mayo肘关节功能评分评估肩、肘关节功能。

结果

本组20例患者手术时间60~110 min,平均(85.0±6.5) min;出血量30~60 ml,平均(53.0±7.2)ml;术后切口均一期愈合;无医源性桡神经、尺神经、肌皮神经及重要血管损伤,无内固定失败的病例;骨折愈合时间10~15周,平均(13.0±2.1)周;肘关节最大屈曲范围131°~146°(137.60°±3.51°);肘关节最大伸直范围0°~5°(2.70°±0.91°);Mayo肘关节功能评分80~100(92.04±5.72)分;Neer肩关节功能评分85~100(93.63±4.11)分。

结论

尺侧入路与常用的前外侧、后侧、外侧入路相比,无需暴露桡神经,避免其带来的医源性损伤;暴露范围大(特别针对内侧蝶形骨块能达到解剖复位),手术时间短;出血少;内侧切口隐蔽、美观;同时结合前侧MIPPO呈90°双钢板固定肱骨干下1/3骨折,防止单钢板固定失效,在提供坚强的骨折稳定的同时带来更快的骨折愈合。目前随访病例无钢板失效、骨不连及血管、神经损伤。肱骨尺侧结合前侧MIPPO入路双钢板内固定治疗肱骨干下1/3骨折疗效确切,值得临床推广。

Background

Humeral shaft fracture refers to the rupture between the surgical neck of 1-2 cm below and the humeral condyle of 2 cm above, which mostly occurs in the middle of the humeral shaft, followed by the lower part and the upper part. The lower third humeral shaft fracture is clinically common and associated with radial nerve injury. It is often caused by indirect violence and presented as oblique or spiral, which is prone to nonunion. Due to the high incidence of radial nerve injury and nonunion, the treatment is more intractable. Alternative methods for surgical procedure involve external fixator, intramedullary nail, plate, etc., and internal fixation and open reduction is generally considered to be the most reliable treatment method. The standard surgical approaches for open reduction and plate fixation include anterior lateral approach, anterior approach, anterior MIPPO technique approach, posterior approach, and medial approach (ulnar approach) . The literature reported that the incidences of iatrogenic radial nerve injury caused by the anterolateral approach, the anterior approach, and the posterior approach were 1/5, 1/25 and 1/9, respectively. In the meanwhile, according to other articles, the incidence of nonunion of this fracture type after open reduction was as high as 15%. The causes of nonunion are attributed to traumatic factors, surgical dissection, etc., but this is mainly due to the fact that single plate fixation does not provide sufficient stability for some "special" fractures. For this purpose, this paper puts forward the specialty of ''lower third humeral shaft fracture'', emphasizing the necessity of double plates for such fractures. In the meanwhile, the ulnar approach and the anterior MIPPO approach with dual minimally invasive incisions and double plates for rigid internal fixation of lower third humeral shaft fracture were proposed in view of the high incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve injury. The active and passive elbow extension and flexion started without any brace for immobilization. The results were satisfactory without iatrogenic radial nerve or ulnar nerve injuries, and all fractures healed as scheduled.

Methods

I. Clinical research: (1) General information: A total of 20 patients (14 males and 6 females) with an average age of 34.4 (19-60 ) years were selected for this research. There were 6 left cases and 14 right cases. The causes of injury included 6 cases of automobile accidents, 6 cases of hand wrestling injuries and 8 cases of fall damages. All patients were closed injury, among which 1 case was combined with femoral fracture, 1 case was combined with contralateral radial fracture, and 1 case was combined with pelvic fracture. According to the AO/ASIF classification, there were 3 cases of type A, 12 cases of type B and 5 cases of type C. (2) Surgical methods. After general anesthesia, the patient was placed in the supine position with routine disinfection and draping. The affected upper arm was abducted in 90°, and the forearm was in supination and 80° of flexion, which was placed on the operating table. A longitudinal incision was made on the inside of the upper arm, and the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and fascia were cut open layer by layer to expose the space between musculus biceps brachii and musculus triceps brachii. The ulnar nerve was exposed and separated carefully, and the rubber sheet was used to pull the ulnar nerve medially for protection. The median nerve and brachial artery were pulled anteriorly for protection. The fracture ends were debrided, reduced and fixed temporarily with Kirschner wires after exposure. A 3.5 mm reconstruction plate or anatomic locking plate was used for fixation of the medial distal humerus with 3 screws on the proximal side and 2 screws on the distal side. As fracture was well reduced under fluoroscopy, a longitudinal incision was made at the coracoid of the proximal anterior upper arm and along the pectoralis major deltoid sulcus. After undermining dissection of the distal humerus, a 3.5 mm LCP of 10-12 holes was inserted with Kirschner wires for temporarily distal and proximal fixation. As the position of the plate was well placed under fluoroscopy, the musculus biceps brachii, musculus brachialis, brachial artery, and median nerve was pulled laterally under direct vision with Hoffman wire retractor to expose approximately 3/5 of the anteromedial area of the distal humerus. The distal plate was placed slightly on the medial side with MIPPO technique (for easy screwing) with 2 locking screws on the distal side for fixation. The proximal screw was inserted under direct vision, and the other two screws were placed percutaneously. The fracture ends were confirmed well reduced under fluoroscopy without elbow joint entrapment or ulnar coronal process impingement. After irrigation, the incision was closed layer by layer. The sheet rubber was placed medially, and the wound was covered with the sterile dressing. Approximately 6 hours after the operation, the patient was allowed fisting exercise. On the 1st postoperative day, the patient was able to perform active and passive elbow extension and flexion, mainly the active exercises, which included shoulder abduction, upthrow and pendulum exercises. II. Observation and follow-up indicators: The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, ulnar nerve function of the radial nerve, and fracture healing time were observed postoperatively. Neer shoulder function score was used to evaluate shoulder joint function, and Mayo elbow function score was used to evaluate elbow joint function.

Results

The operation time of 20 patients in this group was 60-110 min with an average of (85.0±6.5) min. The blood loss was 30-60 ml with an average of (53.0±7.2) ml. All the incision healed in the 1st stage without iatrogenic radial nerve injury, ulnar nerve injury, medial nerve injury or brachial artery injury. One patient had symptoms of radial nerve injury before surgery without postoperative progression after surgery, and the signs recovered 3 months later. The fracture healing time was 10-15 weeks with an average of (13.0±2.1) weeks. The maximum elbow flexion range was 131°-146° (137.60°±3.51°) , and the maximum elbow extension range was 0°-5° (2.70°±0.91°) . The Mayo elbow function score was 80-100 (92.04±5.72) points, and the Neer shoulder function score was 85-100 (93.63 ± 4.11) points.

Conclusions

The specialty of the lower third humeral shaft fracture should be emphasized. It is recommended to perform double plate internal fixation to reduce the incidence of delayed union and nonunion. The ulnar approach combined with anterior MIPPO double incision was proposed in view of the higher incidence of iatrogenic radial nerve injury in the distal humeral incision. Our study shows that the ulnar approach combined with anterior MIPPO approach has the advantages of minimal invasion, rigid fixation and avoidance of iatrogenic radial nerve injury in the treatment of the lower third humeral shaft fracture.

图1 "特殊型"肱骨下段骨折:图A、B 示肱骨干中段或偏下,向下累及干下1/3或髁上,无论髓内固定还是单钢板固定,无法提供有效工作距离及稳定性(如虚线及箭头所示)
图2 手术切口外观
图3 内侧入路可暴露区域:将肱二头肌及肱肌以及肱动脉正中神经用Hoffman拉钩拉向外侧,尺神经及肱三头肌拉向内侧,可暴露约3/5的肱骨远端前内侧区域(图中红色长方框区域)
图4 内侧重建钢板加前侧MIPPO钢板,双钢板"90°"环抱坚强固定
[1]
Volgas DA,Stannard JP,Alonso JE. Nonunions of the humerus[J].Clin Orthop Rclat Rcs, 2004, 4(19):46-50.
[2]
Bhandari M,Devereaux PJ,McKee MD, et al. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures:a meta-analysis[J]. Acta Orthop, 2006, 77(2):279-284.
[3]
Rafael-Kakazu MD,Steven K,Dailey MD, et al. Iatrogenic radial nerve palsy after humeral shaft nonunion repair:more common than you think[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2016, 30(5):256-261.
[4]
Van Houwelingen AP,McKee MD. Treatment of osteopenic humeraI shaft nonunion with compression plating, humeral cortical allograft struts,and bone grafting[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2005, 19(1):36-42.
[5]
Papasoulis E,Dresos GI,Vervefidis AN, et al. Functional bracing of humeral shaft fractures.A review of clinical studies[J]. Injury, 2010, 41(7):21-27.
[6]
Bhandari M,Devereaux PJ,McKee MD, et al. Compression plating versus intramedullary nailing of humeral shaft fractures:A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Orthop, 2006, 77(2):279-284.
[7]
Van Houwelingen AP,McKee MD. Treatment of osteopenic humeraI shaft nonunion with compression plating, humeral cortical allograft struts,and bone grafting[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2005, 19(1):36-42.
[8]
Claessen FM,Peters RM,Verbeek DO, et al. Factors associated with radial nerve palsy after operative treatment of diaphyseal humeral shaft fractures[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(11):e307-e311.
[9]
Volgas DA,Stannard JP,Alonso JE. Nonunions of the humerus[J].Clin Orthop Rclat Rcs, 2004, 4(19):46-50.
[10]
Shao YC,Harwood P,Grotz MR, et al. Radial never palsy associated with fractures of the humerrus:A systematic review[J]. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2005, 87:1647-1652.
[11]
Sanehez-Sotelo J,Torehia ME,O'Driseoll SW. Complex distal humeral Fractures: internal fixation with a principle-based parallel-plate technique[J]. Bone Joint Surg(Am), 2008, 90(2):31-46.
[12]
Scolaro JA,Hsu JE,Svach DJ, et al. Plate selection for fixation of extra-articular distal humerus fractures: A biomechanical comparison of three different implants[J]. Injury, 2014, 45(12):2024-2044.

URL    
[13]
尹鹏,唐佩福.肱骨干骨折的手术治疗[J/CD].中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2013, 1(1):57-60.
[14]
Gouse M,Albert S,Inja DB, et al. Incidence and predictors of radial nerve palsy with the anterolateral brachialis splitting approach to the humeral shaft[J]. Chin J Tra matol, 2016, 19(4):217-220.
[15]
Boschi V,Pogorelic Z,Gulan G, et al. Subbrachial approach to humeral shaft fractures:new surgical technique and retrospective case series study[J]. Can J Surg, 2013, 56(1):27-34.
[16]
Shin SJ,Sohn HS,Do NH. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis of humeral shaft fractures:a technique to aid fracture reduction and minimize complications[J]. J Orthop Trauma, 2012, 26(10):585-589.
[17]
Apivatthakakul T,Patiyasikan S,Luevitoonvechkit S. Danger zone for locking screw placement in minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis(MIPO)of humeral shaft fractures:a cadavefic study[J]. Injury, 2010, 41(2):169-172.
[18]
吴畏,汪海波.加压钢板及螺钉前外侧与内侧入路修复肱骨中下段骨折:疗效及安全性评价[J].中国组织工程研究, 2015, 19(31):5011-5015.
[19]
Lu S,Wu J,Xu SH, et al. Medial approach to treat humeral mid-shaft fractures:a retrospective study[J]. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016, 11:32.
[20]
Defranco MJ,Lawton JN. Radial nerve injuries associated with humeral fractures[J]. J Hand Surg (Am), 2006, 31(4):655-663.
[1] 刘洋, 赵彦瑞, 周君琳. 尺神经松解原位放置在肱骨远端骨折术中的临床应用[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 223-229.
[2] 王伟, 李世英, 郭晓平, 张桐桐, 高星, 孟玉凤, 贾芳莹. 坚骨胶囊联合关节镜和尺神经松解术治疗肘关节骨关节炎伴尺神经卡压综合征的临床研究[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2022, 10(02): 141-147.
[3] 杨明. 内镜下尺神经原位松解治疗原发性肘管综合症[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2020, 08(02): 192-192.
[4] 鲁润春, 伊骏飞, 伊志强, 李春伟, 段鸿洲, 张家湧, 李良. Hoffmann法内镜尺神经松解术治疗特发性肘管综合征[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2021, 11(01): 14-18.
阅读次数
全文


摘要