切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华肩肘外科电子杂志 ›› 2018, Vol. 06 ›› Issue (02) : 97 -104. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2095-5790.2018.02.004

所属专题: 文献

论著

关节镜下单排带线锚钉修补结合大结节骨髓刺激治疗大到巨大肩袖撕裂
孙鲁宁1, 束昊1,(), 袁滨1, 黄瑶1, 刘锌1   
  1. 1. 210029 南京,江苏省中医院运动医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-13 出版日期:2018-05-05
  • 通信作者: 束昊

Arthroscopic single row suture anchor fixation accompanied with greater tuberosity bone marrow stimulating technique for treatment of large to massive rotator cuff tear

Luning Sun1, Hao Shu1,(), Bin Yuan1, Yao Huang1, Xin Liu1   

  1. 1. Sports Medicine Center of Jiangsu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medcine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2017-06-13 Published:2018-05-05
  • Corresponding author: Hao Shu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Shu Hao, Email:
引用本文:

孙鲁宁, 束昊, 袁滨, 黄瑶, 刘锌. 关节镜下单排带线锚钉修补结合大结节骨髓刺激治疗大到巨大肩袖撕裂[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2018, 06(02): 97-104.

Luning Sun, Hao Shu, Bin Yuan, Yao Huang, Xin Liu. Arthroscopic single row suture anchor fixation accompanied with greater tuberosity bone marrow stimulating technique for treatment of large to massive rotator cuff tear[J]. Chinese Journal of Shoulder and Elbow(Electronic Edition), 2018, 06(02): 97-104.

目的

研究关节镜下单排带线锚钉修补结合大结节骨髓刺激技术治疗大到巨大肩袖撕裂的临床效果。

方法

对24例大到巨大肩袖撕裂患者,在关节镜下采用肩袖止点内移单排带线锚钉修补,并在修补肌腱外侧大结节裸露足印区打孔。术后按照康复计划渐进性康复训练。手术前和术后12个月对患肩采用VAS、UCLA、ASES评分系统进行疼痛和功能评估;并在术后第3天、3个月和12个月进行肩关节磁共振检查,观察肩袖修补和大结节足印区软组织覆盖情况。

结果

所有患者随访12个月,术前和术后12个月VAS评分分别为(6.3±1.9)分和(0.4±0.1)分(P<0.05),UCLA评分分别为(10.1±4.5)分和(30.4±4.2)分(P<0.05),ASES评分分别为(27.9±17.8)分和(77.6±17.5)分(P<0.05),所有手术肩关节疼痛和运动能力均较术前明显改善。术后12个月磁共振随访发现2例肩袖再撕裂发生,矢状位显示撕裂宽度均<1 cm;冠状位盂上切迹平面大结节足印区组织覆盖率在术后第3天、3个月、12个月平均分别为34.3%、89.1%和88.7%。

结论

关节镜下肩袖单排带线锚钉修补结合大结节骨髓刺激技术治疗大到巨大肩袖撕裂能够提供可靠的修补,显著缓解疼痛,恢复肩关节功能并促进术后大结节足印区软组织覆盖。

Background

Large to Massive rotator cuff tears are defined as injuries involving two or more tendons without fatty infiltration or >3 cm. With the development of arthroscopy, arthroscopic repair technologies, including single row repair, double row repair and suture bridge repair, are gradually matured for large to massive rotator cuff tear. Snyder, et al. reported the surgical technique of arthroscopic tendon insertion migration and single row suture anchor repair combined with bare foot printing area drilling, and the follow-up results of postoperative shoulder joint function were good. Large to Massive rotator cuff tears are defined as injuries involving two or more tendons without fatty infiltration or >3 cm. With the development of arthroscopy, arthroscopic repair technologies, including single row repair, double row repair and suture bridge repair, are gradually matured for large to massive rotator cuff tear. Snyder, et al. reported the surgical technique of arthroscopic tendon insertion migration and single row suture anchor repair combined with bare foot printing area drilling, and the follow-up results of postoperative shoulder joint function were good.

Objective

To research the clinical outcome of arthroscopic single row suture anchor fixation accompanied with greater tuberosity bone marrow stimulate technique to treat large to massive rotator cuff tear.

Methods

(1) General information:From January 2011 to April 2016, a total of 24 patients (7 males and 17 females) of large to massive rotator cuff tears were treated using this technique, including 1 case of acute injury and 23 cases of dated injuries. Their ages ranged from 48 to 76 years. There were 9 cases in the left shoulder and 15 cases in the right. The preoperative VAS score was (6.3±1.9) points, UCLA score was (10.1±4.5) points, and ASES score was (27.9±17.8) points. Preoperative oblique sagittal MRI demonstrated that the supraspinatus and infraspinatus insertions were involved in all the patients. Oblique coronal MRI revealed that all the contracture of rotator cuff tears were within 2 degrees. Horizontal MRI suggested that the subscapular tendon was not involved. All 24 patients had crescentic tear under arthroscopy. (2) Surgical methods:After successful anesthesia, the patient was placed in lateral position with the affected arm on the upper side. Glenohumeral joint was examined from the posterior approach, and the anterior approach was made in the rotator cuff space from outside-in to explore glenoid labrum and long head tendon of biceps brachii with probe hook. For patients of over 60 years old with long head tendon of biceps brachii lesion (18 cases) , it was transected at the insertion of supraglenoid tubercle with plasm knife. After the angle of traction and abduction was changed to 45o, the arthroscope entered into the subacromial space through posterior approach. The lateral approach was made with the outside-in technique, through which the subacromial bursa was cleaned and the coracoacromial ligament was released with planer. For patients with type 3 acromion, the subacromial decompression was performed with grinding head. For patients of below 60 years old with long head tendon of biceps brachii lesion (6 cases) , the cortical bone at the middle of intertubercular sulcus was polished with grinding head to screw in a 3.5 mm Twinfix suture anchor (Smith & Nephew) . The tail thread was inserted into the thread in the reverse direction to pass through the corresponding tissue of long head tendon and knot for fixation, and then the long head tendon was transected with plasm knife. Through the lateral approach, the tearing morphology was determined with grasper. After the footprint area of greater tuberosity was cleaned with planer and plasma knife, the cortical bone was polished with grinding head. The cortical bone zone should be maintain within 5 mm of lateral margin of humeral head cartilage. The anterolateral superior approach was made close to the anterolateral angle of acromion with outside-in technique. Through this approach, a hole was drilled at the site of posterior edge of tearing and cortical bone zone of humeral head cartilage to implant a 5.0 mm Twinfix suture anchor (Smith & Nephew) . The arthroscope was turned for observation from the lateral approach. Through posterior approach the two free ends of two tail lines were passed through the posterior torn rotator cuff tissue respectively using suture hook (Smith & Nephew) with shuttle thread, and the distance of two threads on the rotator cuff was approximately 1 cm apart. With the repeat of above procedures, the lateral cartilage edge of middle and anterior torn areas was separately implanted into a 5.0 mm Twinfix suture anchor, and the tail threads were passed through the corresponding torn rotator cuff of middle and anterior areas. After a 50 mm×72 mm working sheath (Smith & Nephew) was placed through the lateral approach from the posterior approach, the tail threads were pulled into the working sheath in one-to-one correspondence, and the SMC knot and two half knots were tied to complete rotator cuff repair. The suture site was checked for reliable repair. In the exposed footprint area of greater tuberosity, 2 to 3 holes were drilled from anterior to posterior for bone marrow exudation. All the incisions were sutured and covered with dressings, and the affected limb was suspended in the position of external rotation and 20° of abduction. (3) Postoeprative rehabilitation:The affected limb was immobilized in abductive brace for 6 weeks after operaion. Within 6 weeks, progressive passive external rotation, forward flexion and abduction training were performed 1 time per day. As the brace was removed after 6 weeks, the passive range of motion was further increased within the allowable range of pain. The training of active range of motion was initiated 12 weeks later, and the strength training started after 16 weeks. (4) Evaluation index and statistical treatment:SPSS 17.0 software was used to conduct one way ANOVA and Wilcoxon rank sum test for the analysis of VAS score, UCLA score and ASES score, and the measurement data was expressed±s. A P value <0.05 was considered as statistical difference. The situation of soft tissue coverage on the footprint area of greater tuberosity was observed on the superior glenoid notch of coronal MRI.

Results

(1) Pain:The preoperative and postoperative 12 months follow-up VAS scores were (6.3±1.9) points and (0.4±0.1) points, respectively (P<0.05) , and the shoulder pain was significantly improved in all patients. (2) Range of motion:The passive lifting angles of all shoulder joints were normal at 12 months after the operation. The passive external rotation in 5 cases decreased to 90% of the healthy side, and the internal rotation in 4 cases reduced by 2 vertebral height. The active lifting strength of shoulder joint in 23 cases were equivalent to that of unaffected side, and 1 case suffered from lower active lifting strength. (3) Complications:No infection was found in this study, and no suture anchor displacement or removal occurred in the final follow-up of MRI. There were 5 cases of shoulder joint stiffness at 3 months during follow up. Through strict rehabilitation exercise, the shoulder joint function improved and the range of motion in the final follow up was good. (4) Relationship between preoperative fatty infiltration and re-tear:The MRI examination of 12 months after rotator cuff repair demonstrated that 18 patients with preoperative global fatty degeneration index (GFDI) ≤ 1 had complete healing, 4 patients of preoperative GFDI between 1 to 1.5 had complete healing, 1 patient of preoperative GFDI between 1.5 to 2 had rotator cuff re-tear and 1 patient of preoperative GFDI > 2 had rotator cuff re-tear. (5) Functional evaluation:The preoperative and postoperative 12 months UCLA scores were (10.1±4.5) points and (30.4±4.2) points, respectively (P<0.05) , and the ASES scores were (27.9±17.8) points and (77.6±17.5) points respectively (P<0.05) . The postoperative shoulder joint function of 24 patients was significantly improved compared to that before operation. (6) Imaging assessment:The shoulder joint MRI examinations of postoperative 3rd day, 3rd month and 12th month were conducted to observe the healing of rotator cuff tendon and the soft tissue coverage of footprint area. During the follow ups of postoperative 12 month, the MRI examinations revealed that 22 patients had complete rotator cuff insertion and 2 patients had re-tear of less than 1 cm on sagittal position. The soft tissue coverage of footprint area in the 3rd and 12th months had improvements compared to that on the postoperative 3rd day in all patients. The mean coverage rates of postoperative 3rd day, 3rd months and 12th months were 34.3%, 89.1% and 88.7% respectively.

Conclusions

We believe that for large to massive rotator cuff tear, arthroscopic single row suture anchor fixation accompanied with greater tuberosity bone marrow stimulating technique can provide reliable repair, remarkably reduce pain, restore shoulder function and promote soft tissue coverage of footprint area.

图1 关节镜下巨大肩袖撕裂
图2 使用骨锥在大结节足印区打孔
图3 大结节足印区打孔骨髓刺激技术后
表1 术前与术后12个月疼痛和功能评价(±s
图4 巨大肩袖撕裂患者术前和术后第3天、3个月、12个月复查肩关节MRI影像图A:一例巨大肩袖撕裂患者术前冠状位盂上切迹平面MRI示肩袖肌腱撕裂,Patte 2级回缩;图B:术后3 d MRI示肩袖肌腱止点内移修补后连续性恢复,但修补肌腱外侧大结节足印区域裸露;图C:术后3个月MRI示肩袖肌腱连续性完整,修补肌腱外侧大结节足印区域软组织覆盖良好,肌腱和周围软组织稍水肿;图D:术后12个月MRI示肩袖肌腱连续性完整,修补肌腱外侧大结节足印区域软组织覆盖良好,肌腱和周围软组织水肿完全消退
图5 大肩袖撕裂患者术前和术后第3天、3个月、12个月复查肩关节MRI影像图A:一例大肩袖撕裂患者术前冠状位盂上切迹平面MRI示肩袖肌腱撕裂,Patte 2级回缩;图B:术后第3天MRI示肩袖肌腱止点内移修补后连续性恢复,但修补肌腱外侧大结节足印区域裸露;图C:术后3个月MRI示肩袖肌腱连续性完整,修补肌腱外侧大结节足印区域软组织覆盖良好,肌腱和周围软组织稍水肿;图D:术后12个月MRI示肩袖肌腱连续性完整。
[1]
Cofield RH. Subscapular muscle transposition for repair of chronic rotator cuff tears[J]. Surg Gynecol Obstet, 1982, 154(5): 667-672.
[2]
Jones CR, Snyder SJ. Massive irreparable rotator cuff tears: a solution that bridges the gap[J]. Sports Med Arthrosc, 2015, 23(3): 130-138.
[3]
Thorsness R, Romeo A. Massive rotator cuff tears: trends in surgical management[J]. Orthopedics, 2016, 39(3): 145-151.
[4]
Wong I, Burns J, Snyder S. Arthroscopic GraftJacket repair of rotator cuff tears[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2010, 19(2 Suppl): 104-109.
[5]
Jones CK,Savoie FH.Arthroscopic repair of 1arge and massive rotator cuff tears[J]. Arthroscopy, 2003, 19(6):564-571.
[6]
Kim SJ, Kim SH, Moon HS, et al. Footprint contact area and interface pressure comparison between the knotless and Knot-Tying Transosseous-Equivalent technique for rotator cuff repair[J]. J Arthroscopic Relat Surg, 2016, 32(1): 7-12.
[7]
Burkhart SS, Cole BJ. Bridging self-reinforcing double-row rotator cuff repair: we really are doing better[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(5): 677-680.
[8]
Burkhart SS, Lo IK. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2006, 14(6): 333-346.
[9]
Cho NS, Lee BG, Rhee YG. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair using a suture bridge technique: is the repair integrity actually maintained?[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2011, 39(10): 2108-2116.
[10]
Barber FA, Herbert MA, Schroeder FA, et al. Biomechanical advantages of triple-loaded suture anchors compared with double-row rotator cuff repairs[J]. Arthroscopy, 2010, 26(3): 316-323.
[11]
Bond JL, Dopirak RM, Higgins J, et al. Arthroscopic replacement of massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears using a GraftJacket allograft: technique and preliminary results[J]. Arthroscopy, 2008, 24(4): 403-409.
[12]
Randelli P, Spennacchio P, Ragone V, et al. Complications associated with arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a literature review[J]. Musculoskelet Surg, 2012, 96(1): 9-16.
[13]
Barber FA, Hrnack SA, Snyder SJ, et al. Rotator cuff repair healing influenced by platelet-rich plasma construct augmentation[J]. Arthroscopy, 2011, 27(8): 1029-1035.
[14]
Morris BJ, Haigler RE, O'connor DP, et al. Outcomes of staged bilateral reverse shoulder arthroplasties for rotator cuff tear arthropathy[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(3): 474-481.
[15]
Encalada DI, Cole BJ, Macgillivray JD, et al. Rotator cuff repair augmentation using a novel polycarbonate polyurethane patch,preliminary results at 12 month's follow-up[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2011, 20(5): 788-794.
[16]
Walch G, Edwards TB, Boulahia A, et al. Arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps in the treatment of rotator cuff tears: clinical and radiographic results of 307 cases[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2005, 14(3): 238-246.
[17]
Kempf JF, Gleyze P, Bonnomet F, et al. A multicenter study of 210 rotator cuff tears treated by arthroscopic acromioplasty[J]. Arthroscopy, 1999, 15(1): 56-66.
[18]
Boileau P, Krishnan SG, Coste JS, et al. Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis: a new technique using bioabsorbable interference screw fixation[J]. Arthroscopy, 2002, 18(9): 1002-1012.
[19]
Elhassan BT, Alentorn-Geli E, Assenmacher AT, et al. Arthroscopic-Assisted lower trapezius tendon transfer for massive irreparable Posterior-Superior rotator cuff tears: surgical technique[J]. Arthrosc Tech, 2016, 5(5): e981-e988.
[20]
Jo CH, Shin JS, Park IW, et al. Multiple channeling improves the structural integrity of rotator cuff repair[J]. Am J Sports Med, 2013, 41(11): 2650-2657.
[21]
Kida Y, Morihara T, Matsuda K, et al. Bone marrow-derived cells from the footprint infiltrate into the repaired rotator cuff[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2013, 22(2): 197-205.
[22]
Taniguchi N, Suenaga N, Oizumi N, et al. Bone marrow stimulation at the footprint of arthroscopic surface-holding repair advances cuff repair integrity[J]. J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 2015, 24(6): 860-866.
[23]
Milano G, Saccomanno MF, Careri S, et al. Efficacy of marrow-stimulating technique in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a prospective randomized study[J]. Arthroscopy, 2013, 29(5): 802-810.
[1] 王典, 刘双赫, 曾峥. 肩关节镜术后肌肉功能改变对颈椎形态及矢状面参数影响的自身前后对照队列研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2024, 19(05): 371-378.
[2] 宋连奎, 王建成, 王竹林, 王春生, 木洪伟, 季洪阁. TAPP和TEP治疗腹股沟疝临床效果比较[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 445-447.
[3] 李康虎, 王继伟, 王光远. 腹腔镜下腹股沟疝修补术后并发症及防治进展[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 369-375.
[4] 邱志东, 张杰, 薛鹏, 郑玲玲, 杨建桃, 赵海军, 陈双. 补片固定与否对腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术后患者并发症的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 406-409.
[5] 申亚伟, 黄新, 李万林. 改良医用胶粘合假疝囊技术预防腹腔镜完全腹膜外疝修补术后血清肿的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 410-413.
[6] 蒋会勇, 杨柳, 郭吉祥, 王春帅, 马春, 李琦, 蔡相军. 腹腔镜完全腹膜外患侧外侧间隙入路腹股沟疝修补术[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 414-417.
[7] 许伟, 曹道成, 孙畅, 马雨九. 不同补片用于腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术中的安全性及对患者功能康复的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 423-427.
[8] 郑燕生, 吴舒婷. 保留子宫圆韧带及补片完整的经腹腹膜前疝修补术的早期经验[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 428-432.
[9] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[10] 窦恩, 郑磊, 徐通海, 邓先锐. 局部神经阻滞麻醉在成人腹股沟疝无张力修补术中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 442-445.
[11] 徐淑英, 张汪, 王玲, 江照凤. 个体化护理对腹股沟疝无张力修补术后疼痛及舒适度的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 461-465.
[12] 黄建朋, 邹建强, 宗华. 肝移植术后腹壁疝诊治初步经验[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 471-473.
[13] 单磊, 周君琳. 同期修复肩袖撕裂结合锁定钢板治疗老年肱骨近端骨折的特点及疗效分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 211-215.
[14] 郁凯, 曾保起, 杨剑, 杨杰, 张殿英, 孙凤. 全关节镜与切开手术治疗肩袖撕裂疗效比较的系统综述与Meta分析[J]. 中华肩肘外科电子杂志, 2024, 12(03): 238-245.
[15] 吴宏彬, 陶晓刚, 田润发, 王翀昊, 吴量, 刘伟明, 高国一, 刘佰运. 颅骨修补术后硬膜外积血/积液的危险因素分析及防治措施[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(03): 141-146.
阅读次数
全文


摘要